SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Defining the Anchor Strategy


Lorintine Capital and Steady Options have been trading the Anchor strategy for a number of years. During this time Anchor has evolved as we have learned more, in no short part due to the Steady Option’s members continuing questioning of the strategy, insights they provide, and a large group of individuals seeking to improve the strategy’s efficiency. 

One of the most important parts of evaluating a strategy is to appropriately set target returns and develop a good benchmark to measure relative performance.  Without a known target, measuring performance internally is difficult.  Without an appropriate benchmark, measuring against the competition is impossible.  In order to do this, we need to break the Anchor strategy down into its key components for evaluation.  Anchor is comprised of:

 

  1. A long ETF position that is typically 88%-92% of the total investment;
  2. A long put position that is typically 7%-10% of the investment for the hedge; and
  3. A short put position that makes up the balance to attempt to pay for the hedge.

 

When Anchor was originally devised our goal was to slightly lag the markets in up years, stay level in flat market returns, and beat the market significantly in down years.  That worked in years the market was up ten percent or less, which was the primary evaluation period.  However, the past several years of bull markets have demonstrated that the term “slight lag” is not realistic or appropriate in large up markets. 

 

Given the fact that Anchor is only approximately 90% long at any given time, we automatically are behind bull market performance.  For example, if the market goes up 20%, Anchor’s long ETF positions may only go up around 18%.  Couple that with the fact that in significant up trending markets, the long hedge rolls multiple times per year and you end up with larger lags in rising markets – which get more pronounced the faster the market is rising.  A more effective measurement would be to compare Anchor to a portfolio with comparable risk, such as a 60/40 stock/bond portfolio.  However, even that is not an ideal metric, as Anchor's option hedge can significantly outperform it in bear markets, making comparisons difficult.

 

Swan Global Investment’s Defined Risk Strategy is quite similar to Anchor.  Swan does a nice job of setting expectations on their website with a  “Target Return Band” shown below:

Target-Return-Band-Overview-Swan-Blog-1.png

The theory being that their Defined Risk Strategy should fall within or above the blue range.  The red line represents the theoretical return of the S&P 500, the yellow line is the Swan’s Defined Risk Return target returns when contrasted with the S&P 500 return at the point.

 

It is our opinion that these target bands represent an adequate projection of what results should be expected internally of the Anchor strategy as well.  We will of course always work to exceed those expectations, but this will represent more realistic return projections for Anchor, particularly in large bull scenarios.

 

Another advantage to evaluating Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy, is it now gives us an appropriate benchmark to measure against.  In describing their product, Swan states:

 

Investing to help minimize downside risk. The market is unpredictable, making it difficult to time the markets or consistently pick outperforming stocks. That’s why we believe reducing downside risk can significantly impact wealth creation.”

 

The goal: to achieve positive returns while minimizing the downside risk of the equities markets.”

 

Key strategy elements to each of the Defined Risk Funds include:

 

  • No reliance on market timing or stock selection
  • Designed to seek consistent returns
  • Aims to protect client assets during market downturns
  • Always hedged, all the time, using put options”

 

“Repeatable Four Step Investment Process

 

Step 1: Establish Equities (using diverse ETFs)

 

Step 2: Create the Hedge – Always hedged – We use only longer term puts, which offer the greatest cost-efficiency and stability, and then maintain that protection by rolling the hedge at least annually.  As such, the DRS (Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy) is not under duress to seek protection in market downturns.

 

Step 3: Seek to Generate Market-Neutral Cash Flow – We use options-trading expertise to provide our clients with the potential for return, regardless of market conditions.

 

Step 4: Monitor and Adjust”

 

To anyone who has used Anchor, this should all sound familiar.  Since Swan’s impressive track record is significantly longer (going back to 1997 in different forms) than Anchor it provides proof of concept.  Swan’s Class I mutual fund shares have returned the following (courtesy Morningstar) since 2013:

 

image.png

 

Vs Anchor:


 image.png

Disclosure: Anchor's returns have not been audited by any independent third party, do not guarantee future results, and do not reflect the deduction of applicable management and/or subscription fees.  Anchor’s 2013 returns were dramatically increased by the use of individual stocks which outperformed the market, as opposed to the broad market ETFs that are now used within the strategy to reduce tracking error. 

 

The following table compares Anchor returns with S&P 500 total return, expected return (as defined by Target Return Band) and Swan returns. Anchor outperformed the Swan every single year except 2014.



image.png

While some investors may be frustrated that Anchor lagged the bull market in 2016 and 2017, we believe that is not so much a design flaw in Anchor, as a flaw we made in setting proper expectations. 

Conclusion:

 

The Anchor objective is to produce equity like returns over a full market cycle, with reduced volatility and bear market drawdowns. Investors should expect a trade-off of reduced upside capture during extreme bull market gains. Given our belief that the long term is the only investment time frame that truly matters, we believe the strategy provides attractive mathematical and psychological benefits to investors seeking the long term growth potential of the US stock market.

 

If you have any questions about the Anchor Strategy, how to implement it on your own, or wish to have us manage the strategy for you, contact my firm at anytime or make a post on the SteadyOptions website:

 

Lorintine Capital

Christopher Welsh: cwelsh@lorintine.com

Jesse Blom: jblom@lorintine.com

P: 214-800-5164

F: 214-800-5165

 

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Investing in Private Companies

    It is axiomatic that the largest investment returns typically come from investing in private companies. Peter Thiel initially invested $500,000.00 in Facebook, which was worth over $1b when he cashed out.  Eric Lefkofsky turned an investment of $546 (that’s not a typo) into $386m in cashed out payments.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 68 views
  • Option Strikes and Expirations – What's Next?

    Options expiration dates and strikes are among the most important parameters options traders must consider. Today we have the well-known weekly, monthly, cyclical, and LEAPS options. A lot of choices. But is that as far as we can go? The realm of possibilities could be endless. Consider some of these possible expansions:

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 163 views
  • Buying Deep Out-Of-The-Money (DOTM) Options

    “Income” trading has become wildly popular for option traders since the global financial crisis. This style involves selling out-of-the-money options to a hedger and collecting the full premium payment at expiry — assuming the underlying doesn’t trend too hard in one direction.

    By Tyler Kling,

    • 0 comments
    • 456 views
  • The ABCs of QE And QT

    Is QE money printing or is it something else that appears to be money printing? Search the internet for “QE and money printing”, and you will see countless articles explaining why Quantitative Easing (QE) is or is not money printing. Here are a few articles that we found:

    By Michael Lebowitz,

    • 0 comments
    • 137 views
  • A Case Study in SPX Put Writing

    I've written about writing puts on multiple occasions, as I find it to be an attractive way to gain long exposure to the underlying asset class. It doesn't have to be a decision of one vs. the other (meaning, is it better to sell puts or own the underlying asset directly?), as there are advantages and disadvantages to both.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 236 views
  • 10 Tips: Trade Options Like a Pro and Keep Your Day Job

    Do you feel you don't have time to trade options?  This is one of the most common objections I hear from potential traders. In this article I'll give you 10 actionable tips to trade options like a pro while you balance life's other commitments.

    By Drew Hilleshiem,

    • 0 comments
    • 592 views
  • Straddles - Risks Determine When They Are Best Used

    Risk all too often is defined by the attributes of a strategy, and nothing more. However, the circumstances under which a position is opened is a better indicator of actual risk. Why? Because risk is not fixed but varies based on proximity of price to strike, and of strike to resistance or support.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 359 views
  • 4 Directional Options Trading Strategies

    Some Option traders prefer to trade mostly non directional strategies, while other option traders prefer to trade directional strategies.  Well, in the world of Options trading, there is no right or wrong answer. You can create a host of strategies based on your preferences and outlook.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 510 views
  • Digging Deeper into the Inflation Threat

    Stoking the Embers of Inflation is one of the more important articles we have written. The Monetary Equation Identity discussed in the article provides a counterintuitive way to think about inflation. It took us a long time to accept that this identity lays out a real case for stagflation.

    By Michael Lebowitz,

    • 3 comments
    • 1,189 views
  • Does Option Selling Have Positive Expected Returns?

    Academic research refers to the persistent phenomenon of ex-post implied volatility (IV) exceeding realized volatility (HV) as the Volatility Risk Premium (VRP). As it applies to option premiums, this leads to a positive expected return for being a systematic option seller.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 659 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs