SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

cwelsh

AAPL July 2012 Calendar

92 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

In the realm of sounding like a complete hypocrite -- I just entered an AAPL calendar. With the lower volatility over the last 10 days, it actually fit my model perfectly.

The trade:

Bought July 21 560 Call @34.83

Sold May 19 560 Call @12.98

I particularly like this trade as it has so much time left in it and stands a very real chance of paying for itself in the next two weeks.

AAPL is consolidating around 560, and with the trend down, I moved down 2 strikes to give me some flex room on the declining price. However, even with a 20pt jump up, I can still expect to be getting close to $2.00 per week. With 10 weeks left in the trade (I DONT plan on holding that long), that would still make it worth it.

However, a word of caution, AAPL is a MUCH more volatile stock at heart, and this one bears close watching. It is a higher risk trade and should be treated as such. (I weight high risk trades differently than lower risk trades -- one half a position size).

The other trade I'm going to look at over the weekend is the AAPL DITM leap trade.

I'll post a full anlaysis of this calendar over the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris, thanks for posting this. Will see how it plays out.

If you don't mind, I will change the topic name to include the month and year since we might have more similar topics.

I'm planning to start a SPY calendar in the next 7-10 days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris,

Thanks for sharing this trade! Question: I did a quick Profit and loss chart on this trade and the graph based on your Long July 560 and short the May 19 560 break-even points are 522.68 and 568.23. Is this correct? "However, even with a 20pt jump up, I can still expect to be getting close to $2.00 per week." How does that then work out if the trade is at a loss at 568.23 approx. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GOOG might be another calendar trade candidate too. Consolidating around $600 after earning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is completely off-topic but is there a way to not have to click "Follow this topic" every time a new thread comes out!

Probably not, but do you really want that? If there is a discussion about a trade you have no interest in, do you want to get all emails from that topic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is through the settings....

And no, that profit loss chart is completely wrong, as it frequenltly is with calendars -- it assumes just one sale and static option pricing.

Here's the trade again:

Bought July 21 560 Call @34.83

Sold May 19 560 Call @12.98

AAPL @568 (your calculations appear to have used a value just north of 570)

Your option calculator took the lazy approcach --

For downside break even = Current AAPL price (570) - premium received (12.98) - present value of July option (34.83) = 522.19

You can't do that though because the July option price is dynamic.

Calculating the break even on ONE calendar spread is quite difficult. Here is a way to get a close approxmiation:

http://www.poweropt.com/calcallspreadhelp.asp.

That said, it does not account for changes in volatility that happens over the spread.

For instance, if AAPL drops to 559, the short option expires worthless, but the July option is worth less.

Go read my post on how I calculate calendar values -- it will help. But basically when you are running a rolling calendar, as this is, you estimate the anticpated money from rolling the short position each week.

My "breakeven" occurs when I have received enough income, including the residual value of the long position, to break even.

So in this case I have shelled out 34.63 for the long and have gotten 12.98 for the short -- I need 21.65 more to "break even." If AAPL is at 568 (today's entry price) next Friday, and volatility remains the same, I should get another 12.98. And same for next week. So if AAPL stays right at 12.98 for the 10 weeks of this possible on the position, I would make 129.80 on the shorts on a cost of $34.63 (that would be awesome and make this the best trade I've ever made, by a mile).

That is not realistic. AAPL is volatile, and we can expect it to move. I figure out the expected moves, then use an option calculator to figure out the option pricing. If I receive $2.00 each week going forward, for the next 10 weeks, I would have $20.00 in my pocket, $32.98 including what I already have, and a residual value of about $2.90 -- so $35.88 and the trade makes money. So my goal is to make sure I can get $2.00 each week. If I get more, gravy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris,

Thanks for the explanations! What will you do if the stock does not corporate. I know you have some flexibility week to week ans I know you are not a fan of making it diagonal. Do you have a exit strategy in mind? -- Hannes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always have an exit strategy in mind -- but here's the base of it:

If AAPL moves more than 35 pts in the first week AND the trade is less than 30% down -- I look to roll, diagnol, or double calendar

If AAPL moves more than 35 pts in the first week AND the trade is down more than 30% -- exit

In week two, again 35 pts

In week three, 45 points

In week four 55 points

Though once getting to week three or four, depending on the credits the previous weeks, your options open because a large part of the trade should be paid for.

You can't just use an absolute get out of the trade if AAPL moves up/down by more than a certain point -- primarily because if it moves that much, volatility is almost certainly higher, which increases the premiums and you might be able to stay in and still make money.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was a great example how the increase in volatility can offset a drop in price.

On Friday I entered:

Bought July 21 560 Call @34.83

Sold May 19 560 Call @12.98

AAPL @568

Net cost: $21.85

Well AAPL dropped almost ten points today, and how did that effect the trade? Well, it was good news, the short May 19 Call dropped in value to $5.85 and the long July 21 Call only dropped to $29.50.

So, in other words, even though this trade moved against me (by ten points), I could have gotten out today for $23.65 -- at its peak during the day, the trade actually got up to $24.10 (actual fill) -- that would have been over a 10% return.

I strongly considered taking my profits at that point, but did not, as the potential profit is still quite large. This is just another advantage to the long date rolling calendars.

Please note that this gain (increasing volatility) happens almost exclusively in FALLING markets. In other words, if AAPL had jumped $10-$15 today, it would not have been as pretty as an outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris, that means that it makes sense to start those calendars slightly delta positive - same rationale why I started my RUT IC slightly delta negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you would do for example an out of the money call calendar spread. So with AAPL at 560 you would do something like the 570 Calendar (selling the weekly buying the longer dated) This way the weekly will have a smaller delta (say 35%) than the longer dated (say 45%) so you are small long. The idea is that if the stock drops - which should hurt you pos. as its long delta - that will be offset by rising IV (the longer dated option will profit more from that than you'll lose on the weekly) If the stock goes up vol usually drops but then you are long delta. So starting it slightly positive delta should give you a bit of an inbuild hedge no matter which way the stock goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would happen to this type of trade during a market meltdown/meltup (market rose or fell 5-10% in one session) ?

They will not do well. probably slightly better on a move down, but not by much. Here is why.

Lets take an example of Chris trade (July/may 560), currently worth around $23. AAPL goes down 5% to 530. The May option will be worth almost zero. The July option will be 30 points OTM. Looking at AAPL July 590 options which is currently 30 point OTM, it is worth around $17. That's 25% loss. It might be worth slightly more due to increase in IV, but you get the idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would happen to this type of trade during a market meltdown/meltup (market rose or fell 5-10% in one session) ?

you get creamed :)

you hope for stable markets. You realise the maximum profit if the tock is pinned to your strike - the further (and quicker) it moves away from it the more money you lose (however you max loss is capped at the initial premium)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as Marco stated, you hope for somewhat stable markets -- especially on the front end. If I have already received my entire outlay back, then I don't care. For instance, if I can get $12.98 the first three weeks, I've already made money even if the trade goes 100% the wrong direction. That's why I like these trades, they can consistently go slightly against you and still be profitable.

Now if AAPL drops 5% three consecutive weeks -- well that hurts. But even if it drops 2-3% a week, I can get $12 this week, $10 the next, $8 the next, etc., and still end up ahead.

Note that if the trade really starts moving against you after week 2 or 3 you can actually enter a diagnol risk free. By way of example:

AAPL July cost $34

Short May 19 received $12

Trade is "down" $22.00 (not really becuase the July has value, but you get the point)

Next week lets say I can only sell for $8 and the week after for $4.

Well now the trade is down just $10.00, with six weeks left. At this point, I may be able to sell the diagnol 550 or 540 and make that entire $10. If the price rebounds, the long call will go up too, offsetting the potential loss on the short. This requires a calculation matrix to figure out breakevens, but can be done -- just make sure you're protected against a price rebound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the only case where you can really lose big is when you get a large move just after you entered.

This is why it is so important to have a balanced portfolio with proper allocation. A quick 5% in AAPL will probably will followed by a significant market move, in which case the earnings plays have a good chance to make good money. This is why I less care to have few small losses in those earnings plays - I know that they are compensated by the gains in the ICs and calendars, but if IV suddenly spikes, you can make a year worth of gains in just few days like it happened to me last August.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the only case where you can really lose big is when you get a large move just after you entered.

This is why it is so important to have a balanced portfolio with proper allocation. A quick 5% in AAPL will probably will followed by a significant market move, in which case the earnings plays have a good chance to make good money. This is why I less care to have few small losses in those earnings plays - I know that they are compensated by the gains in the ICs and calendars, but if IV suddenly spikes, you can make a year worth of gains in just few days like it happened to me last August.

Very good point Kim. Balance is the key for me.. Earnings plays have not been positive for me in the past couple of weeks but my other plays have made up for it... I give myself 5-10% for directional plays and balance the rest with +theta / -theta plays. Granted I am still very "Green" but I think I am on my way to finding something that works for me.. Know your strengths, weaknesses and tolerances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the only case where you can really lose big is when you get a large move just after you entered.

This is why it is so important to have a balanced portfolio with proper allocation. A quick 5% in AAPL will probably will followed by a significant market move, in which case the earnings plays have a good chance to make good money. This is why I less care to have few small losses in those earnings plays - I know that they are compensated by the gains in the ICs and calendars, but if IV suddenly spikes, you can make a year worth of gains in just few days like it happened to me last August.

Kim,

please keep making comments like the one above and know that you have to be repetitive, because I usually do not get it the first/second time :). You know, if you make basically the same point in three different threads it is really worth more because of the different context and thoughts. All the new material and the many moving parts are overwhelming at times. Your comments are very valuable guidelines. Hannes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm about BE on the earnings plays in May, but the low IV plays are keeping me positive. The winning ratio is May is terrible so far, but since I had two 16% winners (CSCO and BMC) and the losses are usually in 3-5% range, the overall return is actually slightly positive, but ICs and calendars enhance the returns in this environment.

Seems to me that you are asking the right questions and have a real desire to learn, and this is the most important thing. Manage the risk, and the returns will come. You will be fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little off topic but I prefer to post on forums that are active.

Kim,

What do you use to monitor your portfolio greeks? I use AMTD and can get position greeks but it's time consuming to get a total position theta or delta. And a lot of the time those totals are greatly influenced by positions that are so far OTM that they really shouldn't count at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anybody can answer question regarding Calenders. How would you adjust a trade when the short option (weekly) a few days before expiration or Wednesday the day before the next weeklies come out is approaching close to zero in value but your long position obviously still has value. For example I did a MCD calender in which the long is worth now .99 and the short is worth only .05. The dilemma then is if the underlying is moving down you are not gaining anything with the short as it approaches zero but are losing value on the long. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd close the short in any case. If 5c is all that's left to gain that will hardly be a mistake. You can then hope for a bounce to sell the next weekly with the higher strike once its out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the MCD calendar also.. I am banking on MCD not falling apart today and being able to roll to the June week 1 tomorrow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see how MCD ends today. At $91.50 i would expect .25 - .30 for the weeklies. Ideally MCD rallies to $92 and we can get .50 or so for the weekly.

Right now I am looking to stay in the 92.50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an MCD thread -- don't hijak this one :).

That said, the MCD trade is behaving EXACTLY as it should.

I would not close the trade today -- rather wait for the weekly's to open tomorrow and then do a calendar roll where you close this week's 92.5 and open next week's 92.5. Using an options calculator we learn, if the price of MCD and IV holds steady until tomorrow, we can expect a price of around .59 for next week and .06 for this week -- so you can net debit .53 -- which is perfect because it immediately puts the trade in the money.

I'm also moving this to the MCD thread -- please post there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AAPL is now down 25 points since opening the trade (4.3%), but the trade is still slightly up. Specifically, at close, mine was up 3.7%.

Tommorow is "roll" day. Using our option calculator, we can expect a price for the 560 option somewhere in the $5.70-$6.00 range. This is getting close to the level I'm not comfortable with -- if it was week 3 or 4, gravy, but not in week 2. Right now I would have to say there is a better than average chance I just take my small gain and move on.

I will of course fully evaluate after the opening, but I could be out of this fairly early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AAPL is now down 25 points since opening the trade (4.3%), but the trade is still slightly up. Specifically, at close, mine was up 3.7%.

Tommorow is "roll" day. Using our option calculator, we can expect a price for the 560 option somewhere in the $5.70-$6.00 range. This is getting close to the level I'm not comfortable with -- if it was week 3 or 4, gravy, but not in week 2. Right now I would have to say there is a better than average chance I just take my small gain and move on.

I will of course fully evaluate after the opening, but I could be out of this fairly early.

Chris, why wouldn't you re-open the trade with the long June's closer to the ATM strike? Is it because there is now only 4 weeks to expiration on the monthly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm in the July calendar -- so I still have 8 weeks left. The reason I might not re-enter is the trade might not make financial sense anymore, due to what expected moves are. I'm running the numbers right now and will let you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, quick update, definitely not just rolling down to a lower strike. A 1SD move is now up above 30 points over the last seven days. The chances of either continued falling or a quick rebound of a large amount are just too great right now. This is the inherent problem with this trade on volatile stocks. Typically it works out better, and as Kim noted, if this move had happened in week 3 -- so what, but having a 5.6% drop in the first five days after opening the trade -- well that doesn't work as well. (570-538).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep it is --- but, as everyone knows, I got out of it last week for a tiny gain (about 1.9% after commissions) due to the huge drop. Could I have stayed in and this trade reverted to a home run, sure, but if AAPL had fallen 20 instead of jumping 25 on Monday then I would have been in the brutal loss stage.

Going back to 560 makes it seem like this might be entering a range -- I'm going to watch it this week before deciding on another calendar or not. Seems more like an ideal OTM IC play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep. Looks like a new trading range before the next earnings in July. I was just writing an article for SA about a potential IC trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep. Looks like a new trading range before the next earnings in July. I was just writing an article for SA about a potential IC trade.

Looking forward to the article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      That's great, because it means there is discord, and discord, especially for Apple ahead of earnings has meant a repeating pattern for the clever trader to take advantage of. 
       
      One week before Apple's earnings would be January 25th, 2018. 

      Apple's Disagreement 
      Sometimes a bullish momentum bet works great -- and in fact, for Apple that has been a strong pattern ahead of earnings. But with a toppy market, sometimes a different approach can work as well. 

      It turns out, over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies like Apple Inc, there is a clever way to trade market anxiety or market optimism before earnings announcements with options. 

      This approach has returned 189% with 10 wins and 2 losses over the last 3-years. 

      The Trade Before Earnings 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying a slightly out of the money strangle one-week before earnings, and then sell that strangle just before earnings. 

      Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position 7 calendar days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on a 40-delta strangle, which is a fancy of saying, buying both the 40-delta call and 40-delta put, for a non-directional bet on volatility. 

      Returns 
      If we did this long strangle in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years, but only held it before earnings, using the options closest to 14 days from expiration, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 83.3%   Wins: 10   Losses: 2   % Return:  189% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine™ are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      We see a 189% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Apple Inc. 

      We can also see that this strategy hasn't been a winner all the time, rather it has won 10 times and lost 2 times, for a 83.3% win-rate on an one-week trade. 

      Setting Expectations 
      While this strategy has an overall return of 189%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 
            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 16.9% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 21.8% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per losing trade was -7.6% over 7-days. 

      We like the comfort of a trade that, when it loses, it isn't a disaster -- at least not historically. 

      Option Trading in the Last Year 
      We can also look at the last year of earnings releases and examine the results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 100%   Wins: 4   Losses: 0   % Return:  98.2% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      In the latest year this pre-earnings option trade has 4 wins and lost 0 times and returned 98.2%. 
            ➡ Over just the last year, the average percent return per trade was 22.3% over 7-days. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      We don't always have to look at bullish back-tests in a bull market -- sometimes a straight down the middle volatility pattern pops up. This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market -- finding trading opportunities that avoid earnings risk and work equally well during a bull or bear market. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      These are all trade-able events, at anytime, without concern for earnings. Today we look at exactly what has worked for Apple (AAPL). 
       
      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime.
      The Short-term Option Volatility Trade in Apple Inc 
      We will examine the outcome of going long a short-term at-the-money (50 delta) straddle, in options that are the closest to seven-days from expiration. But we have a rule -- it's a stop and a limit of 10%, and, we back-test re-opening the position immediately, as opposed to waiting for 5-days later. 

      Here is the stock chart for Apple since October 1st -- focus on the volatility, not the direction -- these are daily candles. 
       

      Chart from CMLviz.com

      We can volatility and a general downtrend, in fact, a 14% drop in less than 6 weeks. But let's not worry about direction, let's try to find a back-test that benefits from that volatility that is in fact up 92% in just six-weeks and takes no stock direction risk at all. Here it is, first, we enter the long straddle. 
       


      Second, we set a very specific type of stop and limit: 
       


      At the end of each day, the back-tester checks to see if the long straddle is up or down 10%. If it is, it closes the position, and re-opens at the same time, another long straddle, but this one now re-adjusted for what is the newest at-the-money strike price. 

      We have a full blown tutorial write up on this type of stop/limit behavior in the Discover Tab: Stops & Limits Roll Timing What does "open again at normal time" vs "immediately" mean? 

      The Results 
      We back-tested this only over the last six-weeks. We are hyper focusing not on a long drawn out pattern, but rather this time, right now, this period of volatility. 
       

       
      AAPL: Long 50 Delta Straddle   % Wins: 58.8%   Wins: 10   Losses: 7   % Return:  92% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Notice that this has triggered a trade 17 times in the last six-weeks and while the stock has dropped 14%, the option strategy, which takes no directional positioning, is up more than 92% in six-weeks time. This is a fast moving, re-adjusting straddle. The idea is simple: 

      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime. 
       

       
      Setting Expectations
      Since we use end of day open and closes, while this strategy has an overall return of 92%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 

            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 11%. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 29.9%. 
            ➡ The percent return per losing trade was -16%. 

      Not only are we seeing a high winning percentage, but also that the average win is twice as large as the average loss. Further, this trade takes no stock direction risk at all. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED
      When the market shifts, we need a minimum amount of data to adjust, and succeed. This is how people profit from the option market -- it's not luck, it's preparation. 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      Please note that the executions and other statistics in this article are hypothetical, and do not reflect the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as liquidity and slippage.
       
      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.

      Related articles:
      The Incredible Option Trade In VXX Earnings Momentum Trade In Oracle Post Earnings Option Trade In Facebook Option Trade After Earnings In AutoZone Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade In Netflix Microsoft Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade Post Earnings Trade In FedEx Pre Earnings Pattern In Apple Earnings Momentum Trading In Google PANW Broke The Golden Rule How To Profit From PayPal Volatility
    • By Kim
      This options investment strategy involves buying "Deep In The Money" (DITM) options to limit downside risk while retaining the full benefits of the stock. The options are purchased at a lower cost than the actual stock but still receive close to a $1 increase for every favorable $1 move in the underlying security which increases the percentage return for the same dollar move.
       
      Advantages of stock replacement strategy:
      Keeps all benefits associated with trading the stock. Reduces costs associated with owning the stock. Offers more leverage by increasing the potential percentage return. Offers lower downside risk. Disadvantages of a stock replacement strategy:
      Needs good trading experience and skills to master the strategy. The strategy may fail, when the stock stays on (almost) the same price or moves sidewise. Leverage works both way - If the stock falls, the percentage loss is larger as well. Let's check how you could use this options investment strategy to reduce your cost of owning Apple. The stock closed at $174 yesterday.
       
      Experienced options traders are usually well aware of this strategy and make good use of it.
       
      Strategy No. 1: Buy 100 shares of the stock
      Buying 100 shares will cost you $17,400. Not cheap. If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,100 or 6%. Let's see how it compares with the stock replacement strategy.

      Strategy No. 2: Buy DITM call
      As an alternative to buying the stock, we can buy the AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47. The cost will be $4,547 which is about 26% of the cost of the 100 shares. The P/L graph looks like this:
       

      If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,030. This is slightly less than buying the stock, but percentage wise, it is a 23% gain, compared to the 6% gain when owning the stock. Of course the opposite is true as well - if the stock goes down, your percentage loss is much higher. 

      This is called leverage. It works both ways - you increase the reward if the stock rises and increase the risk if the stock falls.
       
      However, if the stock falls, the volatility should increase which actually helps our option price because increased volatility can cause option prices to increase or not fall as fast. So basically even though we will gain $1 for every $1 the stock increases we will lose slightly less than $1 for every $1 the stock drops.
       
      You might noticed that we gained only 93 cents for every $1 movement in the stock. This is due to the fact that the delta of the 130 call is 0.93. We could choose a call which is deeper in the money - it would have a higher delta and have a better replication of the stock movement. However, it would also be more expensive and provide less leverage. 0.90-0.95 delta provides a good compromise between 1:1 movement and a reasonable price.
       
      Now let's see if we can do better.
       
      Strategy No. 3: Buy DITM call and sell OTM call against it every month
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 We reduce the cost of our trade by $155 to $4,392, but we also limited our gains. The P/L graph looks like this:
       


      As we can see, we increased the maximum gain to $1,147. This gain is not only larger than the dollar gain from owning the 100 shares of the stock, but also translates to a cool 26% in one month. If the stock is below $185 by February expiration, we can repeat the process with the March options. If it is higher, you just close the trade for a gain and can roll to higher strikes.

      Of course if you believe that AAPL will be higher than $185 by Feb expiration, you will be better by just buying the DITM calls.
       
      Strategy No. 4: Buy DITM call, sell OTM call and buy OTM put
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 Buy AAPL Feb 16 2018 165 put at $2.07 Our cost now is $4,599, still significantly lower than owning the stock. The P/L graph looks like this:



      Our gain is now limited to "only" $900 (20%), BUT we also limited our loss to ~13% in case AAPL goes down after earnings. And if the stock really crashes, the position can actually produce some gains because at some point the long put will more than offset the losses from the long call.

      This is a variation of collar, where we replace the long shares with DITM call. 

      And this is the beauty of options. You have almost endless possibilities to structure your trade, based on your outlook and risk tolerance.
       
      Before investing any money, please make sure you understand what you are doing. Good luck.
    • By TrustyJules
      What drew me to this site was Kim professing to apply strategies or trading philosophies as set out in Jeff Augen's books. Besides many things posted on here he also devoted some chapters to stock pinning, i.e. on expiration some stocks tend to gravitate towards a particular strike price. AAPL was and is an example of a stock that often pins to a strike. Jeff did his research on 3rd Friday expiries but I thought to test his theory today for a bit of fun. The actual pinning effect is something I verified by charting minute by minute quotes for AAPL over two years. You get charts like these:
       

       
      Here you see the stock quote from March last year with the Y axis showing how far ($) away from the closest option strike the stock was and the X axis the number of minutes since trading started that day. This plunging chart is very frequent with AAPL as - from the stocks I was able to acquire minute by minute data from - it is the stock that most consistently shows this behaviour - it only failed twice in two years roughly (based on 3rd Friday expiries).
      Anyway I could never make use of this with my European broker because profits are small and trading is frequent - with minimum 36$ to open and close a position this wasnt feasible. Now I switched to a US broker this became a possibility. So for fun I tried this today on a non 3rd Friday expiry and I can say AAPL duly obliged:

       
      I picked up the trading at 11.40 AM EST - you can start earlier but this is usually a midday lull that creates a stable time to open your position. The strategy is to use ratio trades to make profits on low capital investment. The stock was around 208.40$ and in line with the strategy we guessed that 207.50$ mark would be the close hence OB 1 C 205 @ 3.34$ and OS 4 C 202.50 @ 0.93$ for a net credit.
      The stock duly obliged and tumbled; in fact below 207.50$ to 206.80$ or so by which time I closed the trade. Now we retained the theory that at close it would be 207.50 so this time we did a different ratio and sold the 2 C 202.50 @ 4.55$ and bought 4 C 205 @ 2.03 again for a net credit. AAPL proved particularly tractable and by 4.20 PM EST it was trading around 207.85$ so we closed. The 0.40$ credit on the 207.50$ calls beckoned again. Therefore we repeated the setup of the morning except this time of course the trade was a net debit.
      I watched smugly as AAPL duly converged back down to the strike price - with 9 minutes till session close I was reckoning to close at the last minute. Except... my internet went down at that moment with 4 ITM shorts! Slight panic - router reboot and thank goodness Internet worked again (ouf!) I closed out immediately just in case another gremlin would be thrown up. In doing so I gave up a little profit as AAPL closed at 207.53 $ like a champ of pinning.
       
      Profit from all this excitement: $ 362 after commissions - the capital outlay was never more than 2K (but this is a slight cheat because I have an AAPL long position in my portfolio) - anyway 18% in the day and a good bit of fun with a slightly unpleasant bit of excitement toward the end!
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      There is a bullish momentum pattern in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) stock 2 calendar days after earnings, if and only if the stock showed a large gap up after the actual earnings announcement. 

      This is a conditional entry -- the company reports earnings and if the stock move off of that report is a 3% gain or larger, then a bullish position is back-tested looking for continuing momentum. The event is rare, but when it has occurred, the back-test results are noteworthy. 

      Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) Earnings 
      In Apple Inc, if the stock move immediately following an earnings result was large (3% or more to the upside), if we test waiting two-days after that earnings announcement and then bought a three-week at the money (50 delta) call, the results were quite strong. This back-test opens two-days after earnings were announced to try to find a stock that continues an upward trajectory after an earnings rally. 

      Simply owning options after earnings, blindly, is likely not a good trade, but hand-picking the times and the stocks to do it in can be useful. We can test this approach without bias with a custom option back-test. Here is the timing set-up around earnings: 
       
          Rules  Condition: Wait for the one-day stock move off of earnings, and if it shows a 3% gain or more in the underlying, then, follow these rules:  Open the long at-the-money call two-calendar days after earnings.  Close the long call 14 calendar days after earnings.  Use the options closest to 21 days from expiration (but more than 14 days). 
      This is a straight down the middle direction trade -- this trade wins if the stock is continues on an upward trajectory after a large earnings move the two-weeks following earnings and it will stand to lose if the stock does not rise. This is not a silver bullet -- it's a trade that needs to be carefully examined. 

      But, this is a conditional back-test, which is to say, it only triggers if an event before it occurs. 

      RISK CONTROL 
      Since blindly owning calls can be a quick way to lose in the option market, we will apply a tight risk control to this analysis as well. We will add a 40% stop loss and a 40% limit gain. 
       

      In English, at the close of every trading day, if the call is up 40% from the price at the start of the trade, it gets sold for a profit. If it is down 40%, it gets sold for a loss. This also has the benefit of taking profits if there is a stock rally early in the two-week period rather than waiting to close 14-days later. 

      Another risk reducing move we made was to use 21-day options and only hold them for 14-days so the trade doesn't suffer from total premium decay. 

      RESULTS 
      If we bought the at-the-money call in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years but only held it after earnings and after an earnings pop higher, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 50 Delta Call   % Wins: 80%   Wins: 4   Losses: 1   % Return:  151.9% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Looking at Averages 
      The overall return was 151.9%; but the trade statistics tell us more with average trade results: 
            ➡ The average return per trade was 46.54% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per winning trade was 76.92% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per losing trade was -75% over each 12-day period. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED 
      Bullish momentum and sentiment after of earnings can be quite powerful with the tailwind of an earnings beat. This is just one example of what has become a tradable phenomenon in Apple. To identify patterns that have repeated over and over again, empirically, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker on the NYSE and CBOE exchange floors. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald and is often seen on financial television. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.This article is used here with permission and originally appeared here.
    • By Kim
      Given the power of stock options to leverage your investment dollars, you might be tempted to bet on the AAPL earnings report coming out today by buying Apple calls (if you think the stock is going up) or Apple puts (if you want to bet that it will go down).
       
      That bet paid off handsomely in July 2016 when Apple reported earnings. The stock rose 6.5% the next day and the value of Apple’s weekly calls increased dramatically.
       
      But that’s the exception, not the rule.
       
      As I showed in one of my Seeking Alpha articles, buying either puts or calls just before Apple’s earnings report is, on average, a losing proposition.
       
      When you look at longer timeframe, AAPL tends to move less than expected. Take a look at the screenshot from optionslam.com, showing the post earnings movement of the stock in the last 10 cycles:
       

       
       
      The explanation for those numbers is simple. Over time, the options tend to overprice the potential post-earnings move. Those options experience huge volatility drop the day after the earnings are announced. In most cases, this drop erases most of the gains, even if the stock had a substantial move.
       
      The last column shows the one day post earnings performance of the weekly straddle. As we can see, it has lost money 8 out of 10 times. Which means that 8 out of 10 times the stock moved less than expected. If I had to choose, I would take the other side of the trade (selling those options).
       
      Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
       
      "Trying to predict the future is like driving down a country road at night with no headlights on and looking out the back window." - Peter Drucker
       
      Related articles:
      Is Your Risk Worth The Reward? Why We Sell Our Straddles Before Earnings Risk Reward Or Probability Of Success? Whatever You Do, Don't Do This Before Apple's Earnings How NOT To Gamble On AAPL Earnings  
      Want to learn how to trade options in a less risky way?
       
      Start Your Free Trial
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Here it is -- a portfolio of FAANG stocks using pre-earnings trading. A 3:30 video that is staggering and includes some robustness testing.
       
      Reminder that you can sign up for Trade Machine as a Steady Options member here:
      https://cmlviz.com/register/cml-trademachine-49-mo-promotion-so/
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Trading options pre-earnings -- 1 minute 25 second video. (example: $AAPL)
      As a Steady Options member, you can get a promotional price, here:
      Try the Back-tester
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.