SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Building a Short Strangles Portfolio


In my last article I showed you what you can expect selling short strangles and straddles and how much leverage is appropriate. Today I want to show you how to build a well diversified short strangle/straddle portfolio and how to trade it through difficult times.

Lately we experienced a 7% down move in the S&P 500.
 

01. SPY Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

We have also seen an explosion in the VIX.

VIX Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

All in all a pretty shitty situation if you have a delta neutral short premium portfolio.
 

So let's have a look how a portfolio consisting of 30 delta short strangles and/or atm short straddles in IWM, FXE, TLT, GLD, XLE, which was started before this wild ride in the markets happened, would have performed.
 

Set up

As shown in my booksIWM, FXE, TLT, GLD, XLE are the most uncorrelated ETFs. With these underlyings you have exposure to the Russell 2000, the Euro Currency, Bonds, Gold and the Oil Sector.
 

Rules

  • $100k portfolio
  • capital allocation based on the VIX (20-25% allocation in very low VIX environment, 40-50% in a high VIX environment)
  • equal buying power in all underlyings
  • never go above 3x leverage in notional value
  • 30 delta short strangles or atm straddles
  • about 45 DTE
  • profit target = 16 delta strangle credit at trade entry
  • close all positions at 21 DTE if profit target is not hit before
  • if short strike in strangles gets hit, roll untested side into a short straddle (original profit target doesn't change)
  • if break even in a short straddle gets hit, roll untested side to the new atm strike (going inverted)
  • if IVR in IWM goes above 50% and/or VIX makes a big up move, add aggressive short delta strangle to balance deltas
     

Portfolio Performance

As a starting date I picked July 30th 2019, probably the worst day in this expiration cycle to start this kind of portfolio. Since the VIX and IVR was pretty low at this moment, I committed only a little bit above 25% of my net liq.
 

IWM

02. IWM Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform
 

FXE

03. FXE Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

TLT

04. TLT Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

GLD

05. GLD Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

XLE

06. XLE Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

Portfolio

Portfolio.png


So far in dollar terms a $1,571.50 loss or 1.571% loss on the whole portfolio.

Not too bad considering the IV explosion and the big moves, especially in TLT.

As you can see, even in a tough market with big outside the expected moves and IV explosion, short strangles/straddles are not a recipe for disaster.

The key is to trade small when IV is low and mechanically adjust your positions/deltas.

Of course the expiration cycle is not over yet and we can still have more big moves and much higher implied volatility in the coming days, but you should have seen now, when you have the right set of rules and religiously stick to these rules and when you trade small enough when IV is low, you are not going to blow up your portfolio.

Stephan Haller is an author, teacher, options trader and public speaker with over 20 years of experience in the financial markets. Check out his trilogy on options trading here. This article is used here with permission and originally appeared here.

Image


Related articles

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Calculating the Probability of Option Payoff

    A calculation of “breakeven” as well as maximum profit or loss, sets up a single system for modeling and comparing one option to another. But it might also require traders to adopt an unrealistic assumption about outcomes based on best-case or worst-care scenario.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 121 views
  • Realistic Expectations: Using History as A Guide

    One of the biggest challenges I come across with the typical investor is maintaining realistic expectations and being able to properly understand the tradeoffs between risk and return. We all want high returns with low risk and there’s no limit to the efforts we’ll make to find it.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 171 views
  • CAPM As an Alternative Option Pricing Model

    Options traders endlessly debate the merits of the Black-Scholes pricing model. Some swear by it and others don’t even try to use it. Given the many profound flaws in the model, it is not an accurate tool for developing a sense of where price is likely to move in the future. But there are alternatives.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 356 views
  • Option Payoff Probability

    Options traders must, naturally, be concerned with the likelihood of payoff for a strategy. Ironically, one of the most often cited statistics about profit and loss is simply incorrect. That statistic is captured in the headline of a story posted online “Trading Options: Data Shows That 75% or More of Options Expire Worthless.”

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 450 views
  • The Minimum Effective Dose (MED) For Cash Flow Planning

    Financial planners can usually give generic advice that will be appropriate for the majority of Americans, and that’s the goal of this article. If we can get the fundamentals of cash-flow planning right (where to put your money after you earn it and pay your taxes and bills), we’re 80% of the way towards maximizing our financial situation.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 483 views
  • Are You Breaking Even? Or Losing?

    Among the good reasons to trade options is the need to meet or surpass your breakeven yield. This is the yield you need just to preserve your purchasing power; and it higher than most people think. In fact, most people relying on moderate to conservative yields from stocks, mutual funds, real estate and savings accounts might be earning well below this breakeven level.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 579 views
  • Buy When You Have the Money, Sell When You Need the Money

    Money can be quite an emotional topic for many of us. Emotions can enhance our experiences and relationships in many ways, but they can act as mental roadblocks especially when trying to make wise financial decisions. One of the most common emotional roadblocks I come across when working with individuals is an unwillingness to invest idle cash to meet long-term goals.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,203 views
  • Strategy Selection vs. Risk Management

    "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money." Everett McKinley Dirksen. Let’s begin with the bottom line: When I talk to anyone about the concept of choosing an option strategy (or two) to adopt for trading, I stress that the strategy should have certain characteristics.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 543 views
  • Blending Anchor Strategy

    Anchor and Leveraged Anchor investors frequently ask why the strategy only trades SPY and SPY options rather than individual stocks, other indexes or commodities. We avoid individual stocks because of tracking and divergence issues.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 666 views
  • Fundamental Volatility and Stock Prices

    Every options trader must wonder whether any connection will be found between the company's fundamentals and stock prices (and in turn, option valuation as well). Because options are derived from stock price behavior, the analysis of stock movement is crucial to selecting options wisely; and that relies on volatility in the reported profit and loss over several years.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 649 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


@Stephan HallerThank you for another great article!

I like the idea of non correlated instruments. In this case, my biggest concern probably is regarding IWM and TLT. Since they have a pretty strong inverse correlation, wouldn't a strong down move in IWM cause a strong up move in TLT, causing both strangles to be losers?

Also, what are your live results trading this portfolio? For how long have you been trading it?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Kim Of course, there are times when IWM makes a big down move and TLT makes a big move in the other direction.
We have seen this lately, but you can get it under control by adding a short delta/short premium position in SPY, IWM, or QQQ when vol pops.

IWM's correlation to SPY is 0.63 and TLT's correlation to SPY is -0.32.
So long term they aren't this much negatively correlated.

The easiest underlying to trade for short straddles is FXE, but you also get paid the least premium.
I have been trading a short straddle/30 delta short strangle portfolio for almost 5 years now.
But I have always made some adjustments to the strategy (like switching from a static profit target like 50% of max. to a dynamic profit target like 16 delta strangle credit).
In very low IV I add classic put diagonals in SPY or put calendar spreads in SPX and I also cut down my size.
When IVR goes above 50% I ramp up my trade size and I also add short delta/short premium positions like aggressive short delta strangles or call ratio spreads in SPY, QQQ, or IWM to hedge my vega risk and balance my deltas.
I also mechanically roll the untested side when one of my short strikes, or in case of straddles, my break even gets hit.
When we hit 21 DTE I usually close and reestablish delta neutral or a little bit directional if it fits my overall deltas.

Except for 2016, when I went crazy and shorted the Trump rally way too big, I averaged about 15-16%.

As long as I stick to the rules, it works.
But a big ego and thinking that you know something always ends bad.
I'm still learning and I hope, it never ends.
You need to look at every losing trade to become a better trader.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically without leverage you would get around 6-7%, which is in line to my previous estimates here and here.

The big question is how much volatility you add by increasing the leverage, and what would be the drawdown with leverage during periods like 2008 and 2011?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @Stephan Haller

I'm not sure this is "the worst that can happen", as in Sep.2008 IV was already very high, and you got healthy credits for all straddles. However, don't forget that 20% is a one month loss. We don't know how previous and next trade performed, so we don't know what was the total drawdown.

But I agree that the loss is very manageable. And we are in a full agreement that as long as you don't over leverage, the risk is reasonable.

The problem is that with naked straddles/strangles, it's very easy to over leverage, especially if you have portfolio margin. In fact, I think very few people would base their position sizing on notional value instead of margin.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Kim In most underlyings in the portfolio the P&L the month before was great, since markets didn't move much.
The next months would have been pretty good either, since vol was extremely overstated.

In a regular margin account it is hard to over leverage on short strangles/straddles.
Most people I know (including myself) over leveraged in credit spreads and/or iron condors.

Portfolio margin is dangerous for most people.
I always advise people who have portfolio margin to check out the CBOE regular margin calculator to see what regular margin would be and then size their positions like in a regular margin account.

Portfolio margin is great when you need the extra buying power in an overnight move.
Let's assume you had lots of short calls on before the 2016 election night and not much buying power left.
With portfolio margin you could have bought the right amount of /ES and lock in your profits.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree regarding portfolio margin.

Personally I still wouldn't be comfortable with 3x leverage in notional value, but that's just me. I also would never be comfortable holding a portfolio of only gamma negative strategies. You never know when the next flash crash will come. Again, matter of personal choice.

Don't forget that those backtests are based on mid prices. During periods like 2008, there is no chance to get filled anywhere close to mid prices. I believe if you applied 3x leverage in 2008, a 50-60% drawdown was almost guaranteed.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi
Thanks for a great discussion. I've been looking for this type of study for year :))

Is trading FXE even worth it to you?  Whenever I looked at it, strangles seem to pay less than a 0.9$ on a 110$ underlying.... (about 100$ max profit for 3000$ margin requirement)
Have you tried other low correlated assets like UNG,XLU? 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs