SteadyOptions is an options trading forum where you can find solutions from top options traders. Join Us!

We’ve all been there… researching options strategies and unable to find the answers we’re looking for. SteadyOptions has your solution.

The Incredible Winning Trade in SVXY


Shorting volatility via different products like SVXY or XIV has been a very popular and profitable strategy in the last few years. We know what happened on February 5. VIX spiked over 100%, causing a complete collapse of SVXY and XIV, wiping billions of dollars.

Background

Shorting volatility proved to be very profitable historically. The reason is that VIX futures are drifting lower over time, so all you have to do is being short a product that is long volatility (like VXX) or being long an inverse product (like SVXY). Looking at VXX historical chart tells the whole story:

VXX-hist-560x404.jpg

So what's the catch? Well, the issue with going short VXX (or being long SVXY) is those occasional big spikes, like the one in 2008. So the trick is to find a strategy that goes short VXX or long SVXY, but at the same time, doesn't lose much during those occasional spikes.

 

This article tells the story of an incredible SVXY trade that was a big winner despite the total collapse of SVXY.

Few months ago, SteadyOptions introduced a new strategy called PureVolatility. The portfolio is managed by  our veteran member and mentor, Scott Batchelar. Here is an extract from the strategy introduction:

Strategy Description


We will be looking to hold constant exposure to short volatility while the curve is in significant Contango in an effort to harvest volatility premium. We will also look to go long volatility when the curve is in significant Backwardation and indicators reveal the trend will continue in the short term.  Because the curve is in Contango approximately 80% of the time, we will hold short exposure to volatility most of the time.  The main strategy to gain this exposure will be through a Collar spread.


The PureVolatility model portfolio will be based on total capital amount of $10,000 with a 5% allocation on risk.  This is very important as those who are trading in a Reg-T account would on average need $10,000 in initial margin to hold the position even though the risk may only be $500.  Portfolio Margin accounts would only require the $500 max loss amount.  Reg-T is somewhat antiquated when it comes to margin for a Collar spread. However, this really should not be an issue because if one does not have $10,000 to put aside for this strategy it is probably not appropriate.  Furthermore, the increased margin amount will keep members from over allocating to this very aggressive strategy.  We will target a risk reward of better than 1:1 for a two week holding period. 

Here is an example of the Hedged Collar strategy sized for the model portfolio:

  • 100 shares of SVXY at 101.93
  • Short 1 contract of the 11/10 110 Call at (1.35)
  • Long 1 contract of the 11/10 103 Put at 5.54


Using the above example, here is the P/L chart of the trade:

image.png

Please note that the profit potential is around $400 and risk around $300. 

For a strategy that wins around 80% of the time, this is an incredible risk/reward.

But it gets even better.


One of our other veteran members posted the following comment on the forum:
 

Quote

I agree with the trade rationale, but had a thought about a tweak to improve the trade structure that I wonder if you considered - that is replacing the 100 shares of SVXY with a deep ITM call, 90 delta or more.   I see two main benefits.

  1. Significantly lower the capital requirement while maintaining basically the same dollar increases when the SVXY rises since the deep ITM call will grow in value almost as quick as being long the SVXY shares.  
  2. In the event of a large volatility spike where the SVXY would drop in value very quickly, the deep ITM calls would hit a point where they are losing less than the SVXY shares (as that deep ITM strike gets closer to ATM its delta would decrease).  


After some discussion, it has been decided to modify the trade and use deep ITM calls instead of the shares.

Here is an SVXY "modified" collar entered on January 30 with SVXY at 114:
 

Quote

I opened a new collar but I'm holding off on selling the call:

  • BTO 1 March 16, 2018 70 Call
  • BTO 1 March 16, 2018 110 Put


P/L chart:

image.png

Please notice how using ITM calls instead of shares allows to reduce the risk if the stock makes a big down move.

The next day SVXY moved higher and short call has been added.

image.png

On February 2 SVXY started to move down. By the end of the day on February 5, SVXY went down around 40%. After few adjustments the P/L chart looked like this:

image.png

The trade was down $750 or 7.5% loss on $10,000. This is completely reasonable, considering that the underlying was down 40%. Any bounce to $90 area should bring the trade back to breakeven.

But then black Tuesday came. SVXY opened around $11, 60% down. The calls became nearly worthless, but the puts were the big winners, far outpacing the losses in the calls:

image.png

 

Overall this trade produced almost 45% gain on margin or 26% gain on $10,000 portfolio.

 

The bottom line:

A trade that was long SVXY, was a big winner after SVXY went down 90%+. This is options trading at its best. And this is the power of our trading community.

Read the full description of the PureVolatility strategy here.

Related articles:

Edited by Kim

What Is SteadyOptions?

Full Trading Plan

Complete Portfolio Approach

Real-time trade sharing: entry, exit, and adjustments

Diversified Options Strategies

Exclusive Community Forum

Steady And Consistent Gains

High Quality Education

Risk Management, Portfolio Size

Performance based on real fills

Subscribe to SteadyOptions now and experience the full power of options trading!
Subscribe

Non-directional Options Strategies

10-15 trade Ideas Per Month

Targets 5-7% Monthly Net Return

Visit our Education Center

Recent Articles

Articles

  • SPX Options vs. SPY Options: Which Should I Trade?

    Trading options on the S&P 500 is a popular way to make money on the index. There are several ways traders use this index, but two of the most popular are to trade options on SPX or SPY. One key difference between the two is that SPX options are based on the index, while SPY options are based on an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the index.

    By Mark Wolfinger,

    • 0 comments
    • 430 views
  • Yes, We Are Playing Not to Lose!

    There are many trading quotes from different traders/investors, but this one is one of my favorites: “In trading/investing it's not about how much you make, but how much you don't lose" - Bernard Baruch. At SteadyOptions, this has been one of our major goals in the last 12 years.

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 874 views
  • The Impact of Implied Volatility (IV) on Popular Options Trades

    You’ll often read that a given option trade is either vega positive (meaning that IV rising will help it and IV falling will hurt it) or vega negative (meaning IV falling will help and IV rising will hurt).   However, in fact many popular options spreads can be either vega positive or vega negative depending where where the stock price is relative to the spread strikes.  

    By Yowster,

    • 0 comments
    • 779 views
  • Please Follow Me Inside The Insiders

    The greatest joy in investing in options is when you are right on direction. It’s really hard to beat any return that is based on a correct options bet on the direction of a stock, which is why we spend much of our time poring over charts, historical analysis, Elliot waves, RSI and what not.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 467 views
  • Trading Earnings With Ratio Spread

    A 1x2 ratio spread with call options is created by selling one lower-strike call and buying two higher-strike calls. This strategy can be established for either a net credit or for a net debit, depending on the time to expiration, the percentage distance between the strike prices and the level of volatility.

    By TrustyJules,

    • 0 comments
    • 1,473 views
  • SteadyOptions 2023 - Year In Review

    2023 marks our 12th year as a public trading service. We closed 192 winners out of 282 trades (68.1% winning ratio). Our model portfolio produced 112.2% compounded gain on the whole account based on 10% allocation per trade. We had only one losing month and one essentially breakeven in 2023. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 5,886 views
  • Call And Put Backspreads Options Strategies

    A backspread is very bullish or very bearish strategy used to trade direction; ie a trader is betting that a stock will move quickly in one direction. Call Backspreads are used for trading up moves; put backspreads for down moves.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 9,485 views
  • Long Put Option Strategy

    A long put option strategy is the purchase of a put option in the expectation of the underlying stock falling. It is Delta negative, Vega positive and Theta negative strategy. A long put is a single-leg, risk-defined, bearish options strategy. Buying a put option is a levered alternative to selling shares of stock short.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 11,132 views
  • Long Call Option Strategy

    A long call option strategy is the purchase of a call option in the expectation of the underlying stock rising. It is Delta positive, Vega positive and Theta negative strategy. A long call is a single-leg, risk-defined, bullish options strategy. Buying a call option is a levered alternative to buying shares of stock.

    By Chris Young,

    • 0 comments
    • 11,516 views
  • What Is Delta Hedging?

    Delta hedging is an investing strategy that combines the purchase or sale of an option as well as an offsetting transaction in the underlying asset to reduce the risk of a directional move in the price of the option. When a position is delta-neutral, it will not rise or fall in value when the value of the underlying asset stays within certain bounds. 

    By Kim,

    • 0 comments
    • 9,657 views

  Report Article

We want to hear from you!


This was the position on Monday, yes. But not the initial position because the short call was added later and the position was adjusted.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Kim, one note - why did you create so complicated position as collar or deep ITM call (buy) + ATM call (sell) + ATM put (buy). Instead of that, it would be easy to open credit put spread:  something like sell 110 put/ but 103 put? In other words: covered call or ITM call (buy) + ATM call (sell) == selling uncovered put. Credit put spread requires less commisions, has same margin, and easy to manage

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, vasis said:

Hi Kim, one note - why did you create so complicated position as collar or deep ITM call (buy) + ATM call (sell) + ATM put (buy). Instead of that, it would be easy to open credit put spread:  something like sell 110 put/ but 103 put? In other words: covered call or ITM call (buy) + ATM call (sell) == selling uncovered put. Credit put spread requires less commisions, has same margin, and easy to manage

Hi Vasis, Kim asked me to respond to your question.  There are many differences between the modified Collar and a bull put spread.  In addition to nuances related to implied volatility and being more flexible for adjustments, the major difference is a change in Delta.  With the modified Collar (using ITM options instead of shares) in a large drawdown the position actually goes from negative Delta to positive as the gains from the long put begin to outweigh the losses on the long call and ultimately the position can become profitable.  This was proven in the SVXY meltdown of February as the position ended with a gain of over 100% on risk whereas your Bull put spread would have resulted in a 100% loss on risk.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi SBathch and Kim.

Thanks for reply and your explanation. I agree that credit put spread is different from modified Collar, but its absolutely the same as your original approach. Credit bull spread can be also modified buying far OTM Put (in your case 70 strike), something like -110 put + 103 put +70 put. 

Another question about replacing shares with ITM call (or adding OTM Put in my case) - do you think its reasonable in long term? It adds negative teta to the profile plus if you look at volatile skew you will see the IV on that strike is pretty high (for both call and put), so we are buying overvalued option. Yes, it helps in case of market crashes, but it happens 1 time per year (or rare) in average and it seems to me the hedging cost is too high. 

At the same time original scheme is rationale, has limited risk, and makes sense to me - thanks for sharing it. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, vasis said:

Hi SBathch and Kim.

Thanks for reply and your explanation. I agree that credit put spread is different from modified Collar, but its absolutely the same as your original approach. Credit bull spread can be also modified buying far OTM Put (in your case 70 strike), something like -110 put + 103 put +70 put. 

Another question about replacing shares with ITM call (or adding OTM Put in my case) - do you think its reasonable in long term? It adds negative teta to the profile plus if you look at volatile skew you will see the IV on that strike is pretty high (for both call and put), so we are buying overvalued option. Yes, it helps in case of market crashes, but it happens 1 time per year (or rare) in average and it seems to me the hedging cost is too high. 

At the same time original scheme is rationale, has limited risk, and makes sense to me - thanks for sharing it. 

The negative Theta and IV effect are almost non-existent when using a 95+ Delta option.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, vasis said:

Hi SBathch and Kim.

Thanks for reply and your explanation. I agree that credit put spread is different from modified Collar, but its absolutely the same as your original approach. Credit bull spread can be also modified buying far OTM Put (in your case 70 strike), something like -110 put + 103 put +70 put. 

Another question about replacing shares with ITM call (or adding OTM Put in my case) - do you think its reasonable in long term? It adds negative teta to the profile plus if you look at volatile skew you will see the IV on that strike is pretty high (for both call and put), so we are buying overvalued option. Yes, it helps in case of market crashes, but it happens 1 time per year (or rare) in average and it seems to me the hedging cost is too high. 

At the same time original scheme is rationale, has limited risk, and makes sense to me - thanks for sharing it. 

A deep in the money call = a far out of the money put (assuming same strike), for IV purposes.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SBatch said:

The negative Theta and IV effect are almost non-existent when using a 95+ Delta option.

Its the same as just buying far OTM options (lottery ticket) and hope to win. You can do backtest to check that it doesn't make sense.  

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SBatch said:

The negative Theta and IV effect are almost non-existent when using a 95+ Delta option.

Yes...deltas in the "90's" have very little extrinsic value.

Also, the IV basically can only go up.

If the market goes up, then the deep in the money call ( far out of the money put) will become even more out of the money to the downside, which increases IV through the skew.

If the market goes down, then in most cases, IV will go up.

So strikes, very far away on the the downside, will have their IV increase in either case.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, cuegis said:

A deep in the money call = a far out of the money put (assuming same strike), for IV purposes.

Absolutely, and these options overvalued what volatility skew reflects

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, vasis said:

Its the same as just buying far OTM options (lottery ticket) and hope to win. You can do backtest to check that it doesn't make sense.  

No it's not, not even close.  At .95+ Delta we pay essentially no extrinsic value, whereas OTM options are all extrinsic.  Therefore, the extrinsic value can increase (if the underlying moves away) but not really decrease because we close about one month before expiration.  We are using a inverted Collar on VXX currently.  Look at the April 105 put - the mid currently is 63.45 and the intrinsic value is 63.23.  That is a whopping .003% of extrinsic value, most of which will be retained by the time the trade is closed.  It has no impact.  Furthermore, it doesn't take a crash to begin to gain.  If we get a drawdown of 20% (very common) the extrinsic begins to increase and so does the IV which now benefits the trade as the Delta has diminished.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

As already mentioned "A deep in the money call = a far out of the money put", otherwise it can be an option for arbitrage. VXX 105 call has the same intrinsic value and 105 put - yes, its pretty small, but not 0. No difference what you are buying: underlying + OTM put or deep-in the money call. 

The extrinsic value decays in both cases - OTM put or ITM call and since its far from central strike the speed of decay became slow reaching expiration (so almost no impact that you are closing the position one month before expiration) 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, vasis said:

As already mentioned "A deep in the money call = a far out of the money put", otherwise it can be an option for arbitrage. VXX 105 call has the same intrinsic value and 105 put - yes, its pretty small, but not 0. No difference what you are buying: underlying + OTM put or deep-in the money call. 

The extrinsic value decays in both cases - OTM put or ITM call and since its far from central strike the speed of decay became slow reaching expiration (so almost no impact that you are closing the position one month before expiration) 

Yes I am well aware of everything you posted here, what’s your point?  I answered your original question about how the modified  Collar is different than the bull  put spread.  You then told me I need to do more backtesting because of how the Theta and IV were going to hurt the trade.  I illustrated to you how that is completely false.  Now you are giving me a lesson on how a deep ITM call equals a far OTM put (which I am already aware of and it has no real world bearing or practical implications on this trade’s performance).

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, thanks for your answer, I'm not trying to study you and I said at the beginning that original scheme makes sense to me. I don't see the value to add one more option (replacing shares with ITM). For me it reduces the profit in the long term, but yes - helps to fight when market crashes. It's your choice - no doubts

And one more thing: "No it's not, not even close.  At .95+ Delta we pay essentially no extrinsic value, whereas OTM options are all extrinsic." The reality is that extrinsic value is the same for ITM and OTM.

That's all. And please excuse if my posts looks aggressive or mentoring - they are really not. SteadyOptions is one of the best materials about options which I ever seen.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, vasis said:

Yes, thanks for your answer, I'm not trying to study you and I said at the beginning that original scheme makes sense to me. I don't see the value to add one more option (replacing shares with ITM). For me it reduces the profit in the long term, but yes - helps to fight when market crashes. It's your choice - no doubts

And one more thing: "No it's not, not even close.  At .95+ Delta we pay essentially no extrinsic value, whereas OTM options are all extrinsic." The reality is that extrinsic value is the same for ITM and OTM.

That's all. And please excuse if my posts looks aggressive or mentoring - they are really not. SteadyOptions is one of the best materials about options which I ever seen.

Yes the extrinsic is the same on both but you are missing the bigger picture which is how it impacts the trade. This is what I was referring to by saying they were totally different.  I am speaking in terms of reality not academia as reality is what matters. If the underlying moves against the trade the losses are diminished as the Delta declines while the shares take the full loss.  At this time the trade can be adjusted back to a 95+ Delta option to recapture 95%+ of the gains on the mean reversion which would increase returns.  These types of adjustments are made frequently.  In addition the margin requirement is lower using ITM options.  Therefore at a cost of less than 1% per year the trade has the ability to profit in a huge vol spike, loses less in a moderate to high vol spike, is more flexible for adjustments which enhance returns and requires less margin (which could be deployed elsewhere to more than make up the 1% annual hedge cost).  This is what I meant by saying they were totally different.  The extrinsic value may be the same but the trade implications are totally different.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SBatch said:

Yes the extrinsic is the same on both but you are missing the bigger picture which is how it impacts the trade. This is what I was referring to by saying they were totally different.  I am speaking in terms of reality not academia as reality is what matters. If the underlying moves against the trade the losses are diminished as the Delta declines while the shares take the full loss.  At this time the trade can be adjusted back to a 95+ Delta option to recapture 95%+ of the gains on the mean reversion which would increase returns.  These types of adjustments are made frequently.  In addition the margin requirement is lower using ITM options.  Therefore at a cost of less than 1% per year the trade has the ability to profit in a huge vol spike, loses less in a moderate to high vol spike, is more flexible for adjustments which enhance returns and requires less margin (which could be deployed elsewhere to more than make up the 1% annual hedge cost).  This is what I meant by saying they were totally different.  The extrinsic value may be the same but the trade implications are totally different.

OK, a couple of clarifying questions. Let simplify our SVXY position to the ITM Call 70 vs. SVXY + OTM Put 70. Did I get you right that you see a difference between them from P&L perspective (they have same extrinsic value and let forget about margin for a while)? If yes, might it be described as a different IV for the call and put on the same strike? 

And the second question - do you see the difference between your full SVXY position: +Call70 + Put103 - Call110 and my proposal: +Put70 + Put103 - Put110?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point of replacing the shares with deep ITM call is to profit from sharp pullback. If SVXY continues higher, the shares will behave almost like 95% delta call. But when SVXY goes down, the delta of the long calls decreases, so the loss of the calls becomes much smaller than the loss on the shares. At some point if long calls become OTM, the long puts increase in value much more than the long calls lose - this is what allowed this specific trade to make such nice gain after SVXY collapse. It would never be possible with "standard" collar.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Kim,

Yes, the idea of replacing shares with ITM option is pretty clear - you are buying the additional hedge which helps to mitigate/reduce the risk. In my opinion, it's not required, but if you want to have smooth profit curve - it might be OK. SBatch mentioned that cost is low enough and I'd agree here - it's your strategy.  Let close this part.

My question was different - SBatch mentioned that buying ITM call is better than OTM put + underlying (practically, you can build the inverse one: shares - OTM call (covered call) vs naked put).  

"Yes the extrinsic is the same on both but you are missing the bigger picture which is how it impacts the trade." Or "The extrinsic value may be the same but the trade implications are totally different".

For me, there is no difference at all what position to open (no touch commisions or margin): ITM call or shares + OTM put (same strike) OR shares - OTM call vs -ITM put. If you or SBatch can give real examples when it matters - it would be great. A couple of times I saw the situations with NUGT and DUST when IV calls was not equal to IV of puts on the same strikes - but it might be terminal issues.

If you agree with my statement about ITM/OTM - wonderful, all questions have been answered. From commision/margin/management point of view, you can use ITM or OTM according to the situation (spread, etc.) 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, vasis said:

Hi Kim,

Yes, the idea of replacing shares with ITM option is pretty clear - you are buying the additional hedge which helps to mitigate/reduce the risk. In my opinion, it's not required, but if you want to have smooth profit curve - it might be OK. SBatch mentioned that cost is low enough and I'd agree here - it's your strategy.  Let close this part.

My question was different - SBatch mentioned that buying ITM call is better than OTM put + underlying (practically, you can build the inverse one: shares - OTM call (covered call) vs naked put).  

"Yes the extrinsic is the same on both but you are missing the bigger picture which is how it impacts the trade." Or "The extrinsic value may be the same but the trade implications are totally different".

For me, there is no difference at all what position to open (no touch commisions or margin): ITM call or shares + OTM put (same strike) OR shares - OTM call vs -ITM put. If you or SBatch can give real examples when it matters - it would be great. A couple of times I saw the situations with NUGT and DUST when IV calls was not equal to IV of puts on the same strikes - but it might be terminal issues.

If you agree with my statement about ITM/OTM - wonderful, all questions have been answered. From commision/margin/management point of view, you can use ITM or OTM according to the situation (spread, etc.) 

 

I never said buying an ITM call was better than OTM put plus the underlying.  Your question was regarding an OTM credit spread plus a put with no shares.  Your example was -110 put + 103 put +70 put.  That is the example I was referring to, nothing that included shares/ITM options.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look good trade to me. The idea of having the tail risk up-side is great. Quick Questions:

1. This Strategy would be effectively very similar to going short a put spread. In your first example it would be:

  • Short 1 contract of the 11/10 110 Put 
  • Long 1 contract of the 11/10 103 Put 

This trade will not have the tail risk gain but would have a pretty nice increase on the maximum gain compare to the synthetic collar since the collar spend some premiums on the ITM Calls to replicate the move of underlying. 

What do you think the trade-off?

2. Even this is a limit gain/loss strategy, do we have a exit plan if market move against us? or we just leave the trade free of touch?

Again love this idea so much. It's a good ( and most importantly, safe) way to dance with the VIX curve.


Best,

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
  1. Generally speaking, the standard collar P/L is similar to debit spread. But there are some nuances. But the main difference is that we are using deep ITM calls to handle cases exactly like this one, and this makes a HUGE difference. The synthetic collar uses deep ITM calls which have very little time value and are also few weeks away, so we are losing very little compared to using the stock.
  2. The trade is constantly adjusted based on market conditions.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy and free!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Options Trading Blogs