SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

# Why Bother with Annualized Return?

Most options traders realize that annualizing returns does not reflect what you can expect to earn consistently. It is, however, a way to make relevant comparisons between outcomes of different holding periods.The first big question is, What is the basis for calculating a net return?

For example, for a covered call, do you divide profits by your original cost per share, by current value, or by the call’s strike?

Original cost per share is not useful for the calculation. In some outcomes, this price per share will be significantly power than current price. The current value is also not useful, as it changes constantly and does not reflect a true outcome. Only the strike of the covered call can be used to consistently compare one outcome to another.

The initial calculation is easy enough,. Divide net income by the strike. For example, you sold a call for 6 and recently bought to close at 2.50. Your net profit was 3.50 (\$350). The strike in this case was 125, and the call was open for 72 days. Initial net return:

3.50 ÷ 125 = 2.8%

Because the position was open for 72 days, the initial return has to be divided by that holding period and then multiplied by the full year:

2.8% ÷ 72 days * 365 days = 14.2%

The annualized yield was 14.2%. In other words, the same outcome, if held for exactly one year, would have been 14.2%, not 2.8%. This becomes important when yields are compared with different holding periods.

Looking at another example: you sold a call for 6 and recently bought to close at 2.50. Your net profit was 3.50 (\$350), the same numbers as in the first example. The strike was 125, but this option was over for 183 days. Now the annualization of profits looks significantly different:

3.50 ÷ 125 = 2.8%

Annualized:

2.8% ÷183 days * 365 days = 5.6%

Now, instead of double-digit return of 14.2% as in the first example, in this case annualized return was only 5.6%. The sold reason was the holding period. Even though the buy and sell levels were the same, and the strike was 125 in both cases, there is a substantial difference between 72 days and 183 days.

Applied to a series of trades with similar initial returns, but different holding periods, a big difference is realized upon annualizing. We have all heard of traders boasting about 125% returns, but they don’t always tell you it took three years, so annualized this is less than 42% -- still not bad, but not the same as 125%.

Annualizing just makes sense in order to ensure accurate comparisons between trades. The accurate calculation of annualized yield is even more complex when dividends are taken into consideration. Combining option profits with dividend yield produces an outcome called total return, but quarterly payments fall in different way.as For example, over 72 days, you could earn two quarterly dividends covering about 60 days; or you could earn three quarterly dividend s(on days 4, 34, and 64, for example).

To include dividend yield accurately, first calculate annualized return for the option profits only. Then add in the dividend based on the number of ex-dividend dates occurring during the time the covered call was open.

Dividend yield is easy to calculate. It is the yield based on the price paid per share at the time of purchase. As long as the company’s dividend per share is the same, the yield will also be the same no matter how much the underlying price changes.

If dividend per share is changed during the time the covered call is open, the effective yield on the day before ex-dividend date should be used to calculate accurate dividend yield and total return. Chances are the change during a holding period is not going to make a lot of difference, but for complete accuracy, this has to be taken into account.

The annualized option return is then added to actual dividend yield. This yield does not have to be annualized because it is paid (and earned) on a quarterly basis. This complicates the whole process of annualization, but promotes accuracy and consistency when working with several different trades during the year.

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

### Articles

• #### Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value

A lot is written about intrinsic value, but how does it work and what does it mean? The fact is, intrinsic value is an estimate of how future premium levels will change. It is base don current volatility and a set of assumptions. In dividing premium into its component parts, most descriptions deal with intrinsic and time value.

By Michael C. Thomsett,

• 164 views
• #### McDonald's, Not A Shelter in the Coming Storm

The amount of time and effort that investors spend assessing the risks versus the potential returns of their portfolio should shift as the economy and markets cycle over time. For example, when an economic recovery finally breaks the grip of a recession, and asset prices and valuations have fallen to average or below-average levels, price and economic risks are greatly diminished.

By Michael Lebowitz,

• 170 views
• #### Risk Depends On Your Time Horizon

Those who are nearing retirement and those who have recently retired represent the majority of my financial planning and investment advisory client base. One of the most common mistakes I hear from these types of individuals is something similar to “I no longer have enough time for the market to come back.”

By Jesse,

• 128 views
• #### Estimating Gamma for Calls or Puts

In a recent article, the details for estimate Delta were explained. This article deals with estimates of Gamma, which is denoted with the Greek symbol Γ. This calculation measures the rate of change in Delta and is summarized in percentage form. It is alternatively called the option’s curvature.

By Michael C. Thomsett,

• 402 views
• #### Why Options Traders Fail?

In the last 8 years, I trained thousands of options traders. I have seen many success stories, but also a lot of failures. There are a lot of reasons why many options traders fail. Here are the most common reasons, courtesy of our good friend and veteran options trader Gavin McMaster

By Kim,

• 842 views
• #### Using ORATS Wheel To Test Entries and Exits

My favorite option strategy backtester is ORATS Wheel, which includes a free trial for those interested. In the Steady Momentum PutWrite Strategy (SMPW), we sell out of the money puts on global equity indexes and ETF’s while holding our collateral in short and intermediate term fixed income ETF’s.

By Jesse,

• 563 views
• #### Estimating Delta for Calls or Puts

Options trading relies on many estimates of value and volatility. Among these, the most useful estimate is Delta. Even knowledgeable options traders might not fully understand the “Greeks” and how they operate, especially with one another. They are directly related and are useful in making comparisons of market risk and volatility.

By Michael C. Thomsett,

• 550 views
• #### Are Covered Calls a ‘Sure Thing?’

Most covered call writers enjoy the regularity and reliability of the position. In the majority of cases, the covered call will be profitable, even when underlying shares are called away. This assumes that the strike is higher than the basis in the underlying, and that the call writer understands the real limitations to the strategy.

By Michael C. Thomsett,

• 901 views
• #### Lessons from Bill Ackman's comeback

Bill Ackman is an American investor, hedge fund manager and philanthropist. He is the founder and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund management company. Ackman is considered by some to be a contrarian investor but considers himself an activist investor.

By Kim,

• 1 comment
• 2,086 views
• #### Steady Futures 2019 Performance Analysis

Steady Futures began trading the 50K portfolio in July 2019. It produced a 8.5% return during its 6 months of performance (18.0% annualized). We had three goals when we developed this system. First, we wanted a robust system that benefits from turmoil in the markets.

By RapperT,

• 570 views

Report Article

## We want to hear from you!

There are no comments to display.

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator