SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Leveraged Anchor is Boosting Performance


In our last article on the Anchor Strategy, we discussed what the strategy is and what it is not, as well as attempting to set expectations for investors. In this piece we’ll examine the possibility of “boosting” performance through the use of additional options to gain leverage.

A “normal” Anchor portfolio uses about 90% of its available cash to purchase long equities, most commonly ETFs.  The other 10% is used to purchase the hedge.  This means, even if the strategy performs “perfectly” by paying off the hedge, in the best case scenario, it will still lag the market by at least ten percent – and we all know perfect performance is unlikely.  In other words, if the market goes up 20%, Anchor will, at absolute most, go up 18% -- prior to accounting for the cost of the hedge.  By replacing the ETFs with a combination of ETFs and long dated deep in the money call options we can increase performance without greatly impacting risk.

 

Let’s take an example $100,000.00 portfolio and assume SPY is currently trading at 266.92, the end of value on the day this post was written.  Using the June 21, 2019 options, a “normal” Anchor portfolio could look like:

 

            Long 6 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($9,600)

            Short 2 May 25, 2018 268.5 Put         $3.34/contract             $668

            Long 340 shares of SPY[1]                 $266.92/share            ($90,752.80)

            Left over cash                                                                         $315.20

[1] SPY is being used for simplicity sake, one could just as easily use the standard blend of SDY, VIG, and RSP 
 

But what if we instead bought calls and constructed the portfolio as follows:

 

            Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($12,800)

            Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts       $3.34/contract             $1,002

            Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls          $117.56/contract         ($47,024)

            Long 100 shares of SPY                     $266.92/share            ($26,692)

            Left over cash                                                                         $14,486

 

In this case we’re essentially long an extra 47% when compared to the “normal” Anchor portfolio and have left over cash we can invest in a low paying instrument (such as BIL), yielding approximately 1.5%.  The four long calls each control 100 shares, which totals 500 shares under control as opposed to only 340 shares in the “normal” Anchor model.

 
Looking at the possible scenarios in June 2019:

 

image.png 

 

Now the above analysis assumes that the hedge is exactly fully paid for and that all other variables have remained the same.  This assumption means we would have collected exactly $0.80.week each week – and we know that is impossible – but it still a useful analysis.

 
The reason that the further down SPY drops, the more money “normal” Anchor makes is with our 4 long puts we are slightly over-hedged, which profits on the down side.  The Leveraged portfolio is perfectly hedged. 

 

Looking at the above it is very easy to see that Anchor and the Leveraged version perform the same in down conditions but the leveraged version vastly outperforms in up markets.  This only makes sense as it is a leveraged product that is still fully hedged on the downside.  This doesn’t tell the whole story though – for two reasons.  The first is beneficial to the leveraged version.  The above model assumes a delta of one as the price of SPY drops.  However, that is never the case.  As the price of SPY gets closer and closer to the 150 strike, delta will go down (and volatility likely will be increasing during this time as well).  As delta goes down, the long calls won’t lose dollar for dollar, as a pure long position would.  This means that the above values are actually understated.  The Leveraged version should outperform in down markets as well.  It outperforms in flat markets due to the interest gained on the extra $14,486 cash.

 

It would seem then that the Leveraged version is vastly superior and should always be used – and if the paying off the hedged worked perfectly, then that would be the case.  But as any Anchor trader knows, paying off the hedge is always the most difficult task – particularly in large bull markets which require the hedge to be rolled several times.  Because the leveraged version has more short puts, when the market goes down, those short positions are going to lose at a higher clip.  Similarly, when we have to roll the long hedge, we will lose more rolling.  In other words the risk increases.  Is the risk worth the potential gains?  That depends on both market conditions and each individual investor’s preferences. 

 

The Leveraged version is also not tax efficient.  With a normal Anchor account, you hold the long ETF positions until you need to liquidate - which could be decades.  The only real tax impact is from the option positions, which could easily be negative on a year the markets are up.  On the other hand, the leveraged version will realize gains every year as the long calls are bought and sold - leading to tax inefficiencies.  Depending on your tax bracket and situation, this could have an impact on choosing one or the other.

 

Starting in June, we're going to start tracking a leveraged version of the Anchor portfolio for subscribers, which can also be professionally managed through Lorintine Capital.  Feel free to email Chris at cwelsh@lorintine.com with any questions. 

Christopher Welsh is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of an investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of three separate private funds. He is also an attorney practicing in Dallas, Texas. Chris has been practicing since 2006 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris has a Bachelor of Science in Economics, a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Texas A&M University, and a law degree from Southern Methodist University. Chris manages the Anchor Trades portfolio, the Steady Options Fund, and oversees Lorintine Capital's distressed real estate debt fund.
 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Implied Volatility Collapse

    The key ingredient on expiration Friday is volatility collapse. At the beginning of that last trading day, there are more than 6 hours of trading yet to go. However, there are 38 hours left before expiration on Saturday. When volatility is high, OTM options are most likely to be overpriced.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 65 views
  • Trading Volatility: Why It Isn’t Always a Bad Thing

    Volatility is still widely misunderstood — and feared — by novice traders. As someone lacking in trading knowledge and experience, you often hear and believe horror stories of unstable markets. The fear is valid. After all, your shares and investments are at an elevated risk in an unpredictable environment.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 112 views
  • Models and their limits

    Options traders tend to think mathematically. When considering selection of an underlying, risks and expected profits, the model of outcomes is a primary tool for making selections. Without a model how can anyone understand the differences between two or more options that might otherwise appear the same – similar moneyness, same strike, and same premium.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 131 views
  • When You've Only Got $1000 To Invest, What Do You Do?

    Are you new to the world of investments? Most likely; it’s not something you just fall into! BUt at the same time, investing can be done by anyone. Investing doesn’t need to be saved for retirement. It isn’t something only the uber rich are able to get into.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 309 views
  • Use of Options Spreads to Reduce Risk

    Traders may view spreads as a means for reducing market risk. But this also means that the potential profit is just as limited as potential loss, and this is easily overlooked in the focus on risk alone. A realistic view of spreading is that it reduces risk in exchange for accepting limited maximum profit.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 421 views
  • Put Writing in 2020: The Role of Timing Luck

    The impact of luck can play a meaningful role in the short-term outcomes of monthly option trades due to the requirement to roll expiring contracts. The extreme volatility in 2020 highlightsthis fact when we look at results of SPY cash secured put trades launched on slightly different start dates.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 426 views
  • The problem of Option Math

    Option traders may be divided into two categories. First are those relying on instinct or casual observation. This group tends to speculate on directional movement, future volatility, value, and on potential profitability of trades. The second group is involved deeply with math of trading and depends on what is perceived as certainty or near certainty.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 587 views
  • Put/Call Parity: Two Definitions

    Traders hear the term put/call parity a lot, but what does it mean? There are two definitions and they are vastly different from one another. The first definition involves the net credit/debit for any combination trade, with trading costs are considered. The second definition takes assumed interest rates and present value into mind.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 488 views
  • Do Options Affect Stock Prices?

    It is widely acknowledged that the price of the underlying directly impacts the premium of the option. Therefore, options are termed derivatives. Their current value is directly derived from movement of the underlying price. Is the opposite also true? Does movement of the option value affect the underlying price?

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 739 views
  • Portfolio Withdrawal Strategies

    This article will discuss three ways to take systematic withdrawals from your investment portfolio that would be expected to last 30 years, which is a typical time period a 65-year couple might need to plan for in retirement.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 570 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


If we get enough interest yes, but starting an ETF is a huge capital undertaking that you need institutional help/funding for.  We also need a longer proven track record, but it definitely is a possibility that we've considered.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

But what if we instead bought calls and constructed the portfolio as follows:

 

            Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($12,800)

            Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts       $3.34/contract             $1,002

            Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls          $117.56/contract         ($47,024)

            Long 100 shares of SPY                     $266.92/share            ($26,692)

            Left over cash                                                                         $14,486

 

Looking at the possible scenarios in June 2019:

 


Sorry, I'm trying to figure this out out and most likely I'm missing something. Can you provide some clarity as to how is the constructed portfolio showing a balance of $100,963 when the spot at expiry is still 266.92? Mu calculations show the below. What am I missing?

 

 

  Payout PnL
Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts $0 -$12,800
Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts -$5,874 -$4,872
Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls $46,768 -$256
Long 100 shares of SPY $26,692 $0
Left over cash $14,486 $0
TOTAL $82,072 -$17,928

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the comment in the next paragraph that "assumed we paid for the hedge from selling short each week."  So instead of the loss on the short puts, that's actually a gain of the $12,800.

 

The purpose of the example was just to show the difference in levered performance ignoring the short put position.  

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Mikel

Posted

Hi,

Good post, but i have some questions.

Let's say that once you enter in the position, the spy rises 10% in one month. Then you have to sell the puts atm like all the weeks or months. What about the long puts? Do you left them at the original price (10% otm in the present situation) or you roll them and buy again to have these long puts as close as the atm price? If you sell puts, which are 10% above your long puts, I guess that you could end the year with a bad performance, don't you?

I guess that the solution should be roll the long puts once the spy raises, said 7% more or less, in order to not loose the hedge. Am i correct?

Thank you very much for your answer.

Best regards from Spain.

Mikel

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Guest Mikel said:

Hi,

Good post, but i have some questions.

Let's say that once you enter in the position, the spy rises 10% in one month. Then you have to sell the puts atm like all the weeks or months. What about the long puts? Do you left them at the original price (10% otm in the present situation) or you roll them and buy again to have these long puts as close as the atm price? If you sell puts, which are 10% above your long puts, I guess that you could end the year with a bad performance, don't you?

I guess that the solution should be roll the long puts once the spy raises, said 7% more or less, in order to not loose the hedge. Am i correct?

Thank you very much for your answer.

Best regards from Spain.

Mikel

 

Mikel:  Thanks for the questions.

First, if you are a member, it may help to read the thread on when to roll the long hedge.  In essence though, we always roll the hedge by the time the market goes up 10% and begin to look at rolling around a 7% increase.  As you note, if we roll more frequently, the cost can get prohibitive (good news in rising markets, the cost of the hedge declines, so the roll normally is "cheaper" than the initial hedge we opened, not always, but most of the time).  But if we don't roll, then we become underprotected.  

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido