SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

NikTam

CML TradeMachine Trade Ideas

1,717 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sirion said:

Does anyone know a good source for looking up previous expected and actual moves? I know this has been mentioned by other users before in other context, just blanking on good search terms right now

Like that ? My service is not free though.

image.png

 

If you really want free, there is https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/MSFT/Earnings/Earnings-Charts or maybe optionslam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, siddharth310584 said:

@NikTam

would you suggest entering vz msft and ba today ?

Except for BA you can get in at lower prices than I did.  So I would say yes.  The historical data is encouraging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Djtux said:

Like that ? My service is not free though.

image.png

 

If you really want free, there is https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/MSFT/Earnings/Earnings-Charts or maybe optionslam.

You already got my money, man :P Thanks for the support.

Do you generally think that ATM straddle RV roughly equals expected move or do you take some margin off? I think tastytrade argues a 15% discount, though I'm not sure on the methodology. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, NikTam said:

Except for BA you can get in at lower prices than I did.  So I would say yes.  The historical data is encouraging.

    BOT    1    VZ Apr27'18 49 CALL    0.60   

Let's see...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Sirion said:

You already got my money, man :P Thanks for the support.

Do you generally think that ATM straddle RV roughly equals expected move or do you take some margin off? I think tastytrade argues a 15% discount, though I'm not sure on the methodology. 

Ah my bad then lol.

Go to https://www.volatilityhq.com/backtester/straddle_table/?symbol=MSFT&submit=Run+backtest then.

The ATM straddle RV is just the price of the straddle divided by the stock price. I believe it's the same definition for OptionSlam and MarketChameleon.

If you want to calculate like Tastytrade or Optionalpha, you would have to multiply the RV by 0.84, i don't remember the details of why, but it has to be related with the assumption of a normal distribution and you are trying to compute the 1 standard deviation.

https://tastytrade.desk.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2615508-where-can-i-find-the-expected-move-

Quote

The expected move range is calculated by multiplying the ATM straddle (a strategy that combines selling an at the money call and put) in the nearest expiration by 0.85. The end result is a +- number that we apply above and below the current stock price evenly.

I think that TOS as even a different metrics the MMM (market maker move), but i think it's proprietary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IgorK said:

    BOT    1    VZ Apr27'18 49 CALL    0.60   

Let's see...

I like BA right now -- but it has not been very predictable lately!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, NikTam said:

I like BA right now -- but it has not been very predictable lately!

A bit expensive for me now :)

Did I at least got right VZ call?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, NikTam said:

Well, it’s the one I’m in.  :-)

So tomorrow is the last day? Or Monday? As I understand they report Tuesday before open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IgorK said:

So tomorrow is the last day? Or Monday? As I understand they report Tuesday before open.

 Correct.  So out tomorrow or Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, IgorK said:

Let's see where it goes for now. Looking at 96.5 call for now.

    BOT    1    MSFT Apr27'18 96.5 CALL    1.49    

And of cause it went down :)
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/20/2018 at 11:03 AM, IgorK said:

    BOT    1    MSFT Apr27'18 96.5 CALL    1.49    

And of cause it went down :)
 

    SLD    1    MSFT Apr27'18 96.5 CALL    1.70 
Just me. Don't have time to watch it. Thanks @NikTam for the idea.

Edited by IgorK
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/18/2018 at 11:32 AM, NikTam said:

I have entered BA and MSFT for PE 7-1Pro Scan PE 7-1 DOW 4-18-2018.PNG

ugh.. BA was in the green this morning and I didn't get to close before the bottom dropped out on me. This is brutal. Lesson learned.. the price of the option had more than doubled, I should have just taken the win.

I think MSFT flared into the green too, but at least has one more day. Hoping for a recovery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sirion said:

ugh.. BA was in the green this morning and I didn't get to close before the bottom dropped out on me. This is brutal. Lesson learned.. the price of the option had more than doubled, I should have just taken the win.

I think MSFT flared into the green too, but at least has one more day. Hoping for a recovery.

BA:  I exited at BE at the bell this morning and then watched it take off.  After taking heat for last 3 days I flinched and missed out on the opportunity.  Sickening.

MSFT:  I am hanging on and waiting for it to live up to it's back-test history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NikTam said:

BA:  I exited at BE at the bell this morning and then watched it take off.  After taking heat for last 3 days I flinched and missed out on the opportunity.  Sickening.

MSFT:  I am hanging on and waiting for it to live up to it's back-test history.

You may have missed the peak.. but I'm wishing I got out for breakeven now. Down 60%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is why I tend to pull the trigger so quickly after being negative for few days.  These things can turn on a dime.  But then I miss opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NikTam said:

Which is why I tend to pull the trigger so quickly after being negative for few days.  These things can turn on a dime.  But then I miss opportunity.

I almost closed (had a sell order in, just didn't get filled), and my thinking was that it already had an amazing day to day move (over x2). Still, there was positive news among other things to drive the run.. and the bottom fell out of it.

In the future, I'll be more likely to take the win (or even close half) on the last day of the trade.

If it gets much worse I might just roll the dice on earnings. Not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, rasar said:

I'm curious why this forum went radio-silent for the past month. Did something happen ?

I think the strategies that worked in momentum market we had past year and a half stopped working.. Most of the trades backtested for success where since 2016 lows it seems.. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, apsoccermd said:

I think the strategies that worked in momentum market we had past year and a half stopped working.. Most of the trades backtested for success where since 2016 lows it seems.. 

Hmm. I had been contemplating signing up, but I guess I'll hold off. Either way, I would expect at least some chatter; it's like someone put out a gag order :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, apsoccermd said:

I think the strategies that worked in momentum market we had past year and a half stopped working.. Most of the trades backtested for success where since 2016 lows it seems.. 

I would agree with the above.  I had many successes last quarter of 2017 but more 50/50 in 2018.  So I've lost some of my zeal for Pre Earnings Momentum trades.  And I've been focusing more on non-directional trading -- which is SO's prime directive.

 

Absolutely no gag-order.

Edited by NikTam
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of thought that was a big issue with regard to this thing.

And, especially using 2 or 3 year look back periods, in a straight up bull market. Even 5 years.

It really needed to have a lot of current research in full blown sideways market, which is volatile. And it really didn't.

Are you all hanging on to the Trade Machine, for now, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had originally subscribed to CML, but I recently dropped my subscription after using it less and less.  For me, it just wasn't a match for my trading style.  It was a fine tool for backtesting different options strategies based on historical stock price movement, or lack thereof.  However, trade entry and exit were based on dates and gain/loss thresholds.  So much of the SO-style trades are based on determining good entry points based on IV and earnings history and how prior cycles compare to one other.   Even the SO index trades (VIX, SPX, RUT) factor market volatility in trade entry/exit decisions. You couldn't use CML to base trade entry on volatility based triggers.

 

For the SO-style trades, having the RV analysis tools (volatilityHQ, artoftrading) are by far the most important.   Being able to easily & quickly generate RV charts for calendars and straddles, IV charts and earnings history is the most important thing.   Going back a couple of years, it was so much more difficult to do this analysis than it is now.

 

IMO, if you are looking for a tool to help with you SO-style trades then CML is certainly not a "must have" - the RV tools are so much more useful for them.   If you are looking to make other types of trades based on past history of stock price movement then you may find CML useful.  

Edited by Yowster
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've personally started using the pre-earnings momentum trades again and it's gone fairly well, but yeah I'm using CML itself less and less. 

The only thing I'd use it for back-testing is post-earnings ICs. I need to devote the time again to finding them, but they've been painful so I may just avoid them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are too many variables to just rely on CML TM results. You have to factor in volatility/pricing, fundamentals, technicals, and overall market environment.    

Edited by clipsnation183

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, rasar said:

it's like someone put out a gag order :-)

 

The best gag order is making a few losses in a row :-)

My success with the first 100 CML trades is documented on page 32 (I wish I knew how to link a post - someone? help?).

 

The next 50 trades didn't fare so well - for the same reasons posters have already mentioned above.

Plus, I have been going hell-for-leather on the straddles/calender's, doing these like they are going out of fashion, literally trading 6-7 hours a day. I am still a CML subscriber, and will start trading it's ideas again in a week or so. CML trades can be a little 'shallow' (minimal thought required, no real fine-tuning at entry points, nor at exit, a monkey with typing skills could do them) but I feel that if they were combined with some discretionary trading then maybe the results would be better.

 

Update : trying to link post :

 

 

 

Edited by zxcv64
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, zxcv64 said:

The best gag order is making a few losses in a row :-)

My success with the first 100 CML trades is documented on page 32 (I wish I knew how to link a post - someone? help?).

 

The next 50 trades didn't fare so well - for the same reasons posters have already mentioned above.

Plus, I have been going hell-for-leather on the straddles/calender's, doing these like they are going out of fashion, literally trading 6-7 hours a day. I am still a CML subscriber, and will start trading it's ideas again in a week or so. CML trades can be a little 'shallow' (minimal thought required, no real fine-tuning at entry points, nor at exit, a monkey with typing skills could do them) but I feel that if they were combined with some discretionary trading then maybe the results would be better.

 

This post ? https://steadyoptions.com/forums/forum/topic/4072-cml-trademachine-trade-ideas/?do=findComment&comment=98547

 

You can get the link by clicking on the top right of the post : 

 

image.png

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now we have some chatter. :D (sorry I was out for the evening)

I agree - SO trades are also central to my trading. But I liked the idea of having a number of smaller "satellite" trades hanging around to make the days a bit more exciting. I found the CML suggestions, coupled with the associated volatilityhq heat maps provided me with just enough science to validate and place a handful of these trades every couple of days.

I did read @zxcv64's post detailing the trade history; despite the recent losses, that's what had actually added to my desire to keep doing those trades. I don't remember who had mentioned it earlier (a few months ago - I think it was @Sirion), but a comment about "trade small and trade often" had spurred me to add these momentum trades to my portfolio, and I was mostly happy with the results (of course, my sample size isn't as extensive as others').

The reason for nudging this thread was to try and some momentum plays going again, and I figured CML would be a good place to get some ideas.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just a couple weeks short of 1 year trading these and I've actually made more CML trades during that period than SO trades. The problem I run into is that they're almost all bullish trades, so it is easy for big swings to occur when the market throws a fit. If you look at a chart for SPY, you'll see two large drops in a relatively short period of time this year - one at the end of January through mid-February and another mid-March through early April. During those two periods, my average returns on CML trades were -17.4% and -21.2%, respectively. The period in-between (mid-February through mid-March was +11.1% and the period since (early-April to now) was +11.2%. So since the last week of January, I've had returns of +0.5% per trade on the CML trades. I don't find these up-and-down swings to be surprising or unexpected and that's why I allocate less than 1% per trade and keep the overall allocation below 10% of my portfolio. But to answer your question, I haven't been posting on here because of time - I've traveled more and had less time during the day for most of this year. Plus, I don't really have any new trades to add since I still don't subscribe to CML and all the trades I've made are either from the CML blog or from what others have posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an example of how I have used CML as an adjunct to the SO calendar trades, pre earnings.

We know that those calendars , on their own, are very good trades, with a great success rate.

We also know how, if you wait for the "official" alert to come out, more often then not, the price jumps and you either miss the trade entirely, or have to wait a few days, if you are lucky.

Sometimes they jump a huge amount right away.

So, I added the CML concept of price having a run up in the period approaching earnings, and if it backtested well in this area, I would put on less expensive (RV) calendars, which were a few strikes above where the price currently was, and where the "official " trade strike was.

I have found that this has worked far more often, for me, than not.

This is a way of not using CML entirely for a trade, but using an aspect of it, to add to the overall mix of an SO trade.

 

Just a recent example would be NTES, where the official trade was around the $245 strike.

I put on $265 and $270, and the price was $268 the last 3 days before earnings.

Edited by cuegis
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still registered users for Trademachine, not that I am always follow their recommendation but it is some kind of other information source. I am just curious how this tool is developing. Most of the trade recommendation are obviously directional but this is not bad by definition. I always check the entriy signal and validate with other pattern analysis, e.g.  Trademachine tells me to enter a trade and I see that the trade did runaway couple days ago and now is locked at a resistance level. I would not enter this trade. But this depends on each personal style. I am basically using is as research tool than trading tool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a new subscriber to TradeMachine. My biggest complaint so far is that while the site claims that its default fill type is the more realistic halfway between mid-market, the Pro Scanner uses mid-market. Which means that its results are basically worthless since you have to click into each trade and change the setting to halfway and watch the majority of the trades collapse, which I imagine is also indicative of how illiquid a lot of those trades would be in reality. Is there a way to set default trade settings across all searches?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, https://cmlviz.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8740b0e4e1d86119b842cbdf2&id=a9d07ee62f&e=512930d399 MU pre-earnings long call was published today.

However, it seems to disagree with @Djtux's return matrix, which shows some cycles losing.

Also, against the thesis of the trade, it seems to only show optimism for a short period - and then holds steady for the last week.

I'm leaning against this one personally - I don't see enough to pull me in in this environment, but I am curious about where the difference lies in the CML data and vol hq's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Sirion said:

So, https://cmlviz.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8740b0e4e1d86119b842cbdf2&id=a9d07ee62f&e=512930d399 MU pre-earnings long call was published today.

However, it seems to disagree with @Djtux's return matrix, which shows some cycles losing.

Also, against the thesis of the trade, it seems to only show optimism for a short period - and then holds steady for the last week.

I'm leaning against this one personally - I don't see enough to pull me in in this environment, but I am curious about where the difference lies in the CML data and vol hq's?

The results appear to be inconsistent with their own back tests. I poited this out to them and am awaiting a response.

Will report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Sirion said:

So, https://cmlviz.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8740b0e4e1d86119b842cbdf2&id=a9d07ee62f&e=512930d399 MU pre-earnings long call was published today.

However, it seems to disagree with @Djtux's return matrix, which shows some cycles losing.

Also, against the thesis of the trade, it seems to only show optimism for a short period - and then holds steady for the last week.

I'm leaning against this one personally - I don't see enough to pull me in in this environment, but I am curious about where the difference lies in the CML data and vol hq's?

I guess there are 3 factors at least from a very quick look :

  • we don't count the same : i use trading days, CML uses either calendar or trading days depending on some conditions
  • there is no stop loss or profit taking on volatilityhq.com
  • the last cycle gave a huge profit

Here is the original backtesting from CML : https://tm4.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20180601173651_HjKkVvbCyCUuHSJV

Enter 15 days before earning, exit 1 day before earning. I guess it's calendar days.

image.png

 

If you set to enter 14 days before earning and exit 1 day before earning, here is the backtesting link : http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20180601194513_7fVaVw6R2uHb5T4A

image.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Sirion said:

So, https://cmlviz.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8740b0e4e1d86119b842cbdf2&id=a9d07ee62f&e=512930d399 MU pre-earnings long call was published today.

However, it seems to disagree with @Djtux's return matrix, which shows some cycles losing.

Also, against the thesis of the trade, it seems to only show optimism for a short period - and then holds steady for the last week.

I'm leaning against this one personally - I don't see enough to pull me in in this environment, but I am curious about where the difference lies in the CML data and vol hq's?

I don't see how you can compare these two approaches.

They really have absolutely nothing in common.

CML is a 100% directional trade, that is just outright long delta in the period leading up to earnings.

The results are based on a data set of 8 most recent cycles, which all took place in a straight up, raging bull market, all around,as the wind blowing in it's sails.

The Vol HQ approach is way of measuring the RV of the options pricing of either straddles, or calendars, which are as much as possible, non directional trades, also during a period leading up to earnings.

It is the most clear case of apples and oranges.

The only things they have in common is that they are making a trade in the period leading up to earnings, and they both are out of the trade before earnings are released, so not making any earnings bets.

Other than that, they have nothing to do with each other.

But, I do think that you can use the CML Trade Machine as a tool to backtest previous outcomes of straddles, calendars, etc. in those pre earnings periods, to see how they behaved AFTER first using the data you have examined from volatility hq, to provide you with the candidates, that appear to have the best RV's working for them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cuegis said:

I don't see how you can compare these two approaches.

They really have absolutely nothing in common.

CML is a 100% directional trade, that is just outright long delta in the period leading up to earnings.

The results are based on a data set of 8 most recent cycles, which all took place in a straight up, raging bull market, all around,as the wind blowing in it's sails.

The Vol HQ approach is way of measuring the RV of the options pricing of either straddles, or calendars, which are as much as possible, non directional trades, also during a period leading up to earnings.

It is the most clear case of apples and oranges.

The only things they have in common is that they are making a trade in the period leading up to earnings, and they both are out of the trade before earnings are released, so not making any earnings bets.

Other than that, they have nothing to do with each other.

But, I do think that you can use the CML Trade Machine as a tool to backtest previous outcomes of straddles, calendars, etc. in those pre earnings periods, to see how they behaved AFTER first using the data you have examined from volatility hq, to provide you with the candidates, that appear to have the best RV's working for them.

 

I do have other features than just the RV charts. But it is only available to subscribers.

Under the Beta tab, you have the 'return matrix' which for MU gives the screenshot below. This is what @Sirion was referring to.

I detailed the return matrix in this thread but is probably lost under the 34 pages :).

The return matrix allows to change the entry and exit parameter to test the robustness of the strategy : if timing perfectly the entry and exit is necessary to get a huge return, i feel like it's like over-fitting on your in-sample data. 

You can see the details of each earning cycle to drill down as well and double-check before making your own decision.

image.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Djtux said:

I guess there are 3 factors at least from a very quick look :

  • we don't count the same : i use trading days, CML uses either calendar or trading days depending on some conditions
  • there is no stop loss or profit taking on volatilityhq.com
  • the last cycle gave a huge profit

Here is the original backtesting from CML : https://tm4.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20180601173651_HjKkVvbCyCUuHSJV

Enter 15 days before earning, exit 1 day before earning. I guess it's calendar days.

image.png

 

If you set to enter 14 days before earning and exit 1 day before earning, here is the backtesting link : http://tm.cmlviz.com/index.php?share_key=20180601194513_7fVaVw6R2uHb5T4A

image.png

 

Derp, I see the problem. Mixed issue of looking at the wrong entry date and not realizing the 2016-12 cycle had one very good day and would have been closed due to profit-taking before it crashed and burned. Hm.

Still on the fence about this one - I've seen better pre-earnings momentum trades, though there aren't a lot available right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Djtux said:

I do have other features than just the RV charts. But it is only available to subscribers.

Under the Beta tab, you have the 'return matrix' which for MU gives the screenshot below. This is what @Sirion was referring to.

I detailed the return matrix in this thread but is probably lost under the 34 pages :).

The return matrix allows to change the entry and exit parameter to test the robustness of the strategy : if timing perfectly the entry and exit is necessary to get a huge return, i feel like it's like over-fitting on your in-sample data. 

You can see the details of each earning cycle to drill down as well and double-check before making your own decision.

image.png

Sorry, I did not know that. It didn't seem to come up as I was exploring your site as a non-subscriber. All I saw was the straddles, calendars, and, the scanner, which I asked you about yesterday.

I guess I better subscribe soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OPtrdr Note that MTG has not confirmed earnings date.   Most cycles has this date prior to July 20, but there are a few that are later.   So, if you enter a Jul20 straddle and earnings date winds up later, then IV (and therefore straddle price) would drop significantly.   Conversely, if earnings date is announced prior to Jul20, then the straddle would likely get the benefit of a smaller IV increase (although the increase would be much less than the drop in the case of earnings after Jul20).   Just something to be aware of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Thread seems to have died off. Still haven't decided to subscribe but I took the Google momentum trade they emailed out the other day.  closed part for a small winner holding one more to see if I get the 40% Target they mentioned. anyone else take the same trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, mustafaoe said:

Yes, I did the same trade, but slight different. Instead of the call I have opened a BCS. the idea is basically the same.

 

image.png

Is that a Bear Call Diagonal?

It looks like you are short 8/17 1300 calls, and long 9/21 1320 calls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Kim
      Before ever entering a trade, we need a plan. For example, we want to know whether we should avoid earnings, or trade with earnings. Knowing where to place a stop loss, and even a limit gain. Knowing which strike to trade. Knowing whether to trade the monthly or weekly options.

      But it even goes further – even if we know which direction we think the stock will go – do we sell puts or sell a put spread? Do we buy calls or a call spread? Should we be net owners or sellers of volatility? Has there been measurable edge in the trade in the past, or not?

      This is how people profit from the option market — it’s preparation, not luck.

      All of these questions were designed to be answered with the CMLviz Trade Machine, which is an option back-tester created by Capital Market Laboratories (CML). I have been in the same circle as this company’s founder for years.

      CML is in fact a member of the famed Thomson First Call roster. Their research sits side-by-side with Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barclays and the rest of the bulge bracket banks, but they have a different goal: To break the information asymmetry that exists between the top 0.1% and the rest.

      To learn more about the product, you can tap on the link below. You will see a 4- minute video demonstration. I think, for many of you, it will become a valuable tool to supplement your trading and the analysis that Steady Options provides.

      Tap Here to Watch the Video and Sign Up

      P.S. Our members know that I rarely promote other products. But this one really got me excited. I encourage you to give it a try. They plan tons of additional functionality in the upcoming months, including custom strategies to trade around earnings which can be a great benefit for us.
       
      CMLviz Trade Machine is constantly adding new features, and the price will be increasing as new features are added. Those who sign up are grandfathered at the price they signed up even as the prices increase.
    • By Kim
      Couple of weeks ago, the CML published an article The Volatility Option Trade After Earnings in PayPal Holdings Inc.

      The setup was:

      "The week following PayPal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) has had one fairly consistent pattern -- volatility. If we take a myopic view after looking at the last three-years and focus on the last six-months, that pattern is yet more decisive. Irrespective of whether the earnings move was large or small, if we tested waiting one-day after earnings and then holding a long out of the money (40 delta) strangle for one-week (using two-week options), the results were quite strong. This trade opens one-day after earnings were announced to try to find a stock that moves a lot after the earnings announcement."

      If we bought the out-of-the-money strangle in PayPal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) over the last three-years but only held it after earnings we get these results: 
       
      PYPL
      Long out-of-the-money strangle   % Wins: 64%   Wins: 7   Losses: 4   % Return:  174%  Tap Here to See the Back-test

      The backtest also defines very clear rules for the trade:

      * Open the long out-of-the-money (40 delta) strangle one-calendar day after earnings.
      * Close the strangle 7 calendar days after earnings. 
      * Use the options closest to 14 days from expiration (but more than 7 days). 
       
      On July 25, I posted the link to the PYPL potential trade on the forum:
       


      On the next day I posted my entry:



      Please note that this trade didn't make it into the official model portfolio due to higher potential risk - hence I mentioned "small allocation only".

      The next day, some of the members started posting their exit prices:





      I was out a day later for 27% gain:



      Some members did even better:



      And finally an interesting comment from another member:



      Those are real trades, from real traders, posted in real time. 

      Attention tastytrade: Buying premium does work - you just need to know how to do it.

      This is how people profit from the option market. It's not guessing or speculation. Take a reasonable idea or hypothesis, use a rationale system to help overcome cognitive biases, and test it. Tap the link below to learn more: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      When you combine the best options trading community with the best backtester, the results are unbeatable.

      Related articles:
      Lessons From Facebook Earnings Disaster The Incredible Option Trade In VXX Post Earnings Option Trade In Facebook Why We Sell Our Straddles Before Earnings Earnings Momentum Trading In Google
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN)
       
        How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN)
      Date Published: 2017-06-28 

      This article can be seen in a video or as a full written article below the video. 
       

      PREFACE 
      Trading options in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) using a short window before earnings are released has been a staggering winner over the last several years. 

      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market. Identifying strategies that are tightly risk controlled, take no stock direction risk and no earnings risk. Strategies that are immune from a bull or bear market. 

      STORY 
      Everyone knows that the day of an earnings announcement is a risky event for a stock. But the question every option trader, whether professional or amateur, has long asked is if there is a way to profit from this known implied volatility rise. It turns out, that over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies, the answer is actually, yes. 
        Yes, there is a systematic way to trade this repeating phenomenon, without making a bet on earnings or stock direction.

      THE SET UP 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a couple of weeks before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. Here is the setup: 
       

      We are testing opening the position 14 days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money straddle in Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's a 162% return over the last three-years, with 9 winning trades and 3 losing trades. But, let's take a step toward risk reduction before we move forward. 

      While we are looking at this same trade, let's also set a rule that if at any point in the two-week period the straddle loses 25% of its value, we just close it and wait for the next pre-earnings cycle. While we're at it, we will do the same with the upside -- that is, if at any time during the two-weeks the straddle goes up 25%, we take the profits and close the trade. 

      For clarity, this is what we test: 
       

      And now we can see the results over the same three-year period: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      While we are taking 75% less risk, we are seeing about the same results -- we will continue down this risk adjusted path for the rest of this dossier. 

      Digging Deeper 
      Now we can see the results over the last two-years: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's a 126% return and 7 winning trades with 1 losing trade. Remember, this trade takes no stock direction risk and no earnings risk -- this is completely agnostic to a bull or bear market. 

      Even further, that 126% actually came on just 16 weeks of trading (2-weeks per earnings cycle, 8 earnings cycles), which is over 400% annualized returns. 

      Now we look at the last year: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      We see a 65.2% percent return on 3 winning trade and 1 losing trade. 

      Finally, we can look at the last six-months: 
         
      Click here to see the back-test live

      That's 40.1%, winning both of the last two pre-earnings trades. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market. Identifying strategies that are tightly risk controlled, take no stock direction bets or earnings risk. It's preparation, not luck. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition.
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Profit from Trading Options in Autodesk Inc Right After Earnings
       


      Date Published: 2017-05-18 
      Written by Ophir Gottlieb 

      LEDE 
      While Autodesk Inc (NASDAQ:ADSK) just crushed earnings again, sending shares soaring in the after hours trade, one option trade after earnings has been a consistent winner. It takes no earnings risk, little stock direction risk and over the last year has never lost while returning over 160% annualized returns. 

      The Trade After the Excitement 
      While most of the focus is on the actual earnings move for a stock, that's the distraction when it comes to the option market. For Autodesk Inc, irrespective of whether the earnings move was up or down, if we waited one-day after the stock move from earnings, and then sold an out of the money put spread, the results were very strong. 

      We can examine this, objectively, with a custom option back-test. Here is our earnings set-up: 
       


      Rules 
      * Open short put spread 1 day after earnings 
      * Close short put spread 29 days later 
      * Use the option that is closest to but greater than 30-days away from expiration 

      Here are the results over the last year: 
       


      That's a 47.3% return, with 4 winning trades and 0 losing trades. The total holding period was less than 4 full months, meaning the annualized return was over 160%. No earnings risk was taken -- this is not a coin flip over earnings. 

      The Logic 
      This strategy works beautifully in many companies where heavy stock volume follows the earnings release. The logic behind this trade follows a narrative that even after a bad earnings release, if we wait a day after, we find the stock at a point of equilibrium. 

      If it gapped down -- that gap is over. If it beat earnings, the downside move is already likely muted. Here's how this strategy has done over the last 6-months: 
       


      That's a 21.3% return, on 2 winning trades and 0 losing trades. Since this is a total of a two-month holding period, that 21.3% is actually over 120% annualized. 

      If you're curious, yes, this also produced positive returns over the last 3-years. Here are those results. 
       


      Now we can find some comfort in this approach where is shows 9 winning trades and just 2 losing trades over the last three-years. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      There are patterns to stock behaviors before and after earnings and those patterns reveal opportunities in the option market, without taking the actual risk of earnings. You can find them, stock by stock, Apple, Google, Netflix and of course Autodesk Inc are just a handful of examples. There has been edge here with this strategy. 

      To see how to do this for any stock and for any strategy with just the click of a few buttons, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      The author has no position in Autodesk Inc (NASDAQ:ADSK) as of this writing. 

      Back-test Link
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO)

       
      How to Trade Options Before Earnings in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO)
      Date Published: 2017-05-15 

      PREFACE 
      Trading options in a short window before earnings are released benefits from the rising implied volatility but avoids the risk into the actual earnings release and also avoids any kind of stock direction risk. 

      This approach has returned a annualized rate of 198%. Now that's worth looking into. 

      STORY 
      Everyone knows that the day of an earnings announcement is a risky event for a stock. This can be explicitly seen in the option market, where the implied volatility (the expected stock move) rises into the earnings event. 

      The question every option trader, whether professional or amateur, has long asked is if there is a way to profit from this known volatility rise. It turns out, that over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies like Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO) the answer is actually, yes. 
       
      Yes, there is a systematic way to trade this repeating phenomenon, without making a bet on earnings or stock direction.

      THE SET UP 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a few days before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. The goal, is two-fold: (i) to benefit from that known implied volatility rise, and (ii) to own the straddle for a very short period of time when the stock might move 'a lot,' but taking no earnings bets. 

      If either of those two phenomena occur, there's a very good chance this wins, if neither occur, the amount risked is normally quite small. Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position 6 days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money (also called '50-delta') straddle in Broadcom Limited (NASDAQ:AVGO) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
       
      Long At-the-Money Straddle * Monthly Options * Back-test length: three-years * Open 6-days Before Earnings * Close 1-day Before Earnings * Holding Period: 5-Days per Earnings   Winning Trades: 5 Losing Trades: 7 Pre-Earnings Straddle Return:  17.1%  Annualized Return:  102% 
      We see a 17.1% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Broadcom Limited. That's a total of just 60 days (5 days for each earnings date, over 12 earnings dates). That's a annualized rate of 102%. 

      We can also see that this strategy hasn't been a winner all the time, rather it has won 5 times and lost 7 times, but here's the key -- it wins about half of the time, but the average gain per winning trade is substantially larger than the average loss on a losing trade: 
       


      Consistently Successful 
      This idea has also been a successful approach over the last two-years:
      Long At-the-Money Straddle * Monthly Options * Back-test length: two-years * Open 6-days Before Earnings * Close 1-day Before Earnings * Holding Period: 5-Days per Earnings   Winning Trades: 4 Losing Trades: 4 Pre-Earnings Straddle Return:  22%  Annualized Return:  198% 
      Now we see a 22% return, testing this over the last 8 earnings dates which is a annualized rate of 198%. 

      Yet again, we see a trade that wins about half the time, but the average win is much larger than the average loss: 
       


      If you really want to see how we found this, and how to do it for other stocks like Apple, Google and Amazon, here is a 1-minute and 34-second video that every professional option trader would rather that you don't see. 

      Learn more here: Try the Back-tester Yourself

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      There are patterns to stock behaviors before and after earnings and those patterns reveal opportunities in the option market, without taking the actual risk of earnings. You can find them, stock by stock. This is how people profit from the option market -- it's preparation, not luck. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      Back-test Link
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      The Secret Behind Options Pre-Earnings Trading in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC)
       
       
      Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC): The Wonderful Secret Behind Options Pre-Earnings Trading
      Date Published: 2017-05-4

      PREFACE 
      There is a wonderful secret to trading options right before earnings announcements in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) , and really many stocks, that benefits from the rising implied volatility but avoids the risk into the actual earnings release and also avoids any kind of stock direction risk. 

      THE WONDERFUL SECRET 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying an at the money straddle a few days before earnings, and then sell that straddle just before earnings. 

      The goal, is two-fold: (i) to benefit from that known implied volatility rise, and (ii) to own the straddle for a very short period of time when the stock might move 'a lot,' but never take the risk of actually owning options during the earnings release. 

      If either of those two phenomena occur, there's a very good chance this wins, if neither occur, the amount risked is normally quite small. Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position in Intel Corporation 6 days before earnings and then closing the position right before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is notmaking any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on an at-the-money straddle: 

      RETURNS 
      If we did this long at-the-money (also called '50-delta') straddle in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) over the last three-years but only held it before earnings we get these results: 
       


      We see a 47.8% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Intel Corporation. That's a total of just 72 days (6 days for each earnings date, over 12 earnings dates). That's a annualized rate of 242%. 

      We can also see that the win/loss rate is split with 6-wins and 6-losses, yet the return is enormous. That means the winning trades are much larger than the losing trades, which is exactly what a successful trading strategy attempts to do. No magic bullets -- rather smart methodologies for wealth creation. 

      MORE TO IT THAN MEETS THE EYE 
      While this strategy is benefiting from the implied volatility rise into earnings for Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), what it's really doing is far more intelligent. 

      The ideal stocks for this strategy have a couple of common characteristics: 

      (i) The companies rarely pre-announce earnings -- this is an investment that does not look to make an earnings bet, so an earnings pre-announcement is the opposite of what we're hoping for. 

      (ii) The underlying stock price of these companies tend to move a lot (or some) as earnings approach and various institutions and traders shuffle the stock price around in anticipation of the earnings result. The more one sided the outside world starts betting on direction -- up or down, the better it is to own the straddle. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market -- it's preparation, not luck. 

      Test the results on Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc, and the results are staggering. 

      To see how to do this for any stock and for any strategy with just the click of a few buttons, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Thanks for reading. 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      The author has no position in Intel Corporation Inc (NASDAQ:INTC) as of this writing. 

      Back-test Link (does require custom earnings settings).
       
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.