SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Is Your Iron Condor Really Protected?


Iron Condor is a very popular strategy used by many options traders. It can perform very well many months, but the real question is: how much will you lose when the market volatility explodes? Many condor traders give back all of their profits during the 2-3 losing months each year when the markets make large moves because they lack a detailed plan for risk management.

Why Steady Condors is different?

 

Can you make 10% per month with Iron Condors? Yes, you can - but this is a wrong question to ask. The right question is how much you lose when the market goes against you? 

Steady Condors at its core is managed by the Greeks but mostly resembles a variation of iron condors. Anyone who has traded more than a handful of non-directional iron condors knows they can be extremely challenging in a trending market potentially causing a lot of stress, large drawdowns, and significant losses. 

 

Our manage by the Greeks philosophy is designed to take advantage of the volatility skew that naturally exists in index options like RUT and SPX and to deal with the inherent flaws this creates for traditional condors. We all know that the market “takes the stairs up and the elevator down” and this is built into index options pricing. For condors this means that you will be able to sell much farther OTM puts than calls for the equivalent premium. This causes a traditional iron condor to naturally set up short Delta (bearish). If the market makes a move up after trade launch you will start to lose money immediately even with declining implied volatility typically helping your short Vega position. 

 

August 2011 Case Study

 

We certainly saw plenty of upside in the recent years.  But as we all know, the market tends to take the stairs up and the elevator down.  Steady Condors is short Vega, and I thought it would be a good example to show the backtested example of the Steady Condors trade during the August 2011 correction/crash.

 

The trade began like normal on July 6, 2011. 44 DTE.  Note that RUT was at 844.

 

Aug11 trade launch.png

 

No adjustments were necessary until 8 days into the trade when RUT was at 832.  Interesting though was RUT had first moved up to nearly 860 before starting its descent.  The short leg of the put debit spread was rolled down 20 points. Business as usual.

 

Adj1.png

 

On July 18, 32 DTE and 12 DIT, another debit spread was added (one other had also been added a few days prior) and the call credit spreads were taken off for 20 cents. RUT at 816, down about 1 standard deviation since entering the trade.  Being down 1 standard deviation in 12 days isn't necessarily concerning, but RUT has declined over 40 points from it's high.  PnL is in good shape, up about 1%.  

 

Adj2.png

 

On July 27, 21 DIT, RUT is at 806 and another debit spread is added (rolling down the 800 short to 780). At this point the move down is still reasonable (around 1 standard deviation after 21 days).  PnL is in good shape up about 2% at this point.  The debit spread adjustments are causing the trade to look more like a bearish butterfly than a condor.  No additional long puts have been necessary yet at this point.

 

adj3.png

 

Skipping ahead to Aug 2, 27 DIT and 17 DTE, RUT is now at 783.  A few more debit spreads have been added at this point.  The idea is to simply keep managing position delta as RUT moves further down.  PnL is in great shape, closing in on target profit, up close to 4%.  In situations like this I will consider going for more profit because it's possible to make significantly higher returns when the trade finishes under the "wing".  One or two months per year we can usually get 5%+ out of the MIC.

 

adj4.png

 

Later in the day on Aug 2 position delta reached the adjustment target again so at this point a long put was added.  Rational for the long put (compared to yet another debit spread) was as follows...1. There is more than enough potential profit and theta in the trade 2. This was the second adjustment in the same day with the daily move over 1.5 SD 3. RUT has moved down 66 points since trade launch and 82 points since the high. 4. The short leg of the put credit spreads are now carrying a delta of 30 increasing the short gamma of the position. 

 

adj5.png

 

One day later on Aug 3 another long put was needed.  It would certainly be reasonable to take profits at this point, the key is to keep the t+0 line as flat as possible while maintaining as much theta as possible.  Note how flat the t+0 line is, and also how it curves up if a serious crash would occur.  Translation: minimal fear of additional downside.

 

adj6.png

 

One day later on Aug 4 with RUT at 752 the trade was taken off for target profit of 5% and because RUT touched the short put strike, and theta was now negative. IV had increased 56% in the 29 DIT and the total move represented over 2 standard deviations.  Max margin at the beginning of the trade was just over $26,000, and by the end of the trade margin was down to less than $17,000.

 

adj7.png

 

Just to show the power of risk management, the next picture is the original trade with no adjustments.  Although the setup is important, it's the adjustments that make the difference.  Without them, the trade would have been down 22% at the point it was taken off for target profit.

 

WO adjustments down 22%.png

 

One last interesting point...On Monday Aug 8 RUT closed down 64 points at 650.  If you wouldn't have taken the trade off on the 4th the trade would actually have been up 67% at the end of the day on the 8th.  

 

67% Aug8.png

 

Frankly I'm not familiar with another variation of Iron Condor that can actually make a gain after the index declines by 11%+.

 

Note: our current setup is slightly different, but the general principle is very similar.

 

 

Related articles:

 

Want to learn more?

 

Start Your Free Trial

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Are Covered Calls a ‘Sure Thing?’

    Most covered call writers enjoy the regularity and reliability of the position. In the majority of cases, the covered call will be profitable, even when underlying shares are called away. This assumes that the strike is higher than the basis in the underlying, and that the call writer understands the real limitations to the strategy.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 290 views
  • Lessons from Bill Ackman's comeback

    Bill Ackman is an American investor, hedge fund manager and philanthropist. He is the founder and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund management company. Ackman is considered by some to be a contrarian investor but considers himself an activist investor.

    By Kim,

    • 1 comment
    • 1,518 views
  • Steady Futures 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Futures began trading the 50K portfolio in July 2019. It produced a 8.5% return during its 6 months of performance (18.0% annualized). We had three goals when we developed this system. First, we wanted a robust system that benefits from turmoil in the markets.

    By RapperT,

    • 0 comments
    • 240 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 - Year In Review

    2019 marks our 8th year as a public service. It was a good year overall. We closed 151 winners out of 232 trades. Our model portfolio produced 41.7% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only two losing months in 2019. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 344 views
  • Momentum 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Momentum had an excellent first year of publication, producing significant gains in both of the published strategies. The most popular strategy writes (sells) out of the money puts on equity indexes and ETF’s, and returned 19.1% for the year, beating our benchmark by approximately 5.5%.

    By Jesse,

    • 1 comment
    • 452 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options model portfolio produced 41.7% gain in 2019. This is a very good return by any standards, but well below our long term returns. In the name of full transparency and our continuous learning, we are providing a full analysis of the 2019 numbers.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,297 views
  • Anchor 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options now has a full year of trading the Leveraged Anchor Account under its belt. (Technically since today is December 30, the values used herein are one day off.) To say things went as designed is an understatement - the strategy outperformed the S&P 500 in 2019 by 7.2% while being hedged.

    By cwelsh,

    • 1 comment
    • 614 views
  • A Reliable Method for Picking the Underlying

    A lot of emphasis is placed on selection of one strategy over another. Are you conservative or a speculator? Are you trying to make fast money or hedging equity positions? In fact, this is a primary concern among traders. The strategy should match the risk profile, of course. But there is much more to how and why you trade options.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 395 views
  • Total Stock Market Index Funds: A Diversification Illusion?

    I’m a fan of index funds and diversification. Low costs, low turnover, and passively managed exposure to thousands of stocks make Total Stock Market (TSM) index funds great starting points for stock market exposure. In fact, most investor portfolios I see are insufficiently diversified to a point where a TSM index fund would be a material improvement.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 568 views
  • Back to the Basics: How to Get Started Trading Options

    To those of us involved in the Steady Options community, options trading is almost second nature. But most investors, and even most traders, don’t trade options. There may be a variety of reasons why this is the case, but I believe it’s mostly related to the learning curve of understanding a completely new concept.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 359 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


I am an experienced option trader FWIW..  I went through the Iron Condor 2011 case study with the PNL at the end showing -2700 while you talk of a 5% return.  Can you explain?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Guest Jay said:

I am an experienced option trader FWIW..  I went through the Iron Condor 2011 case study with the PNL at the end showing -2700 while you talk of a 5% return.  Can you explain?

This one threw me for a loop when I first saw it, too. The full details of the trade are not explained. The graphs are showing the realized losses, but not the unrealized gains, so you can't tell what the actual cumulative gain is until the end when the author explains that they hit their 5% profit target on $26k margin. So, there was obviously a $4k unrealized gain just before they closed, which when added to the $2,700 realized loss, became an overall gain of $1,300 (5% of $26k).

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Kim said:

Actually ONE software shows total P/L, realized and unrealized. The case study was done by @Jesse, I asked him to comment. But making adjustments at different time of the day when the market is moving fast can make a big difference.

Ah, well I guess I'm still thrown for a loop then. Thanks for the info.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@greenspan76, The last image you are referring to is showing -2700 of realized PnL at that point, but +17,608 of total PnL if the trade were completely closed at that point. The total trade PnL is the important number. 

The reason a positive trade PnL like this can happen is simply from being net long puts (meaning larger total quantity of long puts than shot puts). If you simulate a trade like this, you'll see the upward sloping smile on the left side of the graph in the event of a large move down and increase in IV. Those very small puts bought as a cheap hedge at launch and at adjustment points start to significantly expand in premium, flattening out the risk of the trade.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @Jesse

I just realized the source of the confusion.

The -2700 number on the left upper corner shows realized P/L. But the number on the central column on the bottom shows $1,377 which is the total P/L (realized and unrealized), and this the final P/L number after the trade is closed.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs Expertido