SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. TRY IT FREE!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

Investing in Private Companies


It is axiomatic that the largest investment returns typically come from investing in private companies. Peter Thiel initially invested $500,000.00 in Facebook, which was worth over $1b when he cashed out.  Eric Lefkofsky turned an investment of $546 (that’s not a typo) into $386m in cashed out payments.

Lightspeed Venture Partners turned a $480,000 investment in Snap into $2B (though they did also invest inthe second round).  Such returns aren’t limited to Silicon Valley and the tech either.  Tom Perkins at Genentech, received one of the highest payouts in history when it was acquired by Roche in 2009, turning a minute investment of $500 into an exit worth over $40b. Of course, such investments do not come without risk.

 

Mark Suster of Upfront Ventures has noted that investors in startup private companies should expect the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 return rule. Namely that 1/3 of your investments will be total losses, 1/3 will be around breakeven, and 1/3 will be successful, delivering the lion’s share of returns.  Cambridge Associates and other studies have returned similar findings.  Other VC firms insist that returns for startups mimic the Pareto returns, where 80% of the wins come from 20% of the investments.  But whether the win ratio is 20% or 33%, it is clear making such investments come with risks.

 

This risk can be partially alleviated by investing in second stage companies – those which already have a product, revenue (though they may not be cash flowing positive), and have been in business two to three years.  When advising individuals on making private investments, we always prefer second stage companies to first stage startup ventures.  Private investors typically provide these companies with money to “fuel the fire” by enabling expansion, sales growth, and entry into new markets.  Investing in second stage companies can be just as lucrative as first stage, with significantly less risk.

 

This is all a moot point for most investors though, as most second stage companies seek “professional” venture capital firms, the debt markets, or deal with networks of ultra-high net worth individuals.  However, occasionally a good opportunity is found that is open to smaller retail investors.  These opportunities normally emerge because the company seeking second stage funding seeks amounts under $5m and does not want to cede the level of control that VC firms require.  Our subscribers have just such an opportunity, if they are interested.

 

New Avenue, Inc. is a Silicon Valley technology firm that seeks to address many of the problems individuals may encounter when building or remodeling a private home.  This is often a monumental, time consuming, and expensive process for any individual.  Finding and vetting architects, contractors, and subcontractors can be a time consuming and risky proposition.  Most individuals have never negotiated the complicated contracts at issue.  Ensuring that the consumer is getting a good price and good service can promote anxiety and lead to loss of time and money.  Managing the project itself creates another layer of difficulty.

 

New Avenue address all of these issues.  It has created a system and network for architecture and contracting.  The company has built a network of vetted architects and contractors, a system that automates project management and payment, and pre-negotiated consumer friendly contracts and agreements.  The Open Table like booking and collaboration system reduces project costs from 10% to 30% by reducing time, mistakes, and risks.  Other contractors are frequently at least 40% more expensive.

 

Lorintine Capital has partnered with New Avenue to assist this second stage company in its second stage of growth.  They already have a product, revenue, and a platform and seek to expand into new markets and propel sales.  Their ultimate goal is to be one of the largest residential builders in the country with a $1b valuation in under five years. 

 

Due to their strong momentum and current growth projections New Avenue is avoiding current “traditional” Silicon Valley venture capital firms, which typically require larger infusions of cash than New Avenue needs and demand extensive controls over the firm.  New Avenue is currently seeking $4,000,000 in investment and is taking investments as low as $50,000.00.  It can take up to 35 non-accredited investors.  This cash infusion will cover the next two years of the Company, which should be cash flow positive well before that point.

 

This is a unique investment opportunity not often available to “smaller” investors.  As the amount they are seeking is lower than is normal, they are able to target individual investors, as opposed to corporate.  Investing in a private company such as New Avenue carries much more risk than simply investing in stock indexes.  Lorintine Capital has done what it can to reduce some of those risks by insisting on a board seat or observer rights at all board meetings, reviewing the books, technology, and performing additional due diligence already, performing a site visit, reviewing existing projects, and will stay involved with New Avenue for the foreseeable future.  We view the risk of investing in such a project to be less than almost any first stage investment and less than most second stage investments.  But there is no guarantee of return.  We are making an investment in New Avenue ourselves.  Because of the risk of this style of investment, we do not advocate committing a significant amount of your capital to it.

 

A full investment overview is outside the scope of this article, but the full overview can be found at:

 

http://www.lorintine.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Offering-Overview.pdf

 

Or if you’d like to discuss this potential investment, please contact Christopher Welsh at:

 

Christopher Welsh

Lorintine Capital

E: cwelsh@lorintinecapital.com

P: 214-800-5164

 

           

 

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Try It Free

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • The Gut Strangle

    The graphically named “gut strangle” is a seldom-used strategy, but it might work in some circumstances. This involves trading in-the-money calls and puts. A long gut strangle is set up by buying both options; and a short gut strangle calls for selling both sides.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 18 comments
    • 375 views
  • Selling Options When Implied Volatility is High

    In the second week of October 2018, the Dow Industrial Average tumbled 1,300 points within a two-day period just ahead of earnings season. How did it happen? There were several explanations for why stock prices sold off, but the most obvious was that investor fear had changed market sentiment.

    By Nathan Wade,

    • 1 comment
    • 148 views
  • Do all stocks have the same expected returns?

    When deciding to build a diversified investment portfolio, there are many different considerations. Which asset classes do you buy? Large cap or small cap? US only, or international too? Mutual funds or ETFs? How much in bonds? Passive or active? Growth or value?

    By Jesse,

    • 0 comments
    • 197 views
  • Selling Puts: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly

    Hardly a day goes by that I don't read an article or hear some pundit extol the merits of selling puts (put-write).This article will discuss various variations of put-write strategies. What accounts for put-write strategies under-performance? How to fix put-write underperformance? Why "easy money" isn't so easy.

    By Reel Ken,

    • 0 comments
    • 376 views
  • The “OOPS signal” trade

    Have you been taken by surprise by movement of your stock? Options traders who find themselves on the wrong side of a trade have experienced this dilemma, but as often as not, it occurs as part of a move and retracement.

     

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 411 views
  • 14 Tips to Better Trading from Home

    Here are 14 actionable ideas that will help you improve your trading from home. Implementing these ideas will help aspiring traders move toward the consistent profitability they seek.

    By TFCAB,

    • 0 comments
    • 7,134 views
  • Powerful Channel Signal – Combining Bollinger and T-line

    Technicians tend to focus on single indicators, such as Bollinger Bands or the t-line. These are used to attempt to perfect a timing system. Individually, each signal has merit. Combined, the reversal signal is exceptionally strong.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 6,782 views
  • Following Signs That Others Ignore (VIX Study)

    In fact, the crowd sees hardly anything out there that might end this market party.” Michael Santoli made the above statement during CNBC’s closing market wrap on January 26th, 2018. He had reason to throw caution to the wind as the S&P 500 closed the day up by more than 1%, setting another record high.

    By Michael Lebowitz,

    • 0 comments
    • 489 views
  • Revisiting Anchor Part 2

    Last month we posted some updates to the Anchor strategy that were obtained using an in-depth back testing of the strategy and variations of it using the ORATS Wheel software.  We adopted three conclusions last month:

    By cwelsh,

    • 4 comments
    • 506 views
  • Covered Calls –Does Rolling Forward Mean Higher Risk?

    Do you roll forward to avoid exercise? It seems like an obviously advantageous move. You avoid exercise and generate a net credit. What can go wrong? Actually, rolling incurs more risk, and every covered call writer needs to study the potential roll and compare the advantages of rolling versus closing and taking a loss or allowing exercise.

    By Michael C. Thomsett,

    • 0 comments
    • 652 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


There are no comments to display.



Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Options Trading Blogs