SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Reverse Iron Condor Strategy


The Reverse Iron Condor (RIC) is a limited risk, limited profit trading strategy that is designed to earn a profit when the underlying stock price makes a sharp move in either direction. The RIC Spread is where you buy an Iron Condor Spread from someone who is betting on the underlying stock staying stagnant.

Introduction

 

Reverse Iron Condor Construction

  • Buy 1 OTM Put
  • Sell 1 OTM Put (Lower Strike)
  • Buy 1 OTM Call
  • Sell 1 OTM Call (Higher Strike)

Capture.PNG

 

Reverse Iron Condor has a limited gain and a limited loss potential. The maximum gain It is attained when the underlying stock price drops below the strike price of the short put or rise above or equal to the higher strike price of the short call. In either situation, maximum profit is equal to the difference in strike between the calls (or puts) minus the net debit taken when initiating the trade.

 

Compared to a straddle option strategy, RIC has limited gain potential, but it also needs the stock to move less to be profitable.

 

One of the common uses of the Reverse Iron Condor strategy is betting on a sharp move on one of the high flying stocks after earnings. It can be used on stocks like NFLX, AMZN, GOOG, TSLA, PCLN etc.

 

Example

 

GOOG was scheduled to report earnings on April 21, 2016. The At-The-Money weekly straddle ($760 strike) was trading around $41, implying $41 or 5.3% move.

 

If you believed that GOOG is going to move, you had two options:

 

Option #1: buy a straddle for $41 debit

  • Buy 1 760 Put
  • Buy 1 760 Call

 

Option #2: RIC for 1.75 debit

  • Buy 1 737.5 Put
  • Sell 1 740 Put (Lower Strike)
  • Buy 1 775.7 Call
  • Sell 1 780 Call (Higher Strike)

 

Straddle would need $41 move just to break even, but would have unlimited profit potential if the stock moved big time. It also would not lose as much if the stock moved less than expected.

 

RIC would need only $20 move (above $780 or below $740) to make money.

 

The next day GOOG moved $40 and closed at $719. Since it was below the short put strike, the RIC made a nice 43% gain (2.50/1.75), while the straddle was barely breakeven.

 

Risk-Management-Profit-Loss.jpg

 

The Risks

 

The biggest drawdown of the RIC strategy before earnings is that if the stock doesn't move enough after earnings, IV collapse will crush the options prices. The risk of 80-100% loss is real.

 

Unfortunately, many options gurus present this strategy as almost risk free money, completely ignoring the risks. Here are two examples.

 

A Seeking Alpha contributor suggested the following play on GOOG earnings on April 12, 2012 with GOOG at $632:
 

Quote
  • Buy twenty (20) April Week 2 $610.00 put options
  • Sell twenty (20) April Week 2 $600.00 put options
  • Buy twenty (20) April Week 2 $650.00 call options
  • Sell twenty (20) April Week 2 $660.00 call options

Rationale behind the trade:
 

"Google is a notorious big-mover after reporting. I am completely confident that the trade recommendation I am writing about will work like a charm."

 


What is completely missing in this comment is risk disclosure. The next day GOOG closed at $624, and the trade has lost 100%.

 

As our contributor Chris (cwelsh) mentioned in the comments section:

 

"Earnings are wild and unpredictable. A careful analysis and you can improve your odds, but you always have to factor in position sizing and potential loss into any trade. My entire point of my posts was that I think a discussion of risks should always be included in any article that discusses huge potential gains."

 

I recommend reading the comments section of the article, it can tell a lot about different people's approaches to trading and risk.

 

The second example is from a website that is using the strategy cycle after cycle. Here is the quote:

 

"The Debit Iron Condor is used primarily on stocks that have a long history of big moves when announcing their quarterly earnings. We have a very good idea of how big the move will be, in one direction or the other. And the amazing thing about studying history is that history truly repeats itself, and that means a big percentage of wins. The magic works when the Debit Iron Condor is combined with big moves from stocks on earnings day."

 

The problem is, once again, complete lack of risk disclosure. Even if the "history truly repeats itself" 80% of the time, in 20% of the cases when it doesn't, the strategy can lose 100%. Big percentage of wins means nothing if your losers are much higher than the winners, and you can do nothing to control the losers due to IV collapse. 

 

One way to reduce the risk is using more distant expiration instead of the weekly options. The closer the expiration, the bigger the impact on trade. There is a trade off with respect to time, move and implied volatility drop. If the stock doesn't move, the further expiration trade will lose less because there still will be some time value left. On the other hand, if it does move, the gains will be less as well, and you will have to wait longer to realize the full potential.  

 

The Bottom Line

 

This strategy can be successfully used for trading stocks with history of big moves. GOOG, NFLX, AMZN, TSLA, BIIB are good candidates. However, earnings are unpredictable, and you need to control the risk with proper position sizing. It is definitely possible to lose 100% with this strategy. I would define it as high probability high risk strategy.

 

One of the members asked me on the forum if we are going to play GOOG and AMZN with RIC. Based on earnings uncertainty and our bad experience earlier this year, I decided to skip. It was a good call. GOOG RIC would be a 100% loser, and AMZN would be a borderline as well, depending on the strikes. 

 

Related articles

 

Want to learn more? We discuss all our trades on our forum.

 

Start Your Free Trial

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • How To Lose $197 Million Trading VIX

    The mysterious volatility trader known as "50 Cent" has lost $197 million in 2017 betting on a spike in the VIX, which would accompany a stock market shock. 50 Cent is starting to slow down, deploying roughly 20% of the contracts he had outstanding over the summer. This story has been published in Business Insider.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 17 views
  • Debunking The Dividend Myth

    "Investors should be indifferent to $1 in the form of a dividend (causing the stock’s price to drop by $1) or $1 received by selling shares. This must be true, unless you believe that $1 is not worth $1. This theorem has not been challenged since—except by those bitten by the “dividend bug.”

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 178 views
  • If I Only Bought Netflix a Decade Ago

    Here’s a fun thought experiment. Suppose you had $15,000 to invest evenly in fifteen different companies back before the Great Recession. Then you let it ride through the market’s downturn, holding your investment instead of selling anything. How much would you have today?

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 125 views
  • Why Options Trading Is Not Gambling

    One of the most common criticisms of any kind of investing is that it can be viewed as being akin to gambling. There’s nothing wrong with this given that investing in various forms is a perfectly legal and regular activity. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 253 views
  • Options Equivalent Positions

    One of the interesting features about options is that there is a relationship between calls, puts, and the underlying stock. And because of that relationship, some option positions are equivalent – that means identical profit/loss profiles – to others.

    By MarkWolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 210 views
  • Straddle Option Overview

    For those not familiar with the long straddle option strategy, it is a neutral strategy in options trading that involves the simultaneously buying of a put and a call on the same underlying, strike and expiration. The trade has a limited risk (which is the debit paid for the trade) and unlimited profit potential. 

    By Kim,

    • 1 comment
    • 1,086 views
  • Earnings Momentum Trade in Oracle

    We last wrote about Oracle on 2017-09-03 with this same back-test -- a 3-day momentum swing trade ahead of earnings and it has followed through for 8 consecutive pre-earnings cycles with a 290% total return during that historical period. Oracle's next earnings date is 12-14-2017, but this not is not yet confirmed. 

    By Ophir Gottlieb,

    • 0 comments
    • 316 views
  • Reverse Iron Condor Strategy

    The Reverse Iron Condor (RIC) is a limited risk, limited profit trading strategy that is designed to earn a profit when the underlying stock price makes a sharp move in either direction. The RIC Spread is where you buy an Iron Condor Spread from someone who is betting on the underlying stock staying stagnant.

    By Kim,

    • 2 comments
    • 2,972 views
  • Netflix Pre-earnings Momentum Trade

    Netflix has earnings due out Monday, October 16th, after the market closes. Seven calendar days before then would be 10-9-2017. Coming off of a nice win in THO, now it's time to look at the company's remarkable history of momentum into earnings events and how it compares to FAANG more broadly. 

    By Ophir Gottlieb,

    • 2 comments
    • 1,299 views
  • Options Are Not Stocks

    This question is not related exclusively to options, but, given the time decay element built into them, it may be particularly relevant to them.The question is this: are there any general rules that you use for exiting trades that start to go against you, especially if they are not based on an anticipation of a specific catalyst?

    By MarkWolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 190 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


The RIC definitely hurt 2016 thus far!  Without it, it would have been another very succesful year.  Glad to see SO climbing back.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...