SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

SteadyOptions Strategies Analysis


SteadyOptions trades a variety of option strategies – straddles, hedged straddles, calendars, butterflies and iron condors, volatility trades, etc..  Frequently these trades are designed to work together and complement each other, so for the last several years Steady Options has only analyzed total performance.

For instance, if there were five long straddles on, it is fairly likely that there might also be a short volatility trade on as well.  This would act as a hedge in the event that volatility dropped significantly, ameliorating some of the losses that would have come from the long straddles.  Because of the way the trades are designed to interact, the below information and summaries should not be taken as the gospel.  But it is our hope that the information can be used to improve trade weighting and structure overall.

 
In 2018, Steady Options had 161 different trades, broken down as follows:

  1. 59 Hedged Straddles;
  2. 40 Calendar Spreads;
  3. 34 Butterflies or Iron Condors;
  4. 14 Volatility Trades (VXX and SVXY);
  5. 12 Straddles; and
  6. 2 others 

With the basic information of each type of trade, we find the following:

 

Trade Type

No. Trades

Avg. Return

Std. Deviation

Max Gain

Max Loss

% Win

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedged Straddle

59

4.66%

7.00%

16.20%

-15.70%

83.05%

Calendar

40

9.62%

30.65%

47.50%

-97.40%

77.50%

Fly/Condor

34

16.72%

30.23%

81.40%

-80.40%

85.29%

Volatility

14

-13.68%

43.77%

40.90%

-100.00%

28.57%

Straddle

12

8.33%

11.46%

31.30%

-11.60%

83.33%

Other

2

3.20%

15.27%

14.00%

-7.60%

50.00%

 

A quick look shows us, not surprisingly, that Steady Options core trade of hedged straddles is easily the most reliable and lowest risk but also contains the lowest average return. Also, it has the smallest maximum loss for any of the regular trades which only goes to prove that, even in options, there’s no such thing as a free lunch.  Higher returns come with higher risk. 

 

The highest returns came with Steady Options’ butterfly and iron condor trades. Members who has been trading these for a while, particularly the TLT butterfly or SPX butterfly, probably count such trades as key pieces of their strategies.  The trades regularly generate returns of more than twenty percent.  However, unlike the hedged straddles, if things move adversely against you, close to complete losses are possible.  The TLT butterfly’s largest loss last year was over eight percent and the SPX butterfly’s largest loss was over sixty-five percent.  Which is why Steady Options emphasizes position sizing. 

 

One of the most difficult things to do in active trading, and in particular options trading, is sticking to a plan and not creating larger positions than dictated by one’s trading plan.  Steady Options uses a maximum position size of ten percent.  Even that must be done cautiously if similar positions are on at the same time.  For instance, if a member had on a full RUT condor and SPX butterfly, and the markets move significantly, it is likely that they both will be damaged.  Since the butterfly/condor trades have a higher chance of higher losses, exposure is closer to twenty percent than ten percent.  I personally avoid having both similar RUT and SPX positions on at the same time.  TLT has a lower correlation than RUT and SPX, which makes having it on, at the same time as the SPX and RUT, less of an issue.

 

One interesting factor to note, we should likely prefer a butterfly/condor trade to a calendar trade.  They come with very similar risk profiles, standard deviations and max loss and win percentages, but the butterfly/condor trades have almost double the average return. 

 

Similarly, if a member was trying to decide between an unhedged straddle and a calendar position, the unhedged straddle is likely the better candidate, as it has a similar return profile (8.33% vs 9.62%), but lower risk with lower maximum drawdowns.

 

Pulling up the rear are the volatility trades, which are easily the worst performing portion of the Steady Options library of trades.  In fact, it is likely that I will not trade any of these moving forward as stand-alone trades.  However, one of the great values of a volatility trade is using it to hedge straddle, butterfly and condor positions.  I would still use it for this purpose.  Given the Steady Options trades are typically examined by how they work together, viewing volatility trades on their own is a bit unfair.  For example, if I had on five hedged straddles, I would be fairly inclined to put on a volatility trade if it setup correctly.

 

In looking at this data and in trying to construct how to select what trades to do when, it appears that Steady Options does a pretty good job of blending the trades.  The Hedged Straddles should be the most heavily weighted (they are).  Moving forward, we may want to slightly increase the number of butterfly/condor trades and slightly reduce the number of calendar trades.  Doing so should increase risk adjusted returns by a small bit. 

 

Sometimes potential trades exist which could be setup as either a calendar or unhedged straddle.  These numbers tell us, everything else being equal, the unhedged straddle is likely the better trade from a risk adjusted standpoint.  However, don’t take this as an absolute rule.  For example, all of the AAPL calendars were successful trades, while the NFLX calendars were more volatile.  Always dive further into the data and how individual instruments perform.

 

Data like this can be dangerous if it is taken in isolation.  Always keep in mind how trades interplay with each other, look further into how individual stocks play in different types of trades, and consider this data.  This is merely another tool to use in creating a better risk adjusted trading plan.

Our contributor @Yowster does performance analysis by trade type every year. Here are the highlights from his 2018 analysis:

 

Pre-Earnings Calendars

  • Average gain% down from prior years, largely because of 2 really big losers caused by large stock price movement away from calendar strike. Not really surprising given the bigger market swings this year.   Without those big losers the average gain was right in line with prior years (we avoided big losers in prior years). Win rate comparable to prior years,. and very high.

Pre-Earnings Straddles/Strangles

  • Highest average gain percentage ever. 
  • Highest percentage of winning trades ever.
  • Very low risk trades as it takes RV levels going much lower than prior cycles for these trades to be significant losers (only 4 of 72 trades had losses over -10%).
  • Trade count down slightly from last year due to periods of elevated market volatility.   These are riskier trades to open when IV is very high, as the risk for significant straddle price decline due to falling IV can really hurt trades.

Index trades (RUT, SPX, TLT)

  • Typically longer duration trades, can be open for 30+ days.
  • Gain percentage down slightly from last year, due to 2 large losses. As with the calendars, this is not surprising given some of the bigger market swings.

VIX-based trades

  • Typical trade was for VIX to decline after spikes, but with larger and more sustained spikes this year there were many losing trades.  Two 100% losses really hurt the overall average.

Reverse Iron Condor (RIC) trades

  • Started using the RIC trade later in the year during times when VIX was high (20+).   Trades were designed to take advantage of larger price swings for stocks that was somewhat common during these elevated VIX times.   When the stock prices moved, we saw some great gains.
  • Going forward into January/February earnings cycles, will look to use RICs as alternative to straddles if VIX is still high – because although RICs hurt to IV decline, they are hurt by a lesser degree than straddles.   However, downside of RICs compared to hedged straddles is that you need the stock price to move to make a profit.

Summary
 

2018 was unlike prior years for significant chunks of time.   Prior years had low volatility and any VIX spike above 20 quickly reverted back down.  2018 had VIX near 20 for about 5 months of the year (7 months were much like prior years).   Despite the increase in volatility, 78% of all SO trades were winners with an average gain of 7.07%.    

The biggest take away from this year is that certain trade types are better for certain market volatility conditions – hedged straddles and calendars are great to put on when volatility is low but they are riskier when volatility is elevated. When volatility is elevated, other trades like RICs and butterfly are less risky to put on during these times.

 

SO is a great community, where members share ideas that benefit all of us and we all continue to learn more and more. Looking forward to continued success in 2019.
 

Christopher B. Welsh is a SteadyOptions contributor. He is a licensed investment advisor in the State of Texas and is the president of a small investment firm, Lorintine Capital, LP which is a general partner of two separate private funds. He offers investment advice to his clients, both in the law practice and outside of it. Chris is an active litigator and assists his clients with all aspects of their business, from start-up through closing. Chris is managing the Anchor Trades portfolio.         

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Using ORATS in Anchor Testing

    The purpose of the below piece is to demonstrate how Lorntine Capital uses ORATS (Options Research and Technology Services) in our own backtesting. Note: ORATS does not pay me for writing this but has requested that if we like the software, we assist in promoting it.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 20 views
  • Calculating the Probability of Option Payoff

    A calculation of “breakeven” as well as maximum profit or loss, sets up a single system for modeling and comparing one option to another. But it might also require traders to adopt an unrealistic assumption about outcomes based on best-case or worst-care scenario.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 128 views
  • Realistic Expectations: Using History as A Guide

    One of the biggest challenges I come across with the typical investor is maintaining realistic expectations and being able to properly understand the tradeoffs between risk and return. We all want high returns with low risk and there’s no limit to the efforts we’ll make to find it.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 175 views
  • CAPM As an Alternative Option Pricing Model

    Options traders endlessly debate the merits of the Black-Scholes pricing model. Some swear by it and others don’t even try to use it. Given the many profound flaws in the model, it is not an accurate tool for developing a sense of where price is likely to move in the future. But there are alternatives.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 361 views
  • Option Payoff Probability

    Options traders must, naturally, be concerned with the likelihood of payoff for a strategy. Ironically, one of the most often cited statistics about profit and loss is simply incorrect. That statistic is captured in the headline of a story posted online “Trading Options: Data Shows That 75% or More of Options Expire Worthless.”

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 456 views
  • The Minimum Effective Dose (MED) For Cash Flow Planning

    Financial planners can usually give generic advice that will be appropriate for the majority of Americans, and that’s the goal of this article. If we can get the fundamentals of cash-flow planning right (where to put your money after you earn it and pay your taxes and bills), we’re 80% of the way towards maximizing our financial situation.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 486 views
  • Are You Breaking Even? Or Losing?

    Among the good reasons to trade options is the need to meet or surpass your breakeven yield. This is the yield you need just to preserve your purchasing power; and it higher than most people think. In fact, most people relying on moderate to conservative yields from stocks, mutual funds, real estate and savings accounts might be earning well below this breakeven level.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 584 views
  • Buy When You Have the Money, Sell When You Need the Money

    Money can be quite an emotional topic for many of us. Emotions can enhance our experiences and relationships in many ways, but they can act as mental roadblocks especially when trying to make wise financial decisions. One of the most common emotional roadblocks I come across when working with individuals is an unwillingness to invest idle cash to meet long-term goals.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,210 views
  • Strategy Selection vs. Risk Management

    "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money." Everett McKinley Dirksen. Let’s begin with the bottom line: When I talk to anyone about the concept of choosing an option strategy (or two) to adopt for trading, I stress that the strategy should have certain characteristics.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 548 views
  • Blending Anchor Strategy

    Anchor and Leveraged Anchor investors frequently ask why the strategy only trades SPY and SPY options rather than individual stocks, other indexes or commodities. We avoid individual stocks because of tracking and divergence issues.

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 670 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs