SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Put Permanent Portfolio


Harry Browne popularized the concept of the "Permanent Portfolio" decades ago by recommending an asset allocation of 25% stocks, 25% bonds, 25% gold, and 25% cash. In the 90's, the concept of "risk parity" also became popular with writings by Cliff Asness of AQR Capital.

Read more in Why Not 100% Equities and Bridgewater's "All Weather" Fund. Both are similar concepts attempting to create a more balanced portfolio that is better prepared to handle different economic environments by investing less in stocks and more in everything else. 

Options can be used in portfolios in many different ways, including to create leverage, which is one of the key tenets of risk parity. Active retail traders with margin accounts could fairly easily use the concepts in this article to create diversified portfolios with strong expected Sharpe Ratios by short selling puts on a small handful of ETF options in a sensible way (i.e. cash secured, or modestly levered in a disciplined and repeatable manner).

 

Let's first look at the Permanent Portfolio, from 1970-2017, represented by the S&P 500 for stocks (SPY when available), long term US treasuries for bonds (TLT when available), London gold price index for gold (GLD when available), and 1 month US T-bills for cash.  The portfolio is rebalanced annually. We are using the excellent website, Portfolio Visualizer (www.portfoliovisualizer.com), for our examples. 

 

Click on all images for greater clarity

Perm 70-17.png

Past performance doesn't guarantee future results

 

What is noticeable, and desirable, about the Permanent Portfolio asset allocation is the relatively steady long term historical performance with modest and relatively short lived drawdowns. It has been a stable performer due to the low correlations between stocks, bonds, and gold. But this also means the annual returns can vary substantially from stocks alone, which can be behaviorally challenging for some investors. Know thyself before making investment decisions.

 

By removing cash, portfolio visualizer will allow us to solve for risk parity of our three remaining asset classes. Since 1970, this would have been an allocation of approximately 42% treasury bonds, 33% stocks, and 25% gold. By eliminating cash in the portfolio, we would expect higher returns, but also modestly higher risk, which is in fact what would have happened.

 

Portfolio 1: Our original Permanent Portfolio asset allocation

Portfolio 2: Risk parity weighted allocation (holdings are balanced based on risk instead of dollars)

 

RPPP.png

Past performance doesn't guarantee future results

 

Using the ORATS "Wheel" backtester, we can backtest a Permanent Risk Parity Portfolio of 30 day short puts on SPY, GLD, and TLT since June 2008, while also adding the T-bill return to the portfolio since short puts simply require a good faith margin requirement by the broker instead of a cash outlay when holding the underlying ETF. 

 

Portfolio 1: Permanent Portfolio

Portfolio 2: Risk Parity Permanent Portfolio

Portfolio 3: Risk Parity Put Permanent Portfolio (cash secured, i.e., no leverage)

 

RPPPP.png

Estimated transaction costs of slippage and commissions are built into all ORATS Wheel backtests, therefore they have been accounted for in the put parity portfolio simulation, while portfolio 1 and 2 are gross of estimated transaction costs. None of the portfolios have accounted for the impact of taxes, which have differing impacts on investors. Consult with your tax advisor. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

 

Af first glance, it may appear that selling puts in place of holding the underlying ETF is unattractive. We'd argue that investors should think about portfolios in terms of both total returns and risk-adjusted returns, and the put parity portfolio produces the highest Sharpe Ratio. Since short puts can be levered to create a higher notional exposure in a margin approved brokerage account, investors seeking higher returns could apply a modest amount of leverage to create notional exposure around 150% to produce returns in line with the underlying ETF portfolio, while still maintaining the advantage of lower volatility.

Of course, investors could also lever an ETF portfolio by borrowing in their brokerage account, but typically at a much higher cost than the implied financing rate built into derivative contracts like options. Investors comfortable with the volatility of a 100% equity portfolio (15-20% annualized) could further lever positions to have the potential for equity like returns while still maintaining the attractive diversification characteristics of a Permanent Portfolio style asset allocation mix.

 

It should also be noted that if an investor prefers an option position that acts more like synthetic stock (ETF), an option "combo" or "risk reversal" position can be created by combining a short put and long call. All of these concepts can be tested with the ORATS wheel, which we encourage those interested to check out as it's a great tool for automated backtesting of many option strategies with around a decade of clean historical data on many equity option symbols. 

 

Jesse Blom is a licensed investment advisor and Vice President of Lorintine Capital, LP. He provides investment advice to clients all over the United States and around the world. Jesse has been in financial services since 2008 and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. Jesse has a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Oral Roberts University. Jesse oversees the LC Diversified forum and contributes to the Steady Condors newsletter. 

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Great reversal signal – 50 MA with 8 EMA

    Options traders continually seek the elusive “sure thing” reversal signal. Of course, there is no such thing. But there are ways to use combined signals to identify likely reversal points. Add in strong confirming signals, and you have a reliable system for entering and exiting options trades.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 171 views
  • Why Bother with Annualized Return?

    Most options traders realize that annualizing returns does not reflect what you can expect to earn consistently. It is, however, a way to make relevant comparisons between outcomes of different holding periods.The first big question is, What is the basis for calculating a net return?

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,321 views
  • Is 5% a Good Return For Options Trades?

    I'm often asked if 5% is a good return for an options trade. The answer is: it depends. One of the myths of options trading is that you should aim for at least 100% gain in each option trade, otherwise it is not worth the risk. Is it really the case?

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 397 views
  • How to Trade Volatility

    When trading options, one of the hardest concepts for beginner traders to learn is volatility, and specifically HOW TO TRADE VOLATILITY. After receiving numerous emails from people regarding this topic, I wanted to take an in depth look at option volatility.

    By GavinMcMaster,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,509 views
  • The Real Meaning of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)

    Most traders have heard of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and most believe they know what it means. In a nutshell, it is a belief that the market is “efficient” and that the current price of shares is a reflection of efficiency. Right? Wrong.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 992 views
  • Put Permanent Portfolio

    Harry Browne popularized the concept of the "Permanent Portfolio" decades ago by recommending an asset allocation of 25% stocks, 25% bonds, 25% gold, and 25% cash. In the 90's, the concept of "risk parity" also became popular with writings by Cliff Asness of AQR Capital.

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,509 views
  • Does HFT Harm Individual Investors?

    What is the overall impact of High Frequency Trading (HFT)? Some traders believe that the use of algorithms in super-fast and powerful computers allows large hedge funds and other institutions to beat the market, implying that because these big traders can out-perform individuals, profits are unfairly gained. But is it true?

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,393 views
  • Defining the Anchor Strategy

    Lorintine Capital and Steady Options have been trading the Anchor strategy for a number of years. During this time Anchor has evolved as we have learned more, in no short part due to the Steady Option’s members continuing questioning of the strategy, insights they provide, and a large group of individuals seeking to improve the strategy’s efficiency. 

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 784 views
  • The Life Of An Options Contract

    You may be asking yourself why am I reading this basic article about options trading? Well, if you’re anything like me, I didn’t learn options trading via the fundamentals.  Rather, I found a few strategies that made sense to me and started trading, without much regard to the underlying workings and details.

    By Drew Hilleshiem,

    • 1 comment
    • 2,902 views
  • Volatility Trends in the DJIA

    Options traders focus, often too much, on implied volatility to estimate the next change in option valuation. Is this always a wise policy? Options are derived from volatility in the underlying security (thus the term derivatives), a good question is: Why not focus on volatility trends in the underlying (historical volatility) to judge likely future valuation trends in options?

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,672 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs