SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Options: The Zero Sum Game Myth


Zero-sum is a situation in game theory in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so the net change in wealth or benefit is zero. A zero-sum game may have as few as two players, or millions of participants. Options trading is considered by many a zero sum game. But is it really a zero sum game?

I would like to present two opinions by two different options experts, and let you to decide.

 

Are Options a Zero Sum Game? - by Mark Wolfinger

 

Most people consider options trading to be a zero sum game. When you make a trade, someone takes the other side and when one of you gains, the other loses an equal amount. From that definition it’s difficult to argue that the term ‘zero sum game’ does not apply to options, and to trading in general.

 

However, I do make that argument.

 

A Profit in Stocks

 

When a trader decides to sell a specific holding when it rises to $75 per share, the trader may make a mental stop, or enter a GTC (good ’til canceled) sell order with his/her broker. When the stock is sold, the trader is happy with the result. Sure the stock may move higher, and one can argue that our trader ‘lost’ money by selling and that the ‘buyer’ made money. With this point of view, trading is a zero sum game. I’ll concede that the buyer earned money, but not at the expense of the seller.

 

I prefer to look at it this way: Our trader earned the profit he hoped to earn, and when that happened, he/she willingly transferred ownership of the shares to another trader. Once the position is out of the account, the trader neither makes nor loses anything. Any change in the stock’s value affects only the new owner. There is no corresponding loss on the part of the trader who sold the shares. One trader made a graceful exit, accepted a profit, and now a different trader has a new investment.

 

Options are Different

 

Most of the world looks at options differently. But I don’t.

 

If I buy a call option and earn a profit by selling at a higher price, there is no reason to believe that the seller took a loss corresponding to my gain. The seller may have hedged the play and earned an even larger profit than I did.

 

The thought that options represent a zero sum game assumes that all trades are standalone plays and that if you profit, the other person must have lost. Just as our trader above decided that transferring ownership of the shares to another investor would be a good idea at $75/share, so too does the covered call writer.

 

When I sell a covered call, I am thrilled when the stock rallies far above the strike price. It means I will earn my desired profit. Better than that — if the big rally comes soon, I will be able to exit the trade with perhaps 90% of my cash objective. Why is that so good when the last 10% is sacrificed? Because of time. If there are still many weeks remaining before expiration day arrives, I can reinvest my money into another position and use the same cash to earn even more than that 10% left on the table.

 

It may be true that the person who bought my call scored a big win (if the trade was not hedged), but that’s not my loss. In fact, it was my additional gain (in the scenario presented).

 

Risk Transfer

 

Options were designed to transfer risk. In the covered call example, the seller accepted cash to help reach the target profit. By doing so, he/she willingly took cash to limit the profit potential of the trade. However, the point is that there was no potential profit to be sacrificed. The call seller would have sold stock at the strike price ($75) and earned less profit than the covered call writer, who collected $75 in addition to the option premium.

 

The option buyer took on limited risk. If the stock did not rise far enough or fast enough, that buyer would have earned a loss.

 

I don’t see anything resembling a zero sum game in hedged options transactions. I understand that others see it as black and white: If one gained, the other lost. But that’s an oversimplification.

 

ZeroSumGame.jpg

 

Debunking the Option-Trading Myth of Zero Sum - by Rachel Koning Beals

 

There’s an urban myth in options trading that’s probably as old as the CBOE itself: It’s often said that options trading is a zero-sum game. In other words, if someone wins, someone else has to lose, right? Well, no.

 

It’s true that the stock or option or future or whatever will go up or down, and only one of us can be right. But that assumes that each of us doesn’t do something else on the side.

 

Let’s look at a few scenarios in a typical options trade on an underlying stock.

 

Myth Buster One

 

Say you buy a call, which means the market maker sells the call to you. If the stock goes up, you make money and the market maker loses money, right? Right. But there's more to it. When a market maker sells you that call, he or she might choose to hedge it immediately by purchasing the stock to hedge the short call.

 

Now, you’re still long the call, but the market maker is short the call and now long the stock. Let’s assume the stock goes up, and your call goes up in value as well. The market maker who’s short that call is losing money on it, but is making money on the long stock. It’s possible for the profit on the long stock to exceed the loss on the short call. In that case, you make money on your position, and the market maker makes money on her position, too.

 

In this case, you both can win.

 

Myth Buster Two

 

Let’s say the stock goes down. The market maker is short a call, and makes money on that because she keeps the premium received when she sold the call. But she’s long stock, too, and loses money on that—probably more than what she made on the short call. You own that long call, and you lose when the stock goes down.

 

In this case, you both lose. The difference is that the market maker started out with the opposite of the trade you had, but she changed it into something else.

 

A Caveat

 

So, the options market isn't really a zero-sum game when you look at two independent traders taking opposite sides of a trade. Each can hedge or adjust their position without the other trader doing anything. The beauty of trading options is that you can make investment decisions based on market news, volatility, time to expiration, underlying moves, and so on, and/or create different option strategies to hedge your initial trade or position at any point of time. If there's a hedge involved on the "loser" side of a trade, and the net result is a win, two traders can net out as winners, and the zero sum argument goes out the window. 
 

However, if you look at all the traders and investors out there in aggregate, trading does become a zero-sum game. When the market maker buys the stock as a hedge against her short call, someone else is selling that stock to her. If the stock goes up, the person who sold the stock misses out on the profits.

 

So, the zero-sum theory works for the grand scheme of the markets, but not necessarily on the trader-versus-trader level.

 

Where does this leave you? Pick your trades carefully and make sure they make sense to you. Consider proper hedges with your options trades, and let the other folks worry about their own profit/loss ratios. You just have to worry about yours.

Visit our Options Trading Education Center for more educational articles about options trading. 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • Choosing a broker for forex options trading

    Forex options are options that are tied to a currency pair. Forex options can be both call or put options. The option matures in the money if the exchange rate for the currency is above (call) or below (put) the strike price when the option matures. Forex options are usually cash-settled.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 25 views
  • What is Gamma Hedging and Why is Everyone Talking About It?

    The options markets significantly changed following the pandemic. People got laid off from their jobs or sent to work from home and got bored, so they started trading options. But brand new retail traders weren't selling SPY call spreads. They were buying weekly options in high-momentum, and they were doing it in numbers enough to alter the order flow of the entire options market.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 227 views
  • Risk/Reward vs. Win Ratio

    Whether you're a value investor or short-term options trader, the game of financial markets ultimately comes down to putting the probabilities slightly in your favor rather than making deterministic calls as to where the S&P 500 will be next month.

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 555 views
  • How to Get Started as an Investor

    Money makes the world go round, as many people are well aware of by now. If you have a measure of wealth, then you also have a measure of freedom and security in your life. Money doesn’t mean living a lavish lifestyle, especially if you want to use it properly and responsibly.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 548 views
  • Should You Hedge or Diversify?

    Using the most popular S&P 500 ETF (SPY) to represent the US stock market, this article will look at different ways to manage equity market risk using historical ETF and options data from ORATS Wheel since 2007. We will analyze the following unhedged, hedged and allocation choices:

    By Jesse,

    • 11 comments
    • 3,983 views
  • Market Orders vs. Limit Orders

    While advanced trading platforms allow you to customize orders endlessly, most of them still boil down to a few basic types of orders:

    By Pat Crawley,

    • 0 comments
    • 732 views
  • 7 Steps To Improve Your Trading In 2022

    Gazing at the trading screen or investing a large amount in the stock market is not enough to improve your trading skill and increase the chance of winning a stock. Rather, gathering proper knowledge, and presence of mind is very important to perform confidently in the trading market.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 982 views
  • Starbucks: Using Options to Play Capped Upside Potential Post-Earnings

    Discretionary stocks have led the S&P 500’s recovery over the last several weeks Starbucks faces several headwinds, and the bar might be low enough come Tuesday night when earnings hit the tape, but resistance on the chart suggests caution. ORATS highlights a bearish bet options traders can make.

    By ORATS_Matt,

    • 0 comments
    • 9,397 views
  • Alcoa Earnings Report July 20th, 2022

    Welcome to the ORATS earnings report where we scan for companies with upcoming earnings announcements, check out historical earnings information, and find a potential options trade. Read on or watch the video overview here: https://youtu.be/oYIEM62crYo.

    By ORATS_Matt,

    • 0 comments
    • 928 views
  • Put Selling: Strike Selection Considerations

    When selling puts, such as we do in our Steady Momentum PutWrite strategy, there are many questions a trader must answer: What expiration should I use? What strike should I sell? Should I choose that strike based on delta or percentage out of the money?

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 3,189 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


To me this is a pure philosophical question which has no impact on how you trade. You really have to approach each options trade as if it's a zero sums game and doing everything in your power to make sure you are the winner... by doing the necessary pre-trade research and using the better trading strategy. Because in the end as Rachel Koning Beals states "the zero-sum theory works for the grand scheme of the markets"

 

 Michael Gibson

 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily.

If you trade spreads, one option might be a winner another one a loser - what matters is the price of the spread.

If you trade IC, the put spread might lose and the call win and vice versa - as long as the call spread wins more than the put spread.

If you trade covered call, it might be a loser but the stock gains more than the covered call loss.

The only thing that matters is your overall position, not individual options P/L. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't use spreads, so for me individual options P/L are my only concern. I specialize solely in selling naked puts and if assigned an equity selling covered calls. Absolutely no speculative trading.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest spindr0

Posted

In and of itself, the option market is a zero sum game.  Ignoring slippage and commissions, whatever is made on one side is lost on the other side.  Plain and simple.  

If someone chooses to hedge their option position with stock, that now involves a second market. That does not negate the fact that the option premium changed hands, aka zero sum.

You can create any number of scenarios where both sides make money but the premium still changed hands.  For example:

Investor "A" buys stock at $75 and sells an $80 covered call for $1.  The underlying goes to $83 and he nets a $6 gain.

Call buyer "B" pays $1 for the $80 call and at $83 he nets $2 profit.

Both are profitable but $1 of "B's" money is in the pocket of "A", aka zero sum.   The involvement of stock is a tangential distraction.  

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Guest spindr0 said:

In and of itself, the option market is a zero sum game.  Ignoring slippage and commissions, whatever is made on one side is lost on the other side.  Plain and simple.  

If someone chooses to hedge their option position with stock, that now involves a second market. That does not negate the fact that the option premium changed hands, aka zero sum.

You can create any number of scenarios where both sides make money but the premium still changed hands.  For example:

Investor "A" buys stock at $75 and sells an $80 covered call for $1.  The underlying goes to $83 and he nets a $6 gain.

Call buyer "B" pays $1 for the $80 call and at $83 he nets $2 profit.

Both are profitable but $1 of "B's" money is in the pocket of "A", aka zero sum.   The involvement of stock is a tangential distraction.  

 

 

You must have overlooked the "A Caveat" section where it says that the overall market is a zero-sum game. Or maybe just the entire article beyond one sentence since the article explains that, while the technical definition of zero-sum may be accurate, looking at it like this is oversimplistic. As the article already pointed out, the involvement of stock (or other options, or futures, or whatever other instrument) isn't really a tangential distraction at all to the individual trader - only to the overall market. Let's say I trade a calendar and one side loses $1200, while the other side gains $1400. To me, the individual trader, that is a $200 gain. I don't view it as two separate zero-sum trades and doing so doesn't really make sense because they are connected trades.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs Expertido