SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Kim

AAPL calendar trade - Post-mortem

8 posts in this topic

I usually don't do post-mortem on our trades - most of them are short term, we are in the trade just few days, close them and move on.

 

However, this trade is worth to do a post-mortem so we all can learn from it.

 

Background:

When we trade a calendar spread, we have two Greeks working for us: the Theta (time decay) and the Vega (IV). We have one Greek working against us: the Gamma (stock movement).

 

The trade makes money if the stock stays in the range and IV does not decline. It can lose if the stock moves, but even if the stock doesn't move, IV decline can kill the trade.

 

The AAPL trade was opened on May 31 and structured in the following way:

Buy to open AAPL August 16 2013 450 call
Sell to open AAPL July 19 450 call
Price: $5.50 debit. 

 

The P/L chart looked like this:

 

post-1-0-20984800-1374607009_thumb.png

 

Since AAPL is scheduled to report earnings on July 23, the long options expire after earnings and they were expected to hold value. The IV of August options was around 27% which is pretty low. It was expected to rise as we get closer to earnings.

 

​Fast forward to June 18. The stock is trading slightly below 430. The trade was up ~6% at this point. This is our adjustment point. The correct action was to roll the trade to 430 strike, by selling the 450 calendar and buying the 430 calendar, same expiration. The roll would cost $0.75.

The new P/L chart would look like this:

 

post-1-0-18883900-1374607500_thumb.png

 

​Fast forward to June 21. The stock is trading around 413. The trade was down ~8% at this point. This is our second adjustment point. The correct action was to roll the trade to 410 strike, by selling the 430 calendar and buying the 410 calendar, same expiration. The roll would cost $0.30.

The new P/L chart would look like this:

 

post-1-0-86743800-1374607724_thumb.png

 

The stock continued drifting lower, but it did not reach the next adjustment point. After briefly going below $400, it reversed and came back to $412 on July 8 and could be closed for 20% gain:

 

post-1-0-59546600-1374608105_thumb.png

 

Why didn't we do it and what can be learned here?

 

When the stock reached $425, I estimated that it is oversold and is not going much lower. The IV of August options was still at very low levels. I expected it to start rising as we get closer to earnings. The IV rise would at least partially offset the gamma losses. It did not happen. In fact, today the IV of August options is still around 29% which never happened. The IV of the monthly options before earnings was never below 35%, usually closer to 40%.

 

To add insult to injury, when the stock reached $410, I added a "hedge" by opening a short term 410 calendar. This calendar has lost another $0.60, adding to the overall loss. It also increased the overall investment by almost 40%. This was throwing good money after bad.

 

After the stock recovered to $430, I had a chance to close it for breakeven, but I left it open - again, due to the expectation that IV of the August options just cannot remain that low. The trade was finally closed today for 35% loss.

 

Few things contributed to the big loss:

1. The stock moved more than 50 points at some point which is almost 2 SD (Standard Deviations).

2. The IV of the long options was almost unchanged before earnings which is extremely unusual.

3. The "hedge" added to the loss".

4. The trade was not adjusted in time.

 

Expecting the IV to rise was a reasonable expectation. It did not happen, but there was a high probability that it will. We trade probabilities. There is a big difference between probability and certainty. There was a high probability that IV will not stay that low, based on historical patterns. However, high probability is still not certainty, and IV did not rise as I expected. When something happens few cycles in a row, we have a reasonable expectation that it will happen again. We trade based on those expectations, but we know that patterns not always repeat. In this trade, the main mistake was not expecting the IV rise - the main mistake was not to adjust when the price got to the adjustment point. 

 

The trade was actually up 12% after few days, and some members closed it for a gain. My original profit target was 20-25%. I don't think it was a mistake not to take profits at 12%. While there is nothing wrong to set a 10% target on those trades, I like to set higher profit targets, based on my experience with those trades. 

 

The bottom line is that despite the unfavorable conditions, with proper management we could still make 15-20% on this trade. The main lesson from this trade:

 

When trading non-directional strategies, never let your opinion affect the trade. Always follow the rules, adjust in time, no matter how oversold or overbought the stock looks.

flokebroke, Mikael, jr1221 and 2 others like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clear analysis which shows what we should have done - the beauty is that it is not 20/20 hindsight, we simply did not follow the rules.

 

Well, I was actually lucky on this trade. As the stock moved lower and you did not adjust I hesitated and then eventually bought half the original # of contracts  of the 430 cal. spread for $6.00. That spread saved the trade because the shorts expired worthless and I sold the longs for over $12.00 (100% after comm.). I also did your short term 410 spread and lost. In addition I bought some Aug 425 puts when around 7/8 when I could no more stand the pain - that hedge turned into loss too. I closed the 450 cal spread on 7/9 with about a 7% loss. Over all this trade produced a 5% gain on the combined investment of the 450 and the 430 cal spreads. I am  not proud of my trade, I was just lucky. Your analysis is the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually the adjustment points are near the expiration breakeven points. So if you look at the first P/L chart, the adjustment points are around 430/472, give or take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even you have your own opinion about stock being oversold, there must be another reason why you don't adjust? What is the worst case when you just adjust along with any stock movement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even you have your own opinion about stock being oversold, there must be another reason why you don't adjust? What is the worst case when you just adjust along with any stock movement?

If you adjust too early and the stock reverses, you will usually be sitting on a loss instead on a gain if you didn't adjust. There is always a fine line between adjusting too early and letting the trade to get out of control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By Kim
      Given the power of stock options to leverage your investment dollars, you might be tempted to bet on the earnings report coming out today by buying Apple calls (if you think the stock is going up) or Apple puts (if you want to bet that it will go down).
       
      That bet paid off handsomely in July 2016 when Apple reported earnings. The stock rose 6.5% the next day and the value of Apple’s weekly calls increased dramatically.
       
      But that’s the exception, not the rule.
       
      As I showed in one of my Seeking Alpha articles, buying either puts or calls just before Apple’s earnings report is, on average, a losing proposition.
       
      When you look at longer timeframe, AAPL tends to move less than expected. Take a look at the screenshot from optionslam.com, showing the post earnings movement of the stock in the last 10 cycles:
       

       
      The explanation for those numbers is simple. Over time, the options tend to overprice the potential post-earnings move. Those options experience huge volatility drop the day after the earnings are announced. In most cases, this drop erases most of the gains, even if the stock had a substantial move.
       
      The last column shows the one day post earnings performance of the weekly straddle. As we can see, it has lost money 7 out of 10 times. Which means that 7 out of 10 times the stock moved less than expected. If I had to choose, I would take the other side of the trade (selling those options).
       
      Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
       
      "Trying to predict the future is like driving down a country road at night with no headlights on and looking out the back window." - Peter Drucker
       
      Related articles:
      Is Your Risk Worth The Reward? Risk Reward Or Probability Of Success? Whatever You Do, Don't Do This Before Apple's Earnings How NOT To Gamble On AAPL Earnings  
      Want to learn how to trade options in a less risky way?
       
      Start Your Free Trial
       
    • By Kim
      In one of my previous articles I described a study done by tastytrade, claiming that buying premium before earnings does not work. The title of the study was "We Put The Nail In The Coffin On "Buying Premium Prior To Earnings".
      ​I demonstrated that their study was highly flawed, for several reasons (strikes selection, stocks selection, timing etc.)
      It seems that they did now another study, claiming to get similar results.
      Click here to view the article