SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Alternative Investments: Real Estate Construction

One of the most common complaints received from investors relates to low yields, low returns and/or the inability to have a reasonable cash flow from investments. This is particularly true for investors who feel that they have too much invested in the stock market.  Many want to diversify into real estate of one form or another.

Often, these same investors don’t have several million dollars to invest in commercial real estate,lack experience in evaluating real estate deals, and don’t have experience navigating real estate transactions. Managing a rental portfolio of homes is also outside the experience of many.  Further, it’s quite a bit more complicated to invest in a construction deal, buy a commercial building, or run rental homes than it is to buy Apple stock. 

Over the next several articles, readers will see various types of real estate transactions and the basics of how to evaluate them, andbe presented with opportunities to participate in such transactions.  These include (a) construction from the ground up, (b) value add, and (c) cash flowing.  This week will review construction project investing using a real-world small multi-family development as an example.


All real estate, at one time or another, is built from the ground up, and the process from that beginning point is fairly simple:


  1. Identify land (or property that has a building to tear down);
  2. Decide what is going to be built on it (e.g. multi-family townhome development);
  3. Build financial model to decide if the project is worth doing;
  4. Identify the developer for the project;
  5. Design the buildings;
  6. Secure financing/investors for the project;
  7. Permit the project;
  8. Build; and
  9. Exit – whether sale or rental. 


Lorintine Capital is currently working on a multi-family townhome project with a development company named Ace Development in Dallas, Texas.  Ace Development identified a plot of land, in the medical district, right off Maple Avenue, near two major hospitals.  Ace Development perceived a current shortage of housing for doctors, residents and nurses in the area, saw that a recent nearby townhome development sold quickly, and noticed the only decent apartments nearby are fully rented. 


Ace Development, with the help of an architect, proceeded to design a 13-townhome development and to conduct a market analysis of likely sales price for 2,500 square foot townhomes. 


At this stage, a pro-forma needs to be created.  A pro-forma is simply a financial analysis of the sources and uses of capital.  In this particular transaction, the proforma looks like:




This may look complex, but it is not.  The top section is an anticipated source of capital for the project.  It includes a bank loan (senior loan), investor funds (investors equity), and what Ace Development will put into the project.  The next two sections are broken into hard costs and soft costs.  Hard costs reflect costs relating to actual construction, land acquisition, and any infrastructure that needs to be built, such as sewage and electricity.  Soft costs are those that don’t have a physical component – such as the cost involved in obtaining permits, insurance, attorney’s fees, and interest or fees paid on any loans. 


Hard costs are entirely developer driven.  The more experience a developer has with a specific market and this type of project, the more accurate the cost projects are likely to be.  Soft costs are easy to define in a fixed manner.  The interest cost of a loan, the costs of permits and legal fees are known numbers.  A good developer can easily and accurately build out a very reliable hard cost and soft cost projection.  The difficulty and variability arise from projecting income.


Once the costs side of the transaction is built out, the developer (and his financing team) need to ensure the project can be profitable, as well as stress testing the projections and investor returns.  The importance of stress testing cannot be over emphasized. Stress testing evaluates how well the investment (in this case the construction of the townhomes) will weather negative market occurrences and external events. It can also reveal hidden vulnerabilities in the returns.


On this particular transaction, Ace Development looked at the last townhomes that sold in the area and noted they sold for between $258-$270 per square foot with an average price of $265 per square foot.  Recent single-family homes in the area sold for an average of around $250 per square foot.  Ace Development then contacted several real estate brokerage firms and asked what they would anticipate the sales price to be.  They confirmed the projected sales price to be between $255-$265 per square foot.  A local bank who had funded a similar project was also asked for input, and they estimated a price of $255-$260 per square foot.The townhomes will likely be listed at the $255 per square foot price.


With this many independent sources evaluating residential space at $260 per square foot, some confidence can be felt in that number.  However, one must always plan for inaccuracies.  In this case, when building the pro-forma, Ace Development discounted the $260 estimate by 7.5% to come up with $240 per foot.  If the project can be profitable at $240 per square foot, then the project should receive a green light.


In the present case, sales at $240 per square foot would result in gross proceeds of $7,316,400. 


With hard costs, soft costs and proceeds known, the next step is to start contacting lenders to see what terms can be obtained.  A hard money lender made a firm commitment at 12.5% interest, which is the rate used in the pro-forma, as it is the “worst case” interest rate on the project.  Obtaining traditional financing from a bank would lower this rate significantly (likely into the 6.5%-7.5%). Using worst case scenarios in projections helps minimize a possible negative variance to investors.


Next is to put together an investor “offer” and include that in the model.  In these markets, I like to see investors “average” about 15% per year.  This can be accomplished through any combination of (a) preferred returns, (b) investor loans, and (c) profit sharing.  Typically these rates are up for negotiation if there is only one or two investors.  If there’s a larger pool of investors, this needs to be held constant to treat the investors the same (and avoid complaints/lawsuits down the road).


Ace Development was targeting a twenty percent return on its investment.  This allowed the developer to put an investor package of a 12% preferred return and a 35% profit share together for the investors, leading to:




The project must make sense and realistically look good “on paper.”


Once the pro-forma evaluation is done, the legal evaluation begins.  This includes:


A.    Reviewing the company agreement (or operating agreement if it’s a partnership or bylaws for corporations);

B.     Review title to the property, closing documents, loan documents, and any other financing documents;

C.     Review subscription agreement, private placement memorandum (or offering memorandum), and other investor documents; and

D.    Reviewing permitting, insurance, and construction agreements.


This step is when most investors trip up.  Paying a lawyer to do the above can cost tens of thousands of dollars (if not hundreds of thousands).  No investor is going to put $50,000 into an investment that has $50,000 in upfront costs.


This is when investment advisory firms step in.  Firms (such as Lorintine Capital and hundreds of others), put the investor packages together.  As a registered investment advisor, these firms owe fiduciary duties to their clients requiring them to act in the clients’ best interest at all times.  They must know what they’re doing, do good jobs on the due diligence, and be able to make competent recommendations. 


This is why investors should stick with registered investment advisors over brokers.  A broker’s only obligation is to sell products and to make the commissions.  Registered investment advisors owe that fiduciary duty to their clients through the entirety of the project. 


If any reader has interest in learning more about the above project, how to invest in deals similar to this, or just wishes to learn more about real estate investing in general, please reach out and contact us.

Christopher B. Welsh is a SteadyOptions contributor. He is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of a small investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of two separate private funds. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris is an active litigator and assists his clients with all aspects of their business, from start-up through closing. Chris is managing the Anchor Trades portfolio. 


What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles


  • Realistic Expectations: Using History as A Guide

    One of the biggest challenges I come across with the typical investor is maintaining realistic expectations and being able to properly understand the tradeoffs between risk and return. We all want high returns with low risk and there’s no limit to the efforts we’ll make to find it.

    By Jesse,

  • CAPM As an Alternative Option Pricing Model

    Options traders endlessly debate the merits of the Black-Scholes pricing model. Some swear by it and others don’t even try to use it. Given the many profound flaws in the model, it is not an accurate tool for developing a sense of where price is likely to move in the future. But there are alternatives.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Option Payoff Probability

    Options traders must, naturally, be concerned with the likelihood of payoff for a strategy. Ironically, one of the most often cited statistics about profit and loss is simply incorrect. That statistic is captured in the headline of a story posted online “Trading Options: Data Shows That 75% or More of Options Expire Worthless.”

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • The Minimum Effective Dose (MED) For Cash Flow Planning

    Financial planners can usually give generic advice that will be appropriate for the majority of Americans, and that’s the goal of this article. If we can get the fundamentals of cash-flow planning right (where to put your money after you earn it and pay your taxes and bills), we’re 80% of the way towards maximizing our financial situation.

    By Jesse,

  • Are You Breaking Even? Or Losing?

    Among the good reasons to trade options is the need to meet or surpass your breakeven yield. This is the yield you need just to preserve your purchasing power; and it higher than most people think. In fact, most people relying on moderate to conservative yields from stocks, mutual funds, real estate and savings accounts might be earning well below this breakeven level.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Buy When You Have the Money, Sell When You Need the Money

    Money can be quite an emotional topic for many of us. Emotions can enhance our experiences and relationships in many ways, but they can act as mental roadblocks especially when trying to make wise financial decisions. One of the most common emotional roadblocks I come across when working with individuals is an unwillingness to invest idle cash to meet long-term goals.

    By Jesse,

  • Strategy Selection vs. Risk Management

    "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money." Everett McKinley Dirksen. Let’s begin with the bottom line: When I talk to anyone about the concept of choosing an option strategy (or two) to adopt for trading, I stress that the strategy should have certain characteristics.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

  • Blending Anchor Strategy

    Anchor and Leveraged Anchor investors frequently ask why the strategy only trades SPY and SPY options rather than individual stocks, other indexes or commodities. We avoid individual stocks because of tracking and divergence issues.

    By cwelsh,

  • Fundamental Volatility and Stock Prices

    Every options trader must wonder whether any connection will be found between the company's fundamentals and stock prices (and in turn, option valuation as well). Because options are derived from stock price behavior, the analysis of stock movement is crucial to selecting options wisely; and that relies on volatility in the reported profit and loss over several years.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Bullish Short Strangles

    A bullish short strangle sounds like a complicated strategy, but it’s really quite simple for those familiar with option terminology. A short put is combined with a short call to where the position starts with some amount of positive delta overall. This distinguishes itself from a delta neutral strangle, where both the short put and short call are sold at the same delta.

    By Jesse,


  Report Article

We want to hear from you!

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs