SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Building a Short Strangles Portfolio


In my last article I showed you what you can expect selling short strangles and straddles and how much leverage is appropriate. Today I want to show you how to build a well diversified short strangle/straddle portfolio and how to trade it through difficult times.

Lately we experienced a 7% down move in the S&P 500.
 

01. SPY Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

We have also seen an explosion in the VIX.

VIX Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

All in all a pretty shitty situation if you have a delta neutral short premium portfolio.
 

So let's have a look how a portfolio consisting of 30 delta short strangles and/or atm short straddles in IWM, FXE, TLT, GLD, XLE, which was started before this wild ride in the markets happened, would have performed.
 

Set up

As shown in my booksIWM, FXE, TLT, GLD, XLE are the most uncorrelated ETFs. With these underlyings you have exposure to the Russell 2000, the Euro Currency, Bonds, Gold and the Oil Sector.
 

Rules

  • $100k portfolio
  • capital allocation based on the VIX (20-25% allocation in very low VIX environment, 40-50% in a high VIX environment)
  • equal buying power in all underlyings
  • never go above 3x leverage in notional value
  • 30 delta short strangles or atm straddles
  • about 45 DTE
  • profit target = 16 delta strangle credit at trade entry
  • close all positions at 21 DTE if profit target is not hit before
  • if short strike in strangles gets hit, roll untested side into a short straddle (original profit target doesn't change)
  • if break even in a short straddle gets hit, roll untested side to the new atm strike (going inverted)
  • if IVR in IWM goes above 50% and/or VIX makes a big up move, add aggressive short delta strangle to balance deltas
     

Portfolio Performance

As a starting date I picked July 30th 2019, probably the worst day in this expiration cycle to start this kind of portfolio. Since the VIX and IVR was pretty low at this moment, I committed only a little bit above 25% of my net liq.
 

IWM

02. IWM Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform
 

FXE

03. FXE Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

TLT

04. TLT Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

GLD

05. GLD Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

XLE

06. XLE Chart.png

image source: TOS trading platform

 

Portfolio

Portfolio.png


So far in dollar terms a $1,571.50 loss or 1.571% loss on the whole portfolio.

Not too bad considering the IV explosion and the big moves, especially in TLT.

As you can see, even in a tough market with big outside the expected moves and IV explosion, short strangles/straddles are not a recipe for disaster.

The key is to trade small when IV is low and mechanically adjust your positions/deltas.

Of course the expiration cycle is not over yet and we can still have more big moves and much higher implied volatility in the coming days, but you should have seen now, when you have the right set of rules and religiously stick to these rules and when you trade small enough when IV is low, you are not going to blow up your portfolio.

Stephan Haller is an author, teacher, options trader and public speaker with over 20 years of experience in the financial markets. Check out his trilogy on options trading here. This article is used here with permission and originally appeared here.

Image


Related articles

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Cyclical versus Historical Volatility

    The interest in volatility for options trading is logical and understandable. However, the nature of volatility in not universally understood or agreed upon. In fact, it is more complex than most people believe. Options traders think of volatility coming in two forms, historical and implied.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 91 views
  • Pros and Cons of Paper Trading

    My first recommendation to all new SteadyOptions members is to start with paper trading, then start small and increase your allocation as you gain more experience and confidence. Over the years, we had a lot of discussions related to the benefits of paper trading, and this article will discuss some of the pros and cons.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 147 views
  • Does “Managing Winners” Add Value to Short Strangles?

    Some option educators suggest short strangles have historically benefited from actively managed exit strategies. A widely popularized approach is to enter S&P 500 strangles at 45 DTE and exit at 50% of the credit received or a 21 DTE time stop, whichever occurs first.

    By Jesse,

    • 2 comments
    • 308 views
  • Fat Tails and Option Returns

    When it comes to calculating likely returns from option activity, traders contend with a variety of variations. Returns may be skewed (with declines in value more likely than increases), or unstable in many forms. Or the outcome might reveal itself in the form of a fat tail.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 207 views
  • What To Do In A low Yield Environment

    Investors over the world are struggling with yield in their portfolios.  Government investments are at historically low levels, with thirty-year treasuries basically declining every year for almost thirty years straight:

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 254 views
  • Option Terminology – Avoiding Confusion

    Options traders may easily fall into the habit of expressing ideas inaccurately. This might seem like a minor point, but in fact. It matters a great deal. Confusing and misleading language may lead to incorrect trade entry, and for those novices following more experienced traders, the use of proper terms is the whole story.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 426 views
  • Option Volatility and the Underlying

    Too often, traders may  make the mistake of associating option volatility with behavior of the underlying issue. However, if you employ a volatility assumption to model how an option is likely to change, remember that pricing models are theoretical. It is only useful for estimating the option risks. It does not indicate how underlying price will move.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 360 views
  • Before You Startup Your Own Investment Company, Read This!

    Often when we have had some success on the market, investors minds' begin to consider turning their solitary pursuit into a fully-fledged business. One that does not only line their own pockets but can help make some serious money for our client as well. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 655 views
  • Measuring “The Market”

    When you hear what “the market” did today, what do you think of? Most of us will think of one or more popular US stock indexes like the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, or S&P 500. But how well do these indices actually represent the total stock market? Dimensional Fund Advisors has created an excellent chart to help us answer this question.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 387 views
  • Managing Volatility Spreads

    Although traders often are attracted to hedged combinations (including spreads), some of the features are misunderstood. The spread may be viewed to manage risk, when in fact selection of an appropriate strategy may provide more potential when picked based on volatility.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 534 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


@Stephan HallerThank you for another great article!

I like the idea of non correlated instruments. In this case, my biggest concern probably is regarding IWM and TLT. Since they have a pretty strong inverse correlation, wouldn't a strong down move in IWM cause a strong up move in TLT, causing both strangles to be losers?

Also, what are your live results trading this portfolio? For how long have you been trading it?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Kim Of course, there are times when IWM makes a big down move and TLT makes a big move in the other direction.
We have seen this lately, but you can get it under control by adding a short delta/short premium position in SPY, IWM, or QQQ when vol pops.

IWM's correlation to SPY is 0.63 and TLT's correlation to SPY is -0.32.
So long term they aren't this much negatively correlated.

The easiest underlying to trade for short straddles is FXE, but you also get paid the least premium.
I have been trading a short straddle/30 delta short strangle portfolio for almost 5 years now.
But I have always made some adjustments to the strategy (like switching from a static profit target like 50% of max. to a dynamic profit target like 16 delta strangle credit).
In very low IV I add classic put diagonals in SPY or put calendar spreads in SPX and I also cut down my size.
When IVR goes above 50% I ramp up my trade size and I also add short delta/short premium positions like aggressive short delta strangles or call ratio spreads in SPY, QQQ, or IWM to hedge my vega risk and balance my deltas.
I also mechanically roll the untested side when one of my short strikes, or in case of straddles, my break even gets hit.
When we hit 21 DTE I usually close and reestablish delta neutral or a little bit directional if it fits my overall deltas.

Except for 2016, when I went crazy and shorted the Trump rally way too big, I averaged about 15-16%.

As long as I stick to the rules, it works.
But a big ego and thinking that you know something always ends bad.
I'm still learning and I hope, it never ends.
You need to look at every losing trade to become a better trader.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically without leverage you would get around 6-7%, which is in line to my previous estimates here and here.

The big question is how much volatility you add by increasing the leverage, and what would be the drawdown with leverage during periods like 2008 and 2011?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @Stephan Haller

I'm not sure this is "the worst that can happen", as in Sep.2008 IV was already very high, and you got healthy credits for all straddles. However, don't forget that 20% is a one month loss. We don't know how previous and next trade performed, so we don't know what was the total drawdown.

But I agree that the loss is very manageable. And we are in a full agreement that as long as you don't over leverage, the risk is reasonable.

The problem is that with naked straddles/strangles, it's very easy to over leverage, especially if you have portfolio margin. In fact, I think very few people would base their position sizing on notional value instead of margin.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Kim In most underlyings in the portfolio the P&L the month before was great, since markets didn't move much.
The next months would have been pretty good either, since vol was extremely overstated.

In a regular margin account it is hard to over leverage on short strangles/straddles.
Most people I know (including myself) over leveraged in credit spreads and/or iron condors.

Portfolio margin is dangerous for most people.
I always advise people who have portfolio margin to check out the CBOE regular margin calculator to see what regular margin would be and then size their positions like in a regular margin account.

Portfolio margin is great when you need the extra buying power in an overnight move.
Let's assume you had lots of short calls on before the 2016 election night and not much buying power left.
With portfolio margin you could have bought the right amount of /ES and lock in your profits.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree regarding portfolio margin.

Personally I still wouldn't be comfortable with 3x leverage in notional value, but that's just me. I also would never be comfortable holding a portfolio of only gamma negative strategies. You never know when the next flash crash will come. Again, matter of personal choice.

Don't forget that those backtests are based on mid prices. During periods like 2008, there is no chance to get filled anywhere close to mid prices. I believe if you applied 3x leverage in 2008, a 50-60% drawdown was almost guaranteed.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi
Thanks for a great discussion. I've been looking for this type of study for year :))

Is trading FXE even worth it to you?  Whenever I looked at it, strangles seem to pay less than a 0.9$ on a 110$ underlying.... (about 100$ max profit for 3000$ margin requirement)
Have you tried other low correlated assets like UNG,XLU? 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido