SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Option Payoff Probability


Many options analyses focus on profit, loss and breakeven. These show what occurs on expiration day, assuming the option remains open to that point. But this is not realistic. Most options are closed or exercised before expiration, is calculation of how probable a payoff is going to be, how likely the loss, or the exact neutral outcome (breakeven), are all unrealistic.

In the real world the single modeling of outcomes based on remaining open until expiration day, fail to consider several unknown and unanticipated random variables.

The easily calculated breakeven is easily calculated. Above or below that level, either profit or loss can mean many different things. When either are at maximum, you know the outcome exists within a range of possibilities. When maximum profit or loss are unlimited, it is more difficulty to identify probability beyond a rather simplified assumption: The greater the possible degree of profit or less, the lower the probability. In other words, in most instances, an “unlimited” profit or loss will not be realized in the extreme. A smaller (rather than a larger) profit or loss is more rational to assume as the likely outcome. This is all guesswork, of course, because whether options traders like it or not, the probability itself can never be calculated accurately. Being aware of the range of possibilities is the best anyone can expect.

Not only the percentage of outcome, but time itself, only add to the random variables of possible outcomes. This means that a small, medium or large level (of profit or loss) might be realized in a few hours, a day, several days, weeks or months. No matter how many applications of formulation are applied, there are many possibilities that, at lest, you can apply what you consider the most likely, more limited range.

This is the reality, but it is easy to overlook that by applying some flowed logic. For example, many traders believe that without considering other factors, profit or loss is a 50-50 proposition. Half will be profitable, and the other half will not. This is true for flipping a coin and expecting a 50-50 outcome of heads or tails, but options are not flat, two-sided items. They are not even tangible. The many variables include moneyness, time, volatility, and overall market conditions. Further complicating this, the random variables are not always equal in how they influence outcomes. Even if you can articulate all the matters influencing option profit or loss, how do you weight the elements at play?

Because there is no clear answer to this, every trader ends up having to make a few assumptions about the random variables. For example, you might assume the following:

  1. The closer to the money, the more reliable the assumption that profit or loss stand a 50-50 chance of being realized. The farther away, the loss likely the 50-50 outcome.
  2. The shorter the time to expiration, the greater the odds of loss due to time decay, and the less likely the odds of profit (for long positions). This assumption is flipped for short positions.
  3. The greater the volatility in both underlying and option, the more difficult it will be to predict outcomes on either side.

 

There is a degree of logic to these assumptions, but every options trader has experienced examples in which even the most conservative and logical assumption is betrayed by unexpected surprises and price movements. This is a reality, but it still does not explain why pricing models often do not reveal anything of value. Uncertainty defines options trading, and no pricing model based on current and historical observations can really predict the future.

It may be desirable to wish a pricing model exists that would do so, but it does not. Despite popular beliefs that pricing models are predictive, they never are, and this is the stark reality of trading, whether in options or other instruments. Models just predict future volatility and price based on current volatility and price. It’s like guessing that tomorrow’s temperature will be 72 because today’s high was 70 and it has risen by two degrees every day for the past week. Everyone knows this is not reliable, but that is precisely how pricing models are applied to predict. If we know the flaws in weather prediction based on “trends,” why not apply the same limitation to trading?

 

The great problem of trying to predict future option pricing is that options are not like other topics of analysis:

In physics or engineering, a theory predicts future values. In finance, you’re lucky if your model can predict the future sign correctly. So what’s the point? Models in finance, unlike those in physics, don’t predict the future; mostly they relate the present value of one security to another. In science, when you say a theory is right, you mean that it’s mathematically consistent and true – that is, it explains and predicts its corner of the universe. In finance, right is used to mean merely consistent: many models are right but usually none of them are true. [Derman, Emanuel (2007). Sophisticated vulgarity. Risk, 20(7), 93]


A comparison between several different trades or potential trades is rarely identical. This is where probability analysis becomes useful. It is possible, as an alternative to seeking a perfect pricing model, to develop a means for quantifying the likelihood of profitability when it is greater in one trade than in another. There is no guarantee of a positive outcome, but there is a better probability when the two estimates are vastly different.


This is not only the best any trader can hope for. It is a reliable system for making sound judgments and for overcoming the greatest random variable of all: the human element. Every trader is subject to biases not based on rational analysis, but on opinion, false assumption or irrational preferences. No one can realistically identify a means for ensuring profitable trades all the time, but  modeling can be useful in applying that desirable but rate aspect of trading: objective analysis.

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his websiteat Thomsett Guide as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Human Nature and Option Risk

    Traders may tend to think of risk in purely mathematical terms. It can be quantified by analysis and by a deep understanding of probability. But there is more to this than just the math, and for options traders, some of the intangible considerations might have more impact on trading decisions than the formulas.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 108 views
  • Anchor Analysis and Options

    Anyone who has been trading the Anchor Strategy over the past few months should be extremely happy with its performance.  Now that many have realized how well it performs in down markets, one of the most common questions is “what should I do now?”

    By cwelsh,

    • 0 comments
    • 34 views
  • Discount Stock Shopping In High Volatility Markets

    The COVID-19 pandemic has rocked markets over the past month. The fear of the virus, the fear of the impact on global economics from the mitigation taken on by governments, and, finally, the fear of "what’s next" has propelled the VIX.

    By Drew Hilleshiem,

    • 0 comments
    • 355 views
  • The Fallacy of Market Timing

    The headlines say it all. "The worst day since the financial crisis". "Markets in turmoil". And today was "Stock markets post best day in years as governments fight coronavirus with cash". Could anyone predict the crash? And can anyone tell us where we are headed next week/month/year? Is it possible to call the tops and the bottoms?

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 294 views
  • Long Option Risks

    Among all options, the most easily calculated payoffs are those for long options. But there remains a great misunderstanding, even among experienced option traders. This must be clarified before moving forward. The misunderstanding is often seen expressed online and in the literature: “75% of long options expire worthless.”

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 336 views
  • Option Payoff Probability

    Many options analyses focus on profit, loss and breakeven. These show what occurs on expiration day, assuming the option remains open to that point. But this is not realistic. Most options are closed or exercised before expiration, is calculation of how probable a payoff is going to be, how likely the loss, or the exact neutral outcome (breakeven), are all unrealistic.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 439 views
  • Value of Trend Following During Periods of Market Volatility

    Our trend following system looks at two things when planning a position. The first piece is obviously the direction of the trend.  Does the system signal up or down?  The second piece of a position plan is how much risk we are going to take. 

    By RapperT,

    • 1 comment
    • 990 views
  • Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value

    A lot is written about intrinsic value, but how does it work and what does it mean? The fact is, intrinsic value is an estimate of how future premium levels will change. It is base don current volatility and a set of assumptions. In dividing premium into its component parts, most descriptions deal with intrinsic and time value.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 499 views
  • McDonald's, Not A Shelter in the Coming Storm

    The amount of time and effort that investors spend assessing the risks versus the potential returns of their portfolio should shift as the economy and markets cycle over time. For example, when an economic recovery finally breaks the grip of a recession, and asset prices and valuations have fallen to average or below-average levels, price and economic risks are greatly diminished.

    By Michael Lebowitz,

    • 0 comments
    • 453 views
  • Risk Depends On Your Time Horizon

    Those who are nearing retirement and those who have recently retired represent the majority of my financial planning and investment advisory client base. One of the most common mistakes I hear from these types of individuals is something similar to “I no longer have enough time for the market to come back.”

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 380 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs Expertido