SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

NikTam

CML TradeMachine Trade Ideas

1,717 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Now you tell us! :-)

it’s interesting that this stock scores so poorly on bull squeeze.  I’m guessing bc what you describe was happening so quickly.  

Edited by NikTam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NikTam said:

Now you tell us! :-)

Sorry!....I just had the feeling that directional trading, charts, etc. was "frowned upon" here...so I didn't know where, and how to start a conversation.

I thought I would be "booed" out of the room!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IgorK said:

It is  really good now. 

It was always good today. I didn't get involved because, even though the potential profits are huge, I wasn't feeling comfortable taking on the risk that goes along with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, IgorK said:

SEE -  1/17 SEE 44/46 vertical at .72 and 45 CALL for 65. Will see.

Out of 45 CALL for 70. 7.69% gain.   4.25% after commisisons.

@cuegis @NikTam Does it make sense to hold 44/46 vertical till the end of the week?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, IgorK said:

Out of 45 CALL for 70. 7.69% gain.   4.25% after commisisons.

@cuegis @NikTam Does it make sense to hold 44/46 vertical till the end of the week?

 

Isn’t earnings tomorrow bmo. Would you. It want to close before then. And you expiration is nov17 right ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, siddharth310584 said:

Isn’t earnings tomorrow bmo. Would you. It want to close before then. And you expiration is nov17 right ?

Right. That's why I am asking. Still about 10 days.

Edited by IgorK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, siddharth310584 said:

Isn’t earnings tomorrow bmo. Would you. It want to close before then. And you expiration is nov17 right ?

I have SEE today AC.

I'm holding the Dec 15 $44/$46 vertical.

I have to get out before the close.

I just need to avoid that risk, and I think, when it then settle down in 1-2 days, there will be plenty of things to do withthis stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, although it dosn't matter SEE is tomorrow BO... Earnings announcement* for SEE: Nov 08, 2017. Sealed Air Corporation is expected* to report earnings on 11/08/2017 before market open. The report will be for the fiscal Quarter ending Sep 2017. According to Zacks Investment Research, based on 6 analysts' forecasts, the consensus EPS forecast for the quarter is $0.46.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, cuegis said:

I have SEE today AC.

I'm holding the Dec 15 $44/$46 vertical.

I have to get out before the close.

I just need to avoid that risk, and I think, when it then settle down in 1-2 days, there will be plenty of things to do withthis stock.

I am legging out from 44/46. Bought back 46 CALL.  Hope to sell 44.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IgorK said:

I am legging out from 44/46. Bought back 46 CALL.  Hope to sell 44.

Looks like waited too much. May hold 44 call for a couple of days. Maybe it will come back a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just dumped my Dec 44/46 vertical.

Earlier inthe day, when we went from negative to positive, I thought there might be follow through on that.

But, back down .27 this late in the day, is enough for me bail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IgorK said:

Looks like waited too much. May hold 44 call for a couple of days. Maybe it will come back a bit.

Out of all SEEs with -7.28% after commissions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My P-E positions:  TDG looking better (it closed .33 higher than yesterday) -- I will exit tomorrow.  NVDA had a good day today -- I plan to exit on Thursday.  HD looks like it may be turning around - I plan to hold at least until Friday.  I exited SEE this morning for a 15% loss. 

HD:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171107205455_SL2aDG48Bn3WCPzh

NVDA:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107081710_OVnderlK0LEmvnpk

TDG:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107085110_IZzSOavH5J5IS7q6

SEE:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107082202_qdAwkSiHkfglEav0

 

So the one we thought was the most promising on the trade machine and the charts -- SEE -- turned out to be a loser this time around.  It reinforces my thinking of doing the homework but also doing many smaller trades -- it's a numbers game.

Edited by NikTam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NikTam said:

My P-E positions:  TDG looking better (it closed .33 higher than yesterday) -- I will exit tomorrow.  NVDA had a good day today -- I plan to exit on Thursday.  HD looks like it may be turning around - I plan to hold at least until Friday.  I exited SEE this morning for a 15% loss. 

HD:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171107205455_SL2aDG48Bn3WCPzh

NVDA:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107081710_OVnderlK0LEmvnpk

TDG:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107085110_IZzSOavH5J5IS7q6

SEE:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107082202_qdAwkSiHkfglEav0

 

So the one we thought was the most promising on the trade machine and the charts -- SEE -- turned out to be a loser this time around.  It reinforces my thinking of doing the homework but also doing many smaller trades -- it's a numbers game.

I forgot how I came upon SEE

Now I can't remember which scan put SEE on my radar. I think it was either the "Squeeze" scan, "pre-earnings" "long call" scan, under the "Pro-Scan" tab.

So, because of my forgetfulness , I can't judge whether CML was helpful or not!

Also, when you say your "P-E Positions" does that mean "post earnings?"

 

OK, never mind...I just ran your link to your backtest. SEE came to us from the scan about going long 3 days before earnings. Well, it has been 7 and 0 until today.

 

It was K that popped up from the squeeze scan. And that could turn out to be a great trade.

Edited by cuegis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NikTam said:

My P-E positions:  TDG looking better (it closed .33 higher than yesterday) -- I will exit tomorrow.  NVDA had a good day today -- I plan to exit on Thursday.  HD looks like it may be turning around - I plan to hold at least until Friday.  I exited SEE this morning for a 15% loss. 

HD:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171107205455_SL2aDG48Bn3WCPzh

NVDA:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107081710_OVnderlK0LEmvnpk

TDG:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107085110_IZzSOavH5J5IS7q6

SEE:  http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107082202_qdAwkSiHkfglEav0

 

So the one we thought was the most promising on the trade machine and the charts -- SEE -- turned out to be a loser this time around.  It reinforces my thinking of doing the homework but also doing many smaller trades -- it's a numbers game.

This is driving me insane, so I need another set of trained eyes to tellme what the heckis going on.

This is the CML backtest...

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107195340_FiEUax1UOKMrsTvc

Look at the trades results. On Dec 29,2015, with the stock (FMS) trading at $42.91, they purchased Jan 15 45 calls for .22 cents.

Then, 2 days later , on Dec 31st, with the stock at $41.84, they sold those calls for $2.50, creating $1135 profit on 5 calls.

The stock price never traded higher than when the calls were purchased.

The previous trade, before this one, from May 2015, is exactly the same, only more exaggerated.

 

That is why the backtest shows these results.....

 

 

Expiration:
30 Days
$118 
Total Return:
 $2545 
% Return:
2166%
Avg % Return:
429.4%
Commissions:
 $20
% Wins:
100%
Wins: 4
Losses: 0
Avg Win: $636
Avg Loss: -
Avg % Win: 429.4%
Avg % Loss: 0%
Gross Gain: $2545
Gross Loss: -
It's driving me crazy.......

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, cuegis said:

It was K that popped up from the squeeze scan. And that could turn out to be a great trade.

I am going to wait a few more weeks before I jump into the squeeze trades.. CML is still working on them... I jumped into a trade only to find out that it did not appear in the scan next day because they are still tinkering around. I had a small position and I got out with a small loss, so I chalk it to tuition. 

SEE calls lost money for me too but that is the name of the game... I agree with @NikTam ... it is a numbers game and got to keep at it.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pre-Earnings 

Did you do the put debit spread on K?  

I stepped back based on your comments and it bounced up a bit today - a bear flag?  I’m still watching.  I like the risk/reward.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NikTam said:

Pre-Earnings 

Did you do the put debit spread on K?  

I stepped back based on your comments and it bounced up a bit today - a bear flag?  I’m still watching.  I like the risk/reward.  

If it were a "bear flag" then, the 6 days (since the big gap up following earnings), would basically have higher highs,and higher lows. Just the opposite of a "bull flag" where it is a "pullback" following a big move up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cuegis said:

This is driving me insane, so I need another set of trained eyes to tellme what the heckis going on.

This is the CML backtest...

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107195340_FiEUax1UOKMrsTvc

Look at the trades results. On Dec 29,2015, with the stock (FMS) trading at $42.91, they purchased Jan 15 45 calls for .22 cents.

Then, 2 days later , on Dec 31st, with the stock at $41.84, they sold those calls for $2.50, creating $1135 profit on 5 calls.

The stock price never traded higher than when the calls were purchased.

The previous trade, before this one, from May 2015, is exactly the same, only more exaggerated.

 

That is why the backtest shows these results.....

 

 

Expiration:
30 Days
$118 
Total Return:
 $2545 
% Return:
2166%
Avg % Return:
429.4%
Commissions:
 $20
% Wins:
100%
Wins: 4
Losses: 0
Avg Win: $636
Avg Loss: -
Avg % Win: 429.4%
Avg % Loss: 0%
Gross Gain: $2545
Gross Loss: -
It's driving me crazy.......

 

@cuegisCould be a data problem, but then again IMO the CMLviz software should do sanity checks for this kind of erroneous data.   I've found many bugs like this when I dig into trade details, and why I always tell people to dig into the trade details and not simply rely on the summary data.   It's a relative new product and there are definitely still software bugs out there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Yowster said:

@cuegisCould be a data problem, but then again IMO the CMLviz software should do sanity checks for this kind of erroneous data.   I've found many bugs like this when I dig into trade details, and why I always tell people to dig into the trade details and not simply rely on the summary data.   It's a relative new product and there are definitely still software bugs out there. 

I think I should bring this exact point to their attention so they can get on the ball! 

They have a great "big picture" concept, that seems to fall apart, at times, when you dig deep, past the beautiful results!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, cuegis said:

This is driving me insane, so I need another set of trained eyes to tellme what the heckis going on.

This is the CML backtest...

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=s_0_20171107195340_FiEUax1UOKMrsTvc

Look at the trades results. On Dec 29,2015, with the stock (FMS) trading at $42.91, they purchased Jan 15 45 calls for .22 cents.

Then, 2 days later , on Dec 31st, with the stock at $41.84, they sold those calls for $2.50, creating $1135 profit on 5 calls.

The stock price never traded higher than when the calls were purchased.

The previous trade, before this one, from May 2015, is exactly the same, only more exaggerated.

 

That is why the backtest shows these results.....

It's driving me crazy.......

 

Seems that TOS Thinkback sees the same thing.

Could be the data coming from OPRA is garbage due to liquidity. You can see that the stock only have a volume of 71000.

You could argue that they could filter out those ticker as it's not very liquid.

 

image.png

image.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Djtux said:

Seems that TOS Thinkback sees the same thing.

Could be the data coming from OPRA is garbage due to liquidity. You can see that the stock only have a volume of 71000.

You could argue that they could filter out those ticker as it's not very liquid.

 

image.png

image.png

Yes. I have a long list of arguments that I'm going to present to them tomorrow, in an email to their support.

This is just one very obvious example but, I keep coming across these kind of things way too often to give me the level of confidence I need to have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.  But I have a tight stop loss set up on it.  I don't like losing money on the last day so I will settle for a BE if I have to and I may give up a nice rally later today.  In my experience these long calls either take off, or they don't.  

And based on that philosophy I was just stopped out at a small profit on NVDA.  I had high hopes for that position but a huge red candle this morning is not what I want to live with for the rest of the day.  If I see a major turnaround on the 30 minute chart I may get back in for an attempt at a scalp - NVDA is explosive stock.

Edited by NikTam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NikTam said:

Yes.  But I have a tight stop loss set up on it.  I don't like losing money on the last day so I will settle for a BE if I have to and I may give up a nice rally later today.  In my experience these long calls either take off, or they don't.  

And based on that philosophy I was just stopped out at a small profit on NVDA.  I had high hopes for that position but a huge red candle this morning is not what I want to live with for the rest of the day.  If I see a major turnaround on the 30 minute chart I may get back in for an attempt at a scalp - NVDA is explosive stock.

Do you want mind telling me what you’re stop is ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8.80 Stop and 8.70 Limit.  I also have a GTC limit at 40% profit.  I got in at 8.97.  So I would take a small loss if stopped out.

I'm about to get stopped out.

Edited by NikTam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an interesting chart.  I might nibble.

I have a bid in for a vertical 60/65 call at 1.55 but I could have easily missed the boat.

Edited by NikTam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NikTam said:

That's an interesting chart.  I might nibble.

I was already in it . I had Nov 60/65 verticals, and also Jan 60/65.

I have been icthing for a rally so I can dump the Nov's.

So, I was fortunate to be able to sell a few every .30 cents, on the ask today.

It is not the most liquid stock, and, you have to get to know it's "personality".

For example, more than most other stocks, NEVER chase it.

It is normal for you to see a quick $1.00 rally, which is immediately given all back.

It also works the other way just as often.

As far as the "big picture" goes....you can see that we have already had a major part, if not all of, the bull market.

Now we have been in a sideways pattern for the past 4-6 weeks.

If there is another bull leg coming, then it is a perfect candidate for a "squeeze".

What makes it difficult during this sideways period, is that you are going to get many false breakouts.

You can see it all on the "daily" chart.

So, today might, or might not, be a real one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NikTam said:

I got filled at 1.55 so will see how it goes.  Small position.  I have an OCO of 40% gain and 25% loss.

Are you talking about SQM.

If so, was it the Nov 60/65 vertical?

That is the only thing that I can see trading around that price.

If it is, I would have suggested to do what I am doing, which is rolling out of Nov and into Jan.

I have already been in the Jan because they did not have Dec.

But, I just checked, and now they do have Dec.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, NikTam said:

Ok.  I will take a look.  I thought if anything would happen pretty fast.  

Yes, it pretty much always happens fast. But, that is why you have to be selling off small amounts as it spikes.

In my case, I am keeping a small arsenal for when the breakout (if it ever starts back up), is the "real" one.

But, like I said before, we are in a period of many false breakouts, and those happen VERY fast, then give it all right back, or sometimes even more.

This is why I keep a certain portion to trade those unknowns. So that I have short term inventory, to be able to unload on the ask, during the false spikes.

 

Today seems to be different than all of the recent false breakouts. Because, when they are false, they tend to happen right near the opening,then give back the entire rally.

Today is the first time it has broken out, and as of 11:30, it still remains higher.

Edited by cuegis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, krisbee said:

Didn't HES report on 10/25? Next earnings isn't until January I believe http://www.nasdaq.com/earnings/report/hes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Threading the needle today.  Out of TDG with about 13% gain which came back from a near stop out.  Got out of NVDA early this morning with a small gain but would like to get back in for a scalp it if it shows a reversal.  Seems to be heading into earnings with some negative baggage at this point.  I will not be around for the very end of the market day but would not be surprised to see "informed" buyers rush back in to pick it up at a bargain -- then you know that earnings are going to be positive.  In fact  stochastic is turning up right now...watch this thing change gears rapidly!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@cuegis I can roll my SQM 60/65 vertical to Dec for .45 or Jan for .50 which would make my total cost 2.00 or 2.05...thinking about it.

Earnings are 11/22 -  would I hold this through earnings?  CML doesn't give it great marks for that.  Or would you roll to January before earnings?

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171108182235_mcq9XsrMFgygP6QP

 

 

Edited by NikTam
update

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, NikTam said:

@cuegis I can roll my SQM 60/65 vertical to Dec for .45 or Jan for .50 which would make my total cost 2.00 or 2.05...thinking about it.

Earnings are 11/22 -  would I hold this through earnings?  CML doesn't give it great marks for that.  Or would you roll to January before earnings?

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171108182235_mcq9XsrMFgygP6QP

 

I put in GTC to roll to Dec for .30 -- so if it drops today I will do that instead of getting stopped out.

Actually, I was only in Jan because there was a period of time when there was no Dec.

But, this is not an earnings trade, so, for me, I never hold trades through earnings, unless they are specifically intend to be.

Since earnings is Nov 22, I would not gain any benefit from buying Jan over Dec, because I'm going to close out everything before Nov 22.

Then, of course, this may turn out to be a failed breakout, in which case I would be getting out for stop loss purposes, even sooner.

Unless you plan to hold through earnings, I don't see any advantage in Jan over Dec for now..

And, if it turns out that this breakout follows through, and you get a nice run up between now and earnings....I would be more inclined to lock in , at least most of those gains because earnings , no matter what they are, could always cause a gap down in price, at least initially, and you don't want to give back your gains.....if it plays out that way!

Edited by cuegis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, NikTam said:

@cuegis I can roll my SQM 60/65 vertical to Dec for .45 or Jan for .50 which would make my total cost 2.00 or 2.05...thinking about it.

Earnings are 11/22 -  would I hold this through earnings?  CML doesn't give it great marks for that.  Or would you roll to January before earnings?

http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20171108182235_mcq9XsrMFgygP6QP

 

I put in GTC to roll to Dec for .30 -- so if it drops today I will do that instead of getting stopped out.

This stock tends to do crazy things.

Like this morning, as I do every morning.....I have my smartphone in my bed, and I wake up around 6 AM , for a few minutes, then turn on TWS, on the phone, just to see if anything out of the ordinary happened overnight.

Well, ES is a always accurate, because it is open but, some stocks, even at 6 AM, give some idea of where they might be trading.

.SQM closed at around $59.83 yesterday.......so, my quotes showed that the last trade was $56.83 down $3.00.

I was REALLY not happy, so I did some further exploring, and it showed a bid of $59.50, and ask of $60.

So, I convinced myself to be relieved, and went back to bed.

Ultimately, the stock did what it always does, and opened within .30 cents of the previous close.

This is what it does these days, on most days.

But, on the big run up from May to Oct......everyday, it opened like .70 cents higher, and then just kept on going!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a good day long K.

I bought K and T yesterday.

Today I closed out T for break even, and kept all of my K.

I'm just outright long Dec 62.50 and 65 calls.

This is something that I normally wouldn't do (I would do verticals) but, I intended to hold it for only 1-2 days. So, I 'm not too worried about decay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Kim
      Before ever entering a trade, we need a plan. For example, we want to know whether we should avoid earnings, or trade with earnings. Knowing where to place a stop loss, and even a limit gain. Knowing which strike to trade. Knowing whether to trade the monthly or weekly options.

      But it even goes further – even if we know which direction we think the stock will go – do we sell puts or sell a put spread? Do we buy calls or a call spread? Should we be net owners or sellers of volatility? Has there been measurable edge in the trade in the past, or not?

      This is how people profit from the option market — it’s preparation, not luck.

      All of these questions were designed to be answered with the CMLviz Trade Machine, which is an option back-tester created by Capital Market Laboratories (CML). I have been in the same circle as this company’s founder for years.

      CML is in fact a member of the famed Thomson First Call roster. Their research sits side-by-side with Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barclays and the rest of the bulge bracket banks, but they have a different goal: To break the information asymmetry that exists between the top 0.1% and the rest.

      To learn more about the product, you can tap on the link below. You will see a 4- minute video demonstration. I think, for many of you, it will become a valuable tool to supplement your trading and the analysis that Steady Options provides.

      Tap Here to Watch the Video and Sign Up

      P.S. Our members know that I rarely promote other products. But this one really got me excited. I encourage you to give it a try. They plan tons of additional functionality in the upcoming months, including custom strategies to trade around earnings which can be a great benefit for us.
       
      CMLviz Trade Machine is constantly adding new features, and the price will be increasing as new features are added. Those who sign up are grandfathered at the price they signed up even as the prices increase.
    • By Kim
      Couple of weeks ago, the CML published an article The Volatility Option Trade After Earnings in PayPal Holdings Inc.

      The setup was:

      "The week following PayPal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) has had one fairly consistent pattern -- volatility. If we take a myopic view after looking at the last three-years and focus on the last six-months, that pattern is yet more decisive. Irrespective of whether the earnings move was large or small, if we tested waiting one-day after earnings and then holding a long out of the money (40 delta) strangle for one-week (using two-week options), the results were quite strong. This trade opens one-day after earnings were announced to try to find a stock that moves a lot after the earnings announcement."

      If we bought the out-of-the-money strangle in PayPal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) over the last three-years but only held it after earnings we get these results: 
       
      PYPL
      Long out-of-the-money strangle   % Wins: 64%   Wins: 7   Losses: 4   % Return:  174%  Tap Here to See the Back-test

      The backtest also defines very clear rules for the trade:

      * Open the long out-of-the-money (40 delta) strangle one-calendar day after earnings.
      * Close the strangle 7 calendar days after earnings. 
      * Use the options closest to 14 days from expiration (but more than 7 days). 
       
      On July 25, I posted the link to the PYPL potential trade on the forum:
       


      On the next day I posted my entry:



      Please note that this trade didn't make it into the official model portfolio due to higher potential risk - hence I mentioned "small allocation only".

      The next day, some of the members started posting their exit prices:





      I was out a day later for 27% gain:



      Some members did even better:



      And finally an interesting comment from another member:



      Those are real trades, from real traders, posted in real time. 

      Attention tastytrade: Buying premium does work - you just need to know how to do it.

      This is how people profit from the option market. It's not guessing or speculation. Take a reasonable idea or hypothesis, use a rationale system to help overcome cognitive biases, and test it. Tap the link below to learn more: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      When you combine the best options trading community with the best backtester, the results are unbeatable.

      Related articles:
      Lessons From Facebook Earnings Disaster The Incredible Option Trade In VXX Post Earnings Option Trade In Facebook Why We Sell Our Straddles Before Earnings Earnings Momentum Trading In Google
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN)
       
        How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN)
      Date Published: 2017-06-28 

      This article can be seen in a video or as a full written article below the video. 
       

      PREFACE 
      Trading options in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) using a short window before earnings are released has been a staggering winner over the last several years. 

      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market. Identifying strategies that are tightly risk controlled, take no stock direction risk and no earnings risk. Strategies that are immune from a bull or bear market. 

      STORY 
      Everyone knows that the day of an earnings announcement is a risky event for a stock. But the question every option trader, whether professional or amateur, has long asked is if there is a way to profit from this known implied volatility rise. It turns out, that over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies, the answer is actually, yes. 
        Yes, there is a systematic way to trade this repeating phenomenon, without making a bet on earnings or stock direction.

      THE SET UP 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a couple of weeks before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. Here is the setup: 
       

      We are testing opening the position 14 days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money straddle in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's a 162% return over the last three-years, with 9 winning trades and 3 losing trades. But, let's take a step toward risk reduction before we move forward. 

      While we are looking at this same trade, let's also set a rule that if at any point in the two-week period the straddle loses 25% of its value, we just close it and wait for the next pre-earnings cycle. While we're at it, we will do the same with the upside -- that is, if at any time during the two-weeks the straddle goes up 25%, we take the profits and close the trade. 

      For clarity, this is what we test: 
       

      And now we can see the results over the same three-year period: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      While we are taking 75% less risk, we are seeing about the same results -- we will continue down this risk adjusted path for the rest of this dossier. 

      Digging Deeper 
      Now we can see the results over the last two-years: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's a 126% return and 7 winning trades with 1 losing trade. Remember, this trade takes no stock direction risk and no earnings risk -- this is completely agnostic to a bull or bear market. 

      Even further, that 126% actually came on just 16 weeks of trading (2-weeks per earnings cycle, 8 earnings cycles), which is over 400% annualized returns. 

      Now we look at the last year: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      We see a 65.2% percent return on 3 winning trade and 1 losing trade. 

      Finally, we can look at the last six-months: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's 40.1%, winning both of the last two pre-earnings trades. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market. Identifying strategies that are tightly risk controlled, take no stock direction bets or earnings risk. It's preparation, not luck. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition.
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Profit from Trading Options in Autodesk Inc Right After Earnings
       


      Date Published: 2017-05-18 
      Written by Ophir Gottlieb 

      LEDE 
      While Autodesk Inc (NASDAQ:ADSK) just crushed earnings again, sending shares soaring in the after hours trade, one option trade after earnings has been a consistent winner. It takes no earnings risk, little stock direction risk and over the last year has never lost while returning over 160% annualized returns. 

      The Trade After the Excitement 
      While most of the focus is on the actual earnings move for a stock, that's the distraction when it comes to the option market. For Autodesk Inc, irrespective of whether the earnings move was up or down, if we waited one-day after the stock move from earnings, and then sold an out of the money put spread, the results were very strong. 

      We can examine this, objectively, with a custom option back-test. Here is our earnings set-up: 
       


      Rules 
      * Open short put spread 1 day after earnings 
      * Close short put spread 29 days later 
      * Use the option that is closest to but greater than 30-days away from expiration 

      Here are the results over the last year: 
       


      That's a 47.3% return, with 4 winning trades and 0 losing trades. The total holding period was less than 4 full months, meaning the annualized return was over 160%. No earnings risk was taken -- this is not a coin flip over earnings. 

      The Logic 
      This strategy works beautifully in many companies where heavy stock volume follows the earnings release. The logic behind this trade follows a narrative that even after a bad earnings release, if we wait a day after, we find the stock at a point of equilibrium. 

      If it gapped down -- that gap is over. If it beat earnings, the downside move is already likely muted. Here's how this strategy has done over the last 6-months: 
       


      That's a 21.3% return, on 2 winning trades and 0 losing trades. Since this is a total of a two-month holding period, that 21.3% is actually over 120% annualized. 

      If you're curious, yes, this also produced positive returns over the last 3-years. Here are those results. 
       


      Now we can find some comfort in this approach where is shows 9 winning trades and just 2 losing trades over the last three-years. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      There are patterns to stock behaviors before and after earnings and those patterns reveal opportunities in the option market, without taking the actual risk of earnings. You can find them, stock by stock, Apple, Google, Netflix and of course Autodesk Inc are just a handful of examples. There has been edge here with this strategy. 

      To see how to do this for any stock and for any strategy with just the click of a few buttons, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      The author has no position in Autodesk Inc (NASDAQ:ADSK) as of this writing. 

      Back-test Link
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO)

       
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO)
      Date Published: 2017-05-15 

      PREFACE 
      Trading options in a short window before earnings are released benefits from the rising implied volatility but avoids the risk into the actual earnings release and also avoids any kind of stock direction risk. 

      This approach has returned a annualized rate of 198%. Now that's worth looking into. 

      STORY 
      Everyone knows that the day of an earnings announcement is a risky event for a stock. This can be explicitly seen in the option market, where the implied volatility (the expected stock move) rises into the earnings event. 

      The question every option trader, whether professional or amateur, has long asked is if there is a way to profit from this known volatility rise. It turns out, that over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies like Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO) the answer is actually, yes. 
       
      Yes, there is a systematic way to trade this repeating phenomenon, without making a bet on earnings or stock direction.

      THE SET UP 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a few days before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. The goal, is two-fold: (i) to benefit from that known implied volatility rise, and (ii) to own the straddle for a very short period of time when the stock might move 'a lot,' but taking no earnings bets. 

      If either of those two phenomena occur, there's a very good chance this wins, if neither occur, the amount risked is normally quite small. Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position 6 days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money (also called '50-delta') straddle in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
       
      Long At-the-Money Straddle * Monthly Options * Back-test length: three-years * Open 6-days Before Earnings * Close 1-day Before Earnings * Holding Period: 5-Days per Earnings   Winning Trades: 5 Losing Trades: 7 Pre-Earnings Straddle Return:  17.1%  Annualized Return:  102% 
      We see a 17.1% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Broadcom Limited. That's a total of just 60 days (5 days for each earnings date, over 12 earnings dates). That's a annualized rate of 102%. 

      We can also see that this strategy hasn't been a winner all the time, rather it has won 5 times and lost 7 times, but here's the key -- it wins about half of the time, but the average gain per winning trade is substantially larger than the average loss on a losing trade: 
       


      Consistently Successful 
      This idea has also been a successful approach over the last two-years:
      Long At-the-Money Straddle * Monthly Options * Back-test length: two-years * Open 6-days Before Earnings * Close 1-day Before Earnings * Holding Period: 5-Days per Earnings   Winning Trades: 4 Losing Trades: 4 Pre-Earnings Straddle Return:  22%  Annualized Return:  198% 
      Now we see a 22% return, testing this over the last 8 earnings dates which is a annualized rate of 198%. 

      Yet again, we see a trade that wins about half the time, but the average win is much larger than the average loss: 
       


      If you really want to see how we found this, and how to do it for other stocks like Apple, Google and Amazon, here is a 1-minute and 34-second video that every professional option trader would rather that you don't see. 

      Learn more here: Try the Back-tester Yourself

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      There are patterns to stock behaviors before and after earnings and those patterns reveal opportunities in the option market, without taking the actual risk of earnings. You can find them, stock by stock. This is how people profit from the option market -- it's preparation, not luck. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      Back-test Link
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      The Secret Behind Options Pre-Earnings Trading in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC)
       
       
      Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC): The Wonderful Secret Behind Options Pre-Earnings Trading
      Date Published: 2017-05-4

      PREFACE 
      There is a wonderful secret to trading options right before earnings announcements in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) , and really many stocks, that benefits from the rising implied volatility but avoids the risk into the actual earnings release and also avoids any kind of stock direction risk. 

      THE WONDERFUL SECRET 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a few days before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. 

      The goal, is two-fold: (i) to benefit from that known implied volatility rise, and (ii) to own the straddle for a very short period of time when the stock might move 'a lot,' but never take the risk of actually owning options during the earnings release. 

      If either of those two phenomena occur, there's a very good chance this wins, if neither occur, the amount risked is normally quite small. Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position in Intel Corporation 6 days before earnings and then closing the position right before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is notmaking any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money (also called '50-delta') straddle in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
       


      We see a 47.8% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Intel Corporation. That's a total of just 72 days (6 days for each earnings date, over 12 earnings dates). That's a annualized rate of 242%. 

      We can also see that the win/loss rate is split with 6-wins and 6-losses, yet the return is enormous. That means the winning trades are much larger than the losing trades, which is exactly what a successful trading strategy attempts to do. No magic bullets -- rather smart methodologies for wealth creation. 

      MORE TO IT THAN MEETS THE EYE 
      While this strategy is benefiting from the implied volatility rise into earnings for Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), what it's really doing is far more intelligent. 

      The ideal stocks for this strategy have a couple of common characteristics: 

      (i) The companies rarely pre-announce earnings -- this is an investment that does not look to make an earnings bet, so an earnings pre-announcement is the opposite of what we're hoping for. 

      (ii) The underlying stock price of these companies tend to move a lot (or some) as earnings approach and various institutions and traders shuffle the stock price around in anticipation of the earnings result. The more one sided the outside world starts betting on direction -- up or down, the better it is to own the straddle. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market -- it's preparation, not luck. 

      Test the results on Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc, and the results are staggering. 

      To see how to do this for any stock and for any strategy with just the click of a few buttons, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      The author has no position in Intel Corporation Inc (NASDAQ:INTC) as of this writing. 

      Back-test Link (does require custom earnings settings).
       
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.