SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

A More Diversified Anchor Strategy


Over the past few months, the performance of the Leveraged Anchor strategy has exceeded our expectations.  There has also been a few things learned regarding adjustments after large market falls, that had never been contemplated (see Anchor Analysis And Options). 

The model portfolio also expended a bit of cash to reset the long call position, so the strategy could participate more if and when the market continues to rebound.

Even with this good performance, we are always looking to improve overall performance.  Improved performance can occur through a reduction in risk, better absolute performance over time, or a combination of the two. 


I’ve created three different portfolios for demonstrative purposes.  Portfolio 1 is 100% long SPY.  Portfolio 2 is 25% each of SPY, IWM (small caps), QQQ (technology), and EFA (international).  Portfolio 3 roughly curve fit the best blend of them (thanks to portfolio visualizer):

 

image.png

 

As can be seen, virtually any blend of diversified assets has outperformed simply holding one asset class over the last 20 years. If we curve fit, we can greatly increase performance – by almost 2% per year.  Historically, going further back in time, this pattern holds even more true.  A diversified blend of assets typically reduces risk and increases performance, over significant periods of time. 

Of course, you’ll be able to find a 1-5 year period (or maybe even longer), where a single asset class outperforms a diversified basket – but good luck picking that asset class moving forward.  Is it time for international stocks to rebound more than the U.S. despite lagging for a decade?  Are small caps going to outperform large caps as they traditionally do?  What about technology – will it continue to outperform other large caps?  Maybe you have those answers, but I don’t.  However, as a long term investor, I know that diversification works over time.

 

How does one decide what the “optimal” split is in allocation?  If you look over the last 20 years, SPY has a CAGR of 5.58%, IWM 6.03%, QQQ 7.08%, and EFA 4.31%.  What if we take out the recent bull run in large caps and look at the first decade of this century (2001-2010)?  Things change drastically.  SPY has a CARG of 3.00%, IWM 6.83%, QQQ 4.24%, and EFA 6.69%.  If you expand further, you can find (thanks to Forbes):


image.png

 

(Note: Technology was not an asset class for much of the above period). 

 

After reviewing multiple periods of time (from one year to one hundred years), several trends are clear:

 

  1. Small caps typically outperform large caps;
  2. Over the last 10 years, large caps have been the best performing;
  3. Technology stocks have outperformed even large caps significantly in the last decade;
  4. International stocks have consistently under performed large cap, small cap, and technology, but that trend is “recent” in the last 20 years; but
  5. International has the lowest correlation to the listed classes.

 

There is no “magic” blend and each investor can create their own.  Some people will be most comfortable with a straight 25/25/25/25 split, which takes any risk for picking which sector is going to perform the best off the table.  Others will weigh the most recent better performers stronger.  If we look at just the last 10 or 20 years, we would not allocate anything to international stocks.  However, I personally like the low level of correlation and want at least some exposure internationally.  I also expect a reversion to small caps outperforming, particularly in the near future.  In my personal portfolio, I would choose:

 

  • SPY                     25%
  • QQQ                    25%
  • IWM                     30%
  • EFA                      20%

 

There is no “correct” blend, as it is impossible to know which class will perform the best moving forward, particularly over long periods of time.  Part of the above also contemplates some of the overlap between QQQ and SPY. 

 

Once an asset class division is decided on, all that is left to do is to implement the Leveraged Anchor strategy on each asset.  This is the biggest challenge in setting things up, as it is capital intensive.  Assuming 3 contracts is the smallest size one can use (3 long calls, 3 long puts 5% out of the money, 1 long put at the money, and one short put), then current minimum amounts necessary to open a Leveraged Anchor strategy:

 

  • SPY:      $35,000
  • QQQ:     $30,000
  • IWM:      $20,000
  • EFA:       $7,500

 

These values are going to somewhat dictate how you divide your money among the different asset classes.  For instance, it is virtually impossible, without very large sums of money, to get the splits I set out above.  I could get close:

 

  • SPY:      $35,000  25.6%
  • QQQ:     $40,000  29.2%
  • IWM:      $46,667  34.14%
  • EFA:      $15,000   10.9%

 

But to implement the above, I would need almost $140,000.  The minimum I would need to implement any version of a diversified Anchor is still over $90,000. 

 

I would advise any client that is interested in Anchor, and who has over $100,000 to invest, that diversifying the strategy, should outperform, over long periods of time.  In any given one- or two-year period, there will be outperformance by one class over the other.  The goal of diversification is to reduce variability and risk, while increasing returns, over long periods.

 

In the near future, we will begin listing out Leveraged Anchor trades for the different asset classes.  Members are free to stick with SPY or come up with their own diversification blend.  As always, if you would like to open a managed account, and have Lorintine Capital manage a diversified Anchor portfolio for you, we would be happy to discuss the matter. 

 

Christopher Welsh is a licensed investment advisor and president of LorintineCapital, LP. He provides investment advice to clients all over the United States and around the world. Christopher has been in financial services since 2008 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. Christopher has a J.D. from the SMU Dedman School of Law, a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, and a Bachelor of Science in Economics. Christopher is a regular contributor to the Steady Options Anchor Trades and Lorintine CapitalBlog.

Related articles:

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • SPX Options vs. SPY Options: Which Should I Trade?

    Trading options on the S&P 500 is a popular way to make money on the index. There are several ways traders use this index, but two of the most popular are to trade options on SPX or SPY. One key difference between the two is that SPX options are based on the index, while SPY options are based on an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the index.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 441 views
  • Yes, We Are Playing Not to Lose!

    There are many trading quotes from different traders/investors, but this one is one of my favorites: “In trading/investing it's not about how much you make, but how much you don't lose" - Bernard Baruch. At SteadyOptions, this has been one of our major goals in the last 12 years.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 890 views
  • The Impact of Implied Volatility (IV) on Popular Options Trades

    You’ll often read that a given option trade is either vega positive (meaning that IV rising will help it and IV falling will hurt it) or vega negative (meaning IV falling will help and IV rising will hurt).   However, in fact many popular options spreads can be either vega positive or vega negative depending where where the stock price is relative to the spread strikes.  

    By Yowster,

    • 0 comments
    • 794 views
  • Please Follow Me Inside The Insiders

    The greatest joy in investing in options is when you are right on direction. It’s really hard to beat any return that is based on a correct options bet on the direction of a stock, which is why we spend much of our time poring over charts, historical analysis, Elliot waves, RSI and what not.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 473 views
  • Trading Earnings With Ratio Spread

    A 1x2 ratio spread with call options is created by selling one lower-strike call and buying two higher-strike calls. This strategy can be established for either a net credit or for a net debit, depending on the time to expiration, the percentage distance between the strike prices and the level of volatility.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,482 views
  • SteadyOptions 2023 - Year In Review

    2023 marks our 12th year as a public trading service. We closed 192 winners out of 282 trades (68.1% winning ratio). Our model portfolio produced 112.2% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only one losing month and one essentially breakeven in 2023. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 5,895 views
  • Call And Put Backspreads Options Strategies

    A backspread is very bullish or very bearish strategy used to trade direction; ie a trader is betting that a stock will move quickly in one direction. Call Backspreads are used for trading up moves; put backspreads for down moves.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 9,492 views
  • Long Put Option Strategy

    A long put option strategy is the purchase of a put option in the expectation of the underlying stock falling. It is Delta negative, Vega positive and Theta negative strategy. A long put is a single-leg, risk-defined, bearish options strategy. Buying a put option is a levered alternative to selling shares of stock short.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 11,142 views
  • Long Call Option Strategy

    A long call option strategy is the purchase of a call option in the expectation of the underlying stock rising. It is Delta positive, Vega positive and Theta negative strategy. A long call is a single-leg, risk-defined, bullish options strategy. Buying a call option is a levered alternative to buying shares of stock.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 11,522 views
  • What Is Delta Hedging?

    Delta hedging is an investing strategy that combines the purchase or sale of an option as well as an offsetting transaction in the underlying asset to reduce the risk of a directional move in the price of the option. When a position is delta-neutral, it will not rise or fall in value when the value of the underlying asset stays within certain bounds. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 9,668 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs