SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Leveraged Anchor is Boosting Performance


In our last article on the Anchor Strategy, we discussed what the strategy is and what it is not, as well as attempting to set expectations for investors. In this piece we’ll examine the possibility of “boosting” performance through the use of additional options to gain leverage.

A “normal” Anchor portfolio uses about 90% of its available cash to purchase long equities, most commonly ETFs.  The other 10% is used to purchase the hedge.  This means, even if the strategy performs “perfectly” by paying off the hedge, in the best case scenario, it will still lag the market by at least ten percent – and we all know perfect performance is unlikely.  In other words, if the market goes up 20%, Anchor will, at absolute most, go up 18% -- prior to accounting for the cost of the hedge.  By replacing the ETFs with a combination of ETFs and long dated deep in the money call options we can increase performance without greatly impacting risk.

 

Let’s take an example $100,000.00 portfolio and assume SPY is currently trading at 266.92, the end of value on the day this post was written.  Using the June 21, 2019 options, a “normal” Anchor portfolio could look like:

 

            Long 6 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($9,600)

            Short 2 May 25, 2018 268.5 Put         $3.34/contract             $668

            Long 340 shares of SPY[1]                 $266.92/share            ($90,752.80)

            Left over cash                                                                         $315.20

[1] SPY is being used for simplicity sake, one could just as easily use the standard blend of SDY, VIG, and RSP 
 

But what if we instead bought calls and constructed the portfolio as follows:

 

            Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($12,800)

            Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts       $3.34/contract             $1,002

            Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls          $117.56/contract         ($47,024)

            Long 100 shares of SPY                     $266.92/share            ($26,692)

            Left over cash                                                                         $14,486

 

In this case we’re essentially long an extra 47% when compared to the “normal” Anchor portfolio and have left over cash we can invest in a low paying instrument (such as BIL), yielding approximately 1.5%.  The four long calls each control 100 shares, which totals 500 shares under control as opposed to only 340 shares in the “normal” Anchor model.

 
Looking at the possible scenarios in June 2019:

 

image.png 

 

Now the above analysis assumes that the hedge is exactly fully paid for and that all other variables have remained the same.  This assumption means we would have collected exactly $0.80.week each week – and we know that is impossible – but it still a useful analysis.

 
The reason that the further down SPY drops, the more money “normal” Anchor makes is with our 4 long puts we are slightly over-hedged, which profits on the down side.  The Leveraged portfolio is perfectly hedged. 

 

Looking at the above it is very easy to see that Anchor and the Leveraged version perform the same in down conditions but the leveraged version vastly outperforms in up markets.  This only makes sense as it is a leveraged product that is still fully hedged on the downside.  This doesn’t tell the whole story though – for two reasons.  The first is beneficial to the leveraged version.  The above model assumes a delta of one as the price of SPY drops.  However, that is never the case.  As the price of SPY gets closer and closer to the 150 strike, delta will go down (and volatility likely will be increasing during this time as well).  As delta goes down, the long calls won’t lose dollar for dollar, as a pure long position would.  This means that the above values are actually understated.  The Leveraged version should outperform in down markets as well.  It outperforms in flat markets due to the interest gained on the extra $14,486 cash.

 

It would seem then that the Leveraged version is vastly superior and should always be used – and if the paying off the hedged worked perfectly, then that would be the case.  But as any Anchor trader knows, paying off the hedge is always the most difficult task – particularly in large bull markets which require the hedge to be rolled several times.  Because the leveraged version has more short puts, when the market goes down, those short positions are going to lose at a higher clip.  Similarly, when we have to roll the long hedge, we will lose more rolling.  In other words the risk increases.  Is the risk worth the potential gains?  That depends on both market conditions and each individual investor’s preferences. 

 

The Leveraged version is also not tax efficient.  With a normal Anchor account, you hold the long ETF positions until you need to liquidate - which could be decades.  The only real tax impact is from the option positions, which could easily be negative on a year the markets are up.  On the other hand, the leveraged version will realize gains every year as the long calls are bought and sold - leading to tax inefficiencies.  Depending on your tax bracket and situation, this could have an impact on choosing one or the other.

 

Starting in June, we're going to start tracking a leveraged version of the Anchor portfolio for subscribers, which can also be professionally managed through Lorintine Capital.  Feel free to email Chris at cwelsh@lorintine.com with any questions. 

Christopher Welsh is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of an investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of three separate private funds. He is also an attorney practicing in Dallas, Texas. Chris has been practicing since 2006 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris has a Bachelor of Science in Economics, a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Texas A&M University, and a law degree from Southern Methodist University. Chris manages the Anchor Trades portfolio, the Steady Options Fund, and oversees Lorintine Capital's distressed real estate debt fund.
 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Option Equivalence

    Some option positions are equivalent – that means identical profit/loss profiles – to others. Others are not. A few days ago I had an inquiry from a person trading options in a restricted account (e.g. an IRA that did not allow marginable trades or short options positions):

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 67 views
  • Investment Ideas for Conservative Investors

    Investors with low willingness or need to take risks often look to bank and/or life insurance company fixed-rate products to increase potential returns instead of leaving their money in conventional checking or savings accounts. Some of these product types are CD’s, structured notes, fixed annuities and fixed indexed annuities.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 152 views
  • iVolatility Tools: Advanced Ranker

    Here is one of the analytical tools that allows us to claim "In options we are Big Data!" For those who want to find the movers and shakers, Advanced Ranker does the job. The Advanced Ranker combines an easy to use interface with a powerful sorting logic built on IVR and IVP.

    By Levi Ioffe,

    • 0 comments
    • 132 views
  • Two Pre-earnings Momentum Trades With a Technical Trigger in Alphabet

    Both option trading backtest approaches rely on the fact that there has been a bullish momentum pattern in Alphabet stock 7 calendar days before earnings. Further, we use moving averages as a safety valve to try to avoid opening a bullish position while a stock is in a technical break down, like the fourth quarter of 2018. 

    By Ophir Gottlieb,

    • 0 comments
    • 298 views
  • Flaws in Implied Volatility

    A technical study of chart patterns, focusing on historical volatility of the underlying, reveals that depending on implied volatility is a flawed idea. Traders should remember that options are derivatives, meaning their premium value is derived from historical volatility.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 381 views
  • 7 Trading Cliches For Novice Traders

    Trading is a tough business. There is no easy money in the stock market, but there are a lot of folks who will easily take your money. What is important to know that no matter how experienced you are, mistakes will be part of the trading process. This article should help you to avoid some of those mistakes.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 347 views
  • Iron Condor vs. Iron Butterfly

    Iron Condor and Iron Butterfly are both very popular strategies. Both of them are usually used as non-directional strategies (although butterflied can be used as a directional trade as well). Both trades are vega negative and gamma negative, but there are also few important differences between those two strategies.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 350 views
  • Leveraged Anchor: A Three Month Review

    Steady Options has now been tracking the Leveraged Anchor from the unlevered version for three months.  The results so far have substantially beat expectations, though there is a possibility for improvements discussed at the end of this piece. 

    By cwelsh,

    • 10 comments
    • 1,058 views
  • How a Fund is Developed

    Many individuals are curious as to the testing process for a new fund.  With the plethora of funds continually being developed, having some insight into this process can be helpful for investors.  At the very least, it can provide a series of questions which should be asked in conducting due diligence on fund managers.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 284 views
  • Why Dow Points Are Meaningless

    A quick online search for “Dow rallies 500 points” yields a cascade of news stories with similar titles, as does a similar search for “Dow drops 500 points.” These types of headlines may make little sense to some investors, given that a “point” for the Dow and what it means to an individual’s portfolio may be unclear.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 315 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


If we get enough interest yes, but starting an ETF is a huge capital undertaking that you need institutional help/funding for.  We also need a longer proven track record, but it definitely is a possibility that we've considered.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs