SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value

A lot is written about intrinsic value, but how does it work and what does it mean? The fact is, intrinsic value is an estimate of how future premium levels will change. It is base don current volatility and a set of assumptions. In dividing premium into its component parts, most descriptions deal with intrinsic and time value.

However, time value consists of time itself as an isolated impact on value (the closer to expiration, the more rapidly it declines). A second part of premium is extrinsic value, better known as implied volatility. Intrinsic value refers to the number of points in the money, and time value is a separate and depreciating form of premium. Intrinsic value is where all the variation takes place and where uncertainty is the primary attribute.


Intrinsic value most often tracks historic value closely, and for good reason. Options, it should be remembered, are derivatives, meaning the value is derived from the underlying. For this reason, historic value is a reliable test of option value and volatility. It is reflected in implied volatility (IV), but by itself, IV is of questionable value as a means for timing trades. It can be adjusted by changing the estimates and this itself means that IV cannot be used as a firm means for option pricing or for evaluating the true volatility.


Implied volatility often is given an assumed predictive quality. This is how options traders often use IV. But it is inaccurate to grant IV this value. When IV moves apart from historical volatility, it often indicates not a predictive move, but the mispricing of the option. This occurs for many reasons, but it is important to note that IV is questionable at best and inaccurate at worst. In comparison, realized volatility (movement in the underlying in response to perceived risk) is a more accurate predictive feature of the option:


Implied volatility is widely believed to be informationally superior to historical volatility, because it is the “market’s” forecast of future volatility. [But this is] a poor forecast of subsequent realized volatility … Implied volatility has virtually no correlation with future volatility, and it does not incorporate the information contained in recent observed volatility. [Canina, Linda & Figlawski, Stephen (1993). The informational content of implied volatility. The Review of Financial Studies 6(3(): 659-681]


The value of implied volatility is not disputed. But as an indicator of future pricing, it is not as reliable as many traders believe. Its most practical application is to make comparisons with historical volatility, whose historical and actual results are specific and accurate. When this is a method employed, it is easier to spot mispriced options than using any other method.


Variations and inconsistencies between historical and implied volatility are easily spotted by means of various technical signals, such as Bollinger Bands. This indicator tracks variation outside of the standard deviations of price based on short-term price averages. This is best known as a means for timing underlying trades, but it can also be effective in identifying when options are overbought or oversold. This greatly aids ibn the timing of short-term and speculative trades based on volatility levels. Implied volatility has great value when applied in this manner, but it is a mistake to rely solely on IV without also observing how the underlying is behaving.


The Bollinger Band-based test of historical volatility is expressed as price moves above or below two standard deviations from the average price. Its value is in how easily these volatility moves are seen on a chart. Options traders may immediately compare these moves above the upper band or below the lower band to option premium behavior. The approximate level of change should be similar. But when it is not (and notably when implied volatility is opposite the move in the underlying), traders have the advantage of being able to immediately exploit the mispriced option. These errors in p[ricing tend to self-correct rapidly, so immediate action is required to fully exploit the moment. This relies on the broad assumption that implied volatility has been calculated accurately, and this cannot always be known.


A solution to this potential inaccuracy is to limit the comparison. When an options trader follows the underlying and the option over a period and observes consistent correlation between historical ad implied volatility, it may be assumed that the calculation of UIV is reasonable. When the correlation begins to vary, that is the moment when assumed mispricing can be seen, and trades entered. They revert quickly, and they may perform in a manner equally volatile to the original mispricing, but the point remains valid: A change in correlation is a fair indicator of a mispriced option, but without the longer-term tracking of volatility, it should not be assumed that IV is always calculated accurately. As with all timing techniques, it is the change in correlation that adds meaning, not what is seen only in the moment.


Because option pricing may be affected by other influences than just volatility, the technique of timing for mispriced options relies on a belief that prices is fair and operating efficiently. Anyone who has operated in the market knows this is not always the case. The use of timing and correlation of volatility involves risk and markets are informally efficient, so options traders also need to keep an eye on influences beyond the option price and IV alone. This informational efficiency is a risk itself, because all information is given equal weight. This includes true and false information, rumor, gossip, and speculative belief. Markets are informationally efficient but the information itself may be less than accurate. This is a great flaw in the efficient market theory, and it has a direct impact on option pricing. It lacks economic efficiency, and that is what traders need to reduce market risk.


As levels of IV change, so does the calculation of future IV. This makes the test of pricing even more complex. Bottom line: Correlation is reliable even when IBV is not, and the comparison is the key to better timing of trades.


Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published author with over 80 business and investing books, including the best-selling Getting Started in Options, coming out in its 10th edition later this year. He also wrote the recently released The Mathematics of Options. Thomsett is a frequent speaker at trade shows and blogs on his website at Thomsett Guide as well as on Seeking Alpha, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.

Related articles

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles


  • Human Nature and Option Risk

    Traders may tend to think of risk in purely mathematical terms. It can be quantified by analysis and by a deep understanding of probability. But there is more to this than just the math, and for options traders, some of the intangible considerations might have more impact on trading decisions than the formulas.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Anchor Analysis and Options

    Anyone who has been trading the Anchor Strategy over the past few months should be extremely happy with its performance.  Now that many have realized how well it performs in down markets, one of the most common questions is “what should I do now?”

    By cwelsh,

  • Discount Stock Shopping In High Volatility Markets

    The COVID-19 pandemic has rocked markets over the past month. The fear of the virus, the fear of the impact on global economics from the mitigation taken on by governments, and, finally, the fear of "what’s next" has propelled the VIX.

    By Drew Hilleshiem,

  • The Fallacy of Market Timing

    The headlines say it all. "The worst day since the financial crisis". "Markets in turmoil". And today was "Stock markets post best day in years as governments fight coronavirus with cash". Could anyone predict the crash? And can anyone tell us where we are headed next week/month/year? Is it possible to call the tops and the bottoms?

    By Kim,

  • Long Option Risks

    Among all options, the most easily calculated payoffs are those for long options. But there remains a great misunderstanding, even among experienced option traders. This must be clarified before moving forward. The misunderstanding is often seen expressed online and in the literature: “75% of long options expire worthless.”

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Option Payoff Probability

    Many options analyses focus on profit, loss and breakeven. These show what occurs on expiration day, assuming the option remains open to that point. But this is not realistic. Most options are closed or exercised before expiration, is calculation of how probable a payoff is going to be, how likely the loss, or the exact neutral outcome (breakeven), are all unrealistic.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • Value of Trend Following During Periods of Market Volatility

    Our trend following system looks at two things when planning a position. The first piece is obviously the direction of the trend.  Does the system signal up or down?  The second piece of a position plan is how much risk we are going to take. 

    By RapperT,

    • 1 comment
  • Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value

    A lot is written about intrinsic value, but how does it work and what does it mean? The fact is, intrinsic value is an estimate of how future premium levels will change. It is base don current volatility and a set of assumptions. In dividing premium into its component parts, most descriptions deal with intrinsic and time value.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

  • McDonald's, Not A Shelter in the Coming Storm

    The amount of time and effort that investors spend assessing the risks versus the potential returns of their portfolio should shift as the economy and markets cycle over time. For example, when an economic recovery finally breaks the grip of a recession, and asset prices and valuations have fallen to average or below-average levels, price and economic risks are greatly diminished.

    By Michael Lebowitz,

  • Risk Depends On Your Time Horizon

    Those who are nearing retirement and those who have recently retired represent the majority of my financial planning and investment advisory client base. One of the most common mistakes I hear from these types of individuals is something similar to “I no longer have enough time for the market to come back.”

    By Jesse,


  Report Article

We want to hear from you!

There are no comments to display.

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Options Trading Blogs Expertido