SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Should You Hedge or Diversify?


Using the most popular S&P 500 ETF (SPY) to represent the US stock market, this article will look at different ways to manage equity market risk using historical ETF and options data from ORATS Wheel since 2007. We will analyze the following unhedged, hedged and allocation choices:

  1. Unhedged exposure to SPY.
  2. Fully hedged exposure with at the money puts.
  3. Partially hedged exposure with out of the money puts.
  4. And a more simple approach of reduced allocation to SPY with the proceeds allocated to an intermediate term US Treasury ETF (IEI).
     

In the following data, I’m showing the hedged portfolios compared to the stock/bond portfolios scaled to have similar volatility. The option hedge parameters entered into the ORATS backtester targets the contract closest to one year from expiration and rolls the contracts at 45 days from expiration. The idea of going further out in time and rolling prior to expiration is to reduce the impact of negative theta (time decay) that you experience with long puts. I did not attempt to optimize the parameters that would result in the best hedging results. With the stock/bond portfolios, rebalancing is assumed to occur based on 5/25 rebalancing bands that can be replicated using Portfolio Visualizer and all results include the reinvestment of dividends. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results. Now to the data.

 

1608471669_ScreenShot2020-05-11at10_41_50AM.png.f9a337da70958ab6e26d0044dc380029.png

 

What we see is not surprising based on published research I’ve reviewed from multiple sources. Hedging with puts has been documented to be inefficient due to the volatility risk premium (VRP) built into option prices, making it more effective to simply lower equity allocation and use the proceeds to buy safe bonds (IEI).  A stock/bond ETF or mutual fund portfolio is also much easier and less costly to manage. If buying puts produces poor long-term risk-adjusted results, it then means that selling them may produce attractive long-term risk-adjusted returns. That is the strategy we attempt to capitalize on in the Steady Momentum PutWrite service.

 

In the AQR podcast episode “diversify or hedge?”, the hosts discuss how a portfolio of equities and cash (or safe bonds, as in my example) produces better long-term results than hedging with puts. AQR also has a research paper titled, “Pathetic Protection: The Elusive Benefits of Protective Puts” which concludes that “because of path dependent outcomes and option expensiveness, put options may do more harm than good.

 

An alternative approach to protection that investors can take is increasing diversification. ”Hedging with puts" can still be a rational decision if an investor wants to protect from a near or complete loss of value in the stock market (and is willing to pay for it), at which point the outcomes would favor the hedging approach as opposed to the stock/bond approach. The goal of this article is to simply make investors more aware of the different choices they can make with regard to risk management and the expected outcomes related to those choices.

 

Jesse Blom is a licensed investment advisor and Vice President of Lorintine Capital, LP. He provides investment advice to clients all over the United States and around the world. Jesse has been in financial services since 2008 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. Jesse has a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Oral Roberts University. Jesse manages the Steady Momentum service, and regularly incorporates options into client portfolios.


Related articles

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Options on Options

    Traders have long known that options can be opened on many different securities. Among the most ingenious of these are options on options. There are four types of these: call on a call (CoC), a call on a put (CoP), a put on a call (PoC), and a put on a put (PoP).

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 153 views
  • The Wheel Trade

    The “wheel” trade is variously described as a beginner’s strategy, a combination to exploit features of both calls and puts, and as “perfect” solution to the well-known risks of shorting calls, even when covered. The wheel could be defined as any of these, but a larger question should be: Is the wheel an elegant method for making profits consistently, or just a gimmick?

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 460 views
  • Chooser Options

    Most options traders see their world as a choice between calls or puts, alone or in various combinations. But there is more. With a chooser option, traders can open a position and decide later whether it will be a call or a put. This is also called an as you like it option.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 399 views
  • Leveraged Anchor 2020 Year In Review

    Steady Options has now been trading the Leveraged Anchor strategy for two years, and, somewhat to my surprise, 2020 went even better than 2019. On the year, Leveraged Anchor was up 31.7%, while the total return of the S&P 500 was 18.4%.

    By cwelsh,

    • 2 comments
    • 1,171 views
  • Ratchet Options

    The “ratchet option” is so-called because as a series, each successive position activates when the previous option has expired. The trader ratchets up (or down) to the next position. Each one is set up to be as close to the money as possible. It has many names, including cliquet, moving strike, ladder, lock-in, or reset option.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 421 views
  • Steady Momentum 2020 Year in Review

    Steady Momentum Put Write (SMPW) is one of the available subscription services at Steady Options. We launched the strategy in early 2019, so we now have two years of performance to evaluate on both an absolute basis and relative to the strategy’s benchmark, PUTW (WisdomTree CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Strategy Fund). 

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 401 views
  • SteadyOptions 2020 Year In Review

    2020 marks our 9th year as a public trading service. It was an excellent year for us. We closed 130 winners out of 194 trades. Our model portfolio produced 117.1% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only three losing months in 2020. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 684 views
  • The Jump-Diffusion Pricing Formula

    One of the more complex areas of options analysis involves pricing formulas. The best known among these is the Black Scholes Model (BSM). This is a widely cited method for attempting to determine what the option’s premium should be, but it is deeply flawed.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 444 views
  • Ranges of Exotic Options

    The standard call and put are well known to all option traders, but many exotic and more advanced options can also be opened. Whether a specific broker allows trading in these, and whether a trader has the necessary trading level, are questions to be addressed. This article just defines many of the exotic options that are possible.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 528 views
  • What To Do Before Committing To Trading

    Trading cryptocurrency has become a very popular and significant part of life. While it’s not for everyone, it’s certainly for an awful lot of people. There’s money to be made and areas to be invested in, and people will do what they can to make either a quick buck or an amazing figure.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 689 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


Thank you @Jessefor another great article.

How about trying to combine two approaches: hedge but replace SPY with naked puts? If you sell the puts slightly ITM (maybe 1%) every month, you should still keep some nice upside in case SPY rallies, get some premium to pay for the long puts, without sacrificing returns? Kind of a mix between Anchor and Momentum.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 4/24/2020 at 3:40 PM, Kim said:

Thank you @Jessefor another great article.

How about trying to combine two approaches: hedge but replace SPY with naked puts? If you sell the puts slightly ITM (maybe 1%) every month, you should still keep some nice upside in case SPY rallies, get some premium to pay for the long puts, without sacrificing returns? Kind of a mix between Anchor and Momentum.

 

Using ORATS again, this is what a combination of a 55 delta short put and 30 delta long put looks like since 2007:

CAGR: 3.5%
Volatility: 6.13%
Max DD: 12.82%
Sharpe: 0.57

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Kim said:

Not very encouraging..

 

There may be better parameters to run the long put hedge. If you want me to test any other combinations of entries and exits for the hedge, I'm happy to do so. For example, shorter or longer DTE entries as well as exits. A 365 DTE entry and 45 DTE exit made sense to me for managing the negative theta, but there might be different parameters that work better. Tradeoffs to everything, of course.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'm doing for my personal portfolio is the following:

  • Selling SPX puts one month out around 1% ITM
  • Spending 1% of the portfolio on cheap OTM puts (around 2-3 delta) spread over 6-24 months

During the current meltdown, the long puts provided me a very protection dues to the fact that VIX exploded to 80+. I'm not sure how easy it is to test it..

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

They say "We find that if your view is for a large and systemic selloff—greater than what is priced by the market— then a volatility-based hedge can potentially make more sense. For smaller and more-fundamentally driven selloffs, directional hedges via equity options may be the more appropriate choice."

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WayneCthanks for the links, great resources.

I actually looked into VIX calls and compared them to far OTM SPY puts. I looked at the approach of 50 cents trader. Take a look:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/12/the-mysterious-trader-nicknamed-50-cent-made-200-million-last-week-as-the-market-blew-up.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-volatility/big-volatility-options-trade-points-to-mystery-investor-50-cent-idUSKBN1ZS0HW

The strategy involves buying next month OTM VIX calls around 50 cents. 

It paid of very well in the last crash, but the crash was very sharp and quick, and VIX reached 80+ in a matter of few weeks. In case of more gradual decline, the hedge would be less effective, and after the initial decline, the following months VIX futures will become very expensive and not economical for hedging.

Of course you can spread the hedge over few months, but the following months become too expensive. For example, under "calm" markets (VIX in low teens) you can buy the following month 25 calls for 50 cents. But if you go 6-9 months out, then to spend only 50 cents you will need to go up to 40-45 strike.

But maybe some mix of SPY puts and VIX calls can make sense.

Going back to the article, if we take the current crash, we can see that hedging (as represented by our Anchor strategy) worked better than diversification (as represented by Steady Momentum strategy), at least so far. Both strategies reduced portfolio volatility, but Anchor was actually up at some point in March when SPY was down 30%+. @Jesse would you like to comment?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 5/2/2020 at 7:19 AM, Kim said:

@WayneCthanks for the links, great resources.

I actually looked into VIX calls and compared them to far OTM SPY puts. I looked at the approach of 50 cents trader. Take a look:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/12/the-mysterious-trader-nicknamed-50-cent-made-200-million-last-week-as-the-market-blew-up.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-volatility/big-volatility-options-trade-points-to-mystery-investor-50-cent-idUSKBN1ZS0HW

The strategy involves buying next month OTM VIX calls around 50 cents. 

It paid of very well in the last crash, but the crash was very sharp and quick, and VIX reached 80+ in a matter of few weeks. In case of more gradual decline, the hedge would be less effective, and after the initial decline, the following months VIX futures will become very expensive and not economical for hedging.

Of course you can spread the hedge over few months, but the following months become too expensive. For example, under "calm" markets (VIX in low teens) you can buy the following month 25 calls for 50 cents. But if you go 6-9 months out, then to spend only 50 cents you will need to go up to 40-45 strike.

But maybe some mix of SPY puts and VIX calls can make sense.

Going back to the article, if we take the current crash, we can see that hedging (as represented by our Anchor strategy) worked better than diversification (as represented by Steady Momentum strategy), at least so far. Both strategies reduced portfolio volatility, but Anchor was actually up at some point in March when SPY was down 30%+. @Jesse would you like to comment?

 

I'm waiting for a response from Matt at ORATS about a question related to the backtesting output...I've found a discrepancy that doesn't make sense to me, and might be causing the backtest to be displaying results that are worse than they should based on if you enter the backtest as a "married put" strategy vs. a "protective put" strategy. I backtested based on "married put", but if I change it to "protective put", the results are much better for the hedged strategies. If that turns out to be true, I'll need to update the article with corrected numbers, but until I hear back from Matt I'm not sure so we'll have to standby.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 5/4/2020 at 10:17 AM, Jesse said:

 

I'm waiting for a response from Matt at ORATS about a question related to the backtesting output...I've found a discrepancy that doesn't make sense to me, and might be causing the backtest to be displaying results that are worse than they should based on if you enter the backtest as a "married put" strategy vs. a "protective put" strategy. I backtested based on "married put", but if I change it to "protective put", the results are much better for the hedged strategies. If that turns out to be true, I'll need to update the article with corrected numbers, but until I hear back from Matt I'm not sure so we'll have to standby.

 

I've updated the data in the chart based on discussions with ORATS to make sure the backtest is being simulated properly. The hedged portfolios now looks better than before, although still less attractive on a risk-adjusted basis relative to stock/bond portfolios that have been scaled to have the same volatility as the hedged portfolios. The hedged portfolios also don't factor in the cash outlay required to buy and roll the hedge, so this essentially simulates buying the puts interest free on margin. If that were properly accounted for, by either deducting applicable margin interest, or if not using margin reducing the quantity of SPY, results would be slightly worse than shown.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido