Jump to content


Photo

AAPL calendar trade - Post-mortem

aapl

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 SteadyOptions

SteadyOptions

    Founder and Editor

  • Administrators
  • 12,642 posts

Posted Tue 23 July 2013 - 03:44 PM

I usually don't do post-mortem on our trades - most of them are short term, we are in the trade just few days, close them and move on.

 

However, this trade is worth to do a post-mortem so we all can learn from it.

 

Background:

When we trade a calendar spread, we have two Greeks working for us: the Theta (time decay) and the Vega (IV). We have one Greek working against us: the Gamma (stock movement).

 

The trade makes money if the stock stays in the range and IV does not decline. It can lose if the stock moves, but even if the stock doesn't move, IV decline can kill the trade.

 

The AAPL trade was opened on May 31 and structured in the following way:

Buy to open AAPL August 16 2013 450 call
Sell to open AAPL July 19 450 call
Price: $5.50 debit. 

 

The P/L chart looked like this:

 

chart.PNG

 

Since AAPL is scheduled to report earnings on July 23, the long options expire after earnings and they were expected to hold value. The IV of August options was around 27% which is pretty low. It was expected to rise as we get closer to earnings.

 

​Fast forward to June 18. The stock is trading slightly below 430. The trade was up ~6% at this point. This is our adjustment point. The correct action was to roll the trade to 430 strike, by selling the 450 calendar and buying the 430 calendar, same expiration. The roll would cost $0.75.

The new P/L chart would look like this:

 

chart.PNG

 

​Fast forward to June 21. The stock is trading around 413. The trade was down ~8% at this point. This is our second adjustment point. The correct action was to roll the trade to 410 strike, by selling the 430 calendar and buying the 410 calendar, same expiration. The roll would cost $0.30.

The new P/L chart would look like this:

 

chart.PNG

 

The stock continued drifting lower, but it did not reach the next adjustment point. After briefly going below $400, it reversed and came back to $412 on July 8 and could be closed for 20% gain:

 

chart.PNG

 

Why didn't we do it and what can be learned here?

 

When the stock reached $425, I estimated that it is oversold and is not going much lower. The IV of August options was still at very low levels. I expected it to start rising as we get closer to earnings. The IV rise would at least partially offset the gamma losses. It did not happen. In fact, today the IV of August options is still around 29% which never happened. The IV of the monthly options before earnings was never below 35%, usually closer to 40%.

 

To add insult to injury, when the stock reached $410, I added a "hedge" by opening a short term 410 calendar. This calendar has lost another $0.60, adding to the overall loss. It also increased the overall investment by almost 40%. This was throwing good money after bad.

 

After the stock recovered to $430, I had a chance to close it for breakeven, but I left it open - again, due to the expectation that IV of the August options just cannot remain that low. The trade was finally closed today for 35% loss.

 

Few things contributed to the big loss:

1. The stock moved more than 50 points at some point which is almost 2 SD (Standard Deviations).

2. The IV of the long options was almost unchanged before earnings which is extremely unusual.

3. The "hedge" added to the loss".

4. The trade was not adjusted in time.

 

Expecting the IV to rise was a reasonable expectation. It did not happen, but there was a high probability that it will. We trade probabilities. There is a big difference between probability and certainty. There was a high probability that IV will not stay that low, based on historical patterns. However, high probability is still not certainty, and IV did not rise as I expected. When something happens few cycles in a row, we have a reasonable expectation that it will happen again. We trade based on those expectations, but we know that patterns not always repeat. In this trade, the main mistake was not expecting the IV rise - the main mistake was not to adjust when the price got to the adjustment point. 

 

The trade was actually up 12% after few days, and some members closed it for a gain. My original profit target was 20-25%. I don't think it was a mistake not to take profits at 12%. While there is nothing wrong to set a 10% target on those trades, I like to set higher profit targets, based on my experience with those trades. 

 

The bottom line is that despite the unfavorable conditions, with proper management we could still make 15-20% on this trade. The main lesson from this trade:

 

When trading non-directional strategies, never let your opinion affect the trade. Always follow the rules, adjust in time, no matter how oversold or overbought the stock looks.



#2 Hannes Kury

Hannes Kury

    Contributor

  • Mem_LCD
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 638 posts

Posted Tue 23 July 2013 - 05:13 PM

Thanks for the clear analysis which shows what we should have done - the beauty is that it is not 20/20 hindsight, we simply did not follow the rules.

 

Well, I was actually lucky on this trade. As the stock moved lower and you did not adjust I hesitated and then eventually bought half the original # of contracts  of the 430 cal. spread for $6.00. That spread saved the trade because the shorts expired worthless and I sold the longs for over $12.00 (100% after comm.). I also did your short term 410 spread and lost. In addition I bought some Aug 425 puts when around 7/8 when I could no more stand the pain - that hedge turned into loss too. I closed the 450 cal spread on 7/9 with about a 7% loss. Over all this trade produced a 5% gain on the combined investment of the 450 and the 430 cal spreads. I am  not proud of my trade, I was just lucky. Your analysis is the way to go.



#3 cathval2

cathval2

    Member

  • Mem_ANC
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 09:23 AM

Kim,

 

Could you explain the rationale for how you set the adjustment points for this kind of trade?

 

thanks



#4 SteadyOptions

SteadyOptions

    Founder and Editor

  • Administrators
  • 12,642 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 09:49 AM

Usually the adjustment points are near the expiration breakeven points. So if you look at the first P/L chart, the adjustment points are around 430/472, give or take.



#5 thanitp

thanitp

    Advanced Member

  • Can
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 11:25 AM

Even you have your own opinion about stock being oversold, there must be another reason why you don't adjust? What is the worst case when you just adjust along with any stock movement?



#6 Mikael

Mikael

    Hero Member

  • Can
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 677 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 11:42 AM

hi kim, what kind of charting software is that? 



#7 SteadyOptions

SteadyOptions

    Founder and Editor

  • Administrators
  • 12,642 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 12:13 PM

Even you have your own opinion about stock being oversold, there must be another reason why you don't adjust? What is the worst case when you just adjust along with any stock movement?

If you adjust too early and the stock reverses, you will usually be sitting on a loss instead on a gain if you didn't adjust. There is always a fine line between adjusting too early and letting the trade to get out of control.



#8 SteadyOptions

SteadyOptions

    Founder and Editor

  • Administrators
  • 12,642 posts

Posted Wed 24 July 2013 - 12:13 PM

hi kim, what kind of charting software is that? 

ONE (OptionNET Explorer).






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users