SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Why Dividend ETFs Yield Less Than Expected


I was asked a great question the other day by a member.  He had done some math and noted that the reported dividends received by dividend ETFs (such as SDY, VIG, and others), was LOWER than it should be, than if you just took a weighted average of the EFF's holdings.

 

For instance, if an ETF consisted of equal portions of the following stocks:

 

Stock ABC, dividend of 2%

Stock DEF, dividend of 2.5%

Stock GHI, dividend of 2.25%

 

Then you would expect the ETF holding those stocks to yield 2.25%.  However, it would not.  You much more likely would see a yield somewhere around 1.9%.  He wanted to know why that was.  So I did some digging and this is what I came up with:

 

1.  The biggest difference is the fee the ETFs charge, while it is small (under 0.5%), the fee one charges makes a difference.  They take that fee out of dividends to minimize tax implications to the ETF holders.  For example, if SDY was supposed to yield 2.5%, but the expense ratio was .0.35%, the new yield is only 2.15%.  By taking it out of the dividends received, it reduces taxable expenses, as opposed to liquidating positions.

 

2.  The next is similar, as in it also relates to expenses, but about 0.1% (in one 0.15% in the other) reflects the transaction costs.  Trading shares isn't free for an ETF either.  They are constantly buying and selling shares to match the inflows and outflows of funds into the ETF.  They don't eat these fees, they're passed on.  In actuality this is about average as the transaction cost to most retail traders is higher or the same.  For instance, if I bough 10 shares of Walmart (approximate $75, or a cost of 7500) the trade would cost (on average) about $9.00.  Obviously if you can buy huge blocks of shares this goes down.  These ETFs buy and sell LOTS of shares every day.

 

3.  Then there is some bleed due to the fact that they are typically not 100% invested.  In ETFs like SDY and VIG there are a LOT of cash inflows and outflows every day.  Even if only 1% of the fund trades every day, they will have to be over 1% in cash.  So if the ETF is only 98% invested on average, you receive 2% less dividends than if you were 100% invested.  This lowers the yield too. As an example, if you were 100% invested and were going to receive a 2.5% dividend, by only being 98% invested, your dividend yield would drop to 2.45%.

 

Add all of that up, and you get a yield that "seems" anywhere from 0.3% - 0.5% to low.  That said, MOST small and mid size retailer investors will lose that much on transaction and holding costs too, if not more.

 

Let's say I carry a theoretical $100,000.00 portfolio, and want to be very diverse and buy 50 different dividend stocks, bearing an average of 2.5% dividend (good luck).  That means I allocate $2,000.00 to each stock.  With the average dividend large cap stock price being around $40, that means I'm buying 50 shares, which on TDAmeritrade's retail platform would cost $7.99 a pop.  So I lose 0.4% (.3995), acquiring the position.  Assume I re-balance annually to make sure my position sizes stay proper, and I only have to make adjustments on 1/2 of my positions (more likely more, but lets say 1/2), then you lose another 0.2%.  So my "effective" dividend is 1.9% -- or now worse than the ETF.

 

Obviously if you trade in large sizes, and hold longer without re-balancing, you can eventually beat the ETF dividend "bleed."  But for most people that just isn't the case if you want the diversity, the balance, and the dividends. 

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

12 Years CAGR of 123.5%

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles


  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


Guest The Lazy Trader

Posted

Excellent research. I always wondered the same thing.

Thx,

LT

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs