SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Defining the Anchor Strategy


Lorintine Capital and Steady Options have been trading the Anchor strategy for a number of years. During this time Anchor has evolved as we have learned more, in no short part due to the Steady Option’s members continuing questioning of the strategy, insights they provide, and a large group of individuals seeking to improve the strategy’s efficiency. 

First it is important to understand what is the goal of the Anchor trades: it is to prevent loss of capital while still generating a positive return in all market conditions. It is NOT to outperform the market. 

One of the most important parts of evaluating a strategy is to appropriately set target returns and develop a good benchmark to measure relative performance.  Without a known target, measuring performance internally is difficult.  Without an appropriate benchmark, measuring against the competition is impossible.  In order to do this, we need to break the Anchor strategy down into its key components for evaluation.  Anchor is comprised of:

 

  1. A long ETF position that is typically 88%-92% of the total investment;
  2. A long put position that is typically 7%-10% of the investment for the hedge; and
  3. A short put position that makes up the balance to attempt to pay for the hedge.

 

When Anchor was originally devised our goal was to slightly lag the markets in up years, stay level in flat market returns, and beat the market significantly in down years.  That worked in years the market was up ten percent or less, which was the primary evaluation period.  However, the past several years of bull markets have demonstrated that the term “slight lag” is not realistic or appropriate in large up markets. 

 

Given the fact that Anchor is only approximately 90% long at any given time, we automatically are behind bull market performance.  For example, if the market goes up 20%, Anchor’s long ETF positions may only go up around 18%.  Couple that with the fact that in significant up trending markets, the long hedge rolls multiple times per year and you end up with larger lags in rising markets – which get more pronounced the faster the market is rising.  A more effective measurement would be to compare Anchor to a portfolio with comparable risk, such as a 60/40 stock/bond portfolio.  However, even that is not an ideal metric, as Anchor's option hedge can significantly outperform it in bear markets, making comparisons difficult.

 

Swan Global Investment’s Defined Risk Strategy is quite similar to Anchor.  Swan does a nice job of setting expectations on their website with a  “Target Return Band” shown below:

Target-Return-Band-Overview-Swan-Blog-1.png

The theory being that their Defined Risk Strategy should fall within or above the blue range.  The red line represents the theoretical return of the S&P 500, the yellow line is the Swan’s Defined Risk Return target returns when contrasted with the S&P 500 return at the point.

 

It is our opinion that these target bands represent an adequate projection of what results should be expected internally of the Anchor strategy as well.  We will of course always work to exceed those expectations, but this will represent more realistic return projections for Anchor, particularly in large bull scenarios.

 

Another advantage to evaluating Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy, is it now gives us an appropriate benchmark to measure against.  In describing their product, Swan states:

 

Investing to help minimize downside risk. The market is unpredictable, making it difficult to time the markets or consistently pick outperforming stocks. That’s why we believe reducing downside risk can significantly impact wealth creation.”

 

The goal: to achieve positive returns while minimizing the downside risk of the equities markets.”

 

Key strategy elements to each of the Defined Risk Funds include:

 

  • No reliance on market timing or stock selection
  • Designed to seek consistent returns
  • Aims to protect client assets during market downturns
  • Always hedged, all the time, using put options”

 

“Repeatable Four Step Investment Process

 

Step 1: Establish Equities (using diverse ETFs)

 

Step 2: Create the Hedge – Always hedged – We use only longer term puts, which offer the greatest cost-efficiency and stability, and then maintain that protection by rolling the hedge at least annually.  As such, the DRS (Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy) is not under duress to seek protection in market downturns.

 

Step 3: Seek to Generate Market-Neutral Cash Flow – We use options-trading expertise to provide our clients with the potential for return, regardless of market conditions.

 

Step 4: Monitor and Adjust”

 

To anyone who has used Anchor, this should all sound familiar.  Since Swan’s impressive track record is significantly longer (going back to 1997 in different forms) than Anchor it provides proof of concept.  Swan’s Class I mutual fund shares have returned the following (courtesy Morningstar) since 2013:

 

image.png

 

Vs Anchor:


 image.png

Disclosure: Anchor's returns have not been audited by any independent third party, do not guarantee future results, and do not reflect the deduction of applicable management and/or subscription fees.  Anchor’s 2013 returns were dramatically increased by the use of individual stocks which outperformed the market, as opposed to the broad market ETFs that are now used within the strategy to reduce tracking error. 

 

The following table compares Anchor returns with S&P 500 total return, expected return (as defined by Target Return Band) and Swan returns. Anchor outperformed the Swan every single year except 2014.



image.png

While some investors may be frustrated that Anchor lagged the bull market in 2016 and 2017, we believe that is not so much a design flaw in Anchor, as a flaw we made in setting proper expectations. 

Conclusion:

 

The Anchor objective is to produce equity like returns over a full market cycle, with reduced volatility and bear market drawdowns. Investors should expect a trade-off of reduced upside capture during extreme bull market gains. Given our belief that the long term is the only investment time frame that truly matters, we believe the strategy provides attractive mathematical and psychological benefits to investors seeking the long term growth potential of the US stock market.

 

If you have any questions about the Anchor Strategy, how to implement it on your own, or wish to have us manage the strategy for you, contact my firm at anytime or make a post on the SteadyOptions website:

 

Lorintine Capital

Christopher Welsh: cwelsh@lorintine.com

Jesse Blom: jblom@lorintine.com

P: 214-800-5164

F: 214-800-5165

 

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Options Strategies for Small Accounts

    Ask a handful of traders what they deem a “small account” to be and you’ll get probably get a few different answers. For the sake of this article, we classify a small account as having less than $5,000. There’s a number of obstacles you run into trading a small account, like the options in certain underlyings being too expensive for you to trade, as one example.

     

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 112 views
  • 7 Things I Wish I Knew When I Started Trading

    Options Trading can be very exciting and rewarding. But you should not be trading options before learning at least some basic facts about options. Options are very different from stocks.  This article presents 7 basic options trading facts that every options trader should know. Don't start trading of you don't understand them.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 226 views
  • How LEAPS Differ From Short-Term Options

    LEAPS stands for Long-Term Equity Anticipation Security. Which is just a long-dated option, typically referring to those with expirations more than a year out. There’s no technical difference between LEAPS and shorter-term options other than the expiration date. They’re traded on the same exchanges and have the same rules surrounding margin and whatnot.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 275 views
  • What Is An Implied Volatility Crush

    IV (Implied Volatility) crush when the implied volatility of an option takes a nosedive shortly after the conclusion of a catalyst like an earnings report or corporate action. The uncertainty around a company’s earnings report (or other significant catalyst) drives option prices up in the lead-up to the announcement, and down following the announcement, once the uncertainty is gone.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 223 views
  • Top features of NinjaSpread

    There are two main goals of the scanner: show you hidden opportunities and save a lot of time with automated scanning. Let’s see what the top features are and how NinjaSpread can help your trading life.

    By Gery,

    • 0 comments
    • 779 views
  • Wide, flat SPX Diagonal Spread

    I love to trade SPX diagonals, especially when IV skew is higher than usual and I get a wider range of break evens. I know that time spread break evens are “theoretical” because they are dependent on the IV skew of the front and back month’s IV that changes all the time.

    By Gery,

    • 0 comments
    • 721 views
  • How Investment Trading Can Help Grow Your Business

    When it comes to growing a business, there are many different options out there. For example, you could try traditional marketing methods or explore new and innovative ways of expanding your company. One such way is through investment trading.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,357 views
  • 3 Tips To Use When Getting Into Asset Management

    Asset management has proven to be a fruitful career for more than a few professionals in recent decades, explaining why it’s attractive to finance professionals and students. Not only is it a financially rewarding career, but it’s one of the more interesting ones to pick.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 680 views
  • Extrinsic Value vs. Intrinsic Value

    Options are distinctly different from stocks in that they’re derivatives of another asset. The entire value of an option contract depends on factors outside of itself--it’s all based on the price of its underlying asset. Options are highly mathematical in nature, and in some ways, we can quantify the precise value of an option using a model like Black-Scholes.

     

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 786 views
  • Comparing Iron Condor and Iron Butterfly

    Both the Iron Condor and Iron Butterfly are short-volatility option spreads. You'd use them to profit from situations where option prices imply a larger price move than your view of the market. These spreads are how traders profit from stocks that go nowhere.

     

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 809 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido