SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Leveraged Anchor: A Three Month Review


Steady Options has now been tracking the Leveraged Anchor from the unlevered version for three months.  The results so far have substantially beat expectations, though there is a possibility for improvements discussed at the end of this piece. 

For those who may not be familiar, the original Anchor strategy invested approximately ninety percent of its holding in broad market S&P 500 ETFs and hedged 100% of that value using long dated put options (typically a year out) with the other ten percent of the funds (depending on market conditions, a full year at the money hedge can range from 5% to 12% of the value of the portfolio).  Over time, we would attempt to pay for this hedge using a short put selling strategy. 

Over the years, a few shortcomings in Anchor were identified.  First and foremost was the certainty that it would always lag the S&P 500.  Since only 90% of the investment is in S&P 500 ETFs, at the very best, Anchor would lag 10% behind.  Also, in bull markets where the long hedge had to be frequently rolled, the cost of hedging could become prohibitive.


To combat these issues, Leveraged Anchor was developed.  Instead of owning actual ETFs, deep in the money calls are purchased.  Depending on their risk tolerances, this allows investors to end up owning the equivalent of 125%-200% of just long, without using all of their investment capital.  (Options allow for leverage).  Extra funds can be invested in secure assets, such as BIL, which currently yield around 2.25%.  The second change implemented was no longer buying an at-the-money hedge, instead buying approximately five percent down.  This means the portfolio can suffer a five percent loss that the older Anchor would not have, but given that it makes the cost of the hedge significantly less, we felt as if the slight increase in loss was more than increased by the savings in the hedge.  This has largely eliminated the drag on the portfolio from the cost of hedging.


Prior to implementing the changes to Leveraged Anchor, a decade long back-test was conducted followed by six months of paper trading.  Three months in, having gone to live trading, these changes have been performing exactly as anticipated. Since January 1, 2019 when we started officially tracking the leveraged version of the Anchor, the Anchor model portfolio produced a 14.9% gain, compared to 13.1% gain of S&P 500. In that three month period, despite having to roll the long hedge up once (and thereby incurring a new cost very quickly into the year), Leveraged Anchor has outperformed the S&P 500, while maintaining its hedge.  We would have been content, given the fast roll, to be lagging slightly at this point, but that has not occurred.  So far (and it’s a very short so far period), actual performance has exceeded expectations.


However, we are always striving to improve the strategy.  When analyzing the current trade setup, the biggest potential risk comes from the short positions.  Short positions, when rolled, are typically rolled one to two strikes (around a 55 delta) in the money.  This means, if the market falls, these short puts will lose value quickly, thereby harming the portfolio.  The risk of loss on the short puts is limited, because they also are hedged. 
 

In traditional Anchor, the short puts were hedged at the money, just as the underlying ETFs were.  When switching to Leveraged Anchor, we also moved the hedge on the short puts to 5% out of the money.
 

Practicality, this means as the market goes up, our risk from the short puts increases.  Here’s a simple example:

  1. Assume SPY is trading at $100;
     
  2. Assume we need 5 puts to hedge our portfolio.  We buy 5% out of the money and buy our long puts at $95;
     
  3. Assume we need to buy an additional 2 long puts to hedge the short selling we’ll be doing.  We buy those at $95;
     
  4. The market increases to $105. We are now selling puts at $107 (two strikes in the money);
     
  5. If the market falls back to $95, those short puts lose $17 each – a significant loss; and
     
  6. Our long puts actually would have LOST value over this time due to time decay.

In other words, we are at the exact same starting price of the S&P 500, but we’ve lost money (not $17, because we would have made some money selling puts as the market rose, but we still would have lost).  Whereas, any investor that had just owned SPY would be flat.
 

If possible, we’d like to avoid this situation as much as possible. 


In initial testing, it’s beginning to look like having a 5% out of the money hedge for the long portion (which is the most expensive part) and an at the money hedge for the short puts, may be more advantageous.  Similarly, we roll the long hedge after the market has moved up around 7.5% and always by 10%.  It may be prudent to roll up the hedge on the short puts more frequently – at closer to the 5% mark.  This would reduce losses on short term, and smaller amount, downward market fluctuations, without significantly increasing the cost of the portfolio.


The disadvantages to such a move are (a) it does increase cost, which will hurt performance, and (b) it increases the trades complexity through the number of moving parts and adjustments which occur.  However, if we can reduce risk further while still tracking the S&P 500 in up markets, we still meet our overall objectives.


I would like to invite our members to comment and question on these possible small changes.  Many of our improvements to the strategy have come through investor critiques and suggestions.  Feel free to ask questions and to share your thoughts. 

If you are not a member yet, we invite you to give it a chance.


Christopher B. Welsh is a SteadyOptions contributor. He is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of a small investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of two separate private funds. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris is an active litigator and assists his clients with all aspects of their business, from start-up through closing. Chris is managing the Anchor Trades portfolio. 

Related articles       

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • The Minimum Effective Dose (MED) For Cash Flow Planning

    Financial planners can usually give generic advice that will be appropriate for the majority of Americans, and that’s the goal of this article. If we can get the fundamentals of cash-flow planning right (where to put your money after you earn it and pay your taxes and bills), we’re 80% of the way towards maximizing our financial situation.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 216 views
  • Are You Breaking Even? Or Losing?

    Among the good reasons to trade options is the need to meet or surpass your breakeven yield. This is the yield you need just to preserve your purchasing power; and it higher than most people think. In fact, most people relying on moderate to conservative yields from stocks, mutual funds, real estate and savings accounts might be earning well below this breakeven level.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 245 views
  • Buy When You Have the Money, Sell When You Need the Money

    Money can be quite an emotional topic for many of us. Emotions can enhance our experiences and relationships in many ways, but they can act as mental roadblocks especially when trying to make wise financial decisions. One of the most common emotional roadblocks I come across when working with individuals is an unwillingness to invest idle cash to meet long-term goals.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 553 views
  • Strategy Selection vs. Risk Management

    "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money." Everett McKinley Dirksen. Let’s begin with the bottom line: When I talk to anyone about the concept of choosing an option strategy (or two) to adopt for trading, I stress that the strategy should have certain characteristics.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 287 views
  • Blending Anchor Strategy

    Anchor and Leveraged Anchor investors frequently ask why the strategy only trades SPY and SPY options rather than individual stocks, other indexes or commodities. We avoid individual stocks because of tracking and divergence issues.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 387 views
  • Fundamental Volatility and Stock Prices

    Every options trader must wonder whether any connection will be found between the company's fundamentals and stock prices (and in turn, option valuation as well). Because options are derived from stock price behavior, the analysis of stock movement is crucial to selecting options wisely; and that relies on volatility in the reported profit and loss over several years.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 411 views
  • Bullish Short Strangles

    A bullish short strangle sounds like a complicated strategy, but it’s really quite simple for those familiar with option terminology. A short put is combined with a short call to where the position starts with some amount of positive delta overall. This distinguishes itself from a delta neutral strangle, where both the short put and short call are sold at the same delta.

    By Jesse,

    • 5 comments
    • 656 views
  • Eight Mistakes Every Forex Trader Should Avoid

    The forex market is currently the largest financial market in the world and, due to its highly liquid nature and low barriers to entry, is only expected to grow. Becoming a forex trader requires minimal effort and with a decent internet connection, a laptop or computer, and some spare money to invest, you can start in no time.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 480 views
  • Put/Call Parity - Two Definitions

    Put/call parity is a term options traders use to mean one of two things. The simplest definition and the one most applicable to most options traders compares the similarity in the bid/ask spread and the net debit or credit resulting from this.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 535 views
  • Put Selling: Strike Selection Considerations

    When selling puts, such as we do in our Steady Momentum PutWrite strategy, there are many questions a trader must answer: What expiration should I use? What strike should I sell? Should I choose that strike based on delta or percentage out of the money?

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 567 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


You guys are doing great work,making improvements to this strategy.

A couple of thoughts, I wonder if the strategy could be improved by writing calls when a timing signal is bearish, even something as simple as the 200 DMA?

Secondly, what are your thoughts on using synthetic stock instead of DITM calls? I just recently started a portfolio using synthetic stock and it seems to be working ok for the short time since I started it

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest advantages of DITM calls is that in case of a big down move, move calls will start losing less than the stock because their delta starts to shrink. This is why at some point (when SPY is down around 40%) the whole structure actually starts to make money:

image.png 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Aristotle33 said:

You guys are doing great work,making improvements to this strategy.

A couple of thoughts, I wonder if the strategy could be improved by writing calls when a timing signal is bearish, even something as simple as the 200 DMA?

Secondly, what are your thoughts on using synthetic stock instead of DITM calls? I just recently started a portfolio using synthetic stock and it seems to be working ok for the short time since I started it

We actually were curious as to the same thing with a synthetic stock position when we were modifying the strategy.  When we were testing the new leveraged anchor, we ran the DITM call simultaneously with the synthetic stock from June 1 2018 through November 1, 2018.  This was a great test period, as it included fairly substantial up and down moves.  

 

I was stunned by just how much the synthetic stock under performed, using the same amount of leverage as the DITM call (almost 15% less).  In a six month period, that's gigantic.  So we scrapped the synthetic stock.  From an academic perspective, this shouldn't be true, they should perform close.  But in actual trading, there was a huge variation.  There is a thread discussing possible reasons for this -- but that's why we test things before launching.

 

As for the covered call, we have been trying to find a way to add that in without hurting performance.  I have EXTENSIVELY tested a variety of covered call scenarios using ORATS.  And the short answer is, in bull markets in particular, it always hurts performance -- which makes since, particularly using leveraged long positions.  The one caveat to that is weekly options on SPY have only existed since 2012 or so -- which has been virtually all bullish.  There are only three SHORT time periods where true "bear" signals where hit, and then only for a few weeks, which makes testing a little unreliable.

 

But, with the data we have to look back at, I haven't found a way to make covered calls actually help over any extended period.  We're going to keep looking though.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/4/2019 at 5:14 PM, cwelsh said:

We actually were curious as to the same thing with a synthetic stock position when we were modifying the strategy.  When we were testing the new leveraged anchor, we ran the DITM call simultaneously with the synthetic stock from June 1 2018 through November 1, 2018.  This was a great test period, as it included fairly substantial up and down moves.  

 

I was stunned by just how much the synthetic stock under performed, using the same amount of leverage as the DITM call (almost 15% less).  In a six month period, that's gigantic.  So we scrapped the synthetic stock.  From an academic perspective, this shouldn't be true, they should perform close.  But in actual trading, there was a huge variation.  There is a thread discussing possible reasons for this -- but that's why we test things before launching.

 

As for the covered call, we have been trying to find a way to add that in without hurting performance.  I have EXTENSIVELY tested a variety of covered call scenarios using ORATS.  And the short answer is, in bull markets in particular, it always hurts performance -- which makes since, particularly using leveraged long positions.  The one caveat to that is weekly options on SPY have only existed since 2012 or so -- which has been virtually all bullish.  There are only three SHORT time periods where true "bear" signals where hit, and then only for a few weeks, which makes testing a little unreliable.

 

But, with the data we have to look back at, I haven't found a way to make covered calls actually help over any extended period.  We're going to keep looking though.

Hi @cwelsh

Just the other day I stumbled upon orats for backtesting. They offer a trial for 7 days but are very cryptic about their pricing structure.

How sattisfied are you with orats overall, can you compare it to CML trademachine (I really do not like their calculation on gain to risk value) and offer insight to their pricing model?

I could not find data on your actual performance of the leveraged anchor or has it replaced the original anchor altogether and

the

2019 7.7% 4.4% 2.2% is the performance?

thank you for your insight and advice

 

Edited by urfiend
typo

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@urfiend I think ORAT should be compared to ONE, not CML trademachine.

As for real performance - yes, we switched to leveraged Anchor in January 2019, so 3 months of real time trading. Chris still posts Anchor trades as well, but for performance tracking, we are using the leveraged version since Jan.2019.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Orats -- I would of course change some things on it and add some more things to test for, but it's been one of the better option backtest tools I've seen.  (It's the only one I actually pay for).

 

I'm not sure what their current pricing structure is -- but I'm 90% sure there's still a Steady Options referral pricing structure (e.g. discount), just search through the forum for it.

 

As for performance reporting, we are now reporting Leveraged Anchor performance since that's what is being traded as the recommended strategy for most people.

 

You are not the first to ask that though, so we might start reporting both to eliminate confusion.  I'll discuss that with Kim

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2019 at 6:47 PM, cwelsh said:

I really like Orats -- I would of course change some things on it and add some more things to test for, but it's been one of the better option backtest tools I've seen.  (It's the only one I actually pay for).

 

I'm not sure what their current pricing structure is -- but I'm 90% sure there's still a Steady Options referral pricing structure (e.g. discount), just search through the forum for it.

 

As for performance reporting, we are now reporting Leveraged Anchor performance since that's what is being traded as the recommended strategy for most people.

 

You are not the first to ask that though, so we might start reporting both to eliminate confusion.  I'll discuss that with Kim

Hi @cwelsh @Kim

Thank your for your replies.

I searched SO and could not find a referral / SO member discount?

From what I saw of orats demonstrational videos it looked very much like CML with automated backtesting and not so much like One with the manual trade track keeping backtesting? I would do the free trial they are offering but am holding back for the new implimentations to come just this april. How is orats more like ONE in your consideration?

Thank you

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have any agreements with ORAT at this point.

As for comparison, I will let Chris to answer, as I'm not familiar enough with ORAT, so I definitely could be wrong.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't used CML in a few years, so it might have improved, but one of the things I liked about ORATs Wheel  is how things could be customized fairly easily.  

 

For instance, when I was testing different ways the short puts should be rolled, I could get it to where the rules would be:

 

Roll between 0-28 days

Roll once delta has changed X or price has changed Y that varied based on how close to expiration I was or once a certain profit percentage was hit

 

Even Orats' earnings days features are a bit better (e.g. entering X days before earnings, existing Y days before earnings, exit post earnings, etc).  CML does have the earnings features, but I don't think they were as customizable.  

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I discovered that CBOE has a new index, BXMC, which conditionally writes calls when the VIX is above 20. It improved performance a bit over BXM. I only write covered calls occasionally but it does tend to reduce the volatility of returns while not necessarily improving CAGR

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/11/2019 at 3:28 PM, Kim said:

We don't have any agreements with ORAT at this point.

As for comparison, I will let Chris to answer, as I'm not familiar enough with ORAT, so I definitely could be wrong.

@Kim

@cwelsh

Following up with orats I asked for a steadyoptions discount and they agreed on an extended trial of 2 weeks instead of 1 week and a 50% discount for private investors with steadyoption membership coming down from 99 $ to 49 $ monthly.

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs