SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Lookback Options


Most traders would agree that it would be a great advantage to decide whether to exercise an option with knowledge about past performance. Being aware of the odds an option will expire worthless gives the trader a significant advantage.

This is where the lookback option enters the picture. Also called a hindsight option, the lookback reduces the uncertainties of timing. In exchange, the lookback is more expensive than the standard option contract.


These contracts are bought over the counter (OTC) rather than on one of the commonly used exchanges. Once the option is purchased or sold, the trader can review underlying price over the entire life of the option and may exercise based on the best available price of the underlying. It makes sense to exercise at the widest price separating strike and underlying price.


Lookbacks are cash settled at execution. A buyer receives cash based on the most beneficial price level of the underlying over the life of the option; sellers pay the lowest possible settlement price on the same basis. If a profit is earned, the trader benefits; if a loss, the trader pays the difference.


Lookbacks come in two forms, fixed and floating. With a fixed strike, the strike itself is set and cannot be changed. This is just like most standard options. However, the major difference is that the trader can settle by picking the most profitable underlying price during the time the option was open (or picking the lowest possible net loss). Settlement occurs based on this price selection rather than based on the more commonly applied current strike and underlying price.


A floating strike involves setting the strike at the point of maturity, to the most advantageous underlying price realized during the life of the option. A lookback call would be set at the lowest underlying price, and a lookback put at the highest underlying price. Settlement then takes place against current market price versus the floating strike.

A fixed lookback solves the problem of when to exit the market; and a floating lookback solves the problem of when to enter. This enables a trader to better manage timing on one side or the other. As anyone can imagine, traders are expected to pay a higher price for options granting these benefits, than would be paid for a non-exotic call or put based on the traditional action of strike and underlying price.


Example: An underlying stock trades currently at $25, and this price exists at both the start and finish on an option’s life. During this time, the highest price was $30 per share and the lowest was $20. With a fixed strike lookback option, the strike price will be set at $25. The best available price was $30. The net profit is $5 per share: $30 - $25 = $5.


With a floating strike lookback, the lowest price was $20, and maturity was $25. The holder’s profit is also $5: $25 - $20 = $5. The profit for each version is identical because the underlying moved the same number of points above and below the strike, during the holding period.


Example: Assuming a different set of outcomes, the stock had the same high of $30 per share and low of $40; but the closing price was $27.50, a net gain of $2.50. In a fixed strike lookback, the highest price was $30, and the strike was $25 Profit was $5: $30 - $25 = $5. But with a floating lookback, strike was $27.50 at maturity. The lowest price during the period was $20, so profit was $7.50: $$27.50 - $20 = $7.50.


By adjusting assumed opening, closing, highest, and lowest prices, it can be calculated how the outcome will appear. For either call or put, if the lookback never moves in the money, the outcome would be a net loss; but because of the lookback feature, this loss is set at the lowest possible level. In either case (profit or loss), the result is the optimal that can be realized.


With maximized profits or minimalized losses, the chronic problem of timing is solved, either for entry or for exit. A trader may select a fixed or floating contract based on the premium cost of each, as well as of whether entry or exit is perceived as the greater problem. In addition, chances of worthless expiration for a long option are greatly reduced, further explaining why lookbacks are more expensive than other option contracts. A trader pays for the safer assurances involved with a lookback contract.


The lookback is described as path dependent because the outcome (profit or loss) is determined not only by the direction of underlying price movement, but also by the extent of that movement. The all too common realization by traders that their timing was poor, is solved by the lookback. This explains the motivation for trading the lookback. It provides a form of insurance that profit or loss will be optimal, but it remains uncertain whether fixed or floating will be better in each case. The trader must decide individually which makes more sense. This decision often depends largely on the characteristics of the underling – its historic volatility, long-term price range, and speed of price change. Although this selection describes all options, with the lookback, traders can reduce the uncertainties of market timing, for which they pay for the insurance lookbacks provide.


One of the most chronic problems traders face is deciding when to exit. If too soon, added profits can be missed; if too late, previous paper profits may evaporate. With the lookback these problems are eliminated completely. It may be thought of as a type of “remorse insurance.” Every trader understands all too well that feeling of remorse resulting from poor timing.


There is a premium to be paid for this benefit. The typical lookback option may cost as much as twice the cost of a typical European style contract. Even so, there is an added benefit to the fixed lookback. When the underlying reaches a new high (for a call) or low (for a put) since the date the option was entered, a payoff is locked in for the option. This is the minimum the treader will realize. It may end up being higher if underlying price continues to rise (for the call) or fall (for the put). Higher volatility is advantageous for the trader since this translates into more variability in the underlying price.
 

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his website at Thomsett Publishing as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook. 

 

Related articles:

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

12 Years CAGR of 114.5%

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Expanded Trading Hours for Select Equity Options

    The Cboe Options Exchange will start offering expanded trading hours for select high-liquidity single-stock equity options. The schedule features a morning Global Trading Hours (GTH) session from 7:30 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. ET and an afternoon Curb session from 4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 357 views
  • How LEAPS Differ From Short-Term Options

    LEAPS stands for Long-Term Equity Anticipation Security. Which is just a long-dated option, typically referring to those with expirations more than a year out. There’s no technical difference between LEAPS and shorter-term options other than the expiration date. They’re traded on the same exchanges and have the same rules surrounding margin and whatnot.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 30867 views
  • Why Not to Hold Strangles Through Earnings

    In my previous article, I described a strategy of buying a long strangle a few days before earnings and selling them just before earnings. In this article, I will show why it might be not a good idea to keep those strangles through earnings.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 5947 views
  • Pre-Earnings Entry Price: What 31,000 Cycles Say

    Every card in the scanner carries a block called How expensive is this entry? It compares what you would pay today against what the same setup cost on the same ticker at the same point in past cycles. I built that block in August. It reads well. But a reading that looks sensible and a reading that predicts something are different things, and until last week I had only the first.

     

    By Romuald,

    • 3 comments
    • 428 views
  • Expensive Compared to What?

    A trader looks at a pre-earnings straddle and asks whether it is expensive. It is the right instinct and the wrong question, because the word carries no meaning on its own. Expensive against what? A $12 straddle on a $200 stock is not expensive or cheap. It is $12.

    By Romuald,

    • 0 comments
    • 389 views
  • Beyond Strategies: What Options Traders Should Know

    Options education almost always begins with structures. Traders learn vertical spreads, calendars, butterflies, condors, covered calls and straddles, study the expiration diagrams, work out maximum profit and loss, and build a sense of the conditions each structure is supposed to suit. That foundation is necessary and there is no way around it.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 856 views
  • SPX vs SPY Options: Which One Should You Trade? (2026 Guide)

    Both SPX and SPY options give you exposure to the S&P 500. They track the same 500 stocks, move nearly tick-for-tick, and offer the same core strategies — credit spreads, iron condors, butterflies, and 0DTE trades. Yet the two products settle differently, are taxed differently, and carry very different assignment risks.

    By krisbee,

    • 0 comments
    • 4682 views
  • Strike Price Effects Or Pinning Revisted

    Loyal readers of this blog will recall my post from 2019 “Pinning Down the ‘Option Pinning’”. If you have not heard of pinning have a look at that article as – spoiler – everything in it as well as Jeff Augen’s observations in his books which are referenced is still valid.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 2105 views
  • Could This Strategy Be The Holy Grail Of Investing?

    This is a reprint of my Seeking Alpha article from 2013. If you have SA subscription, you can read the full article including hundreds of comments here. For the record, the strategy implementation has changed since then, but the principle remains the same. You can read more here

    By Kim,

    • 6 comments
    • 5566 views
  • Why Traders Need Brokers: An Important Alliance

    Trading the financial markets can be rewarding, but it also offers its fair share of complexities and obstacles. When faced with thousands of financial instruments, fluctuating markets, and a range of platforms at their disposal, traders can feel overwhelmed.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 2206 views

  Report Article


We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...