SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

cwelsh

AAPL July 2012 Calendar

92 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I will be most likelly entering a variation of that trade tomorrow -- however I will most likely have wider strikes and end up with a credit around the $1.00 to $1.10 range.

Thanks Chris,

wider strikes for a somewhat lower credit - does that mean that the trade would be more "forgiving"? Would you mind publishing the parameters after you place the trade? Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The risk and reward are directly related. By going with wider strikes, the risk is lower but also the potential gain. It is always a tradeoff.

kim - i really don't get how the RIC hedge affects the P/L? couldn't purchasing a weekly RIC essentially make the trade safer but also create the likelihood of no profit plus alot of commission fees? i have alot of trouble "visualizing" anytime we sell weeklies because the P/L graphs don't seem to tell the whole picture.

R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be most likelly entering a variation of that trade tomorrow -- however I will most likely have wider strikes and end up with a credit around the $1.00 to $1.10 range.

what about wider strikes but 10 points between the wings? i know it makes the max potential loss around $850 as opposed to around $350 with the trade kim recommends.

as i have been looking at ICs lately i have been more looking at the price difference in the wings rather than std deviation. for example some wings seem can actually be further out and have nearly the same price difference and thus provide very similar credit with less risk. also sometimes due to market sentiment the puts or calls at the same strike distance can be very different prices. chris - do you see that as an edge or do you feel the market is predicting a rise or fall when the puts or calls are more expensive for similar strike differences from the underlying price.

a made up example:

SPY @ 132

122 JUL PUT $1.15

142 JUL CALL $1.00

the put is still 10 points away but fetches a larger price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be most likelly entering a variation of that trade tomorrow -- however I will most likely have wider strikes and end up with a credit around the $1.00 to $1.10 range.

One more completely unrelated topic Chris. How are you maintaining a full time job and this much trading analysis with a new baby! Usually there is no such thing as "free time" after having children!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're example with SPY is actually the norm -- the market is almost always downward biased -- so you'll get more credit from puts than calls. Sometimes its .05% more sometimes its as much as 5% more.

That's part of my "compliant" against volatility -- volatility does NOT measure volatility, rather it measures downward market pressure sentiment. I mean if the markets jump 500 points in a day, the VIX is going to crash, even though volatility has spiked by an obscene amount. That said, most people would be happy if the market goes up 500 and sad if it goes down 500 -- which is why puts are more expensive.

As to the SD moves -- I always look at both. I have to know the risk of a trade prior to entering. Once I know the risk, I look at the strikes. As I've stated before, on a 10 point spread, if I can't get at least $1.00 (10% return), I just pass. However, let's say I could get $2.00 -- well I'll probably move a little further out, just for the additional cushion.

As to this exact trade analysis, AAPL has been WILDLY volatile. If I were to trade the June expiration (23 days left), I would be looking at the following:

In the last 30 days, a 30 day SD move is 58 points. The largest move over a 30 day period was a whopping 102 points -- which is frankly eye popping. In the last 30 days, a 14SD move is 25 points.

After going through all of the variations, I know I'll need at LEAST a 80 point cushion on the spread, and preferably much more.

To get my 10% return, I would have to use the 620/630 call and the 480/490 put. Simply not worth it.

Now Kim's trade was using the July spreads -- but I don't ever trade non-index based short condors further than six weeks out. I know what the "odds" and statistics say, but I can look at four years of trading logs (paper and actual) and tell you that I lose on those trades all the *#($& time.

As to my trading analysis -- ask Kim, it's dropped off some. That said, I've never slept much, only about 5 hours a night, since I was 15 or 16. It also helps to be the person in charge too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

kim - i really don't get how the RIC hedge affects the P/L? couldn't purchasing a weekly RIC essentially make the trade safer but also create the likelihood of no profit plus alot of commission fees? i have alot of trouble "visualizing" anytime we sell weeklies because the P/L graphs don't seem to tell the whole picture.

R

RIC will help if the stock becomes too volatile. You will win every week a little bit and at least partially offset the longer term IC losses.

Of course it will not always help - the stock might drift slowly in one direction and you lose on both. But if the stock makes wild swings bit still stays in the longer term IV range, then you might win on both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kim,

With AAPL at 572 what would be good strikes for a weekly RIC to hedge the JULY IC ?

565/570/575/580. But I'm not sure I would do it now, probably wait for the next week weeklies, which means waiting for Thursday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

565/570/575/580. But I'm not sure I would do it now, probably wait for the next week weeklies, which means waiting for Thursday.

That's a good call.. Because volatility will probably be minimal until the Friday jobs report? Or because an RIC is better started at the beginning of a new weekly chain?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again -- I have not done anything to this other than just keep rolling. I'm in the 560 calendar and rolled yesterday:

Bought 5 AAPL Jun 1 560 Call @ 18.79 (to close)

Sold 5 AAPL 560 Call @ 21.79 (to open)

Notice, even though it was DITM call at the time -- I still extracted time value premium in excess of what I need to in order for this trade to be profitable prior to July.

Here's an update of the trades to date:

5/11 Bought July 21 560 Call @34.83

Sold May 19 560 Call @12.98

5/18 Bought May 19 560 Call @ 0.06 (to close)

Sold May 25 560 Call @ 2.56 (to open)

5/24 Bought May 25 560 Call @9.35 (to close)

Sold June 1 560 Call @14.5 (to open)

5/31 Bought June 1 560 Call @18.79 (to close)

Sold June 8 560 Call @21.79 (to open)

Net revenue from short sales so far: -11.70

Weeks left: 6

Minimum needed per week: $1.95

And that's assuming ZERO time value left in the July trade in the last week -- which is next to impossible. I could exit this trade today for $17.85, which would result in an incredible gain -- but this stands to be an absolute home run of a trade, so I'm still holding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems counterintuitive that BOTH an RIC and calendar can make money on the same stock, it seems like they're voting against each other. Maybe the rich options prices on AAPL make this possible? Or different time-frames? Or luck?

I too opened a 560 Aug/Jun2 call calendar on AAPL. 1 spread, showing a profit already. My calendar on XOM is sucking wind, IBM and MCD have slight losses for the past month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The calendars that you run for several weeks by shorting the weeklies will frequently have losses (hopefully small) in the first one to two weeks, so i wouldn't necessarily be concerned about that. Obviously if there's a significant move, then you need to be.

As far as hedging with a RIC, yes it runs opposite of the calendar. HOWEVER, you make money on the time frame difference. You calendar is longer term, rolls weekly, and the RIC protects against small changes.

Technically a straddle would work better than an RIC, but they're normally cost prohibitive.

As I've stated several times, I almost never use an RIC to hedge a calendar -- I'm much more likely to enter into a double calendar, a double diagnonal, or just roll the calendar to a different price -- if I don't close out all together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 560 aug/jun2 AAPL calendar is looking kind of sick. With two big up days in AAPL there's not a whole lot of theta left in the short weekly and I suspect in danger of exercise since it's 16+ points under water.

I can roll to a 560 jun for $3 credit.

Here are my thoughts, please offer opinions, I take full responsibility of course, I just want other ideas:

1) hold the weekly until tomorrow, squeeze the last .50 of theta out

2) go ahead and roll to a 560 jun for $3+

3) close out the spread (~$350 loss)

4) roll the 560 to a 570 jun at a cost of about $375

5) create a double calendar at 575?

anything else? My normal inclination would be #3, just take my lumps and move on, but I wouldn't mind trying something else.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would probably go with #2. You want to do it as a few weeks play, right? $3 looks like a good credit, the stock is still not too far from 560. Definitely not #1 and probably not #4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why your calendar is looking sick, my aapl is looking great right now. (Now I'm in the long July short june's, but that shouldn't make that big of a difference).

For those following me, I just rolled the Calendar as follows:

Bought AAPL June 8 560 Call @ 13.56 (to close)

Sold 5 AAPL June 16 560 Call @ 17.56 (to open)

That netted me another $4.00. Taking present value of the long july into consideration, this trade is up just over 25% since opening it on May 11. At the present point, we're almost to the "almost impossible to lose money" stage.

Unless AAPL goes #*($& through the roof (well over 100 points up), there will always be a time value spread between the two weeks. Depending on how close to the 560 strike we are, that amount could vary between $2-$9. So, even if AAPL keeps going up slowly, I'll still extract $2.00 of premium every week, and my long position keeps going up in value.

If AAPL drops, even to the 530 range, I can still extract $2.00 or so of premium. Once I've gotten the intial cost of the long position back (which should happen next week), even if AAPL drops to 0, I would still at least break even.

Now of course, if it keeps going up, at some point it will make sense to just take the gains and go, but, as you keep taking premium out, you are taking risk off the table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 560 aug/jun2 AAPL calendar is looking kind of sick. With two big up days in AAPL there's not a whole lot of theta left in the short weekly and I suspect in danger of exercise since it's 16+ points under water.

I can roll to a 560 jun for $3 credit.

Here are my thoughts, please offer opinions, I take full responsibility of course, I just want other ideas:

1) hold the weekly until tomorrow, squeeze the last .50 of theta out

2) go ahead and roll to a 560 jun for $3+

3) close out the spread (~$350 loss)

4) roll the 560 to a 570 jun at a cost of about $375

5) create a double calendar at 575?

anything else? My normal inclination would be #3, just take my lumps and move on, but I wouldn't mind trying something else.

Thanks

What is wrong with option #5? I'm not sure about the 575 strike or how a double calendar would work with weeklies though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why your calendar is looking sick, my aapl is looking great right now. (Now I'm in the long July short june's, but that shouldn't make that big of a difference).

For those following me, I just rolled the Calendar as follows:

Bought AAPL June 8 560 Call @ 13.56 (to close)

Sold 5 AAPL June 16 560 Call @ 17.56 (to open)

That netted me another $4.00. Taking present value of the long july into consideration, this trade is up just over 25% since opening it on May 11. At the present point, we're almost to the "almost impossible to lose money" stage.

Unless AAPL goes #*($& through the roof (well over 100 points up), there will always be a time value spread between the two weeks. Depending on how close to the 560 strike we are, that amount could vary between $2-$9. So, even if AAPL keeps going up slowly, I'll still extract $2.00 of premium every week, and my long position keeps going up in value.

If AAPL drops, even to the 530 range, I can still extract $2.00 or so of premium. Once I've gotten the intial cost of the long position back (which should happen next week), even if AAPL drops to 0, I would still at least break even.

Now of course, if it keeps going up, at some point it will make sense to just take the gains and go, but, as you keep taking premium out, you are taking risk off the table.

Chris - did you make this some type of ratio trade? What about Eugene's question about being assigned?

Bought AAPL June 8 560 Call @ 13.56 (to close)

Sold 5 AAPL June 16 560 Call @ 17.56 (to open)

Also, you may want to be careful with this apple developer conference coming up. You could see some large stock moves from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot #6:

6) get busy @ work and forget to do anything haha.

which turns out to probably have been the best thing, things settled down a little later in the day, and today a straight 560->560 roll brought in 3.68.

I had just opened that aug-jun2 calendar, and as somebody pointed out the first couple of weeks of this type of play could lose money.

Can anybody recommend a book/site (besides steadyoptions ;) ) that discusses calendars?

I got the Iron condor book by Benkilfa and am enjoying that, thank you whoever recommended it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot #6:
6) get busy @ work and forget to do anything haha.

which turns out to probably have been the best thing, things settled down a little later in the day, and today a straight 560->560 roll brought in 3.68.

I had just opened that aug-jun2 calendar, and as somebody pointed out the first couple of weeks of this type of play could lose money.

Can anybody recommend a book/site (besides steadyoptions ;) ) that discusses calendars?

I got the Iron condor book by Benkilfa and am enjoying that, thank you whoever recommended it.

Sometimes you need some luck..

I'm not familiar with any book which is devoted to calendars only.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at another decision point in my aug/jun2 AAPL 560 call calendar spread.

The theta is almost completely gone from the jun2 option which is going for $11.5 more than I sold it for. The theta is almost gone too, so almost all of its value is intrinsic.

The delta is close to 100 for the short side, the long side's delta is 67, so for every $1 that AAPL rises the value of the spread drops by about $30.

I'll wait to see what happens today, but I want to have a plan

My choices:

1) wait, hope the short doesn't get exercised, look to roll tomorrow when the new weeklies come out, maybe to a higher strike.

2) close out both sides, take the loss which over the 3 weeks I've had it open would be about $300

3) roll the short up to a strike that still has extrinsic value (to avoid exercise). A 5 point roll would cost $500, 10 point about $900.

4) roll both sides up, using some of the gains on the long (5.5 points) to defray the loss on the short (-11.5 points).

5) something else, convert to a double calendar? This still wouldn't help the short 560 though.

Thanks for your thoughts. Pre-market it looks like AAPL is pretty flat, so I don't think I can count on much of a drop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in a 575/570 calendar that is about even right now. My two cents is that AAPL was weak yesterday in a strong market so I am hopeful it stays around 585 today and I will roll the short side tomorrow. I don't claim to be an expert on market direction or AAPL so it is just as likely to jump another dozen points today..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on how long dated your calendar is -- both my LEAP 560 calendar and Aug 570 calendar's are in good shape and I'll just keep rolling the weeklies on.

However, if I were in a July calendar, I might just consider exiting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that running an AAPL calendar during the earnings announcement could be dangerous. You could probably hedge it with a weekly RIC during the week on the announcement. On the positive side you would think that each week leading up to the announcement there is a premium on the calls you are selling against your long?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that running an AAPL calendar during the earnings announcement could be dangerous. You could probably hedge it with a weekly RIC during the week on the announcement. On the positive side you would think that each week leading up to the announcement there is a premium on the calls you are selling against your long?

Exactly -- and as long as I'm in the weeklies, it should be ok. With the announcement not until Jul 16, I have at least a few more weeks of weeklies to run. Just rechecked it all this morning, haven't rolled yet, but will either late this afternoon or early tomorrow.

I could get out now for about a 3% gain, but as long as I stick in my range (under 600 down to about 555), I'll stay positive, so will stay in for at least one more week.

Of course if things start moving I can get out too, liquidity is not a real problem here.

On another note, my long term DITM LEAP on AAPL is still working great, even though this week will probably be a loss. Trade itself is still up well over 25% in three months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you discuss the specifics of that DITM AAPL trade on this board? I'm doing something similar for MMM and VIX and so far so good, I'd be interested in an AAPL one too.

Do you typically sell your weekly short right at the money?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the discussion was actually on the old board, but I'm really not sure. And I try to sell the weekly short ATM, but sometimes that would just be too big of a loss, in which case I move closer to ATM.

For instance, if I a week ago I had shorted the AAPL 550, well to close that call, and then reopen at 585 would cost $35 -- and the DITM call has not increased that much. In those cases, I'll move up to something around 565-570. I still net a $2-3 credit, which is all I'm looking for, and move closer to the ATM trade.

Here's the details of the trade:

Long Jan 2013 340 AAPL Call Cost 244.90, entered 3/14/12

Then I sell the weekly each week. As of today, I've collected 65.90 of premium (have not sold this week's yet) and the LEAP is worth about 245.50 -- so its still going strong. With as much downside protection as that gives me, I will MOST LIKELY, just not be short any calls going into earnings, but still hold the long. Yes, that is a directional and speculative trade, but one that has downside protection and one that could result in large gains. Even if I lose half my gains, I can immediately start selling the calls again.

Still not sure though, I might just exit the entire position and then reenter post earnings, I'll have to evaluate further in a couple of weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris, those are very nice gains. However, I disagree with your "downsize protection" part. You don't have a downsize protection as of NOW. You refer to the past gains. This is what people refer to when they say "now I'm paying with the house money". Once you made a gain, it is YOUR money. if you like to be long going into earnings, that's a different issue. But this is like a new trade. What you made so far is irrelevant for the decision to take or not to take that new trade. it's a new day every day, and you have to decide if you like the current position, no matter what happened in the past.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris, those are very nice gains. However, I disagree with your "downsize protection" part. You don't have a downsize protection as of NOW. You refer to the past gains. This is what people refer to when they say "now I'm paying with the house money". Once you made a gain, it is YOUR money. if you like to be long going into earnings, that's a different issue. But this is like a new trade. What you made so far is irrelevant for the decision to take or not to take that new trade. it's a new day every day, and you have to decide if you like the current position, no matter what happened in the past.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're not wrong, my word choice was incredibly poor -- its not downside protection rather it has been money that has been made. However, with my long term AAPL outlook, and "money in the bank" I am more inclined to pursue a directional trade. That is more speculative in nature, and it will be reclassified as such in my overall portfolio (I allocate roughly 10-15% per month too what I refer to as speculative trades).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      That's great, because it means there is discord, and discord, especially for Apple ahead of earnings has meant a repeating pattern for the clever trader to take advantage of. 
       
      One week before Apple's earnings would be January 25th, 2018. 

      Apple's Disagreement 
      Sometimes a bullish momentum bet works great -- and in fact, for Apple that has been a strong pattern ahead of earnings. But with a toppy market, sometimes a different approach can work as well. 

      It turns out, over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies like Apple Inc, there is a clever way to trade market anxiety or market optimism before earnings announcements with options. 

      This approach has returned 189% with 10 wins and 2 losses over the last 3-years. 

      The Trade Before Earnings 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying a slightly out of the money strangle one-week before earnings, and then sell that strangle just before earnings. 

      Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position 7 calendar days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on a 40-delta strangle, which is a fancy of saying, buying both the 40-delta call and 40-delta put, for a non-directional bet on volatility. 

      Returns 
      If we did this long strangle in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years, but only held it before earnings, using the options closest to 14 days from expiration, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 83.3%   Wins: 10   Losses: 2   % Return:  189% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine™ are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      We see a 189% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Apple Inc. 

      We can also see that this strategy hasn't been a winner all the time, rather it has won 10 times and lost 2 times, for a 83.3% win-rate on an one-week trade. 

      Setting Expectations 
      While this strategy has an overall return of 189%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 
            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 16.9% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 21.8% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per losing trade was -7.6% over 7-days. 

      We like the comfort of a trade that, when it loses, it isn't a disaster -- at least not historically. 

      Option Trading in the Last Year 
      We can also look at the last year of earnings releases and examine the results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 100%   Wins: 4   Losses: 0   % Return:  98.2% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      In the latest year this pre-earnings option trade has 4 wins and lost 0 times and returned 98.2%. 
            ➡ Over just the last year, the average percent return per trade was 22.3% over 7-days. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      We don't always have to look at bullish back-tests in a bull market -- sometimes a straight down the middle volatility pattern pops up. This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market -- finding trading opportunities that avoid earnings risk and work equally well during a bull or bear market. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      These are all trade-able events, at anytime, without concern for earnings. Today we look at exactly what has worked for Apple (AAPL). 
       
      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime.
      The Short-term Option Volatility Trade in Apple Inc 
      We will examine the outcome of going long a short-term at-the-money (50 delta) straddle, in options that are the closest to seven-days from expiration. But we have a rule -- it's a stop and a limit of 10%, and, we back-test re-opening the position immediately, as opposed to waiting for 5-days later. 

      Here is the stock chart for Apple since October 1st -- focus on the volatility, not the direction -- these are daily candles. 
       

      Chart from CMLviz.com

      We can volatility and a general downtrend, in fact, a 14% drop in less than 6 weeks. But let's not worry about direction, let's try to find a back-test that benefits from that volatility that is in fact up 92% in just six-weeks and takes no stock direction risk at all. Here it is, first, we enter the long straddle. 
       


      Second, we set a very specific type of stop and limit: 
       


      At the end of each day, the back-tester checks to see if the long straddle is up or down 10%. If it is, it closes the position, and re-opens at the same time, another long straddle, but this one now re-adjusted for what is the newest at-the-money strike price. 

      We have a full blown tutorial write up on this type of stop/limit behavior in the Discover Tab: Stops & Limits Roll Timing What does "open again at normal time" vs "immediately" mean? 

      The Results 
      We back-tested this only over the last six-weeks. We are hyper focusing not on a long drawn out pattern, but rather this time, right now, this period of volatility. 
       

       
      AAPL: Long 50 Delta Straddle   % Wins: 58.8%   Wins: 10   Losses: 7   % Return:  92% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Notice that this has triggered a trade 17 times in the last six-weeks and while the stock has dropped 14%, the option strategy, which takes no directional positioning, is up more than 92% in six-weeks time. This is a fast moving, re-adjusting straddle. The idea is simple: 

      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime. 
       

       
      Setting Expectations
      Since we use end of day open and closes, while this strategy has an overall return of 92%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 

            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 11%. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 29.9%. 
            ➡ The percent return per losing trade was -16%. 

      Not only are we seeing a high winning percentage, but also that the average win is twice as large as the average loss. Further, this trade takes no stock direction risk at all. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED
      When the market shifts, we need a minimum amount of data to adjust, and succeed. This is how people profit from the option market -- it's not luck, it's preparation. 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      Please note that the executions and other statistics in this article are hypothetical, and do not reflect the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as liquidity and slippage.
       
      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.

      Related articles:
      The Incredible Option Trade In VXX Earnings Momentum Trade In Oracle Post Earnings Option Trade In Facebook Option Trade After Earnings In AutoZone Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade In Netflix Microsoft Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade Post Earnings Trade In FedEx Pre Earnings Pattern In Apple Earnings Momentum Trading In Google PANW Broke The Golden Rule How To Profit From PayPal Volatility
    • By Kim
      This options investment strategy involves buying "Deep In The Money" (DITM) options to limit downside risk while retaining the full benefits of the stock. The options are purchased at a lower cost than the actual stock but still receive close to a $1 increase for every favorable $1 move in the underlying security which increases the percentage return for the same dollar move.
       
      Advantages of stock replacement strategy:
      Keeps all benefits associated with trading the stock. Reduces costs associated with owning the stock. Offers more leverage by increasing the potential percentage return. Offers lower downside risk. Disadvantages of a stock replacement strategy:
      Needs good trading experience and skills to master the strategy. The strategy may fail, when the stock stays on (almost) the same price or moves sidewise. Leverage works both way - If the stock falls, the percentage loss is larger as well. Let's check how you could use this options investment strategy to reduce your cost of owning Apple. The stock closed at $174 yesterday.
       
      Experienced options traders are usually well aware of this strategy and make good use of it.
       
      Strategy No. 1: Buy 100 shares of the stock
      Buying 100 shares will cost you $17,400. Not cheap. If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,100 or 6%. Let's see how it compares with the stock replacement strategy.

      Strategy No. 2: Buy DITM call
      As an alternative to buying the stock, we can buy the AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47. The cost will be $4,547 which is about 26% of the cost of the 100 shares. The P/L graph looks like this:
       

      If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,030. This is slightly less than buying the stock, but percentage wise, it is a 23% gain, compared to the 6% gain when owning the stock. Of course the opposite is true as well - if the stock goes down, your percentage loss is much higher. 

      This is called leverage. It works both ways - you increase the reward if the stock rises and increase the risk if the stock falls.
       
      However, if the stock falls, the volatility should increase which actually helps our option price because increased volatility can cause option prices to increase or not fall as fast. So basically even though we will gain $1 for every $1 the stock increases we will lose slightly less than $1 for every $1 the stock drops.
       
      You might noticed that we gained only 93 cents for every $1 movement in the stock. This is due to the fact that the delta of the 130 call is 0.93. We could choose a call which is deeper in the money - it would have a higher delta and have a better replication of the stock movement. However, it would also be more expensive and provide less leverage. 0.90-0.95 delta provides a good compromise between 1:1 movement and a reasonable price.
       
      Now let's see if we can do better.
       
      Strategy No. 3: Buy DITM call and sell OTM call against it every month
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 We reduce the cost of our trade by $155 to $4,392, but we also limited our gains. The P/L graph looks like this:
       


      As we can see, we increased the maximum gain to $1,147. This gain is not only larger than the dollar gain from owning the 100 shares of the stock, but also translates to a cool 26% in one month. If the stock is below $185 by February expiration, we can repeat the process with the March options. If it is higher, you just close the trade for a gain and can roll to higher strikes.

      Of course if you believe that AAPL will be higher than $185 by Feb expiration, you will be better by just buying the DITM calls.
       
      Strategy No. 4: Buy DITM call, sell OTM call and buy OTM put
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 Buy AAPL Feb 16 2018 165 put at $2.07 Our cost now is $4,599, still significantly lower than owning the stock. The P/L graph looks like this:



      Our gain is now limited to "only" $900 (20%), BUT we also limited our loss to ~13% in case AAPL goes down after earnings. And if the stock really crashes, the position can actually produce some gains because at some point the long put will more than offset the losses from the long call.

      This is a variation of collar, where we replace the long shares with DITM call. 

      And this is the beauty of options. You have almost endless possibilities to structure your trade, based on your outlook and risk tolerance.
       
      Before investing any money, please make sure you understand what you are doing. Good luck.
    • By TrustyJules
      What drew me to this site was Kim professing to apply strategies or trading philosophies as set out in Jeff Augen's books. Besides many things posted on here he also devoted some chapters to stock pinning, i.e. on expiration some stocks tend to gravitate towards a particular strike price. AAPL was and is an example of a stock that often pins to a strike. Jeff did his research on 3rd Friday expiries but I thought to test his theory today for a bit of fun. The actual pinning effect is something I verified by charting minute by minute quotes for AAPL over two years. You get charts like these:
       

       
      Here you see the stock quote from March last year with the Y axis showing how far ($) away from the closest option strike the stock was and the X axis the number of minutes since trading started that day. This plunging chart is very frequent with AAPL as - from the stocks I was able to acquire minute by minute data from - it is the stock that most consistently shows this behaviour - it only failed twice in two years roughly (based on 3rd Friday expiries).
      Anyway I could never make use of this with my European broker because profits are small and trading is frequent - with minimum 36$ to open and close a position this wasnt feasible. Now I switched to a US broker this became a possibility. So for fun I tried this today on a non 3rd Friday expiry and I can say AAPL duly obliged:

       
      I picked up the trading at 11.40 AM EST - you can start earlier but this is usually a midday lull that creates a stable time to open your position. The strategy is to use ratio trades to make profits on low capital investment. The stock was around 208.40$ and in line with the strategy we guessed that 207.50$ mark would be the close hence OB 1 C 205 @ 3.34$ and OS 4 C 202.50 @ 0.93$ for a net credit.
      The stock duly obliged and tumbled; in fact below 207.50$ to 206.80$ or so by which time I closed the trade. Now we retained the theory that at close it would be 207.50 so this time we did a different ratio and sold the 2 C 202.50 @ 4.55$ and bought 4 C 205 @ 2.03 again for a net credit. AAPL proved particularly tractable and by 4.20 PM EST it was trading around 207.85$ so we closed. The 0.40$ credit on the 207.50$ calls beckoned again. Therefore we repeated the setup of the morning except this time of course the trade was a net debit.
      I watched smugly as AAPL duly converged back down to the strike price - with 9 minutes till session close I was reckoning to close at the last minute. Except... my internet went down at that moment with 4 ITM shorts! Slight panic - router reboot and thank goodness Internet worked again (ouf!) I closed out immediately just in case another gremlin would be thrown up. In doing so I gave up a little profit as AAPL closed at 207.53 $ like a champ of pinning.
       
      Profit from all this excitement: $ 362 after commissions - the capital outlay was never more than 2K (but this is a slight cheat because I have an AAPL long position in my portfolio) - anyway 18% in the day and a good bit of fun with a slightly unpleasant bit of excitement toward the end!
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      There is a bullish momentum pattern in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) stock 2 calendar days after earnings, if and only if the stock showed a large gap up after the actual earnings announcement. 

      This is a conditional entry -- the company reports earnings and if the stock move off of that report is a 3% gain or larger, then a bullish position is back-tested looking for continuing momentum. The event is rare, but when it has occurred, the back-test results are noteworthy. 

      Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) Earnings 
      In Apple Inc, if the stock move immediately following an earnings result was large (3% or more to the upside), if we test waiting two-days after that earnings announcement and then bought a three-week at the money (50 delta) call, the results were quite strong. This back-test opens two-days after earnings were announced to try to find a stock that continues an upward trajectory after an earnings rally. 

      Simply owning options after earnings, blindly, is likely not a good trade, but hand-picking the times and the stocks to do it in can be useful. We can test this approach without bias with a custom option back-test. Here is the timing set-up around earnings: 
       
          Rules  Condition: Wait for the one-day stock move off of earnings, and if it shows a 3% gain or more in the underlying, then, follow these rules:  Open the long at-the-money call two-calendar days after earnings.  Close the long call 14 calendar days after earnings.  Use the options closest to 21 days from expiration (but more than 14 days). 
      This is a straight down the middle direction trade -- this trade wins if the stock is continues on an upward trajectory after a large earnings move the two-weeks following earnings and it will stand to lose if the stock does not rise. This is not a silver bullet -- it's a trade that needs to be carefully examined. 

      But, this is a conditional back-test, which is to say, it only triggers if an event before it occurs. 

      RISK CONTROL 
      Since blindly owning calls can be a quick way to lose in the option market, we will apply a tight risk control to this analysis as well. We will add a 40% stop loss and a 40% limit gain. 
       

      In English, at the close of every trading day, if the call is up 40% from the price at the start of the trade, it gets sold for a profit. If it is down 40%, it gets sold for a loss. This also has the benefit of taking profits if there is a stock rally early in the two-week period rather than waiting to close 14-days later. 

      Another risk reducing move we made was to use 21-day options and only hold them for 14-days so the trade doesn't suffer from total premium decay. 

      RESULTS 
      If we bought the at-the-money call in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years but only held it after earnings and after an earnings pop higher, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 50 Delta Call   % Wins: 80%   Wins: 4   Losses: 1   % Return:  151.9% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Looking at Averages 
      The overall return was 151.9%; but the trade statistics tell us more with average trade results: 
            ➡ The average return per trade was 46.54% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per winning trade was 76.92% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per losing trade was -75% over each 12-day period. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED 
      Bullish momentum and sentiment after of earnings can be quite powerful with the tailwind of an earnings beat. This is just one example of what has become a tradable phenomenon in Apple. To identify patterns that have repeated over and over again, empirically, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker on the NYSE and CBOE exchange floors. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald and is often seen on financial television. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.This article is used here with permission and originally appeared here.
    • By Kim
      Given the power of stock options to leverage your investment dollars, you might be tempted to bet on the AAPL earnings report coming out today by buying Apple calls (if you think the stock is going up) or Apple puts (if you want to bet that it will go down).
       
      That bet paid off handsomely in July 2016 when Apple reported earnings. The stock rose 6.5% the next day and the value of Apple’s weekly calls increased dramatically.
       
      But that’s the exception, not the rule.
       
      As I showed in one of my Seeking Alpha articles, buying either puts or calls just before Apple’s earnings report is, on average, a losing proposition.
       
      When you look at longer timeframe, AAPL tends to move less than expected. Take a look at the screenshot from optionslam.com, showing the post earnings movement of the stock in the last 10 cycles:
       

       
       
      The explanation for those numbers is simple. Over time, the options tend to overprice the potential post-earnings move. Those options experience huge volatility drop the day after the earnings are announced. In most cases, this drop erases most of the gains, even if the stock had a substantial move.
       
      The last column shows the one day post earnings performance of the weekly straddle. As we can see, it has lost money 8 out of 10 times. Which means that 8 out of 10 times the stock moved less than expected. If I had to choose, I would take the other side of the trade (selling those options).
       
      Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
       
      "Trying to predict the future is like driving down a country road at night with no headlights on and looking out the back window." - Peter Drucker
       
      Related articles:
      Is Your Risk Worth The Reward? Why We Sell Our Straddles Before Earnings Risk Reward Or Probability Of Success? Whatever You Do, Don't Do This Before Apple's Earnings How NOT To Gamble On AAPL Earnings  
      Want to learn how to trade options in a less risky way?
       
      Start Your Free Trial
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Here it is -- a portfolio of FAANG stocks using pre-earnings trading. A 3:30 video that is staggering and includes some robustness testing.
       
      Reminder that you can sign up for Trade Machine as a Steady Options member here:
      https://cmlviz.com/register/cml-trademachine-49-mo-promotion-so/
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Trading options pre-earnings -- 1 minute 25 second video. (example: $AAPL)
      As a Steady Options member, you can get a promotional price, here:
      Try the Back-tester
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.