SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Accurate Expiration Counting


Options traders are rightfully concerned with the number of days to expiration of an option. At the time the position is opened, whether long or short, the issue of time decay must be at the forefront of risk evaluation. But is this performed accurately?

Most listings report days to expiration on a calendar basis. A one-week expiration is expressed as 7 days, even though only 5 trading days remain. The defense of using calendar days is because time decay continues to occur even on days when markets are closed. For example, between the Friday prior to expiration (with 7 days remaining) and Monday (one session later but 3 calendar days later), about one-third of remaining time value typically disappears. For those writing short-term short positions, this is a significant fact. By selling a position on Friday and opening to close on Monday or Tuesday, a profitable result is more likely than not. This assumes no significant movement in the underlying.
 

Although the opportunity is a great one, so is the risk. With three days transpiring between Friday and Monday, many changes are possible. The evolution of option pricing is not dependent solely on time decay. Volatility is also a factor.


However, volatility is not as severe a risk factor on weekends as many traders believe. It is true that changes can occur, and that a logical position could end up losing due to unexpected changes, often for reasons not fully understood. The “weekend effect” occurs due to lack of market activity. With markets closed, when large volume of selling takes place on Friday, lower implied volatility follows on Saturday and Sunday. The danger in this is relying on the weekend effect, because on Monday, volatility will be likely to return to normal. This could create a sort of “catching up” effect between the two trading days.


Three factors should be kept in mind when going short on Friday before expiration: timing of opening the short position on Friday, moneyness of the option, and liquidity of a position.


Timing: If the underlying is relatively dormant, as you would expect on the weekend, a short position will become profitable due to losing one-third of its remaining time value. However, this all depends on when positions are opened on Friday. Selling late in the day is not desirable, because by then most short traders have already opened short positions. Selling late may create an immediate gain but selling earlier in the session places the short trader at an advantage. This explains why it occurs that selling near Friday’s close results in little or no change by Monday’s open. The best outcome is more likely by selling to open early on Friday and buying to close late on Monday. In effect, this sets up close to two trading days over a four-day span.


Moneyness: Another consideration is moneyness of the option. A short-term short position at the money is likely to gain the most, compared to other strikes. The ultra-conservative idea of selling OTM options the week before expiration is based on the rationale that time value declines but gaining intrinsic value is also difficult. However, the decline in time value is the core issue in selecting the moneyness of the option.


Liquidity: Finally, when bid and ask are exceptionally wide apart, the option is illiquid. Even the reported levels of bid and ask do not always exist in the market and are not possible to get in a trade. Most traders have experienced the frustration of delayed or unexecuted trades due to this problem. It typically happens for deep ITM options, later-expiring positions, and options on much smaller than average stocks. The “zone” for trading should be limited to those on underlying issues with healthy option activity and open interest, to maximize how expiration and time decay work out.


The observation of how the weekend effect is expected to work may be distorted by the decision to count or not count weekends in longer-term volatility analysis. For example, the CBOE’s VIX is calculated using 365 days, but most options analysts prefer limiting their studies to the 252 trading days in a year. This is a difference of about 30% in terms of the number of days used to study volatility (and time decay). The result is that the VIX tends to exaggerate market volatility because it counts weekends when volatility levels are lower than on weekdays.


The difference between calendar days and market days should not be ignored because the assumed outcomes under each method can be vastly different. Markets are typically open for 6 ½ hours each trading day but closed for 17 ½ hours. Over the weekend, the hours closed add up to 65 ½ hours. This difference in time – 17 ½ versus 65 ½ -- may explain why weekend time decay should never be overlooked as a timing factor for short trading close to expiration.


The use of weekends as part of time decay analysis is also distorted by the different timing between last trading day (Friday) and expiration day (Saturday). Should expiration Saturday be included in thew analysis, considering that trading ends the day before? Because of the difference in just which days are counted is substantial, volatility analysis and expected time decay are distorted.


Short positions might not perform as expected by traders trying to take advantage of the weekend effect. There are many reasons for the disappointment, mostly related to timing of entry and exit, moneyness, and liquidity, A simplified assumption might be that “all options lose one-third of their value between Friday and Monday before expiration,” but this is not true. Toi truly benefit from this fact of time decay selection is the key. The option should be opened and closed at maximum timing (early Friday and late Monday); it should be as close as possible to the money; and it should be a liquid position, meaning the spread between bid and ask should be as narrow as possible.

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his website at Thomsett Publishing as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.

 
Related articles

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

12 Years CAGR of 114.5%

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Optimizing Portfolio Growth: Managing Capital and Liabilities in Modern Tax Planning

    Growing your investment portfolio involves more than just picking winners. While strong returns are the goal, many investors overlook a critical factor that significantly impacts their net worth: tax planning. Managing your capital and liabilities with taxes in mind isn't just about saving money in April. It's a year-round strategy that can accelerate your portfolio's growth and help you keep more of what you earn.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 339 views
  • Expanded Trading Hours for Select Equity Options

    The Cboe Options Exchange will start offering expanded trading hours for select high-liquidity single-stock equity options. The schedule features a morning Global Trading Hours (GTH) session from 7:30 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. ET and an afternoon Curb session from 4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 531 views
  • How LEAPS Differ From Short-Term Options

    LEAPS stands for Long-Term Equity Anticipation Security. Which is just a long-dated option, typically referring to those with expirations more than a year out. There’s no technical difference between LEAPS and shorter-term options other than the expiration date. They’re traded on the same exchanges and have the same rules surrounding margin and whatnot.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 31085 views
  • Why Not to Hold Strangles Through Earnings

    In my previous article, I described a strategy of buying a long strangle a few days before earnings and selling them just before earnings. In this article, I will show why it might be not a good idea to keep those strangles through earnings.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 6047 views
  • Pre-Earnings Entry Price: What 31,000 Cycles Say

    Every card in the scanner carries a block called How expensive is this entry? It compares what you would pay today against what the same setup cost on the same ticker at the same point in past cycles. I built that block in August. It reads well. But a reading that looks sensible and a reading that predicts something are different things, and until last week I had only the first.

     

    By Romuald,

    • 3 comments
    • 589 views
  • Expensive Compared to What?

    A trader looks at a pre-earnings straddle and asks whether it is expensive. It is the right instinct and the wrong question, because the word carries no meaning on its own. Expensive against what? A $12 straddle on a $200 stock is not expensive or cheap. It is $12.

    By Romuald,

    • 0 comments
    • 493 views
  • Beyond Strategies: What Options Traders Should Know

    Options education almost always begins with structures. Traders learn vertical spreads, calendars, butterflies, condors, covered calls and straddles, study the expiration diagrams, work out maximum profit and loss, and build a sense of the conditions each structure is supposed to suit. That foundation is necessary and there is no way around it.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1012 views
  • SPX vs SPY Options: Which One Should You Trade? (2026 Guide)

    Both SPX and SPY options give you exposure to the S&P 500. They track the same 500 stocks, move nearly tick-for-tick, and offer the same core strategies — credit spreads, iron condors, butterflies, and 0DTE trades. Yet the two products settle differently, are taxed differently, and carry very different assignment risks.

    By krisbee,

    • 0 comments
    • 4991 views
  • Strike Price Effects Or Pinning Revisted

    Loyal readers of this blog will recall my post from 2019 “Pinning Down the ‘Option Pinning’”. If you have not heard of pinning have a look at that article as – spoiler – everything in it as well as Jeff Augen’s observations in his books which are referenced is still valid.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 2263 views
  • Could This Strategy Be The Holy Grail Of Investing?

    This is a reprint of my Seeking Alpha article from 2013. If you have SA subscription, you can read the full article including hundreds of comments here. For the record, the strategy implementation has changed since then, but the principle remains the same. You can read more here

    By Kim,

    • 6 comments
    • 5689 views

  Report Article


We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...