SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Ratchet Options


The “ratchet option” is so-called because as a series, each successive position activates when the previous option has expired. The trader ratchets up (or down) to the next position. Each one is set up to be as close to the money as possible. It has many names, including cliquet, moving strike, ladder, lock-in, or reset option.

The ratchet is like the better-known Asian option. In this version, payoff relies on the average price of the underlying over a predetermined period. This contrasts with American and European options, in which payoff depends on underlying price at maturity (or during the period it is active). The trader can buy or sell the underlying at the average price rather than the current price. It has been averaged up or down.


The ratchet, also called a cliquet option, sets up payout over a period, to be set according to average price. But the math is not the same as the Asian option because no payout can occur at a level of zero for options that become worthless.


The ratchet locks in gains if predetermined underlying prices (ratchets) are reached. These prices, or rungs in the pricing ladder, are set at specific price differences above strike (for the call) or below strike (for the put). These often are set in one-dollar increments. For an underlying of $35, for example, a ratchet call’s rungs may be $36, $37, and $38. For a ratchet put, the rungs will be $34, $33, and $32.


At maturity, the payoff will be the difference between the farthest rung reached, and exercise price. If the option does not reach any of the rungs, it expires worthless. For example, if a ratchet call reaches $37, payoff will be $2 per contract, regardless of how far underlying price then declines. For a ratchet put, the opposite is true. If the underlying declines from price of $35 down to $34, payoff will be $1 even if the underlying later rebounds. In both cases, the gain is locked in and will be paid.


The number of payout settlements is identified in the contract. For example, za one-year ratchet with four payout dates will be made quarterly. A 3-month option with 3 payouts dates would occur once per month. Traders can opt to receive payments at the point of each expiration, or at the conclusion of the full period, at final maturity. Because each ratchet is set based on current underlying price, the earned payout is fixed at that point.


Because payout depends on volatility of the underlying, the advantage to a ratchet position is greatest when volatility is high. Of course, the profitability also relies on direction of underlying movement. If a ratchet is set up and the identified levels are never reached, the position expires worthless – at least for each individual ratchet. Traders may enter a position with several payouts and accept a loss on some in exchange for exposure to profits on others.


Because each ratchet’s strike is determined by the current underlying value, a loss is not final but part of a series. Higher than average volatility improves potential for profitable outcomes. For underlying issues that tend to offset gains with losses, the potential overall, profit from the ratchet adds an element of potential for seen with individual options.


With this observation in mind, an underlying with high volatility is preferable for the ratchet option, and an underlying with constant or low volatility will not perform as well. The difficulty in this is knowing in advance how volatility will occur. Traders would prefer to know which underlying issues are high or low volatility, but this is not possible. Time and again, past volatility behavior does not mandate future behavior. However, it does provide a starting point.


As a matter of probability, chances are that an issue with high volatility will continue to exhibit high volatility, and one with low volatility will be likely to continue that pattern as well. It is not a guarantee, but a likely result. Traders who have tracked Gamma over many  months or even years, might decide to enter a ratchet position based on either calls or puts (or a combination using both) for notably high-Gamma issues. The likely continuation of high Gamma outcomes is stronger in this case, than it would be for an issue with constant or inconsistent Gamma.
 

For many types of options, including the ratchet, are subject to the statistical concept of regression toward the mean. This is an observation that even for the most random events, an outcome above or below the mean (average) is likely to be following by a reversal back toward expectations. Charles Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton first observed this through his study of physical traits which has become known as eugenics. Galton wrote a book called Heredity Genius in 1869, made the point that sons who were much taller than their fathers were not likely to have sons who were taller than them, but more likely to have sons who were shorter (regressive). This also applied to IQ, artistic abilities, and of course, options and stock prices. A rise in price is not necessarily followed by another rise, for example. And this is where the ratchet option can be valuable.


Based on Galton’s observed regression toward the mean, it is likely that an underlying (even one that rises or falls significantly over time) is likely to exhibit a series of price moves that occur first in one direction, and then in the other. The ratchet exploits the likelihood of regression toward the mean, especially for price behavior within one year or less. The longer-term trends may be bullish or bearish, but for most option trades, regression can help exploit the statistical likely outcomes.
 

This solves the problem every trader faces: Will the short-term price of the underlying rise or fall? Traders cannot rely on past price movement, or on known timing of earnings, dividends, and other influences on the price. By entering a series of successive positions with strikes determined by current price rather than past movement, traders can enhance their trading experiences and payoffs.

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his website at Thomsett Publishing as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.
 

Related articles:

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

12 Years CAGR of 114.5%

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Optimizing Portfolio Growth: Managing Capital and Liabilities in Modern Tax Planning

    Growing your investment portfolio involves more than just picking winners. While strong returns are the goal, many investors overlook a critical factor that significantly impacts their net worth: tax planning. Managing your capital and liabilities with taxes in mind isn't just about saving money in April. It's a year-round strategy that can accelerate your portfolio's growth and help you keep more of what you earn.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 441 views
  • Expanded Trading Hours for Select Equity Options

    The Cboe Options Exchange will start offering expanded trading hours for select high-liquidity single-stock equity options. The schedule features a morning Global Trading Hours (GTH) session from 7:30 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. ET and an afternoon Curb session from 4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 591 views
  • How LEAPS Differ From Short-Term Options

    LEAPS stands for Long-Term Equity Anticipation Security. Which is just a long-dated option, typically referring to those with expirations more than a year out. There’s no technical difference between LEAPS and shorter-term options other than the expiration date. They’re traded on the same exchanges and have the same rules surrounding margin and whatnot.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 31149 views
  • Why Not to Hold Strangles Through Earnings

    In my previous article, I described a strategy of buying a long strangle a few days before earnings and selling them just before earnings. In this article, I will show why it might be not a good idea to keep those strangles through earnings.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 6080 views
  • Pre-Earnings Entry Price: What 31,000 Cycles Say

    Every card in the scanner carries a block called How expensive is this entry? It compares what you would pay today against what the same setup cost on the same ticker at the same point in past cycles. I built that block in August. It reads well. But a reading that looks sensible and a reading that predicts something are different things, and until last week I had only the first.

     

    By Romuald,

    • 3 comments
    • 636 views
  • Expensive Compared to What?

    A trader looks at a pre-earnings straddle and asks whether it is expensive. It is the right instinct and the wrong question, because the word carries no meaning on its own. Expensive against what? A $12 straddle on a $200 stock is not expensive or cheap. It is $12.

    By Romuald,

    • 0 comments
    • 528 views
  • Beyond Strategies: What Options Traders Should Know

    Options education almost always begins with structures. Traders learn vertical spreads, calendars, butterflies, condors, covered calls and straddles, study the expiration diagrams, work out maximum profit and loss, and build a sense of the conditions each structure is supposed to suit. That foundation is necessary and there is no way around it.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1055 views
  • SPX vs SPY Options: Which One Should You Trade? (2026 Guide)

    Both SPX and SPY options give you exposure to the S&P 500. They track the same 500 stocks, move nearly tick-for-tick, and offer the same core strategies — credit spreads, iron condors, butterflies, and 0DTE trades. Yet the two products settle differently, are taxed differently, and carry very different assignment risks.

    By krisbee,

    • 0 comments
    • 5119 views
  • Strike Price Effects Or Pinning Revisted

    Loyal readers of this blog will recall my post from 2019 “Pinning Down the ‘Option Pinning’”. If you have not heard of pinning have a look at that article as – spoiler – everything in it as well as Jeff Augen’s observations in his books which are referenced is still valid.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 2311 views
  • Could This Strategy Be The Holy Grail Of Investing?

    This is a reprint of my Seeking Alpha article from 2013. If you have SA subscription, you can read the full article including hundreds of comments here. For the record, the strategy implementation has changed since then, but the principle remains the same. You can read more here

    By Kim,

    • 6 comments
    • 5732 views

  Report Article


We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...