SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Leveraged Anchor is Boosting Performance


In our last article on the Anchor Strategy, we discussed what the strategy is and what it is not, as well as attempting to set expectations for investors. In this piece we’ll examine the possibility of “boosting” performance through the use of additional options to gain leverage.

A “normal” Anchor portfolio uses about 90% of its available cash to purchase long equities, most commonly ETFs.  The other 10% is used to purchase the hedge.  This means, even if the strategy performs “perfectly” by paying off the hedge, in the best case scenario, it will still lag the market by at least ten percent – and we all know perfect performance is unlikely.  In other words, if the market goes up 20%, Anchor will, at absolute most, go up 18% -- prior to accounting for the cost of the hedge.  By replacing the ETFs with a combination of ETFs and long dated deep in the money call options we can increase performance without greatly impacting risk.

 

Let’s take an example $100,000.00 portfolio and assume SPY is currently trading at 266.92, the end of value on the day this post was written.  Using the June 21, 2019 options, a “normal” Anchor portfolio could look like:

 

            Long 6 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($9,600)

            Short 2 May 25, 2018 268.5 Put         $3.34/contract             $668

            Long 340 shares of SPY[1]                 $266.92/share            ($90,752.80)

            Left over cash                                                                         $315.20

[1] SPY is being used for simplicity sake, one could just as easily use the standard blend of SDY, VIG, and RSP 
 

But what if we instead bought calls and constructed the portfolio as follows:

 

            Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($12,800)

            Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts       $3.34/contract             $1,002

            Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls          $117.56/contract         ($47,024)

            Long 100 shares of SPY                     $266.92/share            ($26,692)

            Left over cash                                                                         $14,486

 

In this case we’re essentially long an extra 47% when compared to the “normal” Anchor portfolio and have left over cash we can invest in a low paying instrument (such as BIL), yielding approximately 1.5%.  The four long calls each control 100 shares, which totals 500 shares under control as opposed to only 340 shares in the “normal” Anchor model.

 
Looking at the possible scenarios in June 2019:

 

image.png 

 

Now the above analysis assumes that the hedge is exactly fully paid for and that all other variables have remained the same.  This assumption means we would have collected exactly $0.80.week each week – and we know that is impossible – but it still a useful analysis.

 
The reason that the further down SPY drops, the more money “normal” Anchor makes is with our 4 long puts we are slightly over-hedged, which profits on the down side.  The Leveraged portfolio is perfectly hedged. 

 

Looking at the above it is very easy to see that Anchor and the Leveraged version perform the same in down conditions but the leveraged version vastly outperforms in up markets.  This only makes sense as it is a leveraged product that is still fully hedged on the downside.  This doesn’t tell the whole story though – for two reasons.  The first is beneficial to the leveraged version.  The above model assumes a delta of one as the price of SPY drops.  However, that is never the case.  As the price of SPY gets closer and closer to the 150 strike, delta will go down (and volatility likely will be increasing during this time as well).  As delta goes down, the long calls won’t lose dollar for dollar, as a pure long position would.  This means that the above values are actually understated.  The Leveraged version should outperform in down markets as well.  It outperforms in flat markets due to the interest gained on the extra $14,486 cash.

 

It would seem then that the Leveraged version is vastly superior and should always be used – and if the paying off the hedged worked perfectly, then that would be the case.  But as any Anchor trader knows, paying off the hedge is always the most difficult task – particularly in large bull markets which require the hedge to be rolled several times.  Because the leveraged version has more short puts, when the market goes down, those short positions are going to lose at a higher clip.  Similarly, when we have to roll the long hedge, we will lose more rolling.  In other words the risk increases.  Is the risk worth the potential gains?  That depends on both market conditions and each individual investor’s preferences. 

 

The Leveraged version is also not tax efficient.  With a normal Anchor account, you hold the long ETF positions until you need to liquidate - which could be decades.  The only real tax impact is from the option positions, which could easily be negative on a year the markets are up.  On the other hand, the leveraged version will realize gains every year as the long calls are bought and sold - leading to tax inefficiencies.  Depending on your tax bracket and situation, this could have an impact on choosing one or the other.

 

Starting in June, we're going to start tracking a leveraged version of the Anchor portfolio for subscribers, which can also be professionally managed through Lorintine Capital.  Feel free to email Chris at cwelsh@lorintine.com with any questions. 

Christopher Welsh is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of an investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of three separate private funds. He is also an attorney practicing in Dallas, Texas. Chris has been practicing since 2006 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris has a Bachelor of Science in Economics, a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Texas A&M University, and a law degree from Southern Methodist University. Chris manages the Anchor Trades portfolio, the Steady Options Fund, and oversees Lorintine Capital's distressed real estate debt fund.
 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Are Covered Calls a ‘Sure Thing?’

    Most covered call writers enjoy the regularity and reliability of the position. In the majority of cases, the covered call will be profitable, even when underlying shares are called away. This assumes that the strike is higher than the basis in the underlying, and that the call writer understands the real limitations to the strategy.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 409 views
  • Lessons from Bill Ackman's comeback

    Bill Ackman is an American investor, hedge fund manager and philanthropist. He is the founder and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund management company. Ackman is considered by some to be a contrarian investor but considers himself an activist investor.

    By Kim,

    • 1 comment
    • 1,584 views
  • Steady Futures 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Futures began trading the 50K portfolio in July 2019. It produced a 8.5% return during its 6 months of performance (18.0% annualized). We had three goals when we developed this system. First, we wanted a robust system that benefits from turmoil in the markets.

    By RapperT,

    • 0 comments
    • 286 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 - Year In Review

    2019 marks our 8th year as a public service. It was a good year overall. We closed 151 winners out of 232 trades. Our model portfolio produced 41.7% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only two losing months in 2019. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 413 views
  • Momentum 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Momentum had an excellent first year of publication, producing significant gains in both of the published strategies. The most popular strategy writes (sells) out of the money puts on equity indexes and ETF’s, and returned 19.1% for the year, beating our benchmark by approximately 5.5%.

    By Jesse,

    • 1 comment
    • 507 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options model portfolio produced 41.7% gain in 2019. This is a very good return by any standards, but well below our long term returns. In the name of full transparency and our continuous learning, we are providing a full analysis of the 2019 numbers.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,373 views
  • Anchor 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options now has a full year of trading the Leveraged Anchor Account under its belt. (Technically since today is December 30, the values used herein are one day off.) To say things went as designed is an understatement - the strategy outperformed the S&P 500 in 2019 by 7.2% while being hedged.

    By cwelsh,

    • 1 comment
    • 685 views
  • A Reliable Method for Picking the Underlying

    A lot of emphasis is placed on selection of one strategy over another. Are you conservative or a speculator? Are you trying to make fast money or hedging equity positions? In fact, this is a primary concern among traders. The strategy should match the risk profile, of course. But there is much more to how and why you trade options.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 466 views
  • Total Stock Market Index Funds: A Diversification Illusion?

    I’m a fan of index funds and diversification. Low costs, low turnover, and passively managed exposure to thousands of stocks make Total Stock Market (TSM) index funds great starting points for stock market exposure. In fact, most investor portfolios I see are insufficiently diversified to a point where a TSM index fund would be a material improvement.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 638 views
  • Back to the Basics: How to Get Started Trading Options

    To those of us involved in the Steady Options community, options trading is almost second nature. But most investors, and even most traders, don’t trade options. There may be a variety of reasons why this is the case, but I believe it’s mostly related to the learning curve of understanding a completely new concept.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 419 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


If we get enough interest yes, but starting an ETF is a huge capital undertaking that you need institutional help/funding for.  We also need a longer proven track record, but it definitely is a possibility that we've considered.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

But what if we instead bought calls and constructed the portfolio as follows:

 

            Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts          $16/contract                ($12,800)

            Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts       $3.34/contract             $1,002

            Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls          $117.56/contract         ($47,024)

            Long 100 shares of SPY                     $266.92/share            ($26,692)

            Left over cash                                                                         $14,486

 

Looking at the possible scenarios in June 2019:

 


Sorry, I'm trying to figure this out out and most likely I'm missing something. Can you provide some clarity as to how is the constructed portfolio showing a balance of $100,963 when the spot at expiry is still 266.92? Mu calculations show the below. What am I missing?

 

 

  Payout PnL
Long 8 June 21, 2019 265 Puts $0 -$12,800
Short 3 May 25, 2018 286.5 Puts -$5,874 -$4,872
Long 4 June 21 2019 150 Calls $46,768 -$256
Long 100 shares of SPY $26,692 $0
Left over cash $14,486 $0
TOTAL $82,072 -$17,928

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the comment in the next paragraph that "assumed we paid for the hedge from selling short each week."  So instead of the loss on the short puts, that's actually a gain of the $12,800.

 

The purpose of the example was just to show the difference in levered performance ignoring the short put position.  

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs Expertido