SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

# Risk Reward Vs. Probability Of Profit

How many times did you hear the following claims:

• "Our system has 90% success ratio".
• "Our trades have 1 to 4 risk reward".
• “Always keep your reward to risk ratio greater than 1”
• “Only take trades with a minimum of a 2:1 reward to risk ratio”
• “If you aim for more than you risk, then you will make money.”

Lets examine those statements and see how you should put them in context and consider other parameters as well. We will use vertical spread strategy as an example.

Lets take a look at the following trade:

• Sell to open RUT August 1175 call
• Buy to open RUT August 1185 call

This is the risk profile of the trade:

As we can see, we are risking \$822 to make \$177. This is pretty bad risk reward. However, the picture looks a lot better when we look at the probability of success: it is 78%. We need the underlying to stay below 1175 by August expiration, and there is 78% chance that it will happen.

Lets take a look at another trade:

• Sell to open RUT August 1100 call
• Buy to open RUT August 1110 call

This is the risk profile of the trade:

As we can see, we are risking only \$185 to make \$815. That's terrific risk/reward (more than 1:4). The only problem is that RUT will have to go below 1110, and there is only 20.7% probability that this will happen. (In fact, to realize the full profit, RUT has to go below 1100 and stay there by expiration).

In this trade, excellent risk/reward = low probability of success.

The following table illustrates the relation between probability of success and risk-reward:

Of course, this is not an exact science, but it helps us to see the approximate relation and trade-off between the risk-reward and the probability of success.

So next time someone will ask you: "Would you risk \$9 to make \$1?" - consider the context. Yes, it is a terrible risk/reward, but considering high probability of success, this is not such a bad trade. It will likely be a winner most of the time - the big question is what you do in those cases it goes against you?

At the same time, the answer to the question "Would you risk \$1 to make \$9?" is also not so obvious. It is an excellent risk/reward, but the probability to actually realize this reward is very low.

In trading, there is always a trade-off. You will have to choose between a good risk-reward and a high probability of success. You cannot have both.

Watch the video:

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

### Articles

• #### 7 Ways To Avoid Forex Scams

Forex scams are becoming frequent. Michael Greenberg reports on luxurious expenses, including a submarine bought from the money taken from forex traders. The forex industry is recently seeing more and more scams. Here are 7 ways to avoid losing your money in such scams:

By Kim,

• 135 views
• #### Historical Performance of Selling S&P 500 OTM Calls

If you’re comfortable owning an S&P 500 index fund, you should also be comfortable with covered calls. For example, CBOE publishes data on a simple covered call strategy with their BXMD index. The description from CBOE is as follows:

By Jesse,

• 141 views
• #### Are Trusts the Best Way to Leave Money to Your Heirs?

First, this is a general comment. Every person’s situation is different. I could say “95% of people don’t need this,” and you could be in the 5% who do. So, don’t ever make personal investment or estate planning decisions based on an online post, contact an actual investment advisor or attorney - most will have initial conversations for free (I do).

By cwelsh,

• 122 views
• #### Anchor and Steady Momentum update

As our members know, we introduced a new strategy to our members few months ago - Steady Momentum. The goal is to produce﻿ higher risk﻿-adjusted﻿﻿﻿﻿﻿﻿ returns﻿ than﻿ the underlying﻿﻿ indexes. We also introduced a new version of our Anchor Trades strategy. This post will provide an update on both strategies.

By Kim,

• 192 views
• #### GBP/USD: If Boris Johnson Becomes PM, Volatility will Rise

UK PM May is set to step down and Boris Johnson is the leading candidate to replace her. The erratic former foreign secretary may increase GBP/USD volatility. Despite Johnson's Brexit credentials, he could surprise and be pound-positive.

By Kim,

• 259 views

Our Steady Momentum PutWrite strategy attempts to outperform the CBOE PUT index, which writes cash secured puts on the S&P 500. An investable version of this strategy can be purchased with the ETF PUTW. The historical data for PUT extends back more than 30 years, highlighting how writing puts can be an attractive strategy.

By Jesse,

• 202 views

Higher dividends are better, right? Yes, usually. But not always. Dividends are a fundamental indicator and many options traders are not interested in fundamentals. But as a means for picking stocks on which to trade options, some fundamentals offer great insight.

By Michael C. Thomsett,

• 300 views
• #### BTC/USD Struggles To Maintain Newly Conquered Territory

The first condition to declare the market is in bullish mode has been fulfilled. Now it is Ethereum's turn to assume its part of the game. XRP/USD keeps a low profile, waiting for its chance. We begin the week of analysis celebrating the bullish behavior of Bitcoin late on Sunday.

By Kim,

• 285 views
• #### Fear of Options Assignment

One of the most common fears in option trading is one of early assignment.  The fear of having a large number of shares (or a large short position) coupled with a potential margin call (or Reg-T call) causing a sudden shortage of cash in their accounts worries investors.  Investors commonly view assignment as a huge potential risk.

By cwelsh,

• 1 comment
• 431 views
• #### The Value of Equity Asset Class Diversification

This investing lesson is a tale of two time periods that highlight the important role of equity asset class diversification and systematic rebalancing in an equity fund portfolio.  Human nature is a failed investor, when our natural instinct is often to do the exact opposite of what we should do in practice.

By Jesse,

• 352 views

Report Article

## We want to hear from you!

Trading always comes hand in hand with risk and is directly proportional to success. If don't take risk you will not succeed.

##### Share on other sites

Of course. But it is also important to understand the trade-off between the risk-reward and the probability of success. It is important to understand that when implementing a 90% winning ratio strategy, you sacrifice something - it doesn't come for free.

##### Share on other sites

This sounds like one of those "there isn't a right or wrong answer"... I think by place 90% probabilty trades you will be close to "picking up nickles infront of a steamroller"... on the other hand, if you do the 10% probabiliyt trades, they will be lottery tickets and you will rarely win... I don't think neither of those trades can be profitable unless you tweak that system. In the 90% chance trade, it will be that 10% that will wipe you out...

##### Share on other sites

Absolutely. It all comes to trade management.

There is still a small edge on all those trades (10%, 90% or 50%) due to the fact that in the long term, Implied Volatility tends to be slightly higher than Historical Volatility. But the main edge comes from the trade management.

##### Share on other sites

With the picking up nickels in front of a steamroller analogy doesn't that really only apply with the spread moves completely against you. Can't you avoid the steamroller by putting a stop loss in place? Are there brokers that have a function where you can have the strategy close out if the underlying security hits a dollar amount? You may get your arm clipped but not run over....

I placed an \$AAPL bull put spread where I bough the Aug 15 93 put and sold the Aug 15 94 put. I collected 150\$ premium and rode it out to collect 90% of the premium before closing out the trade. (The only reason I don't hold into expiration is I am trying to avoid after hours trading debacles)

If I had parameters in place to avoid it ever even getting to the 94 mark, wouldn't it make sense to place this trade over and over and over if the probability of success is there?

##### Share on other sites

Most brokers have this functionality. You just set a contingent order to close or adjust based on certain parameters. We do it all the time in our Steady Condors portfolio.

##### Share on other sites

what you have forgotten to explain is that even with a 78 percent win rate you could still get 4 to 5 losing trades in a row so risking 800 to make 200 in your exanple would be a financial disaster should you run into these horrendous losing clusters

##### Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Guest uktrader said:

what you have forgotten to explain is that even with a 78 percent win rate you could still get 4 to 5 losing trades in a row so risking 800 to make 200 in your exanple would be a financial disaster should you run into these horrendous losing clusters

Of course. But this is true with any trade. This is where position sizing and risk management come in place. If you make 10-15% on you winning trades, you cannot afford to lose more than 20-25% on your losing trades.

There are few dimensions to every trade. Risk/reward, probability of success, risk management etc. The point is that you cannot take just one dimension (like 80% winning ratio) and say that this is what makes this trade better than others.