SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Do You Have a Written Investment Plan?


Meb Faber recently polled his twitter followers, and found that only about 25% have a written investment plan. Your investment plan should be based on your willingness (risk tolerance) and need (required rate of return to meet your long term goals) to take risk. 

Investing without specific goals in mind and a written plan designed to achieve those goals is like sailing on a ship without a rudder, wandering aimlessly whichever direction the wind blows.

So where to begin?  First, think about your goals. Let's assume you're 50 years old, and would like to retire by age 62, and have accumulated $250,000. Ask yourself the following question:  If I were to retire not at age 62, but next month, about how much would I need in monthly income from my portfolio above and beyond what I'll receive from estimated social security and pension benefits to maintain my standard of living?

 

Let's assume the answer to this question is $3,000/month, in today's dollars. This is $36,000 per year. Using historical trend line inflation assumptions of 3% annually, $36,000 today would be about $51,000 at age 62 ($4,250/month). 

 

Next, divide $51,000 by 4.5% (a reasonable portfolio withdrawal rate for a 3 decade retirement), which equals $1,133,333.

 

Congratulations! You've now began the process of creating a date specific, dollar specific, retirement accumulation plan. If at age 62, you began to withdraw $4,250/month, increased by 3% per year for inflation, from a $1.1 million nest egg, the odds are in your favor that your portfolio will outlast you if invested wisely and followed faithfully (something I will only briefly touch on in this post). 

 

The next question should be obvious: How are we going to grow our portfolio from $250,000 to $1.1 million over the next 12 years? This becomes a question of required rate of return. Without any further contributions, this would require about 13.4% CAGR (compound annual growth rate) over the next 12 years. Possible, but just as we assume trend line inflation, I wouldn't suggest building a plan that assumes anything much different than trend line asset class performance. Many will also factor in current valuations for global stocks and bonds, but we're intentionally keeping it simple here for illustrative purposes.

 

Since 1926, cash (US T-bills) has returned about 3.4% per year. The US stock market has returned about 10.6% per year. This is an equity risk premium (equity return in excess of cash) of about 7%. With cash currently yielding about 2%, that would imply an equity return assumption of about 9% before fees and expenses and any other portfolio assumptions such as global diversification, tilts towards known factors such as size, value, and momentum...valuation considerations, etc. Asset allocation assumptions such as how much (if any) to keep in cash, bonds, and alternative strategies should also be accounted for depending on your personal risk tolerance for both portfolio volatility and tracking error (performance variation) from standard benchmarks like the S&P 500. And let's not forget about portfolio management decisions, such as when and how often to rebalance as your portfolio allocations drift over time. The more specific you can make your plan, the less decisions you'll be forced to make during the heat of battle when human emotion and behavioral bias get involved.

 

Assuming you have the historical perspective, patience, and temperament to earn the equity risk premium with disciplined behavior, a diversified equity portfolio returning 9% would require annual contributions of just under $20,000 for the next 12 years. A portfolio that includes lower expected return asset classes, or is impacted by human intervention that results in less than market returns, will require more. Potentially much more.

 

The next consideration is what type of account(s)? Regular taxable brokerage? IRA? 401(k)? Maybe even a triple tax free HSA, if eligible? Tax implications have a substantial impact on your plan over the long run, and can often lead to higher net returns than selecting "better" investments, whatever that means. 

 

Fast forward 12 years, and let's assume you've made it to the finish line. But then you realize what you thought was the finish line is really just the beginning! Now what? Accumulation now seems like it was the easy part, and now you need an income plan from your portfolio for the next 3 decades...Do you switch from equities that got you here to bonds because they provide "income?" Using the same assumptions as before, with cash yielding 2%, and bonds about 3%...ask yourself this common sense question: Would you rather face a 3 decade long retirement taking 4.5% per year from bonds producing income of 3% or from equities with a history of producing 9-10% total returns? At this point, the conventional wisdom that bonds are "safe" and equities are "risky" is probably beginning to sound a bit backwards.

 

An equity focused portfolio may be as necessary post retirement as it was pre retirement. Managing sequence risk with concepts such as "guardrails" where you will keep your withdrawals within a floor of 3% and ceiling of 6% should also be considered as portfolio values fluctuate. A pre-retirement emergency fund of 3-6 months of expenses could be increased to 2 years of expenses in retirement as well, meant to be accessed during bear markets when equity values are depressed.

 

I'll stop here for now, as I've given you plenty to think about and work on in building out the first draft of your long term investing plan. A small percentage of individuals will be interested and able to do this on their own, and maintain discipline at market extremes.  The rest may find that a relationship with an investment advisor who offers comprehensive financial planning, perspective, and behavioral coaching provides value and peace of mind far in excess of the fee they are asked to pay. Vanguard Research believes this value to be about 3% per year, many multiples of what good advisors charge in annual fees.

 

Jesse Blom is a licensed investment advisor and Vice President of Lorintine Capital, LP. He provides investment advice to clients all over the United States and around the world. Jesse has been in financial services since 2008 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. Jesse has a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Oral Roberts University. Jesse is managing the LC Diversified portfolio and forum, the LC Diversified Fund, as well as contributes to the Steady Condors newsletter.   

  

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Option Equivalence

    Some option positions are equivalent – that means identical profit/loss profiles – to others. Others are not. A few days ago I had an inquiry from a person trading options in a restricted account (e.g. an IRA that did not allow marginable trades or short options positions):

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 67 views
  • Investment Ideas for Conservative Investors

    Investors with low willingness or need to take risks often look to bank and/or life insurance company fixed-rate products to increase potential returns instead of leaving their money in conventional checking or savings accounts. Some of these product types are CD’s, structured notes, fixed annuities and fixed indexed annuities.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 152 views
  • iVolatility Tools: Advanced Ranker

    Here is one of the analytical tools that allows us to claim "In options we are Big Data!" For those who want to find the movers and shakers, Advanced Ranker does the job. The Advanced Ranker combines an easy to use interface with a powerful sorting logic built on IVR and IVP.

    By Levi Ioffe,

    • 0 comments
    • 133 views
  • Two Pre-earnings Momentum Trades With a Technical Trigger in Alphabet

    Both option trading backtest approaches rely on the fact that there has been a bullish momentum pattern in Alphabet stock 7 calendar days before earnings. Further, we use moving averages as a safety valve to try to avoid opening a bullish position while a stock is in a technical break down, like the fourth quarter of 2018. 

    By Ophir Gottlieb,

    • 0 comments
    • 299 views
  • Flaws in Implied Volatility

    A technical study of chart patterns, focusing on historical volatility of the underlying, reveals that depending on implied volatility is a flawed idea. Traders should remember that options are derivatives, meaning their premium value is derived from historical volatility.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 381 views
  • 7 Trading Cliches For Novice Traders

    Trading is a tough business. There is no easy money in the stock market, but there are a lot of folks who will easily take your money. What is important to know that no matter how experienced you are, mistakes will be part of the trading process. This article should help you to avoid some of those mistakes.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 347 views
  • Iron Condor vs. Iron Butterfly

    Iron Condor and Iron Butterfly are both very popular strategies. Both of them are usually used as non-directional strategies (although butterflied can be used as a directional trade as well). Both trades are vega negative and gamma negative, but there are also few important differences between those two strategies.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 350 views
  • Leveraged Anchor: A Three Month Review

    Steady Options has now been tracking the Leveraged Anchor from the unlevered version for three months.  The results so far have substantially beat expectations, though there is a possibility for improvements discussed at the end of this piece. 

    By cwelsh,

    • 10 comments
    • 1,058 views
  • How a Fund is Developed

    Many individuals are curious as to the testing process for a new fund.  With the plethora of funds continually being developed, having some insight into this process can be helpful for investors.  At the very least, it can provide a series of questions which should be asked in conducting due diligence on fund managers.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 285 views
  • Why Dow Points Are Meaningless

    A quick online search for “Dow rallies 500 points” yields a cascade of news stories with similar titles, as does a similar search for “Dow drops 500 points.” These types of headlines may make little sense to some investors, given that a “point” for the Dow and what it means to an individual’s portfolio may be unclear.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 315 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs