SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Why You Should Not Ignore Negative Gamma


Iron Condor is a very popular strategy used by many traders and investment newsletters. There are many variables to the Iron Condor strategy. One of the most important ones is time to expiration of the options you use. The time to expiration will impact all the Greeks: the theta, the vega and the gamma. 

In this article, I would like to show how the gamma of the trade is impacted by the time to expiration.

For those of you less familiar with the Options Greeks:

 

The option's gamma is a measure of the rate of change of its delta. The gamma of an option is expressed as a percentage and reflects the change in the delta in response to a one point movement of the underlying stock price.

 

This might sound complicated, but in simple terms, the gamma is the option's sensitivity to changes in the underlying price. In other words, the higher the gamma, the more sensitive the options price is to the changes in the underlying price.

 

When you buy options, the trade has a positive gamma - the gamma is your friend. When you sell options, the trade has a negative gamma - the gamma is your enemy. Since Iron Condor is an options selling strategy, the trade has a negative gamma. The closer we are to expiration, the higher is the gamma.

 

Lets demonstrate how big move in the underlying price can impact the trade, using two RUT trades opened on Friday March 21, 2014. RUT was trading at 1205.

 

The first trade was opened using weekly options expiring the next week:

  • Sell March 28 1230 call
  • Buy March 28 1240 call
  • Sell March 28 1160 put
  • Buy March 28 1150 put

 

This is the risk profile of the trade:

 

0292e6d2639d912cde730a1a25907a13.png

 

As we can see, the profit potential of the trade is 14%. Not bad for one week of holding.

 

The second trade was opened using the monthly options expiring in May:

 

  • Sell May 16 1290 call
  • Buy May 16 1300 call
  • Sell May 16 1080 put
  • Buy May 16 1070 put

 

This is the risk profile of the trade:

 

1b73694562cae3b538a471657e7b919d.png

 

The profit potential of that trade is 23% in 56 days.

 

And now let me ask you a question:

 

What is better: 14% in 7 days or 23% in 56 days?

 

The answer is pretty obvious, isn't it? If you make 14% in 7 days and can repeat it week after week, you will make much more than 23% in 56 days, right? Well, the big question is: CAN you repeat it week after week?

 

Lets see how those two trades performed few days later.

 

This is the risk profile of the first trade on Wednesday next week:

 

13285d3425bffc41fa73e2bca6d4d69b.png

 

RUT moved 50 points and our weekly trade is down 45%. Ouch..

 

The second trade performed much better:

 

cbbeec2448210c846db29ca850cae6ca.png

 

It is actually down only 1%.

 

The lesson from those two trades:

 

Going with close expiration will give you larger theta per day. But there is a catch. Less time to expiration equals larger negative gamma. That means that a sharp move of the underlying will cause much larger loss. So if the underlying doesn't move, then theta will kick off and you will just earn money with every passing day. But if it does move, the loss will become very large very quickly. Another disadvantage of close expiration is that in order to get decent credit, you will have to choose strikes much closer to the underlying.

 

As we know, there are no free lunches in the stock market. Everything comes with a price. When the markets don't move, trading close expiration might seem like a genius move. The markets will look like an ATM machine for few weeks or even months. But when a big move comes, it will wipe out months of gains. If the markets gap, there is nothing you can do to prevent a large loss.

 

Does it mean you should not trade weekly options? Not at all. They can still bring nice gains and diversification to your options portfolio. But you should treat them as speculative trades, and allocate the funds accordingly. Many options "gurus" describe those weekly trades as "conservative" strategy. Nothing can be further from the truth.

 

Related articles

 

Want to learn more about options?

 

Start Your Free Trial

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • OptionNET Explorer (ONE) Software

    OptionNET Explorer (ONE) is a complete options trading and analysis software platform that enables the user to backtest complex options trading strategies, analyze their results and monitor them in real-time, all from within a single, user friendly environment. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 99 views
  • What Happened to SFO Magazine (SFOMag)? Stocks, Options and Futures Magazine

    Remember SFO Magazine? Traders like Jack Schwager and Brett Steenbarger used to write for the publication before its swift shutdown in 2012. What happened. SFO (Stocks, Futures, and Options) magazine was a monthly financial magazine focused on trading and investing in stocks, futures, and options markets.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 543 views
  • How to Use the Finest Covered Call Strategy

    Investing in the stock market can be a great way to grow your wealth over time. However, it can also be a volatile and unpredictable place, with sudden swings in stock prices causing anxiety for even the most experienced investors. This is where the covered call strategy comes in - a popular options trading strategy that can help manage portfolio volatility.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 667 views
  • Put/Call Parity

    Put/call parity is a crucial concept in options trading that establishes the basics of option pricing. The formula, introduced in 1969, came years before the seminal Black-Scholes pricing model. As such, it was one of the first formulations of quantitative option pricing and served as the foundation for future pioneers like Black, Merton, and Scholes.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 310 views
  • What Are Cash-Settled Options?

    Options are finite, wasting assets. They have a shelf-life, and they cease to exist after their expiration. So when that expiration date comes, there needs to be a mechanism in place to ensure that both sides of an option contract hold up their side of the bargain.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 609 views
  • Everything You Need to Know About Options Assignment Risk

    The fear of being assigned early on a short option position is enough to cripple many would-be options traders into sticking by their tried-and-true habit of simply buying puts or calls. After all, theoretically, the counterparty to your short options trade could exercise the option at any time, potentially triggering a Margin Call on your account if you’re undercapitalized.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,085 views
  • Index Options vs. Stock Options: What's The Difference?

    Most traders get their start with options in stock options. Perhaps they want to bet on a big move in a stock or hedge a long stock position. However, there’s more to the world of options than simply stock options, Index Options, which are options listed for indexes like the S&P 500 index or Nasdaq 100 index.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 564 views
  • Why You Should Never Use a Stop Loss in Options Trading

    Making the shift from ordinary financial instruments like stocks and futures to options requires several adjustments. For one, options are nonlinear--an option can go up 10% when the underlying goes from $50 to $51, and then double in price when the underlying goes from $51 to $52.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,006 views
  • Gamma Risk Explained

    Undoubtedly, options are more challenging to understand than stocks or futures. The stock price is based on the market's opinion of an honest company's value. An option, on the other hand, derives all of its value from the price of the underlying security.

     

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 745 views
  • Straddle vs. Strangle Options Strategy

    Options are dynamic, “delta-one” instruments, while stocks and futures are static. No matter how high the price of Tesla stock goes, a $1.00 move will create $1.00 in P&L per share. That same $1.00 price in an underlying alters the delta, gamma, and vega to the point where an option position evolves. The following $1.00 price move will have different implications.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 716 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


Kim,

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but the second trade will become as risky of the 1st trade the close one gets to expiration? Besides, the gamma may be smaller for the 2nd trade but one has to hold the position longer which exposes us more market fluctuations. 

 

Hence, on the long run, is there any money to be made with iron condors?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct. This is why I usually don't advocate to hold till expiration. I prefer to enter 5-7 weeks before expiration and exit 1-2 weeks before expiration. Let someone else to collect the last few nickels.

 

I believe that iron condors can be profitable in the long run if managed correctly. That means limiting the losses in the losing months and not holding till expiration to reduce the gamma risk.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi Kim

 

Very useful post !! thanks!

 

 I prefer to enter 5-7 weeks before expiration and exit 1-2 weeks before expiration.

 

If you entering this trade 5 weeks before expiration, arent there more chances that it might break away and trade outside the boundary exercises prices (the limited profit strike range).

 

exit 1-2 weeks before expiration.

On the contrary, if you enter 1-2 weeks before expiration and exit just before (3 days) expiration, the probability of breaking away is less and you might also avoid the -ve gamma risk.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct, but when you enter 1-2 weeks before expiration, your profit zone is also narrower. Take a look at the two examples. In the first example, the breakeven points are only 2-3% away. In the second example, your breakeven points are 8-9% away. When you use the same deltas, your probability to go ITM is similar in both cases.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is better: 14% in 7 days or 23% in 56 days?

 

Assuming enough occurrences,Probability  and theoretical payoff wise  it would always be more profitable  to choose the shorter duration despite your caveats about gamma.

 

The real killer is the 800%   commission cost for the weekly strategy. Even if you do outperform the equivalent 56 day strategy, you might ponder if  you're not just assuming all the risks and handing all the  theoretical profits over to your broker. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if this is true (which I'm not sure), the real problem is the drawdowns. With weekly options, occasional 50% losses is inevitable due to high negative gamma. And if you make 5%/week 10 weeks and then lose 50%, you are not back to even. You are down 20%. This assuming that 50% loss came after ten 5% winners. What if it comes after two winners?

 

Due to significantly higher potential loss, you should allocate much smaller position to weekly trades, which means that total return will be lower even if the average return is higher over time.

 

There is always tradeoff between risk and reward. Higher reward = higher potential risk = smaller allocation = smaller total return. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Working to come up to speed ...

1) Would you consider something like selling a vertical put spread gamma negative?  Or is that then direction dependent, i.e. you're "happy" (friend) if the underlying goes up, and "sad" (enemy) if it goes down.  So are you referring to when you don't want the underlying to change at all, or in this bull put spread case also?

2) Is an iron condor (initial setup) always vega negative -- because the strikes closer to the money, that one sells, grow faster with a volatility increase than the strikes that one buys (further from the money)?

Edited by Rado

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido