SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Kim

(DISCUSSION) AAPL August 2013 trade

142 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

yeah, basically i always try to take profit around 15-20% range. i don't wait on Kim's alerts for closing the trade, i just close it when it goes into the 15-20% range.

Edited by Mikael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that not taking profits at 10% was a mistake. When you have profit targets, you have to stick to them. My profit target on calendars is 20-30% and most of the time we get there or very close (see IBM, CF, LNKD, previous AAPL trade and RUT trades). Obviously if you aim for 10% gain, you cannot afford for the trade to lose 30-40%. While the current situation with AAPL is definitely not pleasant, but when you aim for 20-30% gain, you should be ready for some occasional 30-40% losses. If you cannot accept this, then set your profit targets lower and cut the losers around 15-20% as well. Higher reward goes with higher risk, this is why I encourage members to set their own targets based on your risk tolerance.

 

Not to adjust earlier was obviously a mistake, and we could also manage this trade better. Adjusting a double calendar is usually easier (you just sell the further strike and move the tent in the direction of the stock), and this is why of the reasons why I prefer double calendars for SO trades. A lesson for next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

all three indices are up nearly one percent today, and AAPL is down ~1.25%. perhaps in the future we can avoid calendar/condor candidates surrounded by negative or positive sentiment. any bit of negative news seems to pin this one to the floor lately. 

Hindsight is always 20/20. When we entered the trade, the stock was stuck in 440-460 range for few weeks. We also played it in the same way in the previous cycle for 25% gain.

 

You can always find reasons why you should not trade something after it tanks, but decisions are based on facts known at the time the trade was initiated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

okay, enough ranting about what's past.

 

in all seriousness, what is our stop-loss here? the calendar is down over ~40-45% currently...are you looking to close out down 50%? 60%?

 

with two back-to-back up days in the markets, and the increased volatility all-around, tomorrow could be painful for this trade. 

 

it seems the options are 1) continue to wait

 

                                       2) close the trade and cut our losses

 

                                       3) close the 410 put calendar and open the 400 put calendar - though I'd really hate to throw any more good money after bad, and the P/L graph doesn't look favorable anyway.

 

 

so it seems the logical thing to do would be to close the trade now, or at least have a maximum loss target in mind.  

Edited by Ice101781

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stock is now down over 12% in just 3 weeks. The RSI is at 23. How low can it go? I have no idea. However, I do think that at those levels, there is a good chance of at least some technical bounce. Plus we have the August calls IV playing in our favor. The 410 calendar is currently down 0.50, but even a small bounce will put it in a positive territory. We can then close it and roll to next week 400 calendar.

 

There are no guarantees, and the loss can become even larger. But we need to play probabilities, and probabilities tell us that the chances of some bounce are greater at those levels than the chances of the stock going even lower. Of course I might be wrong, but I'm going to take my chances and continue holding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: I promise to do a post-Morten of this trade when it's over (and I can tell you it won't be pretty). But right now I don't see a point to close it. All the arguments that I mentioned are getting even more convincing with the stock at 395 (again, it doesn't mean it cannot go lower), and the long 450 calls will have value and probably slightly increase even if the stock goes another 10-15 points down. I will likely close the 410 calendar tomorrow and might open the 400 calendar one week further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: I promise to do a post-Morten of this trade when it's over (and I can tell you it won't be pretty).

 

One aspect the post-mortem might address is position sizing.  The adjustment calendar increased our capital at risk by about 40%.  Those already holding a full position (e.g. 10% of one's portfolio) have now well exceeded our position sizing guidelines.  In addition to the trade being down over 60%, the loss now represents nearly 10% of my portfolio value.  My goal was to use proper position sizing to avoid a single loss consuming more than 2-3% of the portfolio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100% true, and I'm in the same boat as you are (I'm sure it's no relief for you).

 

One clear lesson from this trade: when you trade a non-directional trading, never rely on your opinion about the direction to manage the trade. I'm trying to follow this simple rule in all my trading (the recent RUT and IBM trades are good examples), but we all are just humans. In this case, I just relied on my opinion "cannot go any lower" and we all are paying the price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here my personal post mortem.

I think I missed the point to adjust the trade, which usually I would have done somewhere at 425 the latest. But against my usual rules I decided that AAPL was due a bounce and did hold on to it. At 410 I was seriously annoyed with myself that I didn't adjust the trade but refused to adjust it then - when Kim did. Clearly getting stubborn and emotional here, which doesn't happen to me very often anymore however when it happens its usually when I don't follow my trading plan. So that was a good reminder for me to stick to the plan and adjust when I thought I would when I put on the trade. Anyway when I saw AAPL breaking 400 on a day where SPY was pretty firm after underperforming for quite a few days I decided I don't know what's going on with the stock and that I finally have to cut this position. I was way past the point of adjusting it and I had become way too emotional with the trade. So I cut yesterday at about 58% loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea was to slightly reduce the positive delta but mostly to add some positive theta.

 

I probably will not be adding any adjustments after closing the 410 calendar today. The stock became too unpredictable, and "cannot go any lower" assumption doesn't work anymore (well, actually it never really worked).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the best case is obviously the stock rallying to 410 - probably not going to happen today. But if it goes to ~400, we should be able to get around 1.50-1.70. Right now the mid is around 0.90, I think the downside is no more than .20-.30. I will be looking to exit around 1.50, if we are not there around 3pm, I will sell for whatever I can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jozsika

I don't think that not taking profits at 10% was a mistake. When you have profit targets, you have to stick to them. My profit target on calendars is 20-30% and most of the time we get there or very close (see IBM, CF, LNKD, previous AAPL trade and RUT trades). Obviously if you aim for 10% gain, you cannot afford for the trade to lose 30-40%. While the current situation with AAPL is definitely not pleasant, but when you aim for 20-30% gain, you should be ready for some occasional 30-40% losses. If you cannot accept this, then set your profit targets lower and cut the losers around 15-20% as well. Higher reward goes with higher risk, this is why I encourage members to set their own targets based on your risk tolerance.

 

Not to adjust earlier was obviously a mistake, and we could also manage this trade better. Adjusting a double calendar is usually easier (you just sell the further strike and move the tent in the direction of the stock), and this is why of the reasons why I prefer double calendars for SO trades. A lesson for next time.

 

I have problems with exiting the trades too, so I use this post to ask some questions.

 

You say "...we get there or very close..."

 

What does this mean? That you "almost win" (of course it doesn't count :-) or that as you approach your target you tighten your stop or do you place a training stop or what?

 

"Obviously if you aim for 10% gain, you cannot afford for the trade to lose 30-40%" This is not obvious for me at all. If, e.g. your w/l ratio is 10:1, then aiming at 10% gain (10 of them) with an occasional 40% loss seems a rewarding, low-risk strategy.

 

Do you have this type of tabulated hypothetical results for your trades?

 

Or to put it differently: *how* can we 'dial in' our risk/reward tolerance? We do need some guidance from you. Maybe a high/low/medium risk target and similarly for a stop when you enter the trade (or as the trade evolves.)

 

"Higher reward goes with higher risk, this is why I encourage members to set their own targets based on your risk tolerance."

 

Let's assume that my risk tolerance is infinite (maybe because I trade with a small percent of my total portfolio or maybe I like to live dangerously, whatever.) Do you think that if I am willing to accept 100% "occasional" loss, can I set my profit target to 1,000%? Probably not.So it is not *entirely* true that we should use our personal risk/reward profile. It got to do something with the actual trade, no?

 

I agree that we shouldn't crowd the exit (maybe we shouldn't crowd the entry either?) but we do need some help from you.

 

Thanks,

 

--joseph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good points Joseph, and I'll try to answer.

 

First of all, the profit targets and probabilities of success are different for different strategies and can also vary in different markets. For example, in relatively slow and low IV markets I will aim for 10-15% in earnings straddles, but I might increase it when I see that the markets become more volatile. Some strategies like ICs are easier to evaluate, so lets use the IC as an example.

 

If you trade 10 deltas IC, you will make around 10-15% in a winning months and your winning ratio will be around 80%. You absolutely cannot afford to lose more than 15-20% in you losing months. For example:

10%*9 winners=90%

30%*3 losers=90%

Net results: zero.

 

With 90% IC, you probably will not make more than 4-6%, so one 50% loser will erase all your gains.

 

With calendars it is more problematic to calculate the probability of success, but the winning ratio is probably in the 60-70% range. I would even say that 70% can be considered excellent by all standards. It is definitely not even close to 90%. So 10% profit target with occasional 40-50% losers will not work. While there is nothing wrong with taking profits at 10%, to me, it will require to adjust much earlier and not to allow the trade to go to the 30-40% loss range.

 

When I say "we get there or very close", I refer to the results of the calendars this year:

IBM: +18.3% and +14.0%

CF: +36.0%

LNKD: 32.8%

NFLX: 17.6%

AAPL: +25.8%

CRM: +43.3%

RUT: +12.6%, +25.6%, +19.3%, +30%, +14.0%

 

We had couple losers as well, but overall the results are in the 20-30% range. It doesn't mean we can "afford" the AAPL 50%+ loss which is unacceptable, but imagine that most of our winners were in the 10% range - this would make the AAPL loss much more painful.

 

When exactly to take profits involves some judgement call in many cases, and I always share my thoughts in each trade. For example, I described exactly why I took profits in the last RUT IC - the risk/reward at 20% gain was much favorable. However, over time, members might develop their own guidelines which might be slightly (or very) different from mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AAPL is a broken stock without a clear trading range. Good stock for directional/lottery ticket trades, but not good for income trading. I'm avoiding it for now. 

With proper adjustments, even after 12-13% drop in the stock the trade would be still around breakeven. I will do the full analysis after we are done, but here is a short summary:

 

450 calendar opened at 5.50 on May 31;

Rolled to 430 calendar on June 18 (stock at 430) for 0.60 debit;

Rolled to 410 calendar on June 21 (stock at 410) for 0.35 debit.

 

Total debit: 6.45

The 410 calendar is worth today 6.45.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I made a stupid mistake.  I thought I sold the adjustment calendar (the 410 put calendar), but apparently I was still holding 1 contract when the front option expired on Jun 28.  I was assigned 100 shares of AAPL over the weekend, and I paid $410 per share.  However, I am still holding the long Jul 5 put, so I guess I can turn around and sell those shares for $410 this weekend, right?

 

The value of the shares plus the value of the put roughly equals the $41,000 cash that is now tied up in this.  Should I just close it all to get my money back?  If I hold another week through expiration of the Jul 5 option, then in the worst case, I get my $41K back for the shares and the put option expires out of the money and is a total loss.  But that's no worse than just selling everything now, and there's the possibility I make a little extra if AAPL goes above 410, right?  Am I overlooking some other risks here?  I've never been assigned before.

 

Thanks!

Josh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would probably close now both the shares and the puts. You will do slightly better than me by closing today since the stock popped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Help me get an education, folks.  I understand "buy it as a spread, sell it as a spread," delta neutral trading, etc in theory.  It's the practice I have trouble with.

 

On this spread, we sold the Jul 450 call for about $17.00 and it's now worth about $0.70.  With the stock around $400, digging out of our hole can only be done by the long 450 (Aug).  It seems to me that the short call can only hurt us if the stock pops, and with a delta around 6% won't make us much if the stock keeps dropping, especially considering the 15% delta on the long.  Why wouldn't we close it?  What am I missing? 

Hi Kim

 

Sorry for bringing this conversation again; but now we can buy the July 450C for +- 0.50. Wouldn`t it be a good shot rolling it to july26 and take some money off the table?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kim

 

Sorry for bringing this conversation again; but now we can buy the July 450C for +- 0.50. Wouldn`t it be a good shot rolling it to july26 and take some money off the table?

By doing this, you will reduce your risk but also significantly reduce the profit potential in case the stock continues higher. The current position will be breakeven around 425-430 (assuming constant IV), if we roll, we basically lock the loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, this is back to being in the range of acceptable losses.  Is it too much to hope that we may break even on this trade?  Tempted to sell now to lock in the smaller loss and avoid a reversal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The breakeven is around 430 now, assuming IV unchanged. Since the trade started, the IV of August options is basically flat - this should start changing soon. IV of earnings month options for AAPL just cannot stay at 28%. Historically it was in the mid to high 30s. Projecting 5% increase 10 days from now will move the breakeven price to 420.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kim, how did you calculate that a 5% move in IV would shift the BE price to 420?

I did not calculate it, the software did it for me :)

 

But in fact it is pretty easy: at 4.80, we are currently at .70 loss. Including the .60 loss from the hedge, that's 1.30 loss. Vega is .30, so each 1% IV increase will increase the value of the trade by .30. .30*5=1.50 - a small gain actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting for IV spike in August options. Should come soon, we are 2 weeks before earnings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll most likely be holding until July expiration. There's a couple of possible scenarios at this point. The ideal is that AAPL stock continues its uptrend regardless of the overall markets' moves, and IV increases significantly leading up to earnings. With a bit of luck, we might actually have a small gain. 

Edited by Ice101781

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One issue is that AAPL stock may move in lockstep with the overall market. If that happens, a move up for AAPL means our July VIX fly continues to crater. I think it's going to be important to roll the fly to August as Kim suggested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This trade is recovering nicely. I'm still holding it for two reasons.

 

First, the short options still have 0.40+ of premium. This premium should be gone in the next few days.

Second, the IV of August options is actually down almost 2% percentage points since we started the trade. This is VERY unusual less than 2 weeks to earnings. The IV is now around 27%. Last cycle the IV of monthly options was 33% 2 weeks before earnings and reached 41% a day before the release. Previous cycles it was even higher. I don't believe it can stay at those levels much longer.

 

The risk of course is a sharp reversal in the stock price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but I think your last sentence says it all. it seems the market believes this AAPL rally won't last. the analyst upgrade(s) gave us a nice bump though. here's to a bit of luck.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I'm wondering if I should take my profit and exit, or try to ride it out a big longer for the IV increase.  I was in the original July/Aug 450 Call calendar.  I bought back the short side on 06/28 for .37.. leaving a profit of 17.12 - .37 = $16.75 or total gain of $3345.

On the long side I have averaged my cost down when AAPL dropped and am sitting on a loss of $4.55 or $2734.  or a net gain of $611.  I only have the long side of the calendar left. I understand that I made this a directional play, but am trying to decide if the IV increase will offset any potential drop in price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we aren't going to close this today, would it make sense to buy back the July calls.  They are trading around 15 cents right now, so no longer providing much balance in case AAPL tanks, and if AAPL continues climbing we'll be better off without them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can do that. It's now a bit late to send the alert, but I think we can do it tomorrow as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another thing to consider is that AAPL will be paying a dividend sometime in mid-August. the stock saw a nice run-up leading up to the ex-dividend date last cycle. these calls might be worth holding onto for a while, barring a strong correction in the overall markets. consider also that IV for these calls is still ~27%...at this point, there does not seem to be a high risk for a vol crush after earnings are reported.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, IV is still very low and it should rise as we get close to earnings. I know that I sound like a broken record, but 27% is less than in some non-earnings months. It's almost like there is no earnings. Week4 option that expire right after earnings are trading at 38%. I would actually consider doing a calendar August/week4 - I think it was NEVER that cheap, not even close.

 

That said, there is no way I will hold it through earnings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just closed the short calls for 0.09.

 

The August 450 calls are trading at 4.80 with IV at 28%. Just to show how ridiculous this price is, I went back to check the prices in the previous cycles.

 

In April cycle, a week before earnings the stock was trading at $426 (similar to the current price). The 450 May calls were priced at $8.40, with IV at 36%. 

In January cycle, a week before earnings the stock was trading at $485. The 515 February calls were priced at $12.40, with IV at 42%. 

 

So in terms of IV, I believe it should go up at least 3-5 points. The stock price is obviously still a risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually was considering it. It would flatten the P/L chart and significantly decrease the profit potential if the stock goes above $430. The risk will be reduced as well if the stock goes below $420.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The August straddle is priced at 6.8% IM which is WAY cheaper than previous cycles. But maybe the markets expect much lower move than in previous cycles, and this is the reason for the cheap price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      That's great, because it means there is discord, and discord, especially for Apple ahead of earnings has meant a repeating pattern for the clever trader to take advantage of. 
       
      One week before Apple's earnings would be January 25th, 2018. 

      Apple's Disagreement 
      Sometimes a bullish momentum bet works great -- and in fact, for Apple that has been a strong pattern ahead of earnings. But with a toppy market, sometimes a different approach can work as well. 

      It turns out, over the long-run, for stocks with certain tendencies like Apple Inc, there is a clever way to trade market anxiety or market optimism before earnings announcements with options. 

      This approach has returned 189% with 10 wins and 2 losses over the last 3-years. 

      The Trade Before Earnings 
      What a trader wants to do is to see the results of buying a slightly out of the money strangle one-week before earnings, and then sell that strangle just before earnings. 

      Here is the setup: 
       


      We are testing opening the position 7 calendar days before earnings and then closing the position 1 day before earnings. This is not making any earnings bet. This is not making any stock direction bet. 

      Once we apply that simple rule to our back-test, we run it on a 40-delta strangle, which is a fancy of saying, buying both the 40-delta call and 40-delta put, for a non-directional bet on volatility. 

      Returns 
      If we did this long strangle in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years, but only held it before earnings, using the options closest to 14 days from expiration, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 83.3%   Wins: 10   Losses: 2   % Return:  189% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine™ are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      We see a 189% return, testing this over the last 12 earnings dates in Apple Inc. 

      We can also see that this strategy hasn't been a winner all the time, rather it has won 10 times and lost 2 times, for a 83.3% win-rate on an one-week trade. 

      Setting Expectations 
      While this strategy has an overall return of 189%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 
            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 16.9% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 21.8% over 7-days. 
            ➡ The average percent return per losing trade was -7.6% over 7-days. 

      We like the comfort of a trade that, when it loses, it isn't a disaster -- at least not historically. 

      Option Trading in the Last Year 
      We can also look at the last year of earnings releases and examine the results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 40 Delta Strangle   % Wins: 100%   Wins: 4   Losses: 0   % Return:  98.2% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      In the latest year this pre-earnings option trade has 4 wins and lost 0 times and returned 98.2%. 
            ➡ Over just the last year, the average percent return per trade was 22.3% over 7-days. 

      WHAT HAPPENED 
      We don't always have to look at bullish back-tests in a bull market -- sometimes a straight down the middle volatility pattern pops up. This is it -- this is how people profit from the option market -- finding trading opportunities that avoid earnings risk and work equally well during a bull or bear market. 

      To see how to do this for any stock we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      These are all trade-able events, at anytime, without concern for earnings. Today we look at exactly what has worked for Apple (AAPL). 
       
      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime.
      The Short-term Option Volatility Trade in Apple Inc 
      We will examine the outcome of going long a short-term at-the-money (50 delta) straddle, in options that are the closest to seven-days from expiration. But we have a rule -- it's a stop and a limit of 10%, and, we back-test re-opening the position immediately, as opposed to waiting for 5-days later. 

      Here is the stock chart for Apple since October 1st -- focus on the volatility, not the direction -- these are daily candles. 
       

      Chart from CMLviz.com

      We can volatility and a general downtrend, in fact, a 14% drop in less than 6 weeks. But let's not worry about direction, let's try to find a back-test that benefits from that volatility that is in fact up 92% in just six-weeks and takes no stock direction risk at all. Here it is, first, we enter the long straddle. 
       


      Second, we set a very specific type of stop and limit: 
       


      At the end of each day, the back-tester checks to see if the long straddle is up or down 10%. If it is, it closes the position, and re-opens at the same time, another long straddle, but this one now re-adjusted for what is the newest at-the-money strike price. 

      We have a full blown tutorial write up on this type of stop/limit behavior in the Discover Tab: Stops & Limits Roll Timing What does "open again at normal time" vs "immediately" mean? 

      The Results 
      We back-tested this only over the last six-weeks. We are hyper focusing not on a long drawn out pattern, but rather this time, right now, this period of volatility. 
       

       
      AAPL: Long 50 Delta Straddle   % Wins: 58.8%   Wins: 10   Losses: 7   % Return:  92% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Notice that this has triggered a trade 17 times in the last six-weeks and while the stock has dropped 14%, the option strategy, which takes no directional positioning, is up more than 92% in six-weeks time. This is a fast moving, re-adjusting straddle. The idea is simple: 

      Take well bounded risk, small, and direction-less, and let a tweet, a news headline, an Apple headline, a day of pessimism or a day of optimism, whatever -- move the market, as it has so often in this new volatility regime. 
       

       
      Setting Expectations
      Since we use end of day open and closes, while this strategy has an overall return of 92%, the trade details keep us in bounds with expectations: 

            ➡ The average percent return per trade was 11%. 
            ➡ The average percent return per winning trade was 29.9%. 
            ➡ The percent return per losing trade was -16%. 

      Not only are we seeing a high winning percentage, but also that the average win is twice as large as the average loss. Further, this trade takes no stock direction risk at all. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED
      When the market shifts, we need a minimum amount of data to adjust, and succeed. This is how people profit from the option market -- it's not luck, it's preparation. 
      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Past performance is not an indication of future results. 

      Trading futures and options involves the risk of loss. Please consider carefully whether futures or options are appropriate to your financial situation. Only risk capital should be used when trading futures or options. Investors could lose more than their initial investment. 

      Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. 

      Please note that the executions and other statistics in this article are hypothetical, and do not reflect the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as liquidity and slippage.
       
      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.

      Related articles:
      The Incredible Option Trade In VXX Earnings Momentum Trade In Oracle Post Earnings Option Trade In Facebook Option Trade After Earnings In AutoZone Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade In Netflix Microsoft Pre-Earnings Momentum Trade Post Earnings Trade In FedEx Pre Earnings Pattern In Apple Earnings Momentum Trading In Google PANW Broke The Golden Rule How To Profit From PayPal Volatility
    • By Kim
      This options investment strategy involves buying "Deep In The Money" (DITM) options to limit downside risk while retaining the full benefits of the stock. The options are purchased at a lower cost than the actual stock but still receive close to a $1 increase for every favorable $1 move in the underlying security which increases the percentage return for the same dollar move.
       
      Advantages of stock replacement strategy:
      Keeps all benefits associated with trading the stock. Reduces costs associated with owning the stock. Offers more leverage by increasing the potential percentage return. Offers lower downside risk. Disadvantages of a stock replacement strategy:
      Needs good trading experience and skills to master the strategy. The strategy may fail, when the stock stays on (almost) the same price or moves sidewise. Leverage works both way - If the stock falls, the percentage loss is larger as well. Let's check how you could use this options investment strategy to reduce your cost of owning Apple. The stock closed at $174 yesterday.
       
      Experienced options traders are usually well aware of this strategy and make good use of it.
       
      Strategy No. 1: Buy 100 shares of the stock
      Buying 100 shares will cost you $17,400. Not cheap. If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,100 or 6%. Let's see how it compares with the stock replacement strategy.

      Strategy No. 2: Buy DITM call
      As an alternative to buying the stock, we can buy the AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47. The cost will be $4,547 which is about 26% of the cost of the 100 shares. The P/L graph looks like this:
       

      If the stock rallies to $185, you have made $1,030. This is slightly less than buying the stock, but percentage wise, it is a 23% gain, compared to the 6% gain when owning the stock. Of course the opposite is true as well - if the stock goes down, your percentage loss is much higher. 

      This is called leverage. It works both ways - you increase the reward if the stock rises and increase the risk if the stock falls.
       
      However, if the stock falls, the volatility should increase which actually helps our option price because increased volatility can cause option prices to increase or not fall as fast. So basically even though we will gain $1 for every $1 the stock increases we will lose slightly less than $1 for every $1 the stock drops.
       
      You might noticed that we gained only 93 cents for every $1 movement in the stock. This is due to the fact that the delta of the 130 call is 0.93. We could choose a call which is deeper in the money - it would have a higher delta and have a better replication of the stock movement. However, it would also be more expensive and provide less leverage. 0.90-0.95 delta provides a good compromise between 1:1 movement and a reasonable price.
       
      Now let's see if we can do better.
       
      Strategy No. 3: Buy DITM call and sell OTM call against it every month
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 We reduce the cost of our trade by $155 to $4,392, but we also limited our gains. The P/L graph looks like this:
       


      As we can see, we increased the maximum gain to $1,147. This gain is not only larger than the dollar gain from owning the 100 shares of the stock, but also translates to a cool 26% in one month. If the stock is below $185 by February expiration, we can repeat the process with the March options. If it is higher, you just close the trade for a gain and can roll to higher strikes.

      Of course if you believe that AAPL will be higher than $185 by Feb expiration, you will be better by just buying the DITM calls.
       
      Strategy No. 4: Buy DITM call, sell OTM call and buy OTM put
      Here is how it works:
      Buy AAPL July 20 2018 130 call at $45.47 Sell AAPL Feb 16 2018 185 call at $1.55 Buy AAPL Feb 16 2018 165 put at $2.07 Our cost now is $4,599, still significantly lower than owning the stock. The P/L graph looks like this:



      Our gain is now limited to "only" $900 (20%), BUT we also limited our loss to ~13% in case AAPL goes down after earnings. And if the stock really crashes, the position can actually produce some gains because at some point the long put will more than offset the losses from the long call.

      This is a variation of collar, where we replace the long shares with DITM call. 

      And this is the beauty of options. You have almost endless possibilities to structure your trade, based on your outlook and risk tolerance.
       
      Before investing any money, please make sure you understand what you are doing. Good luck.
    • By TrustyJules
      What drew me to this site was Kim professing to apply strategies or trading philosophies as set out in Jeff Augen's books. Besides many things posted on here he also devoted some chapters to stock pinning, i.e. on expiration some stocks tend to gravitate towards a particular strike price. AAPL was and is an example of a stock that often pins to a strike. Jeff did his research on 3rd Friday expiries but I thought to test his theory today for a bit of fun. The actual pinning effect is something I verified by charting minute by minute quotes for AAPL over two years. You get charts like these:
       

       
      Here you see the stock quote from March last year with the Y axis showing how far ($) away from the closest option strike the stock was and the X axis the number of minutes since trading started that day. This plunging chart is very frequent with AAPL as - from the stocks I was able to acquire minute by minute data from - it is the stock that most consistently shows this behaviour - it only failed twice in two years roughly (based on 3rd Friday expiries).
      Anyway I could never make use of this with my European broker because profits are small and trading is frequent - with minimum 36$ to open and close a position this wasnt feasible. Now I switched to a US broker this became a possibility. So for fun I tried this today on a non 3rd Friday expiry and I can say AAPL duly obliged:

       
      I picked up the trading at 11.40 AM EST - you can start earlier but this is usually a midday lull that creates a stable time to open your position. The strategy is to use ratio trades to make profits on low capital investment. The stock was around 208.40$ and in line with the strategy we guessed that 207.50$ mark would be the close hence OB 1 C 205 @ 3.34$ and OS 4 C 202.50 @ 0.93$ for a net credit.
      The stock duly obliged and tumbled; in fact below 207.50$ to 206.80$ or so by which time I closed the trade. Now we retained the theory that at close it would be 207.50 so this time we did a different ratio and sold the 2 C 202.50 @ 4.55$ and bought 4 C 205 @ 2.03 again for a net credit. AAPL proved particularly tractable and by 4.20 PM EST it was trading around 207.85$ so we closed. The 0.40$ credit on the 207.50$ calls beckoned again. Therefore we repeated the setup of the morning except this time of course the trade was a net debit.
      I watched smugly as AAPL duly converged back down to the strike price - with 9 minutes till session close I was reckoning to close at the last minute. Except... my internet went down at that moment with 4 ITM shorts! Slight panic - router reboot and thank goodness Internet worked again (ouf!) I closed out immediately just in case another gremlin would be thrown up. In doing so I gave up a little profit as AAPL closed at 207.53 $ like a champ of pinning.
       
      Profit from all this excitement: $ 362 after commissions - the capital outlay was never more than 2K (but this is a slight cheat because I have an AAPL long position in my portfolio) - anyway 18% in the day and a good bit of fun with a slightly unpleasant bit of excitement toward the end!
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      There is a bullish momentum pattern in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) stock 2 calendar days after earnings, if and only if the stock showed a large gap up after the actual earnings announcement. 

      This is a conditional entry -- the company reports earnings and if the stock move off of that report is a 3% gain or larger, then a bullish position is back-tested looking for continuing momentum. The event is rare, but when it has occurred, the back-test results are noteworthy. 

      Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) Earnings 
      In Apple Inc, if the stock move immediately following an earnings result was large (3% or more to the upside), if we test waiting two-days after that earnings announcement and then bought a three-week at the money (50 delta) call, the results were quite strong. This back-test opens two-days after earnings were announced to try to find a stock that continues an upward trajectory after an earnings rally. 

      Simply owning options after earnings, blindly, is likely not a good trade, but hand-picking the times and the stocks to do it in can be useful. We can test this approach without bias with a custom option back-test. Here is the timing set-up around earnings: 
       
          Rules  Condition: Wait for the one-day stock move off of earnings, and if it shows a 3% gain or more in the underlying, then, follow these rules:  Open the long at-the-money call two-calendar days after earnings.  Close the long call 14 calendar days after earnings.  Use the options closest to 21 days from expiration (but more than 14 days). 
      This is a straight down the middle direction trade -- this trade wins if the stock is continues on an upward trajectory after a large earnings move the two-weeks following earnings and it will stand to lose if the stock does not rise. This is not a silver bullet -- it's a trade that needs to be carefully examined. 

      But, this is a conditional back-test, which is to say, it only triggers if an event before it occurs. 

      RISK CONTROL 
      Since blindly owning calls can be a quick way to lose in the option market, we will apply a tight risk control to this analysis as well. We will add a 40% stop loss and a 40% limit gain. 
       

      In English, at the close of every trading day, if the call is up 40% from the price at the start of the trade, it gets sold for a profit. If it is down 40%, it gets sold for a loss. This also has the benefit of taking profits if there is a stock rally early in the two-week period rather than waiting to close 14-days later. 

      Another risk reducing move we made was to use 21-day options and only hold them for 14-days so the trade doesn't suffer from total premium decay. 

      RESULTS 
      If we bought the at-the-money call in Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the last three-years but only held it after earnings and after an earnings pop higher, we get these results: 
       
      AAPL
      Long 50 Delta Call   % Wins: 80%   Wins: 4   Losses: 1   % Return:  151.9% 
      Tap Here to See the Back-test
      The mechanics of the TradeMachine® are that it uses end of day prices for every back-test entry and exit (every trigger). 

      Looking at Averages 
      The overall return was 151.9%; but the trade statistics tell us more with average trade results: 
            ➡ The average return per trade was 46.54% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per winning trade was 76.92% over each 12-day period. 
            ➡ The average return per losing trade was -75% over each 12-day period. 
       
      WHAT HAPPENED 
      Bullish momentum and sentiment after of earnings can be quite powerful with the tailwind of an earnings beat. This is just one example of what has become a tradable phenomenon in Apple. To identify patterns that have repeated over and over again, empirically, we welcome you to watch this quick demonstration video: 

      Tap Here to See the Tools at Work 

      Risk Disclosure 
      You should read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. 

      Ophir Gottlieb is the CEO & Co-founder of Capital Market Laboratories. Mr Gottlieb’s learning background stems from his graduate work in mathematics and measure theory at Stanford University and his time as an option market maker on the NYSE and CBOE exchange floors. He has been cited by Yahoo! Finance, CNNMoney, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Reuters, Bloomberg, Wall St. Journal, Dow Jones Newswire, Barron’s, Forbes, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune and Miami Herald and is often seen on financial television. He created and authored what was believed to be the most heavily followed option trading blog in the world for three-years.This article is used here with permission and originally appeared here.
    • By Kim
      Given the power of stock options to leverage your investment dollars, you might be tempted to bet on the AAPL earnings report coming out today by buying Apple calls (if you think the stock is going up) or Apple puts (if you want to bet that it will go down).
       
      That bet paid off handsomely in July 2016 when Apple reported earnings. The stock rose 6.5% the next day and the value of Apple’s weekly calls increased dramatically.
       
      But that’s the exception, not the rule.
       
      As I showed in one of my Seeking Alpha articles, buying either puts or calls just before Apple’s earnings report is, on average, a losing proposition.
       
      When you look at longer timeframe, AAPL tends to move less than expected. Take a look at the screenshot from optionslam.com, showing the post earnings movement of the stock in the last 10 cycles:
       

       
       
      The explanation for those numbers is simple. Over time, the options tend to overprice the potential post-earnings move. Those options experience huge volatility drop the day after the earnings are announced. In most cases, this drop erases most of the gains, even if the stock had a substantial move.
       
      The last column shows the one day post earnings performance of the weekly straddle. As we can see, it has lost money 8 out of 10 times. Which means that 8 out of 10 times the stock moved less than expected. If I had to choose, I would take the other side of the trade (selling those options).
       
      Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
       
      "Trying to predict the future is like driving down a country road at night with no headlights on and looking out the back window." - Peter Drucker
       
      Related articles:
      Is Your Risk Worth The Reward? Why We Sell Our Straddles Before Earnings Risk Reward Or Probability Of Success? Whatever You Do, Don't Do This Before Apple's Earnings How NOT To Gamble On AAPL Earnings  
      Want to learn how to trade options in a less risky way?
       
      Start Your Free Trial
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Here it is -- a portfolio of FAANG stocks using pre-earnings trading. A 3:30 video that is staggering and includes some robustness testing.
       
      Reminder that you can sign up for Trade Machine as a Steady Options member here:
      https://cmlviz.com/register/cml-trademachine-49-mo-promotion-so/
       
       
       
       
    • By Ophir Gottlieb
      Trading options pre-earnings -- 1 minute 25 second video. (example: $AAPL)
      As a Steady Options member, you can get a promotional price, here:
      Try the Back-tester
       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.