SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Long and Short Straddles: Opposite Structures


Simplification: We can all better understand options trading by removing the complexity so often seen in articles. One of the best ways to understand the profit potential and risk levels of any options strategy is through diagrams and a demonstration of the formula.

The long and short straddle are normally understood only in terms of how money flows. In a long straddle, the trader pays, and risk is mainly one of time versus price movement. In a short straddle, the trader is paid, and risk involves time decay and time to expiration. But does this really explain how these two strategies work?
 

In both forms of the straddle, the key to risk and profit potential is volatility. But the significance is opposite. A long trader tends to realize the greatest possibility of profits when underlying volatility is high; a short trader relies on declining time value and will reduce exercise risks when volatility is low.

 

Long profits
 

The formula for maximum profit in a long straddle is twofold, as maximum profit will be found at the upper price or the lower price:

            U – S – ( P + F ) = Pu

                S – U – ( P + F ) = Pl

            When  U = underlying price

                        S = strike

                        P = premium paid

                        F = trading fees

                        Pu = upper profit

                        Pl = lower profit

 

Breakeven point also is found at two price points:

 

                        S + P + F = Bu

                        S – P + F = Bl

 

When  S = strike

                        P = premium paid

                        F = trading fees

                        Bu = upper breakeven

                        Bl = lower breakeven

 

Finally, maximum loss occurs when the underlying price is at strike at expiration. Both sides expire worthless and loss is equal to premium paid:

                        P + F = M

 

            When  P = premium paid

                        F = fees paid

                        M = maximum loss

 

For example, a long straddle consists of the following positions:

            Buy one 105 call, ask 3.40 plus trading fees = $349

            Buy one 105 put, ask 3.10 plus trading fees = $319

                        Total debit $668

 

Possible outcomes, assuming a movement in the underlying of 8 points:

 

            Upper profit: 113 – 105 – 6.68 = $132

            Lower profit: 105 – 90 – 6.68 = $832

            Upper breakeven: 105 + 6.68 = $121.68

            Lower breakeven: 105 – 6.68 = $98.32

            Maximum loss: 6.50 + 0.18 = $668

 

These outcomes are diagrammed in the following payoff chart.

 

image.png  

 

Short profits

 

The opposite occurs for a short straddle. Traders want underlying prices to remain as close as possible to the strike so profits will result from declining time value and, ultimately, worthless expiration.
 

Although short straddle profits are limited to the net premiums received, the strategy is appealing to those willing to be exposed to the risk. Maximum profit is:

            P – F = M

            When  P = premium received

                        F = trading fees

                        M = maximum profit

 

Breakeven occurs at two points, upper and lower:

 

            ­S + ( P – F ) = Bu

            S – ( P – F ) = Bl

 

            When   S = strike

                        P = premium received

                        Bu = upper breakeven

                        Bl = lower breakeven

 

Maximum loss is unlimited and depends on how far the underlying price moves. It occurs at two points:

            U > S – ( P – F )

            U < S – ( P – F )

 

            When  U = underlying price

                        S = strike

                        P = premium received

                        F = trading fees

 

 

For example, a short straddle is constructed with the following positions:

            Sell one 105 call, bid 3.20, less trading fees = $311

            Sell one 105 put, bid 2.90, less trading fees = $281

                                    Net credit = $592

 

Outcomes for this trade, assuming a 215-point movement ibn the underlying, are:

            Maximum profit: $610 - $18 = $592

            Upper breakeven: 105 + 5.92 = $110.92

            Lower breakeven: 105 – 5.92 = $99.08

            Upper loss: 112 – 5 – 5.92 = $108

            Lower loss: 105 – 97 – 5.92 = $208

           

These outcomes are also summarized in the diagram.

 

image.png

 

The complexity of the long and short straddle is clarified by the realization that they operate in opposite directions – limited profit versus unlimited profit, and limited risk versus unlimited risk.
 

The nature of the short straddle must be further modified by the realization that collateral is required. For two positions, a total equal to potential exercise requires deposit of a significant sum. As a result, capital is tied up between position entry and expiration date. A completely accurate analysis should include calculation of the internal rate of return, given the requirement for depositing capital in the margin account. This is a significant variable; the longer the time to expiration, the more expensive it is to open a short straddle.

 

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his websiteat Thomsett Guide as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.

Related articles:

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Are Covered Calls a ‘Sure Thing?’

    Most covered call writers enjoy the regularity and reliability of the position. In the majority of cases, the covered call will be profitable, even when underlying shares are called away. This assumes that the strike is higher than the basis in the underlying, and that the call writer understands the real limitations to the strategy.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 456 views
  • Lessons from Bill Ackman's comeback

    Bill Ackman is an American investor, hedge fund manager and philanthropist. He is the founder and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund management company. Ackman is considered by some to be a contrarian investor but considers himself an activist investor.

    By Kim,

    • 1 comment
    • 1,612 views
  • Steady Futures 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Futures began trading the 50K portfolio in July 2019. It produced a 8.5% return during its 6 months of performance (18.0% annualized). We had three goals when we developed this system. First, we wanted a robust system that benefits from turmoil in the markets.

    By RapperT,

    • 0 comments
    • 310 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 - Year In Review

    2019 marks our 8th year as a public service. It was a good year overall. We closed 151 winners out of 232 trades. Our model portfolio produced 41.7% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only two losing months in 2019. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 459 views
  • Momentum 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Momentum had an excellent first year of publication, producing significant gains in both of the published strategies. The most popular strategy writes (sells) out of the money puts on equity indexes and ETF’s, and returned 19.1% for the year, beating our benchmark by approximately 5.5%.

    By Jesse,

    • 1 comment
    • 550 views
  • SteadyOptions 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options model portfolio produced 41.7% gain in 2019. This is a very good return by any standards, but well below our long term returns. In the name of full transparency and our continuous learning, we are providing a full analysis of the 2019 numbers.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,441 views
  • Anchor 2019 Performance Analysis

    Steady Options now has a full year of trading the Leveraged Anchor Account under its belt. (Technically since today is December 30, the values used herein are one day off.) To say things went as designed is an understatement - the strategy outperformed the S&P 500 in 2019 by 7.2% while being hedged.

    By cwelsh,

    • 1 comment
    • 709 views
  • A Reliable Method for Picking the Underlying

    A lot of emphasis is placed on selection of one strategy over another. Are you conservative or a speculator? Are you trying to make fast money or hedging equity positions? In fact, this is a primary concern among traders. The strategy should match the risk profile, of course. But there is much more to how and why you trade options.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 494 views
  • Total Stock Market Index Funds: A Diversification Illusion?

    I’m a fan of index funds and diversification. Low costs, low turnover, and passively managed exposure to thousands of stocks make Total Stock Market (TSM) index funds great starting points for stock market exposure. In fact, most investor portfolios I see are insufficiently diversified to a point where a TSM index fund would be a material improvement.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 685 views
  • Back to the Basics: How to Get Started Trading Options

    To those of us involved in the Steady Options community, options trading is almost second nature. But most investors, and even most traders, don’t trade options. There may be a variety of reasons why this is the case, but I believe it’s mostly related to the learning curve of understanding a completely new concept.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 445 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs Expertido